UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :NA Architecture
Main Author :Herry Rizal Djahwasi
Additional Authors :Zaharul Lailiddin Saidon
Title :Artistic research: artistic as research vs artistic as method
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Muzik dan Seni Persembahan
Year of Publication :2020
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Reflecting on what is currently happening to artistic research in an academic setting, we identified three domains of knowledge that must be interpreted appropriately. In the present article, these three domains of knowledge to which we refer are covered the way we think about art, the way art is processed, and the art works itself. The way we think about art is closely related to the profile of knowledge which is philosophically known as ontology. The way art to be processed is closely related to the structure of knowledge which is philosophically known as epistemology. Meanwhile, the art works itself is closely related to the value of knowledge which is philosophically known as axiology. These three aspects play a role in determining the artistic research paradigms carried out in an academic environment. Based on literature review, we have classified artistic research into two paradigms. The first paradigm, we called artistic as research, in which this notion is representation that artistic works is the production of knowledge. The second paradigm we call artistic as a method, in which this notion is triggered from the understanding that artistic works can be expressed based on research design. Our main motivation to promote two paradigms of the artistic research is to further develop artistic research in conducting scholarly communication. Finally, this article specifically describes how artistic practice and research in academic settings can come together  


Audi, R. (1998). Epistemology: a contemporary introduction to the theory of Knowledge, Routledge.

Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts-based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Biggs, M., & Buchler, D. (2007). Rigor and Practice-based Research. Design Issues, 23(3), 62-69. Retrieved August 15, 2020, from

Biggs, M., and Buchler, D. (2008). Eight criteria for practice-based research in the creative and cultural industries. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, Volume 7, Number 1, pp. 5-18(14)

Biggs, M., and Karlsson, K. (2011). The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, Routledge

Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011): Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.

Bolt, B. (2007), ‘The magic is in handling’, in E. Barrett and B. Bolt (eds), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, London and New York: I. B. Tauris, pp. 27–34.

Borgdorff, H. (2006). The debate on research in the arts. Sensuous Knowledge, Bergen: Bergen National Academy of the Arts, (02).

Borgdorff, H. (2009). ’Artistic Research within the Fields of Science’, Sensuous Knowledge Publications 6/2009. Bergen Academy of Arts; http://sensuous artistic- research- within- the- fields- ofscience/.

Borgdorff, H. (2012). The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden University Press.

Bridges, D. (2017). Philosophy in Educational Research: Epistemology, Ethics, Politics and Quality. Springer International Publishing AG

Bridges, D., & Smith, R. (2006). Philosophy, Methodology and Educational Research: Introduction. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 131-135.

Clingan, J. (2008): An Understanding of Textual/Theoretical Research. http://www.prescott. Edu/faculty staff/faculty/jclingan/documents/RMT

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3nd Edition), SAGE Publications, Inc.

Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in The Research Process, SAGE Publications Ltd.

Davis, T. C. (2004). ‘The context problem’, Theatre Survey, 45 (2), 203–9.

Davey, N. (2006). Art and theoria. In Macleod, K. and Holdridge, L (eds), Thinking Through Art: Reflections on art as research. Routledge, 20-39

Elkins, J. (ed.) (2009). Artists with PhDs: On the new Doctoral Degree in StudioArt. Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing.

Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4–10.

Eisner, E. (2008). Art and Knowledge. In Knowles, J. G. and. Cole. A. L (eds). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies Sage Publications 3-12

Frayling, C. (1993). ‘Research in Art and Design’, Royal College of Art Research Papers Series 1(1). London: Royal College of Arts.

Friedman, K. (2003). Theory Construction in Design Research: Criteria: Approaches, and Methods, Design Studies, 24(6): 507-522.

Friedman, K. (2017). Research Writing Workshop. Politecnico di Milano, Italy. –

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (1960). Truth and Method, tr. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D.G. London: Sheed & Ward

Gray, C. (1996), Inquiry through Practice: Developing Appropriate Research Strategies (cited 18 March 2003), available at:

Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (Third edition). Los Angeles SAGE.

Grix, J. (2001). Demystifying postgraduate research: From MA to PhD. Edgbaston: University of Birmingham Press.

Hannula, M. J., Suoranta, and Vaden, T. (2005). Artistic Research: theories, methods and practices, Gothenburg, Sweden: Academy of Fine Arts Helsinki, and Gothenburg University.

Hannula, M. J., Suoranta, and Vadén, T (2014). Artistic Research Methodology- Narrative, Power and the Public, Peter Lang.

Habermas, Jurgen. (1973). Legitimation Crisis, tr. McCarthy, T. from Legitimation sprobleme im Spatkapitalismus. London: Heinemann Educational.

Haseman, B. (2006) ‘A Manifesto for Performative Research’, Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy 118: Special issue ‘Practice-led Research’ 98–106

Haseman, B., and Mafe, D. (2009). ‘Acquiring Know- How: Research Training for Practice- Led Researchers’, in H. Smith and R. Dean (eds), Practice- Led Research, Research- Led Practice in the Creative Arts (Research Methods for the Arts and Humanities). Edinburgh University Press, 211–281.

Heidegger, Martin. (1954). What Is Called Thinking? tr. Gray, J.G. and Wieck, F.D. London: HarperCollins.

Howell, K. E. (2013). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology. Sage Publications Ltd

Hunter, A., Lusardi, P., Zucker, D., Jacelon, C., & Chandler, G. (2002). Making meaning: The creative component in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research Journal, 12(3), 388–398.

Jackson, E. (2013). Choosing a Methodology: Philosophical Underpinning, Practitioner Research in Higher Education Journal, 7(1), 49-62. Available at: (Accessed 15 October 2013).

Kalvemark, T. (2011). University Politics and Practice-based Research. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, K. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, Routledge, 3-23

Karlsson, H. (ed.) (2007) Kontext – Kvalitet – Kontinuitet. Utvardering av Vetenskapsrådets anslag till konstnarlig forskning och utveckling 2001–2005, Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet

Kiljunen, S., and Hannula, M. (ed.) (2002) Artistic Research. Helsinki: Finnish Academy of Fine Arts.

Kiljunen, S., and Hannula, M. (eds) (2012) ‘Inventions and Institutions: Artistic Research as a Medium of Change’, presentation at the seminar of the Finnish Society for Aesthetics, 1 March 2012 (manuscript).

Kirkkopelto, E. (2018). Abandoning Art in the Name of Art: Transpositional Logic in Artistic Research. In Schwab M. (Ed.), Transpositions: Aesthetico-Epistemic Operators in Artistic Research (pp. 33-40). Leuven (Belgium): Leuven University Press. Retrieved August 16, 2020, from

Kemp, J. (1964). The work of art and the artist’s intention. The British Journal of Aesthetics, Volume 4, Issue 2, April 1964, Pages 146–154,

Kershaw, B. (2009) ‘Practice as Research Through Performance’, in H. Smith and R. Dean (eds) Practice- Led Research, Research- Led Practice in the Creative Arts (Research Methods for the Arts and Humanities). Edinburgh University Press, pp. 63–75.

Kershaw, B., Miller, L., Whalley, J., Rosemary, L., and Pollard, N. (2011). Practice as Research: Transdisciplinary Innovation in Action, In Kershaw, B and Nicholson, H. (eds), Research Methods in Theatre and Performance, editor, Research Methods in Theatre and Performance, University Press, 63-85.

Leavy, P. (2009) Method Meets Art. New York: Guilford Press. Maarit, M., Nimkulrat, N., Dash, D. P., Nsenga, Francois-X. (2011). On Reflecting and Making in Artistic Research. Journal of Research Practice Volume 7 (1), 1-12

Maggie, B. G.,and Featherston, A. (2011). The Imperative of the Archive: Creative Archive Research, In Kershaw, B and Nicholson, H. (ed.), Research Methods in Theatre and Performance, editor, Research Methods in Theatre and Performance, University Press, 17-40.

Makela, M. (2007). Knowing through making: The role of the artefact in practice-led research. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3), 157-163. 

Makela, M. (2009). The place and the product(s) of making in practice-led research. In N. Nimkulrat & T. O’Riley (Eds.) Reflections and connections: On the relationship between production and academic research (pp. 29-37). University of Art and Design Helsinki, Finland.

Makela, M., & Nimkulrat, N. (2011, May). Reflection and documentation in practice-led design research. Paper presented at the Making Design Matter conference, Helsinki, Finland, May 29-31. Retrieved December 3, 2011, from

Makela, M., and Routarinne, S. (2006b). ‘Connecting different practices’, in M. Makela and S. Routarinne (eds), The Art of Research: Practice in Research of Art and Design, Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki, pp. 10–39.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Maxwell, J. A. (2013) Qualitative Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Macleod, K., and Holdridge, L. (2006) (eds), Thinking Through Art: Reflections on art as research. Routledge.

McKenzie, J., Roms, H., and Wee, C. J. W. L. (ed.) (2010) Contesting Performance: Global Sites of Research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

McNiff, J., and Whitehead, J. (2002). Action Research: Principles and Practice. The Taylor & Francis e-Library

Melrose, S. (2006). “The Body” in Question: Expert Performance- Making in the University and the Problem of Spectatorship’;

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Montag, D. (2000) Bioglyphs: Generating images in collaboration with nature’s events, PhD thesis, University of Hetfordshire. Online version: 1

Neilsen, L. (2004). Aesthetics and knowing: Ephemeral principles for a groundless theory. In A. L. Cole, L. Neilsen, J. G. Knowles, & T. C. Luciani (Eds.), Provoked by art: Theorizing artsinformed research Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Backalong Books, 44–49.

Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances Palgrave Macmillan.

Newbury, D. (1996) Viewpoint: Knowledge and Research in art and design. In Design Studies 17, 1996, pp 215-219

Nyberg, F. (2019) The Writing and the Doing—about Artistic Research through a Writing Practice in Artistic Research and Literature, in Caduff, C. and Tan Walchli (ed), Artistic Research and Literature Brill, Wilhelm Fink.

Polanyi, M. (1983). The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.

Popkewitz, T. S. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual. London/New York: Falmer.

Pring, R. (2000) Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Continuum. Ravitch, S. M., and Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Ruitenberg, C. (2009): Introduction: The Question of Method in Philosophy of Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 43(3), 315-323.

Rust, C. (2007). Unstated contributions: How artistic inquiry can inform interdisciplinary research. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 69-76.

Rust, C., Mottam, J., & Till, J. (2007). AHRC research review: Practice-led research in art, design and architecture. Retrieved December 3, 2011, from

Saarnivaara, M. (2003). Art as inquiry: The autopsy of an [art] experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 580–602.

Savin-Baden, M., and Wimpenny, K. (2014). A Practical Guide to Arts-related Research. Sense Publishers.

Sikes, P. (2004). Chapter 2 Methodology Procedures and Ethical Concerns, in Opie, C. (ed.). (2004). Doing Educational Research. London: Sage

Skains, R. L. (2018). Creative Practice as Research: Discourse on Methodology, Media Practice and Education, 19 (1), 82-97, DOI: 10.1080/14682753.2017.1362175

Schön, D. (1995). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Ashgate/Arena. (First published by Basic Books, New York, in 1983)

Smith, H., and Dean, R. T. (2009). Introduction: Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice – Towards the Iterative Cyclic Web. In Smith, H. and Dean, R.T (ed.), Practice-Led Research, Research- Led Practice in the Creative Arts (Research Methods for the Arts and Humanities). Edinburgh University Press, 1-40.

Smith, J., and Small, R. (2017). Is It Necessary to Articulate a Research Methodology When Reporting on Theoretical Research? Current Business and Economics Driven Discourse and Education: Perspectives from Around the World BCES. Conference Books, Volume 15, 202-208

Slager, H. (2004). In DISCOURS DE LA MÉTHODE in Annette W. Balkema, A.W. and Slager, H. (eds), Artistic Research. Rodopi B.V, 34-38.

Sonderen, P. C. (2017). Of Research, Passion, and Art. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 51(1), 54- 68. doi:10.5406/jaesteduc.51.1.0054.

Sullivan, G. (2006b), Artefacts as Evidence within Changing Contexts (cited 16 august 2020), available at: papers/wpades/vol4/gsfull.html.

Sullivan, Graeme. (2006). ‘Research Acts in Research Practice’, Studies in Art Education, 48 (1), 19–35.

Sullivan, G. (2009), Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-led Research, In Smith, H. and Dean, R.T (eds), Practice- Led Research, Research- Led Practice in the Creative Arts (Research Methods for the Arts and Humanities). Edinburgh University Press, 41-65.

Wharton, G. (2015). Artist intention and the conservation of contemporary art. AIC Objects Specialty Group Postprints, Vol. 22, 1-12.

Westerlund, H. (2003). Reconsidering aesthetic experience in praxial music education. Philosophy of music education review, 11 (1), 45-62, published by Indiana university press.

Wilson, E., and Stutchbury, K. (2009). Chapter 4 - Research Design and Ethics, in Wilson, (eds). School Based Research A Guide For Education Students. London: Sage.

Wimsatt, Jr., W. K., and Beardsley, M.C. (1946). The intentional fallacy. Sewanee Review 54 (3): 468–488.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)