Evaluating service quality at Malaysian Public Universities: perspective of International Students by world geographical regions

Wan Salmuni Wan Mustaffa

Abstract

Recently, the issue of international students’ perceptions on service quality offered by Malaysian public universities has been debated among practitioners and academicians. The international students may experience different educational services in the host country compared to their home country due to cultural and values differences. In addition, the existing research has reported that the perceptions of international students towards services at Malaysian public universities are only at moderate level. Thus, the aim of this research is to determine the perceptions of international students towards service quality at Malaysian public universities according to world geographical regions, namely Asia, Middle East, and Africa. This research was conducted at Malaysian public universities. An online questionnaire was utilized as a research instrument. The stratified sampling technique was applied to gather the data among international students. The descriptive and one-way ANOVA techniques were performed to analyze the data. Based on the mean results, the Asian students were more satisfied with service offered by Malaysian public universities. The one-way ANOVA analysis result revealed the perceptions of international students towards service quality experienced at Malaysian public universities is significantly different across Asia, Middle East, and Africa regions. This research has an important implication for practitioners. Knowledge concerning the concept of service quality will assist practitioners to manage the service delivery at Malaysian public universities from the international students’ perspectives.

References

[1] MoHE. (2011). Internationalization Policy for Higher Education Malaysia, (pp. 1–103). Malaysia.

[2] Tham, S. Y., & Kam, A. J. Y. (2008). Internationalizing higher education: Comparing the challenges of different higher education institutions in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 28(4), 353–367.

[3] Sidhu, G. K., & Singh, M. (2009). Addressing global challenges in higher education: A Malaysian initiative. Commonwealth Education Partnerships, (2008), 2008–2010.

[4] Bhandari, R., & Blumenthal, P. (2009). Global Student Mobility: Moving Towards Brain Exchange. In R. Bhandari & S. Laughlin (Eds.), Higher Education on the Move: New Developments in Global Mobility (pp. 1–15). New York: AIFS Foundation.

[5] Clark, N., & Sedgwick, R. (2005). International students: It’s a buyer’s market. World Education News and Reviews. http://www.wes.org/ewenr/05july/feature.htm

[6] Durvasula, S., Lysonski, S., & Madhavi, A. D. (2011). Beyond service attributes: do personal values matter? Journal of Services Marketing, 25(1), 33–46.

[7] Shekarchizadeh, A., Rasli, A., & Hon-Tat, H. (2011). SERVQUAL in Malaysian universities: Perspectives of international students. Business Process Management Journal, 17(1), 67–81.

[8] UNESCO (2006). Gobal Education Digest 2006: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World. Montreal, canada.

[9] MoHE. (2016). Data for Public HEI for International Students' Enrolment 2016. Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia.

[10] Lim, Y. M., Yap, C. S., & Lee, T. H. (2011). Destination choice , service quality, satisfaction , and consumerism : International students in Malaysian institutions of higher education. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1691–1702.

[11] Richards, C., & Abdul Aziz, M. I. (2011). Malaysia and education hubs. Going Global International Higher Education Conference

[12] Yee, C. P., Hazlin, A., & Mokhtar, A. (2013). International students’ learning experiences at private higher education institutions in Malaysia. In Proceeding of the Global Summit on Education (Vol. 2020, pp. 11–12).

[13] Jalali, A., Islam, M. A., & Ku Ariffin, K. H. (2011). Service satisfaction : the case of a higher learning institution in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 4(1), 182– 192.

[14] Rajab, A., Abdul Rahman, H., & Shaari, R. (2011). The international students’ perception towards the education quality. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 49–58.

[15] Rasli, A., Shekarchizadeh, A., & Iqbal, M. J. (2012). Perception of service quality in higher education : Perspective of Iranian students in Malaysian Universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 1(1), 10–25.

[16] Siang, L. C. (2012). Analysis of the satisfaction on programme of studies among international students. Prosiding Perkembangan, 2 (VII, Jilid 2 (2012)), 1019– 1031.

[17] Mckinney, V., Yoon, K., & Zahedi, F. M. (2002). The measurement of web-customers satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information System Research, 13(3), 296–315.

[18] Arambewela, R., Hall, J., & Zuhair, S. (2005). Postgraduate international students from Asia: Factors influencing satisfaction. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(2), 105- 107.

[19] Liao, C., Chen, J. L., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) andcustomer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2804–2822.

[20] Archambault, L. Z. (2008). Measuring Student Satisfaction and its Impact on Student Retention: Developing a Combined Model for use in Private, Post-Secondary Institutions. Nova Southeastern University.

[21] Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

[22] Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall 1985), 41–50.

[23] Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A.; Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

[24] Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A.; Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 4(Winter 1991), 420–450.

[25] Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32.

[26] Cronin, J Joseph, & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF Versus SERVQUAL : Reconciling performance-based and measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58, 125–131.

[27] Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2010). Service quality in higher education – a review and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(2), 259–272.

[28] Teas, R. K. (1993). Expectations, performance evaluation, and consumers’ perceptions of quality. Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 18-32.

[29] Bayraktaroglu, G., & Atrek, B. (2010). resting the superiority and dimensionality of SERVQUAL vs SERVPERF in higher education. Quality Management Journal, 17(1), 47–59.

[30] Seth, N., Deshmukh, S. G., & Vrat, P. (2005). Service quality models: A review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(9), 913–949.

[31] Carrillat, F. A., Jaramillo, F., & Mulki, J. P. (2007). The validity of the SERVQUAL and SERVPERF scales: A meta-analytic view of 17 years of research across five continents. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5), 472–490.

[32] Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305–328.

[33] Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569–581.

[34] Brochado, A. (2009). Comparing alternative instruments to measure service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(2), 174–190.

[35] Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

[36] Stat Trek. http://stattrek.com/statistics/random-numbergenerator.aspx