Perceived training needs of science teachers in fostering HOTS among lower secondary students in Peninsular Malaysia

Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin

Perceived training needs of science teachers in fostering HOTS among lower secondary students in Peninsular Malaysia

AVAILABLE Article 892 Views

Back to search

Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files

General Information Cached

Title

Perceived training needs of science teachers in fostering HOTS among lower secondary students in Peninsular Malaysia

Type

Article

Main Author

Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin

Additional Authors

NurulhudaAbd Rahman
Paramesvary a/p Perumal
Ong, Eng Tek
Khuan, Wai Bing

Subject

L Education (General)

Language Code

eng

Bibliographic Details

Place of Production

Tanjong Malim

Publisher

Fakulti Sains dan Matematik

Year of publication

2019

Degree Type

Not related

Corporate Name

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

This study aims to determine the perceived training needs of lower secondary science teachers in Peninsular Malaysia, to enable them to foster Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) among students during science lessons. The study uses the cross-sectional survey design. Respondents were sampled using the multistage random sampling technique from a population of in-service lower secondary science teachers in Peninsular Malaysia, involving four states, 49 districts, and 158 schools. Self-completion of a questionnaire that was developed based on Borich Needs Assessment Model that is valid and reliable and mail back data collection method yielded a response rate of 65.3% (n=220).Qualitative data of teachers understanding about HOTS and ways to foster HOTS were analysed thematically while quantitative data of teachers’ perceived level of importance, confidence and actual practice for 33 ways of fostering HOTS items were determined using descriptive statistics such as frequency and Mean Weighted Discrepancy Scores (MWDS). Both analyses showed that two-third of the science teachers should be provided with knowledge of HOTS with explicit examples, as well as knowledge of ways to foster HOTS with appropriate examples related to science teaching. The study also revealed that teachers need training in all 33 selected ways of fostering HOTS with the top nine perceived training needs being “Debates”, “Critical reviews of peers’ work”, “Six Thinking Hats”, “Case Study”, “De Bono’s lateral thinking”, “Challenging teacher’s/peers’ ideas”, “Designing Model/ Prototype”, “Project-based learning” and “Think-Pair-Share”. We conclude that there is a need to train teachers in aspects related to HOTS and that the training should be subject-specific to ensure training transfer that is relevant and effective with regards to fostering HOTS in the classroom. This finding offers important information for in-service and pre-service training designers/planners specifically in the area of fostering HOTS in teaching science

References

[1] Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Handbook of research on science education. Science Education (Vol. 20). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9294-3

[2] Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, M. D., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., &Wittrock, M. C. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon.

[3] Barrik, R. K., Ladening, H. W., & Hedges, L. E. (1983). Development of a systematic approach to identifying technical in-service needs of teachers. The Journal of American Association of Teacher Educators in Agriculture, 24(1), 13–19.

[4] Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4).

[5] Bergevin, P. (1967). A philosophy for adult education. New York: Seabury

[6] Borich, G. D. (1980). Three models for conducting follow-up studies of teacher education and training. Austin, USA.

[7] Bryce, T. (2004). Tough acts to follow: The challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 717-722.

[8] Cannon, J. G., Duncan, D. W., & Arnett, S. E. (2011). Professional development needs of Idaho technology teachers: Teaching and learning. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 26(1), 32–47. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y

[9] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited.

[10] Nishit Gohel, D. M. Patel, Komal Patel, Rushik Ghodasara. "Formulation Development and Evaluation of Metformin Hydrochloride Extended Release Tablets ." International Journal of Pharmacy Research & Technology 2.2 (2012), 18-23.

[11] Davis, F. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end user information system: theory and results. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.

[12] Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socio-scientific issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133–148. http://doi.org/10.

[13] Edward, M. C., & Briers, G. E. (1999). Assessing the In-service Needs of Entry-Phase Agriculture teachers in Texas: A discrepancy Model Versus Direct Assessment. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40–49.

[14] Jones, E. V, & Lowe, J. (1990). Changing teacher behavior: Effective staff development. Adult Learning, 1(7), 8–10.

[15] Jones, H. (2008). Thoughts on teaching thinking: perceptions of practitioners with a shared culture of thinking skill education. The Curriculum Journal, 19(4), 309–324. htp://doi.org/10.1080/0958.5170802509898

[16] Kaufman, R. (1983). Planning and organizational improvement terms. Performance & Instruction Journal, 22(8), 12–15.

[17] Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysian Education Development Plan 2013-2015 (Preschool to high school). Putra Jaya, Malaysia.

[18] Knowles M.S, Holton III, E.F, & Swanson, R.A. (2005) The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

[19] Labrecque, M. (1999). Development and validation of a needs assessment model using stakeholder involved in a university program. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 14(1), 85–102.

[20] Lilia Halim, Kamisah Othman, T. Subahan, & M. M. (2007). Trends and issues of research on in-service needs assessment: Global vs Malaysian context. Trends in Science Education Research.

[21] Ministry of Education. (2016). Implementation of secondary school standard curriculum in stages starting from 2017.

[22] Muhammad Zahid Iqbal, A., & Rashid Ahmad Khan. (2011). The growing concept and uses of training needs assessment: A review with proposed model. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(5), 439–466. http://doi.org/10.1108/03090591111138017

[23] Ng, B. Y. (1988). Towards a generalized model of needs analysis (Doctoral thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 8824174)

[24] Nurulhuda, A.R., Paramesvary, P, & Ong, E.T. (2018). Motivation and Self-efficacy of Science Teachers in Fostering HOTS in Peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1825-1842.

[25] OECD. (2013). Structural Policy Challenges for Southeast Asian Countries, Structural Policy Country Notes Malaysia. Southeast Asian Economic Outlook 2013: With Perspectives on China and India, 1–19. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/saeo-2014-en.

[26] Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). England: The McGraw-Hill Co.

[27] Raisa B Gul, Khan, S., Ahmed, A., Cassum, S., Saeed, T., Parpio, Y., & Profetto-mcgrath, J. (2014). Enhancing Educators’ Skills for Promoting Critical Thinking in Their Classroom Discourses?: A Randomized Control Trial, 26(1), 37–54.

[28] Rogers, M. H. (1993). Assessments of staff development needs as perceived by extension agents Texas Agricultural Extention Model utilizing a modified Borich Needs Assessment Model. Texas A & M University.

[29] Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Education technology publications.

[30] Slater, L. (2013). Building High-Performing and Improving Education System [Review report of Curriculum and Assessment]. England: CfBT education trust. Retrived from ERIC database. (ED546816).[pdf]

[31] UNESCO. (2015). Malaysia National Education for All Review Report. World Education Forum.

[32] Von Glaserfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer.

[33] Waltz, C.F., Strickland, O.L., & Lenz, E.R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd Ed.) New York: Springer Publishing Co.