UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The utilization of teaching aids is crucial in enhancing students’ mathematical process skills. However, teachers give less accentuation on this aspect of usage which leads to students’ low competence in mathematical process skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a developed teaching aids, in particular, a Smart Kit in enhancing mathematical process skills and achievement among selected primary school students in Hulu Kinta, Perak. The experimental method was used in this study. Cluster sampling was used to select the samples. The samples were divided into two groups, the control and treatment groups which each consisted of 36 respondents. The treatment group was engaged with the developed Smart Kit while the students in the control group followed the conventional method of teaching and learning. Measurement and Geometry topics at primary school level were selected and students’ mathematical process skills were assessed based on Malaysia Assessment and Curriculum Standard Documents. The findings revealed that there was a significant difference in problem solving, reasoning and connecting skills between the control group and the treatment group. Furthermore, the mathematical achievement of the treatment group was higher than the control group. In conclusion, the utilization of the developed Smart Kit enhanced students’ problem solving, reasoning and connecting skills, and improved mathematical achievement. In implicative insinuation, the use of the developed Smart Kit can help teachers and students in teaching and learning processes specifically on the topics of Measurement and Geometry. |
| References |
1. J. K. Coates, and H. P. Wilson, "Learning while playing: Children’s Forest School experiences in the UK," British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 2019, pp. 21-40. 2. M. Dockendorff, and H.Solar, "ICT integration in mathematics initial teacher training and its impact on visualization: The case of GeoGebra," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 2018, pp. 66-84. 3. E. Pujiastuti, and Mashuri, "Making a math teaching aids of junior high school based on scientific approach through an integrated and sustainable training," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1), 2017, pp. 1-6. 4. S. Fuentemilla, and J. Domínguez, "How to create a STEAM installation," ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2018, pp. 118-119. 5. E. O. Bereczki, and A. Kárpáti, "Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature,” Educational Research Review, 23, 2018, pp. 25-56. 6. J. Xiang, and T. B. Jin, "Instrumental teaching AIDS for sound and vibration education," 25th International Congress on Sound and Vibration, 2018, pp. 5100-5104. 7. Ministry of Education Malaysia, Malaysia's Education Development Plan 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division, 2012. 8. M. Kumar, I. Saxena, J. Kumar, G. Kumar, and S. Kapoor, "Assessment of lecture strategy with different teaching aids," Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 9(1), 2015, pp. CC01-CC05. 9. P. D. Martino, and F. Gregorio, "The mathematical crisis in secondary–tertiary transition," International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(4), 2019, pp. 825-843. 10. D. Fouryza, S. M. Amin, and R. Ekawati, "Review of learning materials development procedure based on fun and easy math (FEM)," AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(1), 2018, pp. 1-9. 11. G. A. Nortvedt, and A. Siqveland, "Are beginning calculus and engineering students adequately prepared for higher education? An assessment of students’ basic mathematical knowledge," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(3), 2019, pp. 325-343. 12. K. Higgins, J. H. D. Angelo, and L. Crawford, "Effects of technology in mathematics on achievement, motivation, and attitude: A meta-analysis," Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 2019, pp. 283-319. 13. P. T. Tosic, and J. Beeston, "Designing undergraduate data science curricula: A computer science perspective," ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018, pp. 1-11. 14. T. J. Impelluso, "The moving frame method in dynamics :Reforming a curriculum and assessment," International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 46(2), 2018, pp. 158-191. 15. X. Yan, J. Mason, and G. Hanna, "Probing interactions in exploratory teaching: A case study," International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 2019, pp. 244-259. 16. A. Mahmood, Y. M. Yusof, and M. F. Othman, "Integrating mathematical thinking-oriented problem-solving approach with blended learning open source science or math studies (BLOSSOMS) modules," AIP Conference Proceedings, 1750(1), 2015, pp. 1-6. 17. S. T. Yong, P. Gates, and A. T. Y. Chan, "A gaming perspective on mathematics education," International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(4), 2018, pp. 85-98. 18. D. M. S. Diba, and S. Prabawanto, "The analysis of students' answers in solving ratio and proportion problems," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 2019, pp. 1-6. 19. M. Samuelsson, and J. Samuelsson, "Proficient classroom management through focused mathematic teaching," Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 2017, pp. 654-651. 20. M. L. Dewi, A. R. Hakim, A. Setiawan, S. Adhisuwignjo, and E. Rohadi, "Mathematics teaching aids to improve the student’s abstraction on Geometry in Civil Engineering of State Polytechnic Malang," IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 434(1), 2018, pp. 1-5. 21. M. Anggo, and L. Arapu, "The use of mathematics teaching aids to train metacognition ability of elementary school students," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028(1), 2018, pp. 1-6. 22. E. S. Sugiman, and N. F. Kurniawati, "Growing of the mathematical thinking imaginative to students in designing of the teaching aids for CWD towards to joyful learning," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 2018, pp. 1-5. 23. S. Kaur, and A. Kauts, "Impact of webquest on student engagement," Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 9(12), 2018, pp. 1665-1669. 24. C. Xie, M. Wang, and H. Hu, "Effects of constructivist and transmission instructional models on mathematics achievement in mainland China: A meta-analysis," Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2018, pp. 1-18. 25. M. Wronowski, A. Urick, A. S. P. Wilson, W. Thompson, D. Thomas, S. Wilson, F. J. Elizondo, and R. Ralston, "Effect of a serious educational game on academic and affective outcomes for statistics instruction," Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2019, 2019, pp. 1-33. 26. C. S. Fui, and L. H. Lian, "The effect of computerized feedback on students’ misconceptions in algebraic expression," Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26(3), 2018, pp. 1387-1403. 27. Y. Topkaya, "The impact of instructional comics on the cognitive and affective learning about environmental problems," Egitim ve Bilim, 41(187), 2016, pp. 199-219. 28. C. Hursen, "The impact of Edmodo-assisted project-based learning applications on the inquiry skills and the academic achievement of prospective teachers," TEM Journal, 7(2), 2018, pp. 446-455. 29. M. Öztürk, "An evaluation of an innovative in-service teacher training model in Turkey," International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1), 2019, pp. 23-36. 30. F. Zulkifli, R. Z. Abidin, N. F. M. Razi, N. H. Mohammad, R. Ahmad, and A. Z. Azmi, “Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using Rasch model,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(4), 2018, pp. 32-36. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |