|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Education 4.0 is the inspiration of the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 which is focusing on teaching and learning especially in terms of personalization of learning, quality education and learners as connectors, creators, and constructivist (Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 2015). Pre-service teachers’ mastery of the technological pedagogical content knowledge for teaching practice is deemed crucial in order for them to face the challenges apparent in the Industrial Revolution 4.0. The purpose of this study is to investigate how themastery of TPACK assists the pre-service English teachers with their teaching practice. The research design was mainly qualitative. Four ESL pre-service teachers were selected using the purposive sampling method. Each teacher was observed five times over a period of twenty lessons. Non-participant observation was conducted during the teaching sessions. A checklist was used during the observation to ensure uniformity in the elements observed during each lesson. Findings of the study clearly revealed that the pre-service teachers have a substantial understanding and mastery of TPACK. The pre-service teachers revealed some effective technological pedagogical content knowledge strategies used for teaching purposes to capture students’ interest to make learning more fun and meaningful. |
| References |
[1] Ministry of Education, Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia [2] Futrell, M. H. 2010. Transforming teacher education to reform America's P–20 education system. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5): 432–440. [3] Berita Harian Online. (2011, September 27), Pekerjaan Paling Strehttp://www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/Po lislebihstresberbandingguru/Article ss di Malaysia. Retrieved from [4] Ong, S. K., Ros, A. S., Azlian, A. A., Sharnti, K., & Ho, L. C. (2004). Trainee teachers’ perceptions of the school practicum. Paper presented at the conference of the National Seminar on English Language Teaching 2004. Bangi, Malaysia. [5] Kyriacou, C. and Stephens, P. (1999). Student teachers’ concerns during teaching practice. Evaluation and Research in Education, 13, 18-31. [6] Richards, J.and Nunan, D. (1990). Second Language teacher Education.New York: Cambridge university Press. [7] Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A. Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in Learning to Teach: Accommodation and the Development of a Teaching Identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8-24. [8] Devlin, M., Kift, S., Nelson, K., Smith, L., & McKay, J. (2012). Effective teaching and support of students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds: Practical advice for teaching staff. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching. [9] Lee, Y. A. (2011). What Does Teaching for Social Justice Mean to Teacher Candidates? The Professional Educator, 35(2), 1. [10] Zeichner, K. M. (1993). Educating Teachers for Cultural Diversity. NCRTL Special Report. [11] Ho, W.K. (2003). English language teaching in Asia today: An overview. In W. K. Ho & R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), English Language Teaching in East Asia Today: Changing Policies and Practices (pp. 1-32). Singapore: Eastern Universities Press. [12] Goh, P. S. and Matthews, B. (2011) "Listening to the Concerns of Student Teachers in Malaysia during Teaching Practice, Australian Journal of Teacher Education: Vol. 36: Iss. 3, Article 3.Available at:http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol36/iss3/3. [13] Shulman, L. (1986a). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. [14] Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. [15] Farrell, T. (2007). Failing the practicum: Narrowing the gap between expectations and reality with reflective practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 193-201. [16] Quinn, F., Littledyke, M., Taylor, N. & Davis, C. (2010). Integrating education for sustainability into pre-service primary teacher education: Forging Connections in Science and Technology. Paper presented at the 14th International Organisation of Science and Technology Educators Symposium: Socio-cultural and Human Values in Science and Technology Education. Bled, Slovenia, 13-18 June. [17] Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practic :Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. [18] Taghreed E.M. & Mohd. Rashid bin Mohd. Saad (2017). The English Teacher, 46(1), 1 - 16. [19] Wellington, Edna, & DeWitt, Dorothy. (2017). Challenges faced during teaching practice by undergraduate pre-service music trainees at a teachers’ training institution. In Proceedings of 8ICLEI 2017-048. [20] Yuan, E. R. (2016). The dark side of mentoring on pre-service language teachers’ identity formation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 188-197. [21] Peercy, M. M. (2012). Problematising the theory practice gap: How ESL teachers make sense of their pre-service education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 8(1), 20-40 [22] Elmore, R. E. (2005). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [23] Husband, T. (2013). Improving the quality of instruction through a service teaching framework. Journal of Effective Teaching, 13(2), 73- 82. [24] Schmoker, M. (2006). Results now: How can we achieve unprecedented improvements in teaching and learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. [25] Bucholz, J. L., & Sheffler, J. L. (2009). Creating a warm and inclusive classroom environment: Planning for all children to feel welcome. Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education, 2(4), 1-3. [26] Falsario, H. N., Muyong, R. F., & Nuevaespaña, J. S. (2014,March). Classroom climate and academic performance of education students. Paper presented at the DLSU Research Congress, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines. [27] Garbarino, J., Dubrow, N., Kostelny, K., & Pardo, C. (1992). Children in danger. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. [28] Hannah, R. (2013). The effect of classroom environment on students learning (Honors thesis, Lee Honors College, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/2375 [29] Chai, S. C., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C.(2013). A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00372.x [30] Brophy, J. (1986). Classroom management techniques. Education and Urban Society, 18(2), 182–194. [31] Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302. [32] Rosas, C., & West, M. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs about classroom management: Pre-service and inservice teachers’ beliefs about classroom management. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 5(1), 54-61. [33] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. [34] Alayyar, G., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service science teachers: Support from Blended Learning. Australian Educational Technology Journal, 28(8), 1298-1316. [35] Thuthukile, Jita. (2016). Pre-service Teachers’ Competence to Teach Science Through and Communication Technologies in South Africa. Perspectives in Education, 34(3), 15-26. [36] Hasniza Nordin, Niki Davis, & Tengku Faekah Tengku Ariffin. (2013). A case study of secondary pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge mastery level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 103, 1 – 9. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.300 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |