UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)

Construction of test instrument in school-based assessment (DBA) on sign language listening test for deaf candidates

AVAILABLE Article 1983 Views
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Login required to access this item.
General Information Cached
Title
Construction of test instrument in school-based assessment (DBA) on sign language listening test for deaf candidates
Type
Article
Main Author
Abdul Rahim Razalli
Additional Authors
  • Abdul Talib Hashim
  • Nordin Mamat
  • Azli Ariffin
Subject
P Language and Literature
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of publication
2019
Degree Type
Not related
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

This study is intended to develop a test instrument in testing sign language listening in School-based Assessment (SBA) and to test the effect of using the tests on deaf students. The purpose of this study is also to obtain validity and reliability of the test instrument known as Sign Language Listening Test for Deaf Candidate (IPULDCP). IPULDCP contains six elements namely instrument type, task, task form, item type, presentation mode and scoring method. This study involves the construction phase, the validity and reliability testing phase. It also examines the effect of IPULDCP usage on deaf students. The construction phase is to obtain data through questionnaires to special education teachers to determine the key elements in IPULDCP. The second phase is to obtain value of validity through interviews and written responses from a group of experts/specialists. In measuring the IPULDCP reliability, 40 special education teachers from Perak and Selangor were selected as the study respondents. Five students with hearing disabilities were selected as study samples to assess the effect of using IPULDCP. The results show that instruments of IPULDCP have a good overall content validity of .89 while reliability of the overall IPULDCP is .968. The findings show that the use of IPULDCP effectively measures the test element of communication using sign language compared to the visual test. This study implicates that it can directly develop knowledge in special education in particular assessment instrument among deaf students  

References

An, S. (2013). Schema theory in reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 130-134.

Andrews, J. F., & Mason, J. M. (2011). Strategy usage among deaf and hearing readers. Exceptional Children, 57(6), 536-545.

Baker, S., & Baker, K. (2009). Children who are deaf or hard of hearing: Bilingualbi-cultural education. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

Barton, J., & Sawyer, D. M. (2013). Our students are ready for this: Comprehension instruction in the elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 57(4), 334-347.

Bedard, C., Van Horn, L., & Garcia, Viola, M. (2011). The Impact of Culture on Literacy.

Benedict, K. M., Rivera, M. C., & Antia, S. D. (2015). Instruction in metacognitive strategies to increase deaf and hard-of-hearing students’ reading comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(1), 1-15.

Bickham, L. M. (2015). Reading Comprehension in Deaf Education: Comprehension Strategies to Support Students Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

Bowen, & Glenn, A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 on 26/03/17.

Breiseth, L. (2013). Getting to Know Your ELLs: Six Steps for Success.

Brentari, D. (2011). Sign language phonology. The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Second Edition, 691-721.

Brigham, R., Berkley, S., Simpkins, P., & Brigham, M. (2007). A focus on reading comprehension strategy instruction. Current practice alerts, 12.

Bullock, E. E., & Reardon, R. C. (2008). Interesprofile elevation, big five personality traits, and secondary constructs on the self-Directed search: A replication and extension. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 326-338

Cawthon, S., & Wurtz, K. (2008). Alternate assessment use with students who are deaf or hard of hearing: an exploratory mixed-methods analysis of portfolio, checklists, and out-of-level test formats. Jurnal of Deaf Studies and deaf Education, 14(2), 155-177.

Courtin, C. (2000). The Impact of sign language on the cognitive development of hearing impaired children. The Jurnal of Hearing Impaired Studies and Hearing Impaired Education, 5 (3), 266-276.

Chaleff, C., & Toranzo, N. (2000). Helping our student meet the standards through test preparation classes. American Annals of the Hearing impaired, 145, 33-40.

Chaleff, C & Ritter, M. (2011). The use of miscue analysis with deaf readers. The Reading Teacher, 55(2), 190-200.

Channa, M. A., Nordin, Z. S., Siming, I. A., Chandio, A. A., & Koondher, M. A. (2014). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies: A review of previous studies. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 181.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education, 6th ed. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Davies, M. A., & Wavering, M. (1999). Alternative assessment: New directions in teaching and learning. Contemporary Education, 71, 39-46.

Dennis, D. V. (2008). Are assessment data really driving middle school reading instruction? What we can learn from one student's experience. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(7), 578-587.

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.

Donne, V., & Zigmond, N. (2008). Engagement during reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing in public schools. American annals of the deaf, 153(3), 294-303.

Durkin, D. (2014). Teaching them to read (6 th ed) University of Florida, Pearson Education,Inc.

Evans, C., Zimmer, K., & Murray, D. (2014). Discovering with words and signs: A resource guide for developing a bilingual and bicultural preschool program for deaf and hearing children. Sign Talk Development Project.

Freel, B. L., Clark, M. D., Anderson, M. L., Gilbert, G. L., Musyoka, M. M., & Hauser, P. C. (2011). Deaf individuals’ bilingual abilities: American Sign Language proficiency, reading skills, and family characteristics. Psychology,2(01), 18.

Ferdman, Bernardo, M. (2010). Literacy and Culture Identity. Harvard Educational Review.

Grabe, E. (2009). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. In Intonation: Theory, Models and Applications.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Gallaudet Research Institute. (2016). Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition, Form S, Norms Booklet for Deaf and

Hornby, A. S., & Wehmeier, S. (2015). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary (Vol. 1428). Oxford: Oxford university press.

Howell, J., & Luckner, J. (2013). Helping one deaf student develop content literacy skills: An action research report. Communications Disorders Quarterly 25(1), 23-27.

Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P. C. (2015). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.

Kamhi, A. G. &, Catts, H. W. (2012). Language and reading disabilities (3 rd ed) Pearson Education,

Inc. USA. Kelly, A. B. (1995). Fingerspelling interaction: A set of deaf parents and their deaf daughter. In C. Lucas (Ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities (pp. 62-73). Washington, DC: Gallaudent University Press.

Klein, R., Klein, B. E., Linton, K. L., & De Mets, D. L. (2011). The Beaver Dam eye study: visual acuity. Ophthalmology, 98(8), 1310-1315.

Kushalnagar, P., Hannay, H. J., & Hernandez, A. E. (2010). Bilingualism and attention: A study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 15(3), 263-273.

Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., Hudson, R. F., & Konold, T. R. (2009). Identifying essential instructional components of literacy tutoring for struggling beginning readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 277-297.

Lederberg, A. R., Schick, B., & Spencer, P. E. (2013). Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: successes and challenges. Developmental psychology, 49(1), 15.

Luckner, J. L. (2011). Mainstreaming Hearing-Impaired StudentsPerceptions of Regular Educators. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 22(1), 302-307.

Mainna, E. N., Kochung, E. J., & Oketch, O. (2014). Learning strategies used by deaf. International Research Journal, 5 (4), 122-130.

Marley, S. &, Szabo, Z. (2010). Improving children’s listening comprehension with a manipulation. Journal of Educational Research, 103(4), 227-238. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Marschark, M., Sarchet, T., Convertino, C. M., Borgna, G., Morrison, C., & Remelt, S. (2012). Print exposure, reading habits, and reading achievement among deaf and hearing college students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 17(1), 61-74.

Mich, O., Pianta, E., &, Mana, N. (2013). Interactive stories and exercises with dynamic feedback for improving reading comprehension skills in deaf children. Computers & Education, 65, 34-44.

Miller, P. (2015). Reading comprehension and its relation to the quality of functional hearing: Evidence from readers with different functional hearing abilities. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(3), 305-323.

Moores, D. F, (2011). Educating the deaf: psychology, principles, and practices (5 th ed.). 

 


Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.