UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :Q Science
Main Author :Nadira Ismail
Title :The implementation of science creative teaching design tool in teaching and learning science
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This case study was conducted qualitatively to explore and understand the process through Science Creative Teaching Design (SCTD) implementation. Seven informants including two Science teachers and five form two students from selected boarding school were involved in this research. Data were collected through in-depth semistructured interviews, observations, document analysis and field notes. The data were further analyzed through coding, categorizing and sub- themes to develop the main themes. This research found that, SCTD tool was feasible for Science teachers, improves both teachers’ and students’ emotions against stressful and less innovative teaching and learning. Informants have practiced almost all suggested creative strategies, hence, demonstrated creative teaching and learning and active teaching. Thinking culture was found amongst students and teachers as they attained creative thinking characteristics such as cognitive flexibility, originality thinking, fluency thinking, elaboration thinking, evaluating own works and making decision. The students displayed higher order thinking skills such as analyzing, evaluating and creating and found to develop skill sets such as communication skills, self-confidence and team work skills. Thus, a novel framework of SCTD is successfully designed to enhance teaching and learning in Science. In conclusion, this research promotes a better understanding and exploration on creative teaching and learning through a systematic guide on design thinking and creative skills. This implies that, Science teachers may use SCTD tool to produce a high impact and interesting teaching and learning for the students.

References

Abdulla,  A.  M.,  &  Cramond,  B.  (2017).  After  six  decades  of  systematic  study  of

creativity: what do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured?.

Roeper Review, 39(1), 9-23.

 

Ahmad, S., Ch, A. H., Batool, A., Sittar, K., & Malik, M. (2016). Play and Cognitive Development:  

Formal  Operational  Perspective  of  Piaget's  Theory.  Journal  of Education and Practice, 7(28), 

72-79.

 

Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of the Inquiry-Based Project Application in Science Education   

upon   Turkish   Science   teachers’   Perspectives.   Education,   129.2 (Winter 2008), 202–215.

 

Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT  

professional  development  and  ICT  practices  enacted  in  their  classrooms. Teaching and 

Teacher Education, 73, 141-150.

 

Aliakbari,  F.,  Parvin,  N.,  Heidari,  M.,  &  Haghani,  F.  (2015).  Learning  theories 

application in nursing education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4.

 

Amabile,   T.   M.   (1983).   The   social   psychology   of   creativity:   A   componential 

conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

 

Amir, N. (2017). Developing a measurement tool of the effectiveness of the physical education 

teachers' teaching and learning process. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17, 127.

 

Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning  

about  science  in  the  twenty-first  century:  Exploring  the  abilities  and constraints of 

adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89-117.

 

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. 

R., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of 

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.

 

Angrosino,  M.  V.,  &  Mays  de  Pérez,  K.  A.  (2000).  Rethinking  observation:  From method to 

context. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 673-702.

 

Anwar,  M.  N.,  Aness,  M.,  Khizar,  A.,  Naseer,  M.,  &  Muhammad,  G.  (2012). Relationship of 

creative thinking with the academic achievements of secondary school students. International 

Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3), 44- 47.

 

Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis.

 

Ball, A. L., & Garton, B. L. (2005). Modeling higher order thinking: The alignment

between    objectives,    classroom    discourse,    and    assessments.    Journal    of 

Agricultural Education, 46(2), 58-69.

 

Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.

 

Barnes, C. W. (1961). A definition of science education: Curriculum research. Science Education, 

45(5), 394-396.

 

Becker-Weidman, E. G., Jacobs, R. H., Reinecke, M. A., Silva, S. G., & March, J. S. (2010).   

Social   problem-solving   among   adolescents   treated   for   depression. Behaviour Research and 

Therapy, 48(1), 11–18.

 

Beghetto,  R.  A.,  & Kaufman,  J.  C.  (2014).  Classroom  contexts  for creativity.  High Ability 

Studies, 25(1), 53-69.

 

Berland, E. (2013). Barriers to Creativity in Education: educators and parents grade the system 

(Adobe Systems, Inc).

 

Boden, M. (2001). Creativity and knowledge. Creativity in Education, 95-102. 

 

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Foundations of qualitative research in education.

Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods, 1-48.

 

Books, B., & Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.

 

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology.  Qualitative Research in 

Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887.

 

Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research 

interviewing. Aalborg, 24, 2017.

 

Brooks,  J.  G.,  &  Brooks,  M.  G.  (1993).  In  search  of  understanding.  The  case  for 

constructivist classrooms, 101-118.

 

Broussard, K., Murphy, L., & Fu, K. K. S. (2017). A descriptive study of the effect of K-12 design 

education on changes in self-esteem. In DS 87-9 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on 

Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 9: Design Education, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017 (pp. 

069-078).

 

Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. MIT press.

 

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.

 

Buchanan, B. G. (2001). Creativity at the metalevel: AAAI-2000 presidential address.

AI magazine, 22(3), 13.

 

Bullough Jr, R. V. (2012). Against best practice: Uncertainty, outliers and local studies

in educational research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 343-357.

 

Burdick,  A.,  &  Willis,  H.  (2011).  Digital  learning,  digital  scholarship  and  design 

thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546-556.

 

Bunyamin,  M.  A.  H.,  &  Finley,  F.  (2016,  January).  STEM  education  in  Malaysia: reviewing 

 the   current   physics   curriculum.   In   International   Conference   of Association for 

Science Teacher Education.

 

Canas,  J.  J.,  Fajardo,  I.,  & Salmeron,  L.  (2006).  Cognitive  flexibility.  International 

Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 1, 297-301.

 

Canas,  J.,  Quesada,  J.,  Antolí,  A.,  &  Fajardo,  I.  (2003).  Cognitive  flexibility  and 

adaptability  to  environmental  changes  in  dynamic  complex  problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 

46(5), 482-501.

 

Card,  S.  K.,  Mackinlay,  J.  D.,  &  Shneiderman,  B.  (1999).  Readings  in  information 

visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Kaufmann.

 

Carroll,  M.,  Goldman,  S.,  Britos,  L.,  Koh,  J.,  Royalty,  A.,  &  Hornstein,  M.  (2010). 

Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. 

International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.

 

Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science?. Hackett Publishing.

 

Chang,  S.-N.,  Yeung,  Y.-Y.  &  Hung  Cheng,  M.  (2009).  Ninth  graders’  learning interests, 

life experiences and attitude towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and 

Technology, 18(5), 447–457.

 

Chiam, C. L., Hong, H., Ning, F., & Tay, W. Y. (2014). Creative and critical thinking in Singapore 

schools.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Mcgraw-Hill Education.

 

Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching?

Review of the underpinning research.

 

Corebima,  A.  D.,  Susilo,  H.,  &  Zubaidah,  S.  (2017).  Creative  Thinking  of  Low Academic   

Student   Undergoing   Search   Solve   Create   and   Share   Learning Integrated      with      

Metacognitive      Strategy. International      Journal      of Instruction, 10(2).

 

Co?kun, E., & Alkan, M. (2017). Evaluation of learning and teaching process in Turkish courses. 

International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 387- 407.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qualitative inquiry and

research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2, 53-80.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. Educational Research: Planning,

Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Boston: Pearson, 

204-35.

 

Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd 

ed). Thousand.

 

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed 

methods approaches. Sage publications.

 

Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.

 

Croxford, L. (2002). Participation in science, engineering and technology at school and in higher 

education. Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.

 

Csikszentmihalyi,  M.  (2014).  Society,  culture,  and  person:  A  systems  view  of creativity. 

In The Systems Model of Creativity (pp. 47-61). Springer Netherlands.

 

Das,  A.  K.,  Nguyen,  Q.  T.,  Nguyen,  A.,  &  Thomas,  S.  (2018).  Flipping  Business 

Computing    Class:    An    Integration    of    Design    Thinking    and    Blended 

Implementation  in  the  Vietnamese  Educational  Culture.  In InSITE  2018:  Our Next Leap Forward 

(pp. 1-11). Informing Science Institute.

 

Darling-Hammond,  L.  (2001).  The  challenge  of  staffing  our  schools.  Educational Leadership, 

58(8), 12-17.

 

Davies,  M.  B.,  &  Hughes,  N.  (2014).  Doing  a  successful  research  project:  Using 

qualitative or quantitative methods. Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Day,  M.  C.  (1981).  Thinking  at  Piaget's  stage  of  formal  operations.  Educational 

Leadership, 39(1), 44-45.

 

Danielson, C., & McNeal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional 

practice.Alexandria,    VA:    Association    for    Supervision    and    Curriculum Development.

 

DeMarrais,  K.  (2004).  Qualitative  interview  studies:  Learning  through  experience. 

Foundations  for  research:  Methods  of  inquiry  in  education  and  the  social sciences, 1(1), 

51-68.

 

Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide. Berkshire. England: McGraw-Hill Education.

 

Donnelly, J. F. (2004). Humanizing science education. Science Education, 88(5), 762– 784.

 

Dörner, D. (1999). Approaching design thinking research. Design Studies, 20(5), 407-

415.

 

Dorst,  K.  (2011).  The  core  of  ‘design  thinking’and  its  application.  Design  studies,

32(6), 521-532.

Dweck,  C.,  &  Molden,  D.  C.  (2000).  Self  theories.  Handbook  of  competence  and

motivation, 122-140.

 

Fabil,  N.  &  Ismail,  Z.  (2005)  Visualisasi  maklumat  dalam  pendidikan  masa  kini.

Masalah Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Universiti of Malaya.

 

Feynman,   R.   P.   (1969). What   Is   Science.   The   Physics   Teacher,   7(6),   313– 320. 

doi:10.1119/1.2351388

 

Fisher,  R.  (2004).  What  is  creativity.  Unlocking  creativity:  Teaching  across  the 

curriculum, 6-20.

 

Fisher, R. (2006). Expanding minds: Developing creative thinking in young learners.

CATS: The IATEFL Young Learners SIG Journal, 5-9.

 

Fosnot,  C.  T.,  &  Perry,  R.  S.  (1996).  Constructivism:  A  psychological  theory  of 

learning. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2, 8-33.

 

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). The nature of qualitative research.  How to design and 

evaluate research in education, seventh edition.  Boston: McGraw- Hill, 420.

 

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth,  M.  

P.  (2014).  Active  learning  increases  student  performance  in science, engineering, and 

mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

 

Gaya, H. J., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic  

management  realm:  An  appropriate  research  design.  International Journal of Business 

Management & Economic Research, 7(2), 529-538.

 

Georgiev,  G.  V.  (2012).  Design  Thinking:  An  Overview  (<  Special  Issue>  Design Thinking). 

Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 20(1), 70- 77.

 

Ghani, M. Z., Yaacob, N. R. N., Ahmad, A. C., Aman, R. C., and Isa, Z. M. (2010). Perbezaan  

personaliti  kestabilan  emosi  dalam  kalangan  pelajar  Pintar  Cerdas Akademik  (PCA)  

berdasarkan  jantina  dan  jenis  sekolah  (Differences  in  the emotional  stability  among  

academically  talented  students  base  on  gender  and different type of schools). Asia Pacific 

Journal of Educators and Education.25, 153–167.

 

Ghani, M.A F., Siraj, S., Mohd, N., and Elham, F. (2011). School effectiveness and improvement 

practices in excellent schools in Malaysia and Brunei. Procedia -

Social and Behavioral Sciences.15, 1705–1712.

 

Ghofur, A. (2017). Creative Teaching. Okara: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(2).

 

 

Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and Learning Science in the 21st Century: Challenging Critical 

Assumptions in Post-Secondary Science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12.

 

Glense, G., & Peshkin, A. (1991). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.

White Plains, New York. Longman.

 

González, M. Á., González, M. Á., Martín, M. E., Llamas, C., Martínez, Ó., Vegas, J.,

... & Hernández, C. (2017). Teaching and learning physics with smartphones. In Blended Learning: 

Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 866- 885). IGI Global.

 

Goodson,  I.  F.,  & Sikes,  P. J. (2001).  Life history research in educational settings: Learning 

from lives. Open University Press.

 

Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study.

 

Griffiths, S. (2008). The experience of creative activity as a treatment medium. Journal of Mental 

Health, 17(1), 49-63.

 

Hadi, A. Z. S. A., Ramlee, M. R., & Amin, N. M. (2018). Enhancing Teaching and Learning  

Methodology  with  Computing  Visualization  in  Studies  of  Qiraat (Malaysia).

 

Haenen,   J.   (2001).   Outlining   the   teaching–learning   process:   Piotr   Gal'perin's 

contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 157-170.

 

Halverson, R., Kelley, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). How principals make sense of complex artifacts to 

shape local instructional practice. In W. K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational administration, 

policy, and reform: Research and measurement (pp. 153 – 188).Greenwich, CT: George F. Johnson.

 

Hannafin,  M.J.  and  Peck,  K.L.  (1988)  The  design  development  and  evaluation  of 

instructional software. Macmillan. Publishing Company, New York.

 

Haq, R., Shamim-ur-Rasool, S., & Anwar, M. N. (2012). A  comparison  of creative thinking     

abilities     of     high     and     low     achievers     secondary     school students. 

International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 23-28.

 

Haring-Smith,   T.   (2006).   Creativity   research   review:   Some   lessons   for   higher 

education. Peer Review, 8(2), 23.

 

Harpaz, Y. Teaching and learning: Analysis of the relationships.

 

Hatchuel,  A.,  &  Weil,  B.  (2009).  CK  design  theory:  An  advanced  formulation.

Research in Engineering Design, 19(4), 181.

 

Henriksen,  D.,  Richardson,  C.,  &  Mehta,  R.  (2017).  Design  thinking:  A  creative

approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153.

 

 

 

 

Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & dan Cepi, K. (2018). The Effectiveness of Enrichment Test  

Instruments  Design  to  Measure  Students’  Creative  Thinking  Skills  and Problem-Solving. 

Thinking Skills and Creativity.

 

Ho, M. K., MacGlashan, J., Littman, M. L., & Cushman, F. (2017). Social is special: A normative 

framework for teaching with and learning from evaluative feedback. Cognition, 167, 91-106.

 

Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009).  What is design knowledge and how do we teach it. Educating  

learning  technology  designers:  Guiding  and  inspiring  creators  of innovative educational 

tools, 19-35.

 

Hooda, m., & devi, r. (2017). Relationship of creative thinking abilities with family environment   

   and      intelligence      among      senior      secondary      school students. International 

education and research journal, 3(7).

 

Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review  of  

qualitative  case  study  reports.  International  journal  of  Qualitative Studies on Health and 

Well-being, 9(1), 23606.

 

Ilias,  K.  (2012).  Kesejahteraan  Sekolah  dan  Pencapaian  Akademik  Pelajar  Sekolah Berasrama 

Penuh (SBP) dan Maktab Rendah Sains Mara (MRSM) di Malaysia. Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Universiti 

Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.

 

Isman, A., Çaglar, M., Dabaj, F., & Ersözlü, H. (2005). A New Model for the World of Instructional  

Design:  A  New  Model. Turkish  Online  Journal  of  Educational Technology-TOJET, 4(3), 33-39.

 

Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument  

for  formative  and  summative  program  evaluation  of  a  teacher education program. Science 

Education, 92(6), 1096-1126.

 

Jenkins,  E.  W.  (2006).  The  student  voice  and  school  science  education.  Studies  in 

Science Education, 42(1), 49–88.

 

Jenkins,  E.,  & Nelson,  N.  W.  (2005).  Important  but  not  for  me:  Students’  attitudes 

towards   secondary   school   science   in   England.   Research   in   Science   & Technological 

Education, 23 (1), 41–57.

 

Jidesjö,  A.,  &  Danielsson,  Å.  (2016).  Student  experience  and  interest  in  science: 

Connections  and  relations  with  further  education. Nordic  Studies  in  Science

Education, 12(1), 36-55.

 

Johansson?Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and 

possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121- 146.

 

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. 

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.

 

Johari  Surif,  Nor  Hasniza  Ibrahim  &  Yusof  Arshad.  (2007).  Visualisasi  Dalam Pendidikan 

Sains : Ke Arah Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Yang Berkesan. Jurnal Pendidikan. 2, 26-40. Universiti 

Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai : Malaysia.

 

John,  E.  B.,  &  Meera,  K.  P.  (2014).  Effect  of  cooperative  learning  strategy  on  the 

creative thinking skills of secondary school students of Kozhikode District. IOSR Journal of 

Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 70-74.

 

Jung, E., Song, G., & Le, M. (2017, January). Role of Form-making Exercises in Design Education  

For  Creative  Thinking.  Hice  (Hawaii  International  Conference  On Education).

 

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. 

E-learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222.

 

Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us 

all. Crown Pub.

 

Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as   a   factor 

  in   adjusting   to   study  in   higher   education. Studies   in   Higher Education, 26(2), 

205-221.

 

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher 

knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 

127-140.

 

Khalidah, K. A., Rohani, S., and Mashitah, S. (2014). Ethical Values and Commitment Towards 

Achieving Excellence : A Study on Public Boarding School Students In Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. 

Sci. & Hum. 22(S), 33–50.

 

Kirschner,  P.  A.  (2015).  Do  we need  teachers  as  designers  of  technology enhanced 

learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309-322.

 

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The 

development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing 

Research, 32(2), 131-152.

 

Kostaris, C., Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Giannakos, M. Í., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Investigating 

the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 ICT teaching and learning: An action research 

study.  Journal of Educational Technology  &

Society, 20(1), 261.

 

Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting

knowledge  of  STEM.  International  Journal  of  Education  in  Mathematics, Science and 

Technology, 5(1), 21-28.

 

Krulik, S., Rudnick, J. A., & Milou, E. (2003). Teaching mathematics in middle school: A practical 

guide. Allyn and Bacon.

 

Kyle,  D.  (1980).  Curriculum  decisions:  Who  decides  what?.  Elementary  School Journal, 

81(2), 77 – 85.

 

Laporan TIMSS 2015- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study ISBN 978-983-3444-96-0. 

Laporan TIMSS 2015- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study Laman sesawang : 

www.moe.gov.my

 

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.

Cambridge university press.

 

Leverenz, C. S. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing.

Computers and Composition, 33, 1-12.

 

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, 75. Sage.

 

Lindahl,         B.         (2003).         Lust         attläranaturvetenskapochteknik?         En 

longitudinellstudieomvägen  till  gymnasiet.  Dissertation  (Göteborg  studies  in educational 

sciences 196), Göteborg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

 

Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research 

Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.

 

Lugmayr, A. (2011, September). Applying design thinking as a method for teaching in media 

education. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning 

Future Media Environments (pp. 332-334). ACM.

 

Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school 

science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (6), 591–613.

 

Mali,  A.,  &  Kumar,  P.  (2017).  Creative  Thinking  of  Secondary School  Students  in Relation 

to their School Type and Residential Background. Educational Quest, 8, 435.

 

Mali, A., & Kumar, P. (2017a). Creative thinking and socio-Demographic variables of secondary 

school students. IJAR, 3(4), 824-828.

 

Mantzicopoulos,  P.,  Samarapungavan,  A.  &  Patrick,  H.  (2009).  ‘We  learn  how  to predict 

and be a scientist’: Early science experiences and kindergarten children’s

social meanings about science. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 312–369.

 

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in

science.  International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685.

 

Mardiana,  H.,  Dharma,  U.  B.,  &  No,  J.  I.  B.  (2017).  Forecasting  Social  Media  As 

Potential  Tool  For  Teaching And  Learning Process  In  The  Classroom.  Jurnal Sains Terapan Dan 

Teknologi, 2(2).

 

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Data collection methods. Designing qualitative research, 

97-150.

 

McCutcheon,  G.  (1980).  How  do  elementary  school  teachers  plan?  The  nature  of planning 

and influences on it. The elementary school journal, 81(1), 4-23.

 

Melles,  G.,  Anderson,  N.,  Barrett,  T.,  &  Thompson-Whiteside,  S.  (2015).  Problem Finding 

through Design Thinking in Education. In Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A 

Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (pp. 191-209). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

 

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case study research and case study applications in education.

 

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative case study research. Qualitative research: A guide to design and 

implementation, 39-54.

 

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation

(3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.

 

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Designing your study and selecting a sample.

Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 73-104.

 

Meyer, C.B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4): 329– 352.

 

Miles,  M.  B.,  Huberman,  A.  M.,  Huberman,  M.  A.,  &  Huberman,  M.  (1994).

Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

 

Millar,  R.  (2006).  Twenty  first  century  science:   Insights  from  the  design  and 

implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of 

Science Education, 28 (13), 1499–1521.

 

Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting 

point  for  inquiry in  primary science.  Science  Education  International, 21(2), 102–115.

 

OECD/PISA (2006). PISA 2006 technical report. Publication 02/02/2009. OECD 2009. Oppenheim,   A.   

N.   (2000).   Questionnaire   design,   interviewing   and   attitude

measurement. London: Continuum.

 

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A

framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017.

 

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of  mind:  

Extending  the  TPACK  framework  towards  21st  century  learning. Educational Technology, 22-28.

 

Mishra,  P.,  &  Mehta,  R.  (2017).  What  we  educators  get  wrong  about  21st-Century 

learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19.

 

Muhriz, T. ’Abidin, Abdullah, A., and Jan, W. S. W. (2011). Pilihan, persaingan dan peranan sektor 

swasta dalam sistem sekolah Malaysia.

 

Nachiappan, S., Osman,  Z., Hassan,  N. M.,  Jamil, N., Hussein,  H., Othman, M.,  & Suffian,  S.  

(2018).  An  Analysis  of  the  Criteria  and  Effectiveness  of  Using Teaching Aids in Preschool 

Science and Technology Components in Malaysia. International  Journal  of  Academic  Research  in  

Progressive  Education  and Development, 7(1), 63–82.

 

Najihah Mustaffa, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohamad Said (2017). 

Integrating Algebraic Thinking in Problem-Based Learning Among Secondary   School   Students.   

Universiti   Teknologi   Malaysia.   Doctor   of Philosophy.

 

Nicholls,  J.  G.  (1989).  The  competitive  ethos  and  democratic  education.  Harvard 

University Press.

 

Norton,  P.,  &  Hathaway,  D.  (2015).  In  search  of  a  teacher  education  curriculum: 

appropriating   a   design   lens   to   solve   problems   of   practice.   Educational 

Technology, 3-14.

 

Nurjaman, A., & Sari, I. P. (2017). The Effect Of Problem Posing Approach Towards 

Students’mathematical Disposition, Critical & Creative Thinking Ability Based On School Level. 

Infinity Journal, 6(1), 69-76.

 

Nwachukwu, T. A., & Iordaah, T. A. (2016). Effect Of Training On Junior And Senior Secondary School 

Students’creative Thinking Performance. Sustainable Human Development Review, 1(4).Oaks, Ca: Sage.

 

OECD.  (2013).  Pisa  2012  Assessment  And  Analytical  Framework-Mathematics, Reading, Science, 

Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Oecd.

 

Owen,  C.  (2007).  Design  thinking:  Notes  on  its  nature  and  use.  Design  Research 

Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.

 

Patton,   M.   Q.   (1990).   Qualitative   evaluation   and   research   methods.   SAGE

Publications, inc.

 

Payne,  D., &  Zimmerman, T. (2010). The  Inclusion of Environmental Education in

Science teacher Education. The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education, 

81–94.

 

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker.

Cambridge University Press.

 

Pendleton-Jullian, A. M., & Brown, J. S. (2015).  Design unbound: Evolving  design literacy 

pathways of efficacy. CreateSpace (distributor).

 

Peng, C. F., & Nadaraja, S. (2016). Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif Dan Kritis Dalam  

Pengajaran  Dan  Pembelajaran  Komsas  Di  Sekolah  Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 

4(2), 10-24.

 

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.

 

Pinnegar, S., & Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically. Handbook of 

narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology, 3-34.

 

PISA 2015- Programme For International Student Assessment ISBN 978-983-3444-97-

7   PISA   2015-   Programme   For   International   Student   Assessment.   Laman sesawang : 

www.moe.gov.my/v/bppdp

 

Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. Springer

 

Preja,  C.  A.,  Grosu,  E.  F.,  &  Grosu,  V.  T.  (2017).  The  Development  Of  Creative 

Thinking In Children In Secondary Schools. Gymnasium, 15(1).

 

Pugh, K. J. & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art, and Experience: Constructing science pedagogy from 

Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9–27.

 

Pukdeewut,  S.,  Chantarasombat,  C.,  & Satapornwong,  P.  (2013).  Creative  Thinking Development 

Program for Learning Activity Management of Secondary School Teachers. International Education 

Studies, 6(12), 82.

 

Rahman, S., Surat, S., & Azmi, N. H. (2017). Creativity and Teaching Strategies in Institution of 

Higher Learning. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 865-868.

 

Razali, F. B., Talib, O. B., & Othman, A. B. (2017). Aplikasi Kemahiran Proses Sains Dalam 

Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah Untuk Mata Pelajaran Biologi. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran 

Asia Pasifik, 4(3), 38-46.

 

Razik, T. (1966). Recent findings and developments in creativity studies. Theory into Practice, 

5(4), 160-165.

 

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?.

Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.

 

Reilly, E. M. (2018). Performance in Math and Science by English Language

Learners. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-5.

 

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.

 

Rizk, N. M. H., Attia, K. A. M., & Al-Jundi, A. A. H. (2017). The Impact of

Metacognition Strategies in Teaching Mathematics among Innovative Thinking

Students in Primary School, Rafha, KSA. International Journal of English

Linguistics, 7(3), 103.

 

Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. John Wiley & Sons.

 

Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. 2nd. Edition. Blackwell Publishing. Malden.

 

Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2017). People, passions, problems: The role

of creative exemplars in teaching for creativity. In Creative contradictions in

education (pp. 143-164). Springer, Cham.

 

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational leadership,

67(1), 16-21.

 

Saçkes, M., Cabe Trundle, K., Bell, R. L. & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of

early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later

science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235.

 

Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than

meets the eye?. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352.

 

Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic

interactional view. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational

considerations, 111-138.

 

Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model

and its constructivist framework. Educational technology, 35(5), 31-38.

 

Seale, C. (2002). Quality issues in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1),

97-110.

 

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in

education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.

 

Sequeira, A. H. (2012). Introduction to concepts of teaching and learning.

 

Shute, V. J., & Torres, R. (2012). Where streams converge: Using evidence-centered

design to assess Quest to Learn. Technology-based assessments for 21st century

skills: Theoretical and practical implications from modern research, 91124.

 

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE

Publications Limited.

 

Soper, J. C., Walstad, W. B., Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., Madaus, G. F., & Vanfossen,

P. J. (2003). Views from the Classroom : Teachers ’. Theory & Research in Social

Education, 28(3), 391–410.

 

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

 

Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press.

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom and its relations to intelligence and creativity. Wisdom:

Its nature, origins, and development, 142-159.

 

Taber, K. S., & Akpan, B. (Eds.). (2016). Science Education: An International Course

Companion. Springer.

 

Tan, L. S., Lee, S. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., Koh, E. R., & Tan, K. C. K. (2016). Fostering

Creativity in the Classroom for High Ability Students: Context Does

Matter. Education Sciences, 6(4), 36.

 

Teh, N. C., Isa, N. H., & Omar, A. (2018). Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills in

Literature Class via Critical Thinking Module (CTM). ASIAN TEFL, 1(1).

 

Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review

of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6): 511–521

 

Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of

creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, 43.

 

Türkmen, H., & Sertkahya, M. (2015). Creative Thinking Skills Analyzes Of

Vocational High School Students. Journal Of Educational & Instructional

Studies In The World, 5(1).

 

Vani, K. S. (2016). A Study of Creative Thinking of Secondary School Teachers in

West Godawari District. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(8).

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological

processes. Harvard university press.

 

Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12-18.

 

Wellington, J. (2001). What is science education for? Canadian Journal of Science,

Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(1), 23–38.

 

Weisman, D. L. (2012). An essay on the art and science of teaching. The American

Economist, 57(1), 111-125.

 

Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.). (1986). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian

perspectives. CUP Archive.

 

Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of Learning and Teaching: What Do

They Mean for Educators? Working Paper. National Education Association

Research Department.

 

Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.

 

Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage.

 

Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Guo, D. (2018). Embodied Cognition From the Perspective of

Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural Theory. Philosophy, 8(8), 362-367.

 

Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement

orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 83(2), 261.

 

Ziman, J. (2002). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge University

Press.

 

Zulkpli, Z., Mohamed, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Assessing Mathematics

Teachers’ Knowledge in Teaching Thinking Skills. Sains Humanika, 9(1-4).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)