A thinking-based learning module for enhancing 21st century skills

Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education
Main Author :	Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin
Additional Authors :	Zamzana Zamzamir Ruslina Othman
Title :	A thinking-based learning module for enhancing 21st century skills

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study aims to develop the Thinking-Based Learning (TBL) module for learning secondary school Algebra. This study uses the developmental model design and the TBL module is designed using the combination of ADDIE Model and Kemp Model. It is conducted in five phases: (1) Analysis (2) Design of TBL Module, (3) Development of TBL Module (4) Implementation, and (5) Assessment of TBL Module. The research instruments are the Content Validity Form and Module Reliability Survey. The validity of the module is validated by three experts in the field of mathematics education. Sample of the study in the evaluation phase consisted of the pre-service secondary school mathematics teachers which are selected using random sampling technique.The findings showed that the content validity and the reliability indices for the TBL module are at a satisfactory level.Significantly, the TBL module is able to provide guidance to all secondary school mathematics teachers in customary teaching practices for the inculcation of higher level thinking, thus generating knowledgeable generation and a good problem solver for the present and future challenges.

References

1. Ministry of Education Malaysia, “Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025,” Putrajaya, Malaysia, Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2013 2009 results: Executive summary,” 2010. Available at https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf

2. L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement.” Education Policy Analysis., vol. 8, no 1, 2000, Available at http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392/515>

3. M. Barber, and M. Mourshed, “How the world's best performing schools come out on top,” London, McKinsey and Company, 2007.

4. OECD, “PISA 2009 results: Executive summary,” 2010. Available at www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.

5. B. Jensen, “Investing in our teachers, investing in our economy,” Melbourne, Grattan Institute, 2010.

6. RohaniArbaa, HazriJamil and NordinAbdRazak, “Hubungan guru-pelajar dan kaitannya dengan komitmen belajar pelajar: adakah guru berkualiti menghasilkan perbezaan pembelajaran antara jantina pelajar,” JurnalPendidikan Malaysia. vol, 35, no. 2, pp. 61-69. 2010.

7. K. Elliott, “Teacher performance appraisal: More about performance or development?,” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 40, no. 9, 2015. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.6

8. L. Radulovic, and M. Stancic, “What is needed to develop critical thinking in schools?”, CEPS Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 9-25, 2017.

9. M. Adnot, T. Dee, V. Katz, and J. Wycko, “Teacher turnover, teacher quality, and student achievement in DCPS (CEPA Working Paper No.16-03),” 2016. Available at http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp16-03.

10. S. Ryan, “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis of Teacher Credentialization and Student Test Scores in California High Schools,” McGill Sociological Review, vol. 5, pp. 1-18, 2016.

11. S. Loucks-Horsley, P. W. Hewson, N. Love, and K. E. Stiles, “ Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, ” Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press, 1998.

12. NoorizaKassim and EffandiZakaria, “Integrasikemahiranberfikirarastinggidalampengajarandanpe mbelajaranmatematik: Analisiskeperluan guru,” Proceeding of Seminar Education Graduate Regional, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2015.

13. N. S. Rajendran, “Pengajaran&PenguasaanKemahiranBerfikir Aras Tinggi: TeoridanAmalan,” TanjongMalim, PenerbitUniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, 2017.

14. RosnaniHashim and Suhailah Hussein, “The teaching of thinking in Malaysia (1st ed.),” Kuala Lumpur, Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2003.

15. SukimanSaad, Noor Shah Saad, and Mohd Uzi Dollah, “Pengajarankemahiranberfikirarastinggi: Persepsidanamalan guru matematiksemasapengajarandanpembelajaran di bilikdarjah.” JurnalPendidikanSains&Matematik Malaysia. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18-36, 2012.

16. Maria Salih, “Teachers perceptions and students’ motivation to thinking-based learning (TBL) in a classroom context,” Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, vol. 4,no.2, pp. 5-14, 2015

17. Nor'ainMohd. Tajudin, MarzitaPuteh, and Mazlini Adnan, “Guiding principles to foster higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of mathematics,” International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, no. 4.15, pp. 195-199, 2018.

18. R. J. Swartz, A. L. Costa, B. K. Beyer, and B. Kallick, “Thinking-basedlearning promoting quality student achievement in the 21st century,” New York, Teachers College Press, 2010.

19. M. Yusuf, “Infusing thinking-based learning in twenty-firstcentury classroom: the role of training programme to enhance teachers’ skillful thinking skills,” In: Amzat I., Valdez N. (eds), Teacher empowerment toward professional development and practices, Springer, Singapore, 2017.

20. R. J. Swartz, and C. McGuinness, “Developing and Assessing Thinking Skills Project Final Report Part 1,” International Baccalaureate Organisation, 2014.

21. Mok Soon Sang, PsikologiPendidikandanPedagogiMuriddanAlamBelajar, Kuala Lumpur, Kumpulan BudimanSdn. Bhd., 2010.

22. B. Trilling, and C.Fadel, “Twenty-first century skills: Learning for life in our times,” San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2009.

23. R. Swartz, and S. Parks, “Infusing the teaching of critical and creative thinking into content instruction: A lesson design handbook for the elementary grades,” California, Critical Thinking Press and Software, 1994.

24. Ministry of Education,Dokumen Standard KurikulumdanPentaksiran. RekaBentukdanTeknologiTahun 4,5dan 6, Putrajaya, Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, KementerianPendidikan Malaysia, 2015.

25. R. C. Richey, and J. D. Klein, “Design and development research: Methods, strategies and issues, Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007.

26. MohdAfifiBurhanudinSetambah. Pembangunan danpengujianpengajaranberasaskan adventure

terhadappencapaian, pemikirankritisdankepimpinanbagitopikStatistik. Unpublished PhD thesis, UniversitiPendidikan Sultan Idris, TanjongMalim, Perak, 2017.

27. G. M. Piskurich, (2006). Rapid Instructional Design: Learning ID Fast and Right. NJ, USA:John Wiley & Sons.

28. J. E. Kemp, G. R. Morrison, and S. M. Ross, “Designing effective instruction,” New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inc., 1998.

29. M. R. Lynn, M. R. (1986). “Determination and quatification of content validity,” Nursing Research, vol. 5, pp. 382–385, 1986.

30. B. P. Subedi, “Using Likert type data in social science research: confusion, issues and challenges,”International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, vol.3, no. 2, (2016).Available at https://www.ijcas.net

31. SidekMohd Noah and Jamaludin Ahmad,”PembinaanModul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik,” Serdang, PenerbitUniveristi Putra Malaysa, 2005.

32. R. J. Swartz, A. Costa, B. Kallick, B.Beyer, and R. Reagan, “Thinking-based learning: Activating students' potential,” Norwood, MA, Christopher Gordon Publishers, 2007.

33. Maryam Sedaghat andSoudehRahmani, “A review of approaches to teaching thinking: appropriate approach for Iran education system,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 30, pp.1037 – 1042, 2017.

34. C. McGuinness, A.Eakin, C. Curry, and N. Sheehy, “Building thinking skills in thinking classrooms. ACTS (Activating Children's Thinking Skills) in Northern Ireland, 2006.Available athttp://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/021/vol1/015/ecp2107015.pdf

35. S. Zubaidah, N. M. Fuad, S. Mahanal, and E. Suarsini,“ Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map”,Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 77-91, Dec 2017.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page