1. Abdelrahman, L. A. M., Dewitt, D., Alias, N. & Rahman, M. N. A. (2017). Flipped learning for ESL writing in a Sudanese school. Turkish Online Journal of Ed Nagaletchimeecational Technology, 16(3), 60-70.

2. Akinwamide, T. K. (2012). The influence of process approach on English as second language students' performances in essay writing. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 16-29.

3. Al-Thehli, F. A. R. & Ahamat, A. (2019). Managing innovation and creativity in human resource management: a critical review of the literature. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 21-29.

4. Anderson, L. W. & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy forlearning, teaching, and assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. London: Pearson.

5. Annamalai, N. (2018). A Case Study of the Online Interactions among ESL Students to Complete Their Narrative Writing Task. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 1-17.

6. Ariffin, T. F., Bush, T. & Nordin, H. (2018). Framing the roles and responsibilities of excellent teachers: Evidence from Malaysia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 14-23.

7. Ashmore, N. & Moriarty, J. (2016). Supporting creative practice students learning leaps in interdisciplinary workshops. Journal of 21st Century Writing, 4(1), 1-18.

8. Baftim, S. S. S. A. & Mustapha, G. (2010). Infusion of thinking skills in English language instructional development at tertiary level. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 18, 65-85.

9. Bhattacharjee, J. & College, V. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning – An effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 69(65), 65-74.

10. Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. United State: Pearson Education.

11. Bupu, S. & Subiyantoro, S. (2018). Understanding influence of writing poetry module using in contextual learning to writing poetry learning result of elementary student. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious, 5(2), 9-18.

12. Burdyko, P. V. (2018). Focal skill approach to language education. Master Thesis, Belarusian State University, Belarus.

11. Burnett, E.-j., Bulloch, R., Jones, B., Gregory, P., Bulloch, R., Jones, B., Gregory, P., Burnett, E.-j., Bulloch, R., Jones, B. & Gregory, P. (2018). Trick or retreat: The value of creative writing retreats in H. E. The International Journal for the Practice and Theory of Creative Writing, 1(1), 1-7.

12. Cambridge University. (2013). Introductory Guide to the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) for English Language Teachers. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

13. Camp, D. & Eggs, G. (2010). Here, there, and anywhere: Transfer of learning. Critical Questions in Education, 3(1), 35-42.

14. Charles, C. & James, A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. United States: The George Washington University.

15. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3, 3-7.

16. Cobb, P. & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175-190.

17. Connolly, S. & Burn, A. (2017). Literacy the story engine: Offering an online platform for making ‘Unofficial’ creative writing work. United States: Wiley.

18. Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Meyer, O. & Schuck, K. (2018). Knowledge ecology for conceptual growth: teachers as active agents in developing a pluriliteracies approach to teaching for learning (PTL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 349-365.

19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2011). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discover and invention. Personnel Psychology, 51(3), 794.

20. Dawi, A. H., Hamzah, M. and Noh, N. M. (2017). Developing module for ethnic interaction in secondary school in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 10(2), 43-49.

21. Dewitt, D., Alias, N. & Siraj, S. (2016). "Problem solving strategies of Malaysian secondary school teachers. In Educational Technology World Conference 2016, pp. 1–14.

22. Dewitt, D., Alias, N., Ibrahim, Z., Shing, N. K., Meeze, S. & Rashid, M. (2015). Design of a learning module for the deaf in a higher education institution using padlet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 220-226.

23. Efe, R., Koleva, I. & Atasoy, E. (2016). Creativity and art in early childhood. Developments in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 76-90.

24. Englert, C. S. & Dunsmore, K. (2015). Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints. In Brophy, J. (ed.). Advances in Research on Teaching, pp. 81-130. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

25. Fani, T. & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Implications of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) in teacher education: ZPTD and self-scaffolding. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp.1549-1554.

26. Fernando, W. (2018). Show me your true colours: Scaffolding formative academic literacy assessment through an online learning platform. Assessing Writing, 3, 1-14.

27. Fisher, M. & Baird, D. (2006). Making learning work: Utilizing mobile technology for active exploration, collaboration, assessment, and reflection in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(1), 3-30.

28. Freeman, D. L. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

29. Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (2007). Looking in Classrooms. United Kingdom: Routledge.

30. Gredler, G. R. (1997). Issues in early childhood screening and assessment. Psychology in the Schools, 34(2), 99-106.

31. Gredler, M., Gredler, M. E. & Johnston, J. W. (2005). Learning and Instruction: Theory into Practice. London: Pearson.

32. Halim, H.A. (2009). Creativity: Voices in the ESL curriculum. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Teaching and Learning, ICTL 2009, INTI University College, Malaysia.

33. Hapsari, A. M. (2016). The effectiveness of guided imagery for teaching writing viewed from students’ creativity. PhD Thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Jawa Tengah.

34. Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M. & Embi. M. A. (2016). Pre-university English as a second language (ESL) learners' attitude towards mobile learning. Creative Education, 7, 1147-1153.

35. Heppner, D. H. (2017). Writing instruction in Canadian preschool-primary grades: A literature review. McGill Journal of Education, 52(2), 335-358.

36. Hess, G. F. (1999). Principle 3: Good practice encourages active learning. J. LegaL educ., 49, 401.

37. Hiebert, E. & Taffy E, R. (1998). Early Literacy Instruction. Santa Cruz: Harcourt Brace College Publishers

38. Higgins, L., Flower, L. & Petraglia, J. (2015). Planning text together: The role of critical reflection in student collaboration. Written Communication, 9(1), 48-84.

39. Hsu, C.-f., Li, R.-k., Kang, H.-y. & Lee, A. H. I. (2014). A systematic evaluation model for solar cell technologies. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1, 1-16.

40. Hussin, H. (2006). Dimensions of questioning: a qualitative study of current classroom practice in Malaysia. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 10(2), 1-18.

41. Ibrahim, N.A., Shak, M.S.Y., Mohd, T., Ismail, N. A., Perumal, D., Zaidi, A. & Yasin, S.M.A. (2015). The importance of implementing collaborative learning in thr English as a asecong language (ESL) classroom in Malaysia. International Accounting and Business Conference, IABC 2015, pp. 346-353.

42. Jaelani, S. R. (2017). Treating of content-based instruction to teach writing viewed from EFL Learners’ creativity. English Language Teaching, 10(11), 156-161.

43. Karimah, N. A. (2017). Developing basic writing module: paper based and android based operating system for second semester at University of Muhammadiyah Gresik. Journal of English Teaching, Literature, and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-1.

44. Kassem, M. A. M. (2018). The effect of a suggested in-service teacher training program based on mall applications on developing EFL students ' vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 9(2): 250-260.

45. Keengwe, J. a. & Agamba, J. J. (2014). Models for Improving and Optimizing Online and Blended Learning in Higher Education. Idaho: IGI Global Publications.

46. Kim, J., Cheng, J. & Bernstein, M. S. (2014). Ensemble: Exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW '14, pp. 745-755.

47. Klee, C. A., Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Cambridge university press.

48. KPM. (2003). Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran: Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Tingkatan 5. Putrajaya, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

49. KPM. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

50. Laal, M. & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(December 2012), 491-495.

51. Lim, J., & Biocca, F. (2012). ESL learning through writing pattern: Development of a webbased planning and writing supporting system for ESL learner. Information Science and Digital Content Technology (ICIDT,) 8, 641-645.

52. Lin, L. (2015). Exploring collaborative learning: Theoretical and conceptual perspectives. In Lin, L. (ed.). Investigating Chinese, HE EFL Classrooms, pp. 11-28. Berlin: Springer.

53. Maley, A. & Bolitho, R. (2015). Creativity. ELT Journal, 69(4), 434-436.

54. Marsh, J. D. & Campion, J. (2018). Academic integrity and referencing: Whose responsibility is it? Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 12(1), 213-226.

55. Masek, A. & Yamin, S. (2010). Fostering creativity from the constructivist perspectives: A literature review. Proceeding of the 3 rd Regional Conference on Engineering Education & Research in Higher Education, pp. 1-10.

56. Mason, M. (2007). Critical thinking and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 339-349.

57. McWilliam, E. & Dawson, S. (2008). Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice. Higher Education, 56(6), 633-643.

58. McWilliams, J., Hickey, D. T., Hines, M. B., Conner, J. M. & Bishop, S. C. (2011. Using Collaborative Writing Tools for Literary Analysis: Twitter, Fan Fiction and The Crucible in the Secondary English Classroom. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 2(3), 238-245.

59. Munasinghe, D. M. W. (2018). Preschool teachers’ concerns on educational theories and views of educationists to develop creativity in the teaching- learning process. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 1715-1729.

60. Mustapha, S. M. & Yahaya, R. A. (2013). Communicative language teaching (CLT) in Malaysian context: Its’ implementation in selected community colleges. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 788-794.

61. Mutwarasibo, F. (2013). Supporting the development of students' academic writing through collaborative process writing. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 11, 1-13.

62. Nachiappan, S., Osman, Z., Hassan, N. M., Jamil, N., Hussein, H., Othman, M. & Suffian, S. (2018). An analysis of the criteria and effectiveness of using teaching aids in preschool science and technology components in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(1), 63-82.

63. Nordin, N., & Norman, H. (2018). Mapping the Fourth Industrial Revolution Global Transformations on 21st Century Education in the Context of Sustainable Development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 1–7.

64. Nordlof,J. (2014). Vygotsky,scaffolding, and the role of theory in writing centre work. Writing Centre Journal, 34(1), 45-65.

65. Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Fostering creativity among children in the 21st-century classroom: The emerging perspectives. Academic Research International Journal, 6(6), 1-8.

66. Patrick, J. T. A. (2017). Experiences from the teacher-researcher's perspective on learning study- Challenges and Opportunities. Reference Services Reviews Service Review, 45(2), 227-241.

67. Phillips,J. M. (2005). Strategiesfor active learning in online continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77-84.

68. Prakash, L. K. (2016). Ascertaining improved pedagogical administration through innovative classroom management software. Phd Thesis, Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand.

69. Prawat, R. S. & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37-48.

70. Rababah, L., & Melhem, N. B. (2015). An investigation into strategies of creativity in EFL writing in Jordan. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 3(5), 14-25.

71. Rahmah, L. S. (2017). Improving students’ score in writing descriptive text through think talk write strategy. International Journal of English and Education, 6(4), 180-193.

72. Rahman. M. N. A. (2014). Pembangunan model homeschooling berasaskan nilai dan amalan masyarakat bagi kanak-kanak orang asli. PhD Thesis, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

73. Rasalingam, R. R., & Embi, M. A. (2018). The Use of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the Teaching of English Courses among Malaysian Polytechnics Lecturers. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 6(2), 254–264.

74. Rashid, S. & Heng, C. S. (2008). Exploring the interplay of the mode of discourse and proficiency level in ESL writing performance: Implications for Testing. The English Teacher, 37, 105-122.

75. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A. (2004). Developmental Research: Studies of Instructional Design and Development. Development, 2(4), 1099-1130.

76. Robinson, K., Minkin, L. & Bolton, E. (1999). All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education. Sudbury: DFEE.

77. Row, B. N., Subramaniam, S. and Renuka, V. (2016). When students say “ i just couldn ? tthink ”: Challenges in teaching skilful thinking. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 59–69.

78. Said, N. E. M., Yunus, M.M., Doring, L. K., Asmi, A., Aqilah, F., & Li, L. K. S. (2013). Blogging to enhance writing skills: A Survey of Students’ Perception and Attitude. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 95-101.

79. Salam, A.R., Sarala, T., & Ismail, F. (2014). Comparative analysis of process versus product approach of teaching writing in Malaysian schools: Review of the literature. MiddleEast Journal of Scientific Research, 22(6), 789-795.

80. Salehi, H., Yunus, M.M. (2012). The washback effect of the iranian universities entrance exam: Teachers' insights. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12 (2), 609-628.

81. Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational Psychology. 5th. United States: Mc Graw Hill.

82. Scoffham, S. & Barnes, J. (2011). Happiness matters: Towards a pedagogy of happiness and well-being. Curriculum Journa,l 22(4), 535-548.

83. Sengupta, A. (2015). Generating content through online collaborative writing: A study. Innovation in English Language Teacher Education, 5, 265-290.

84. Sergeeva, M. G., Serebrennikova, A. V., Nikolaeva, M. V., Suslennikova, E. E., Bondarenko, N.G., Shumeyko A. A. (2019). Development of University Teachers’ Innovative Culture. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(4), 20-25.

85. Shah, M. I. A. & Othman, N. (2006). Students' output in the communicative classroom. 3L Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 1, 44-64.

86. Sibeko, J. (2015). The use of rubrics and correction codes in the marking of Grade 10 Sesotho home language creative writing essays MA in Applied Language Studies MA dissertation: Vaal Triangle Campus of the North-West University. PhD Thesis, NorthWest University (South Africa), South Africa.

87. Sidek, H. M. (2012). EFL reading instruction: Communicative task-based approach. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 109-128.

88. Siegel, L. S. (1993). The development of reading modules and usage of reading strategies in ESL classroom. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol 24(24), 63-97.