Prose reading:the influence of text- reader factors

Revathi Gopal

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	PL Languages and literatures of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
Main Author :	Revathi Gopal
Additional Authors :	Che Ton binti Mahmud
Title :	Prose reading:the influence of text- reader factors

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study highlights the importance of text-reader factors in prose reading. The study was carried out to identify the text-reader factors involved in enhancing reading comprehension. A qualitative research methodology was employed involving individual in-depth interview sessions with six average ability Form Two students from a secondary school. The interviews were conducted to gauge their views on the influence of text-reader factors in text comprehension. The interview questions centered on the literature textbook currently used in school and also the short story “Cheat” by Allan Baillie included in the book. Thematic analysis was carried out on the data collected. The findings show that text-reader factors affect text comprehension. The factors include pictures, font, the author, glossary, text organization, cover of the book and the length of the literary prose forms. The reader factors are related to the students’ life background, interest, and motivation in reading. The study implies that these text-reader factors must be met to ensure improved reading comprehension ability among students.

References

1. Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

2. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

3. Bucher, K. T., & Hinton, K. V. (2014). Young adult literature: Exploration, evaluation, and appreciation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

4. Cart, M. (2008). The value of young adult literature. Lanham, MD.: Scarecrow Press.

5. Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills (3rd ed.). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

6. Chujo, K., & Utiyama, M. (2005). The role of text length, sample size, and vocabulary size in determining text coverage. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 1-22.

7. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22(1&2), 8-15.

8. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

9. Gaskins, I. W. (1993). Six teachers’ dialogue during cognitive process instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 277-304.

10. Goodman, K. (1996). Analysis of reading miscues. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 9-30.

11. Herlina. (2016). The effect of interest in reading on mastery of English vocabulary with fifth grade elementary students. Studies in English Language and Education, 3(2), 188-202.

12. Herz, S. K., & Gallo, D. R. (1996). From Hinton to Hamlet. Westport: Greenwood Press.

13. Janan, D. (2011). Towards a new model of readability. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Warwick, Tucson.

14. Kaplan, J. S. (2007). Critical reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(3), 416-420.

15. Kassim, S. R. (2011). Literacy through children’s literature: A Malaysian perspective. Jurnal Pengajian Media Malaysia, 12(2), 1-19.

16. Kinder, D., & Bursuck, W. (1991). The search for a unified social studies curriculum: Does history really repeat itself? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(5), 270-275.

17. Kucer, S. B. (2001). Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base of teaching reading and writing in school settings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

18. Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19. Nagayar, S., Aziz, A. A., & Kanniah, M. N. (2015). A review of English literature: Its place in Malaysia’s education. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 3, 51-61.

20. Narvaez, D. (2001). Moral text comprehension: Implications for education and research. Journal of Moral Education, 30(1), 43-54.

21. Newsom, R. S., & Gaite, A. J. H. (1971). Prose learning: Effects of pretesting and reduction of passage length. Psychological Reports, 28, 123-128.

22. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual-coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.

23. Pardo, L. S. (2001). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(3), 272-280.

24. Smith, F. (1982). Understanding reading (3th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

25. Stover, L. T. (2001). The place of young adult literature in secondary reading programs. In B. O. Ericson (Ed.), Teaching reading in high school English classes (pp. 115–138). Urbana, IL: NCTE.

26. Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.

27. Woolley, G. (2011). Reading comprehension: Assisting children with learning difficulties. New York: Springer.

28. Young, A. (2002). Introducing critical thinking at the college level with children’s stories. College Teaching, 44(3), 90.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page