The Use of the interactive whiteboard in Mathematics lessons towards the achievement and motivation of year five students in the topic of space

Mazlini Adnan

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Mazlini Adnan
Additional Authors :	Kogilavani a/p Muniandy
Title :	The Use of the interactive whiteboard in Mathematics lessons towards the achievement and motivation of year five students in the topic of space

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The purpose of this research was to determine the use of interactive board in students’ achievement and motivation in the topics of space. The research methodology is based on an quasi experiment whereby two different teaching techniques were applied, which were traditional technique for the controlled group and teaching by using interactive board for the treatment group. The data were students’ scores on their performance on the pre-test and post-test while the data on students’ level of motivation was collected using a questionnaire: Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). 60 students were selected as samples and they were divided into two groups of 30 students in the controlled group and 30 students in the treatment group. The difference of students’ scores was then analyzed using t-test. The results of this study indicated that the mean score of post-test for the treatment group is significantly higher. In conclusion, the treatment group who had undergone the lesson using interactive whiteboard performed better with a positive motivation level towards learning material compared to the controlled group with the traditional method. The implication of this study shows the use of interactive boards showed positive impact on students’ achievement and is suitable for an alternative to existing methods.

References

1. Abdul Halim Abdullah, Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim, Marlina Ali, &Mohd Hilmi Hamzah. (2014). The Development of Mygsp: An Online Resource for Teaching Mathematics Based on Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP). Asian Social Science, 10(22), 227–240. Doi:10.5539/Ass.V10n22p227

2. Ahmad Rizal, M., Nurliana, M., &Yahya, B. (2007). Kesan Model PembelajaranBerasaskanKaedahPenyelesaianMasalahKeA tasPelajarBerbeza Gaya KognitifdanKemahiranLogik. 2nd International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention.

3. Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S. & I., T. (2005). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57, 457-469.

4. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. &Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research. 6th Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont.

5. Beeland, W. D. Jr. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help? In Annual Conference of the Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education. Trinity College, Dublin.

6. Brown, S. (2003). Interactive Whiteboards in education. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Interactivewhi teboards.pdf

7. Cheung, A. C., &Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A metaanalysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001

8. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

9. Diseth, A. (2011). Self-Efficacy, Goal Orientations and Learning Strategies As Mediators Between Preceding and Subsequent Academic Achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191–195.

10. Ekici, F. (2008). Effects of smart board usage on primary school maths students’ success. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Marmara University, ?stanbul. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi.

11. Fatimah Saguni (2006). Prinsip?PrinsipKognitifPembelajaran Multimedia :Peranan Modality Dan Contiguity TerhadapPeningkatanHasilBelajar. INSAN,8(3), 147?157.

12. Fies, C. (2007). Research Summary: Digital Technologies In Mathematics And Science Education. http://Ww.Nmsa.Org/Researchsummaries/Digital technology/Tabid/1486/ Default.Aspx

13. García, M. Del M., & Romero, I. (2009). The Influence of New Technologies on The Evolution Of Learning And Attitudes Towards Mathematics In Secondary Students. Electronic Journal of Research In Educational Psychology, 7, 369–395.

14. Glover,D. & Miller, D. (2001). Running With Technology: The Pedagogic Impact of The Large?Scale Introduction Of Interactive Whiteboards In One Secondary School. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10 (3), 257?276.

15. Greenwell, L. (2002).Physical Education: An Interactive Approach.Http://Www.Mirandanet.Ac.Uk/Pubs/ Greenwell.

16. Greiffenhagen, C. (2000). From Traditional Blackboards To Interactive Whiteboards: A Pilot Study To Inform System Design. In Proceedings of The 24th International Conference Psychology Of Mathematics Education, 2, 305-312.

17. Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted learning 21, 102–117.

18. Healy, L., &Hoyles, C. (2000). A Study of Proof Conceptions in Algebra. Journal for Research on Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396- 428.

19. Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The Role Of A Dynamic Software Program For Geometry In The Strategies High School Mathematics Students Employ. Journal for Research In Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164-192.

20. Jamerson J. (2002).Helping All Children Learn: Action Research Project. Http://Www.Smarterkids.Org/

21. Kamariah Abu Bakar, Ahmad FauziMohdAyub, Wong, S. L., & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi. (2010). Exploring Secondary School Students’ Motivation Using Technologies In Teaching And Learning Mathematics. Procedia - Social And Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4650–4654. Doi:10.1016/J.Sbspro.2010.03.744

22. Kennewell, S. (2006). Reflections on the Interactive Whiteboard Phenomenon: A Synthesis of Research From The UK. In Proceedings Australian Association For Research In Education Conference, 26-30 November, Adelaide, Australia. Http://Www.Aare.Edu.Au/06pap/Ken06138.Pdf.

23. Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G., 2007. Features of interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), pp. 227-241.

24. KamarulAzmiJasmi. (2010). Guru CemerlangPendidikan Islam SekolahMenengah Di Malaysia: SatuKajianKes.TesisPhd, UKM.

25. Latham P. (2002).Teaching And Learning Mathematics: The Impact Of Interactive Whiteboards – Results Of The North Islington Education Action Zone RM Easiteach Mathematics Project. BEAM Education, London.

26. Lay, Y. F., &Khoo, C. H. (2013). PengenalanKepadaPendekatanKuantitatifDalamPenyelidi kanPendidikan. Kota Kinabalu: PenerbitUniversiti Malaysia Sabah.

27. Lee M. & Boyle M. (2003).The Educational Effects and Implications of The Interactive Whiteboard Strategy of Richardson Primary School. Richardson Primary School: ACT, Australia.

28. Lee, T. T. (2013). Pembinaan Dan KeberkesananModul Multimedia InteraktifDenganAgenPedagogiDalamPembelajaranElektr okimia. Unpublished thesis. UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia.

29. Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: A developmental study. http://www.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.

30. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students' mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 215-243.

31. Martin, A.J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413-440.

32. MohdFaizalNizam Lee Abdullah, MohdSahandriGaniHamzah, CheNidzamChe Ahmad, Mazlini Adnan, Noraini Mohamed Noh, ShafiniSuhaimi&LajimanJanoory. (2014). An instrument to assess secondary school mathematics teachers’ assessment practices in Malaysia. Journal of Teaching and Education, 03(03), 483 – 492.

33. Othman Talib. (2013). AsasPenulisanTesisPenyelidikan&Statistik(1st Edition). Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

34. NorazahNordin, EffandiZakaria, Nik Rahimah Nik Mohamed, &Mohamaed Amin Embi. (2010). Pedagogical Usability Of The Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) Digital Module In The Mathematics Teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 9, 113–117.

35. Penuel, W. R., Bates, L., Gallagher, L. P., Pasnik, S., Llorente, C., Townsend, E.., Hupert, N., Dominguez, X. &VanderBorght, M. (2012). Supplementing literacy instruction with amedia-rich intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 115-127. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.002.

36. Richardson, A. (2002). Effective Questioning In Teaching Mathematics Using an Interactive Whiteboard. Micromaths, 18(2), 8-12.

37. Reif, S. D., &Heimburge, J. A. (2007). How to reach and teach all children through balanced literacy: Userfriendly strategies, tools, activities, and ready-to-use materials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

38. Smith, F., Hardman, F., & Higgins, S. (2006). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher-pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. British Educational Research Journal, 32 (3), 443–457.

39. Solvie, P.A. (2004). The Digital Whiteboard: A Tool In Early Literacy Instruction. Reading Teacher, 57(5), 484¬–7.

40. Tezer M. &Deniz A.K. (2009).The effect of using an interactive board in mathematics course on the learning of equation solving. 9th International Educational Technology Conference, Ankara, Turkey.

41. Thompson, J. &Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in Key Stage. Management in Education, 17(3), 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08920206030170030601.

42. Troff, B. &Tirotta, R. (2009). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education ,54, 379-383

43. TunkuBadariahTunku Ahmad. (2014). Between School Factors And Teacher Factors : What Inhibits Malaysian Science Teachers From Using ICT ? The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 1–10.

44. Zevenbergen, R., &Lerman, S. (2008). Learning Environments Using Interactive Whiteboards: New Learning Spaces or Reproduction of Old Technologies?. Mathematics Education Research.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page