UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| This research took place in the following four countries: Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, and the United States (US). Educators in each country reported on how they addressed US international policies in their respective curricula. Critical border praxis emergedas a theoretical construct as a result of these transnational studies. Critical border praxis provides a contemplation of the intersection of place-based and border pedagogies, as well as how pedagogies are central to understanding one’s own situatedness.The findings of this study include recommendations for additional in-depth discussions of international policies in the US social studies curriculum. Implications for educators elsewhere are also articulated. |
| References |
Abraham, S. (2014). A nepantla pedagogy: Comparing Anzaldua’s and Bakhtin’s ideas for pedagogical and social change. Critical Education, 5(5), 1-19. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books. Anzaldúa, G. (2002). Now let us shift...the path of conocimiento...inner work public acts. In G. Anzaldúa & A. Keating (Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation(pp. 540-577). New York: Routledge. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination(C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (original work published 1975). Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & Halsey, A.H., (Eds.), Powerand Ideology in Education. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Bowles, S.,& Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books. Cashman, T. G.(2013). Border pedagogy as a conduit: Comparing the perspectives of educators in Malaysia, Mexico, and Canada. Multicultural Education, 20 (2), 2-9. Cashman, T. G.(2015). Developing a critical border dialogism: Learning from fellow educators in Malaysia, Mexico, Canada, and the United States. Charlotte, NC: Information Age. Cervantes-Soon, C. G. & Carrillo, J. F. (2016). Toward a pedagogy of border thinking: Building on Latin@ students’ subaltern knowledge. High School Journal, 99(4), 282-301. Clark, K., & Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Cline, Z., & Necochea, J. (2003). Education in the Borderlands: A border pedagogy conceptual model. El Bordo: Retos de Frontera, 6 (11), 43-52. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rdEd.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Darling-Hammond, L., & McCloskey, L. (2011).Assessment for learning around the world: What would it mean to be internationally competitive? In A. C. Ornstein, E. F. Pajak, & S. B. Ornstein (Eds.), Contemporary issues in curriculum (2nd ed., pp. 336-347). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Davis, O. L., Jr. (2005). Where is the Iraq War in the curriculum this year? Or is it missing? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 20(3), 183-187. Delanty, G. (2006). The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 25-47. Epstein, E.H. (2008) Setting the Normative Boundaries: crucial epistemological benchmarks in comparative education, Comparative Education, 44(4), 373-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050060802481405 Flinders, D.J. (2006). We Can andShould Teach the War in Iraq, Educational Digest, 71(5), 8-12. Garza, E. (2007). Becoming a border pedagogy educator: Rooting practice in paradox. Multicultural Education, 15(1), 2-7. Giroux, H. A. (1988).Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvey. Giroux, H. A. (1991).Borderpedagogyandthepoliticsof postmodernism.SocialText, 28, 51-67.Giroux, H. A. (2005). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education(2ndEd.). New York: Routledge. Goh, P. S. C.,& Wong, K. T. (2015). Exploring the challenges for teacher educators.Journal of Research, Policy and Practice of Teachers andTeacher Education, 5(1), 37-45. Goodrick, D. (2014). Comparative case studies, Methodological briefs: Impact Evaluation 9, Florence, IT: UNICEF Office of Research. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3-12. Hampton, E.,Liguori, O., & Rippberger, S. (2003). Binational border collaboration in teacher education. Multicultural Education, 11(1), 2-10. Holquist, M. (2002). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world(2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Hoon, C.L., Dziauddin, M. F., Jabar, B., Daud, M. N., Abd Rahman, N. F., & Othman, Z. (2014). Social science literacy among form four students in Malaysian secondary schools. Journal of Research, Policy and Practice of Teachers andTeacher Education, 4(2),59-72. James, W.(1906).What pragmatism means. Retrieved from http:// www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/us/james. htm Kliebard, H. M. (2004). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Koopman, C. (2006). Pragmatism as a philosophy of hope: Emerson, James, Dewey, and Rorty. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 20(2), 106-116. Maffie, J. (2007). The centrality of nepantla in conquest-era Nahua philosophy. Nahua Newsletter, 44, 11-22. Retrieved from http:// www.nahuanewsletter.org/nnarchive/newsletters/Nahua44.pdf Mignolo, W. D. (2000a). The many faces of cosmo-polis: Border thinking and critical cosmopolitanism, Public Culture, 12(3), 721748. Mignolo, W. D. (2000b). Introduction: From cross-genealogies and subaltern knowledges to nepantla. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(1), 1-8. Necochea, J.,& Cline, Z.(2005). Borderlandeducationand teachereducationreformin California:Unfulfilledpromises. JournalofBorderlands Studies,20 (1), 129-141. Nelles, W. (2003). Comparative education, terrorism and human security: From critical pedagogy to peacekeeping. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Nolan, C.,& Stitzlein, S.M. (2011). Meaningful hope for teachers in times of high anxiety and low morale. Democracy and Education, 19(1), 1-11. Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2006). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method, and practice. London, UK: Continuum. Puigvert, L. (2012). The dialogic turn: Dialogue or violence? International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 78-96. doi: 10.4471/rimcis.2012.04 Ratnavadivel, N., Nagappan, R., Dawi, A. H., & Lim, C. H. (2014).The implications of a changing value system for policy and practice of teacher education curriculum in Malaysia.Journal ofResearch, Policy and Practice of Teachers andTeacher Education, 4 (2), 45-58. Reyes, M. D. L. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: Educational lives on the border. Journal of Latinos and Education, 4(3), 149-152. Romo,J.J., & Chavez,C. (2006)Border pedagogy: A study of pre-service teacher transformation. The Educational Forum, 70, 142-153. Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. New York: Penguin Books. Rothstein, R. (2015, April 3). Taking the fall in Atlanta. Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/blog/takingthe-fall-in-Atlanta Shade, P. (2001). Habits of hope: A pragmatic theory. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press. Yaeger, P. (1991). Afterword. In D. M. Bauer & S. J. McKinstry (Eds.),Feminism, Bakhtin, and the dialogic(pp. 239-245). Albany: State University of New York Press. Yin, R. K. (2003).Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |