UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of audio imagery with video modelling on participants’ self-efficacy during resistance exercise. Forty five individuals volunteered as research participant and were divided homogenously into imagery with modelling end instruction (EIM) or initial instruction (IIM) groups and a modelling only (M) as control group. During the pre-test all participants employed self-efficacy (SE) of lunges exercise. All participants were provided with the interventions (EIM, IIM, & M) during 10 minutes rest before the first post-test which, all measurements were conducted to look at the acute effects of interventions employed. Participants’ android phones were downloaded with specific intervention according to their group and they were advised to employ the intervention once a day for seven days. The second post-test was conducted consist of all measurements after seven days of intervention duration. For self-efficacy, significant results were recorded on pre-test and post-test within participants in EIM and IIM (p < 0.05), moreover, results for post-test comparing data between groups indicates significant between EIM and M groups, IIM and M groups (p < 0.05). No significant different results found comparing EIM with IIM groups. Results from this study indicate that there are psychological performances improvement among participant who employed imagery and modelling comparing to modelling alone |
References |
1. Lesinski, M., O. Prieske, and U. Granacher, Effects and dose–response relationships of resistance training on physical performance in youth athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med, 2016. 50(13): p. 781-795. 2. Faigenbaum, A.D., et al., Citius, Altius, Fortius: beneficial effects of resistance training for young athletes: narrative review. Br J Sports Med, 2016. 50(1): p. 3-7. 3. Nadzalan, A.M., et al., The effects of resistance training with different focus attention on muscular strength: Application to teaching methods in physical conditioning class. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 2019. 8(8): p. 16-19. 4. Shazana, N., et al., Electromyographical analysis and performance during bench press exercise: The influence of self-talk. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering 2019. 8(1): p. 1279-1281. 5. Tajudin, A.S., M.H.N. Rosni, and J.L.F. Low, Effects of augmented feedback on squat technique among eleven years old children. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2016. 5(1): p. 1-8. 6. Khan, T., T. Morris, and D. Marchant, Portable devices for delivering imagery and modelling interventions: effects on netball players’ adherence, shooting performance, and self-efficacy. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 2017. 9(6S): p. 1334-1345. 7. Mazli, A.M., T.K.A. Khan, and A. Hashim, The effects of PETTLEP and traditional imagery interventions on netball players shooting accuracy. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2018. 7(2): p. 53-60. 8. Khan, T.K.A., M. Janep, and S. Hamzah, The effects of specific and general cognitive imagery on service achievement among tekong in sepak takraw. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2013. 2(1):p. 29-47. 9. Khan, T.K.A., T. Morris, and D. Marchant, Portable devices for delivering imagery and modelling among netball players, a qualitative study Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2015. 4(1): p. 50-64. 10. Sani, M.H.M. and T.K.A. Khan, Kesan imageri terhadap prestasi conversion kick dalam sukan ragbi. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2018. 7(1): p. 53-61. 11. Sani, M.H.M. and T.K.A. Khan, Imagery and modeling-impact on rugby skill performance, single case multiple baseline assessment across participant. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2017. 6(2): p. 10-27. 12. Sato, N., T.K.A. Khan, and N. Jusoh, The effects of combined self-talk,imagery and video-modelling interventions on anaerobic performance, heart rate response and self-efficacy Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2017. 6(1): p. 1-10. 13. Parnabas, V., et al., Internal and external imagery on sports performance among football players. International Journal of Physical and Social Sciences, 2015. 5(4): p. 190. 14. Marshall, E.A. and A.-M. Gibson, The effect of an imagery training intervention on self-confidence, anxiety and performance in acrobatic gymnastics–a pilot study. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2017. 12(1). 15. Marshall, E. and A.-M. Gibson, The effect of an imagery training intervention on self-confidence and anxiety in acrobatic gymnastics. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2017. 20: p. e92. 16. Weibull, F., et al., Walk this way: A brief exercise imagery intervention increases barrier self-efficacy in women. Current Psychology, 2015. 34(2): p. 477-490. 17. Wesch, N., et al., Imagery and self-efficacy in the injury context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2016. 24: p. 72-81. 18. Kuan, G., et al., Effects of relaxing and arousing music during imagery training on dart-throwing performance, physiological arousal indices, and competitive state anxiety. Frontiers in psychology, 2018. 9: p. 14. 19. Asaseh, M., J.H. Azar, and E. Pishyare, The effect of motor imagery on the gross motor skills of children with developmental coordination disorder. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège, 2016. 85: p. 130-139. 20. Sachet, A.B., et al., Development of the correspondence between real and imagined fine and gross motor actions. Journal of Cognition and Development, 2016. 17(1): p. 162-179. 21. Baert, H., Technology strategies to address grade-level outcomes: National standards 1 and 2. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2015. 86(7): p. 40-45. 22. Obrusnikova, I. and P.J. Rattigan, Using video-based modeling to promote acquisition of fundamental motor skills. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 2016. 87(4): p. 24-29. 23. Nadzalan, A.M., et al., Relationship between muscle architecture and badminton-specific physical abilities. Human Movement, 2018. 19(1): p. 44-50. 24. Nadzalan, A.M., et al., Relationship between lower body muscle architecture and lunges performance. Jurnal Sains Sukan dan Pendidikan Jasmani, 2016. 5(2): p. 15-23. 25. Nadzalan, A.M., et al., The effects of step versus jump forward lunge exercise training on muscle architecture among recreational badminton players. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2017. 35(8): p. 1581-1587. 26. Bandura, A., Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 2010: p. 1-3. 27. Watt, A.P., T. Morris, and M.B. Andersen, Issues in the Development of a Measure of Imagery Ability in Sport. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2004. 28. Gilson, T.A. and L.E. Curnock, An examination of athletes' self-efficacy and strength training effort during an entire off-season. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 2012. 26(2): p. 443-451. 29. Wright, C.J. and D. Smith, The effect of PETTLEP imagery on strength performance. International journal of sport and exercise psychology, 2009. 7(1): p. 18-31. 30. Buck, D., et al., The effects of mental imagery with video-modeling on self-efficacy and maximal front squat ability. Sports, 2016. 4(2): p. 23. 31. Debarnot, U., et al., Experts bodies, experts minds: how physical and mental training shape the brain. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. 8: p. 280. 32. Weinberg, R., Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2008. 3(1). 33. Rymal, A.M. and D.M. Ste-Marie, Does self-modeling affect imagery ability or vividness? Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2009. 4(1). |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |