The Effects of Elbow Flexion Angles on Handgrip Force Production among Trained Women

Nurul Uyun Abd Aziz

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	GV Recreation Leisure
Main Author :	Nurul Uyun Abd Aziz
Additional Authors :	Noorzaliza Osman Noor Aiwa Rosman Nur Khairunisa Abu Talip Chamnan Chinnasee Ali Md Nadzalan
Title :	The Effects of Elbow Flexion Angles on Handgrip Force Production among Trained Women

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains Sukan dan Kejurulatihan
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of elbow flexion angles on handgrip force production. 200 women involved voluntarily as participants in this study. Participants were required to perform handgrip dynamometer strength test in three elbow flexion angle conditions; i) 0˚ (full extension), ii) 90˚ and iii) full degrees. Participants were given three trials for each side (dominant and non-dominant) in all three elbow flexion angles. Results showed that in all elbow flexion angles, dominant handgrip force were higher compared to the non-dominant side. Besides that, performing handgrip with 0˚ elbow flexion produced greatest force followed by 90˚ and full elbow flexion. To conclude, testers need to standardize the handgrip strength test procedures as different in elbow flexion angles and the use of dominant/non-dominant sides were shown to significantly affect the force production.

References

1. McGinnis, P.M., Biomechanics of sport and exercise. 2013: Human Kinetics.

2. Bohannon, R.W., Muscle strength: clinical and prognostic value of hand-grip dynamometry. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, 2015. 18(5): p. 465-470.

3. Gerodimos, V., Reliability of handgrip strength test in basketball players. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2012. 31: p. 25-36.

4. Dias, F.M., et al., Functional capacity of oldest old living in a long-stay institution in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2014. 26(7): p. 1097-1105.

5. Kumar, A.S., et al., A study of grip endurance and strengh in different elbow positions. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2008. 9(4): p. 209-211.

6. Schmidt, R.T. and J. Toews, Grip strength as measured by the Jamar dynamometer. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1970. 51(6): p. 321.

7. Kenney, W.L., J.H. Wilmore, and D.L. Costill, Physiology of sport and exercise. 2015: Human Kinetics.

8. Kaltenborn, F.M., O. Evjenth, and W. Hinsen, Mobilization of the extremity joints. 1980: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel.

9. Josephson, R.K., Extensive and intensive factors determining the performance of striated muscle. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1975. 194(1): p. 135-153.

10. Zierler, K.L., Mechanism of muscle contraction and its energetics. Medical Physiology, 1974. 1: p. 84.

11. Fugl‐Meyer, A.R., et al., Is muscle structure influenced by genetical or functional factors? A study of three forearm muscles. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 1982. 114(2): p. 277-281.

12. Chinnasee, C., et al. Kinematics analysis of dominant and non-dominant lower limb during knee strike among MuayThai beginners. in Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. IOP Publishing.

13. Bechtol, C.O., Grip test: the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. JBJS, 1954. 36(4): p. 820-832.

14. Nadzalan, A.M., The effects of forearm position on handgrip strength. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2013. 2(1): p. 1-8.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page