1. An, Y-J., Haynes, L, D'Alba, A., & Chumney, F. (2016). Using educational computer games in the classroom: Science teachers’ experiences, attitudes, perceptions, concerns, and support needs. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 16(4), 415-433.

2. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., & Pyke, C. (2002), Educational Technology Resource Development, 50, 23.

3. Batson, L. & Feinberg, S. (2006). Game designs that enhance motivation and learning for teenagers. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5(1), 34-43.

4. Bailenson, J. N., Swinth, K., Hoyt, C., Persky, S., Dimov, A., & Blascovich, J. (2005). The Independent and Interactive Effects of Embodied-Agent Appearance and Behavior on Self-Report, Cognitive, and Behavioral Markers of Copresence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14, 379-393

5. Bailey, R., Wise, K. & Bolls, P. (2014). How avatar customizability affects children’s arousal and subjective presence during junk food–sponsored online video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 12(3),277-283.

6. Barreto, D., Vasconcelos, L., & Orey, M. (2017). Motivation and Learning Engagement through Playing Math Video Games. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 1-21.

7. Baylor, A. L. (2011). The design of motivational agents and avatars. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), 291-300.

8. Baylor, A. L. (2009). Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: Role of visual presence and appearance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535),3559–3565.

9. Baylor, A. L. & Kim, Y. (2004). Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role. In (Eds. J. Lester, et al) Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Volume 3220, (pp. 592-603) Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

10. Baylor, A. L., & Ryu, J. (2003). Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(4), 373-395.

11. Baylor, A. L. (2000). Beyond butlers: Intelligent agents as mentors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 373-382

12. Christopoulos, A., Conrad, M., & Shukla, M. (2018). Increasing student engagement through virtual interactions: How?. Virtual Reality, 1-17.

13. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

14. Clement, L. (2016). External and internal barriers to studying can affect student success and retention in a diverse classroom. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 17(3), 351.

15. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B. & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated Pedagogical Agents in Multimedia Educational Environments: Effects of Agent Properties, Picture Features, and Redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.

16. Dai, D., & Fry, A. (2014). Effect of video games on child development. Developmental Psychology at Vanderbilt. Dalibard, S., Magnenat-Talmann, N., & Thalmann, D. (2012, May). Anthropomorphism of artificial agents: a comparative survey of expressive design and motion of virtual characters and social robots. In Workshop on Autonomous Social Robots and Virtual Humans at the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (CASA 2012).

17. de Borst, A. W., & de Gelder, B. (2015). Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: an affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 576.

18. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9.

19. Doerr, N. (2007). Heavy Rain devs have ‘‘conquered’’ the Uncanny Valley. Joystiq. Retrieved from http://www.joystiq.com/2007/12/18/heavy-rain-devs-have-conquered-theuncanny-valley/

20. Domagk, S. (2010). Do pedagogical agents facilitate learner motivation and learning outcomes? The role of the appeal of agent’s appearance and voice. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods and Applications, 22(2), 84-97

21. Ellis, R. (2001). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, Sixth Impression.

22. Ersoz, A. (2000). Six games for EFL/ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(6)

23. Evans, M. A., Jones, B. D., & Akalin, S. (2017). Using Video Game Design to Motivate Students. Afterschool Matters, 26, 18-26.

24. Franciosi, S. J. (2011). A Comparison of Computer Game and Language-Learning Task Design Using Flow Theory. CALL-EJ, 12(1), 11-25.

25. Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., & Sasse, A. M. (2003). The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on the perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’03 (New York, NY: ACM), 529–536.

26. Groff, J., Howells, C. & Cranmer, S. (2010). The impact of games in the classroom: Evidence from schools in Scotland. Learning and Teaching in Scotland. Futurelab. Retrieved from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL25/FUTL25.pdf

27. Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2005). Social and visual style in virtual pedagogical agents. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Adapting the Interaction Style to Affective Factors, 10th International Conference on User Modelling.

28. Haake, M. (2009). Embodied pedagogical agents: From visual impact to pedagogical implications.

29. Hays-Roth, B., & Doyle, P. (1998). Animate Characters. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1, 195-230.

30. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (1993). Instructional media and the new technology of instruction. Macmillan

31. Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2018). An Analysis of Learners’ Intentions Toward Virtual Reality Learning Based on Constructivist and Technology Acceptance Approaches. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).

32. Huang, W. H. (2011). Evaluating learners’ motivational and cognitive processing in an online game-based learning environment. Computer in Human Behavior, 27(2), 694-704

33. Hoggins, T. (2010). Heavy Rain video game review. The Telegraph. Retreived from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/video-games/7196822/Heavy-Rain videogame-review.html

34. Inal, Y. & Cagiltay, K. (2006). Avatars as Pedagogical Agents for Digital Game-Based Learning. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology &

35. Teacher Education International Conference 2006 (pp. 3440-3443). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

36. Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W. & Lester, J.C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.

37. Kapp, K. (2014). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer

38. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443.

39. Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2010). Micro Adaptivity: Protecting Immersion in Didactically Adaptive Digital Educational Games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 95-105.

40. Kokkinara, E., & McDonnell, R. (2015). Animation realism affects perceived character appeal of self-virtual face. Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games, 221-226.

41. Krämer, N., Rosenthal-von der Pütten, A., & Hoffmann, L. (2015). Social effects of virtual and robot companions. In S. Shyam Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 137–159). Wiley Blackwell.

42. Lee, S. P., Badler, J. B., & Badler, N. I. (2002). Eyes alive. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) (ACM), 21, 637–644

43. Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630-643.

44. MacDorman, K. F., Green, R. D., Ho, C.-C., & Koch, C. (2009). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior. 25, 695–710.

45. Ma, X., Andalibi, N., Barkhuus, L., & Naaman, M. (2017, May). People are either too fake or too real: opportunities and challenges in tie-based anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(pp. 1781-1793). ACM

46. Mert, Y., & Samur, Y. (2018). Students' Opinions Toward Game Elements Used in Gamification Application. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 9(2).

47. Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani [the uncanny valley]. Energy, 7, 33–35.

48. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. C. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 177-213.

49. Norman, D. A. (1994). How might people interact with agents? Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 68-71.

50. Norman, D. A. (1997). How might people interact with agents. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software agents (pp. 49-55). Menlo Park, CA: MIT Press.

51. Nomura, T., Shintani, T., Fujii, K., & Hokabe, K. (2007). Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots. Proceeding of the Second IASTED International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction ,13-18.

52. Nowak, K.L., & Rauh, C. (2005). Influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction.Journal of computer–mediated communication, 11(1), 153–178.

53. Pan, X., Gillies, M., & Slater, M. (2015). Virtual character personality influences participant attitudes and behavior–an interview with a virtual human character about her social anxiety. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2, 1.

54. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12.

55. Pesare. E., Roselli, T., Corriero, N., & Rossano, V. (2016). Game-based learning and gamification to promote engagement and motivation in medical learning contexts. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), p.5

56. Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 21–21.

57. Ratan, R. A., & Hasler, B. (2011). Designing the virtual self: How psychological connections to avatars may influence education-related outcomes of use. European Immersive Education Summit 1(1), 110-121.

58. Rankin, Y., Gold, R., & Gooch, B. (2006). 3D role-playing game as language learning tools. Paper presented at the EuroGraphics 2006, Vienna, Austria.

59. Ravaja, N., Turpeinen, M., Saari, T., Puttonen, S., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2008). The psychophysiology of James Bond: Phasic emotional responses to violent video game events. Emotion, 8(1), 114–120

60. Rizzo, P. (2000). Why should agents be emotional for entertaining users? A critical analysis. In A. M. Paiva (Ed.), Affective interaction: Towards a new generation of computer interfaces (pp. 166-181). Berlin: SpringerVerlag.

61. Reschly, A.L., & Christenson, S.L. (2012). Handb. Res. Student Engagem, 3–1.9

62. Romero, L., & Glass, M. (2015). Learning by doing: Creating engaging online learning. Educational Technology, 35-39.

63. Shaked, N. A. (2017). Avatars and virtual agents–relationship interfaces for the elderly. Healthcare technology letters, 4(3), 83-87.

64. Sheth, R. (2003). Avatar Technology: Giving a Face to the e-Learning Interface. The Elearning Developers

65. Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012) Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. Handbook of research on student engagement, 219-235.

66. Schroeder, N. L., Adesope, O. O., & Gilbert, R. B. (2013). How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A metaanalytic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 1-39.

67. Skinner, E.A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. Handbook of motivation at school,.223-245

68. Strafling, N., Fleischer, I., Polzer, C., Leutner, D., & Kramer, N. C. (2010). Teaching Learning Strategies with a Pedagogical Agent: The Effects of a Virtual Tutor and its Appearance on Learning and Motivation. Journal Of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22(2), 73-83

69. Tinwell, A. (2015). The uncanney valley in games and animation. New York: CRC Press.

70. Tinwell, A. (2013) ‘3D graffiti: Virtuality to the streets’, in Borriello, L. & Ruggiero, C. (eds) Inopinatum: Urban Creativity. Rome: Artigrafiche Bocchia, 119 - 213. 

71. Uzun, L., Cetinavci, U.R., Korkmaz, S., Salihoglu, U.M. (2013). Developing and applying a foreign language vocabulary learning and practice game: The effect of VocaWord. Digital Culture Education 5(1), 48–70

72. Vassileva J., Deters R., Greer J., McCalla G., Kumar V., Mudgal C. (1998) A Multi-Agent Architecture for Peer-Help in a University Course, Proc. Workshop on Pedagogical Agents at ITS'98, San Antonio, Texas, 64-68.

73. Vinayagamoorthy,V., Steed,A., and Slater,M. (2008). The impact of a character posture model on the communication of affect in an immersive virtual environment. Computer, 14, 1–17.

74. Vinayagamoorthy, V., Garau, M., Steed, A., and Slater, M. (2004). An eye gaze model for dyadic interaction in an immersive virtual environment: practice and experience. Computer Graphic Forum ,23, 1–11.

75. Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni A., Steed A., & Slater M. (2006). The role of posture in the communication of affect in immersive virtual environments. In The 2nd ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Virtual Reality Continuum and Its Applications.

76. Wilkinson, P. (2013). Affective educational games: Utilizing emotions in game-based learning. 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pp. 1-8.

77. Yang, Y.-T. C. (2012). Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Computers & Education, 59(2), 365-377.

78. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. Cyber-Psychology Behavior, 9, 772– 775.

79. Zanbaka, C. A., Ulinski, A. C., Goolkasian, P., & Hodges, L. F. (2007). Social responses to virtual humans: implications for future interface design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems