UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This case study was conducted qualitatively to explore and understand the process
through Science Creative Teaching Design (SCTD) implementation. Seven informants
including two Science teachers and five form two students from selected boarding
school were involved in this research. Data were collected through in-depth semistructured
interviews, observations, document analysis and field notes. The data were
further analyzed through coding, categorizing and sub- themes to develop the main
themes. This research found that, SCTD tool was feasible for Science teachers,
improves both teachers’ and students’ emotions against stressful and less innovative
teaching and learning. Informants have practiced almost all suggested creative
strategies, hence, demonstrated creative teaching and learning and active teaching.
Thinking culture was found amongst students and teachers as they attained creative
thinking characteristics such as cognitive flexibility, originality thinking, fluency
thinking, elaboration thinking, evaluating own works and making decision. The
students displayed higher order thinking skills such as analyzing, evaluating and
creating and found to develop skill sets such as communication skills, self-confidence
and team work skills. Thus, a novel framework of SCTD is successfully designed to
enhance teaching and learning in Science. In conclusion, this research promotes a better
understanding and exploration on creative teaching and learning through a systematic
guide on design thinking and creative skills. This implies that, Science teachers may
use SCTD tool to produce a high impact and interesting teaching and learning for the
students. |
References |
Abdulla, A. M., & Cramond, B. (2017). After six decades of systematic study of creativity: what do teachers need to know about what it is and how it is measured?. Roeper Review, 39(1), 9-23.
Ahmad, S., Ch, A. H., Batool, A., Sittar, K., & Malik, M. (2016). Play and Cognitive Development: Formal Operational Perspective of Piaget's Theory. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28), 72-79.
Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of the Inquiry-Based Project Application in Science Education upon Turkish Science teachers’ Perspectives. Education, 129.2 (Winter 2008), 202–215.
Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141-150.
Aliakbari, F., Parvin, N., Heidari, M., & Haghani, F. (2015). Learning theories application in nursing education. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.
Amir, N. (2017). Developing a measurement tool of the effectiveness of the physical education teachers' teaching and learning process. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 17, 127.
Anderman, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Gray, D. L. (2012). The challenges of teaching and learning about science in the twenty-first century: Exploring the abilities and constraints of adolescent learners. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 89-117.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, abridged edition. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Angrosino, M. V., & Mays de Pérez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 673-702.
Anwar, M. N., Aness, M., Khizar, A., Naseer, M., & Muhammad, G. (2012). Relationship of creative thinking with the academic achievements of secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(3), 44- 47.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis.
Ball, A. L., & Garton, B. L. (2005). Modeling higher order thinking: The alignment between objectives, classroom discourse, and assessments. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(2), 58-69.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
Barnes, C. W. (1961). A definition of science education: Curriculum research. Science Education, 45(5), 394-396.
Becker-Weidman, E. G., Jacobs, R. H., Reinecke, M. A., Silva, S. G., & March, J. S. (2010). Social problem-solving among adolescents treated for depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(1), 11–18.
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53-69.
Berland, E. (2013). Barriers to Creativity in Education: educators and parents grade the system (Adobe Systems, Inc).
Boden, M. (2001). Creativity and knowledge. Creativity in Education, 95-102.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Foundations of qualitative research in education. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods, 1-48.
Books, B., & Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887.
Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Aalborg, 24, 2017.
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding. The case for constructivist classrooms, 101-118.
Broussard, K., Murphy, L., & Fu, K. K. S. (2017). A descriptive study of the effect of K-12 design education on changes in self-esteem. In DS 87-9 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 9: Design Education, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25.08. 2017 (pp. 069-078).
Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. MIT press.
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.
Buchanan, B. G. (2001). Creativity at the metalevel: AAAI-2000 presidential address. AI magazine, 22(3), 13.
Bullough Jr, R. V. (2012). Against best practice: Uncertainty, outliers and local studies in educational research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(3), 343-357.
Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 546-556.
Bunyamin, M. A. H., & Finley, F. (2016, January). STEM education in Malaysia: reviewing the current physics curriculum. In International Conference of Association for Science Teacher Education.
Canas, J. J., Fajardo, I., & Salmeron, L. (2006). Cognitive flexibility. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 1, 297-301.
Canas, J., Quesada, J., Antolí, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46(5), 482-501.
Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Francisco, CA: Kaufmann.
Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37-53.
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science?. Hackett Publishing.
Chang, S.-N., Yeung, Y.-Y. & Hung Cheng, M. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitude towards science & technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 447–457.
Chiam, C. L., Hong, H., Ning, F., & Tay, W. Y. (2014). Creative and critical thinking in Singapore schools.
Chua, Y. P. (2012). Mastering research methods. Mcgraw-Hill Education.
Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014). What makes great teaching? Review of the underpinning research.
Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). Creative Thinking of Low Academic Student Undergoing Search Solve Create and Share Learning Integrated with Metacognitive Strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2).
Co?kun, E., & Alkan, M. (2017). Evaluation of learning and teaching process in Turkish courses. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(3), 387- 407.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2, 53-80.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Boston: Pearson, 204-35.
Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed). Thousand.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berg.
Croxford, L. (2002). Participation in science, engineering and technology at school and in higher education. Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In The Systems Model of Creativity (pp. 47-61). Springer Netherlands.
Das, A. K., Nguyen, Q. T., Nguyen, A., & Thomas, S. (2018). Flipping Business Computing Class: An Integration of Design Thinking and Blended Implementation in the Vietnamese Educational Culture. In InSITE 2018: Our Next Leap Forward (pp. 1-11). Informing Science Institute.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The challenge of staffing our schools. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 12-17.
Davies, M. B., & Hughes, N. (2014). Doing a successful research project: Using qualitative or quantitative methods. Palgrave Macmillan.
Day, M. C. (1981). Thinking at Piaget's stage of formal operations. Educational Leadership, 39(1), 44-45.
Danielson, C., & McNeal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
DeMarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences, 1(1), 51-68.
Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide. Berkshire. England: McGraw-Hill Education.
Donnelly, J. F. (2004). Humanizing science education. Science Education, 88(5), 762– 784.
Dörner, D. (1999). Approaching design thinking research. Design Studies, 20(5), 407- 415.
Dorst, K. (2011). The core of ‘design thinking’and its application. Design studies, 32(6), 521-532. Dweck, C., & Molden, D. C. (2000). Self theories. Handbook of competence and motivation, 122-140.
Fabil, N. & Ismail, Z. (2005) Visualisasi maklumat dalam pendidikan masa kini. Masalah Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Universiti of Malaya.
Feynman, R. P. (1969). What Is Science. The Physics Teacher, 7(6), 313– 320. doi:10.1119/1.2351388
Fisher, R. (2004). What is creativity. Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum, 6-20.
Fisher, R. (2006). Expanding minds: Developing creative thinking in young learners. CATS: The IATEFL Young Learners SIG Journal, 5-9.
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice, 2, 8-33.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). The nature of qualitative research. How to design and evaluate research in education, seventh edition. Boston: McGraw- Hill, 420.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.
Gaya, H. J., & Smith, E. E. (2016). Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: An appropriate research design. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 7(2), 529-538.
Georgiev, G. V. (2012). Design Thinking: An Overview (< Special Issue> Design Thinking). Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 20(1), 70- 77.
Ghani, M. Z., Yaacob, N. R. N., Ahmad, A. C., Aman, R. C., and Isa, Z. M. (2010). Perbezaan personaliti kestabilan emosi dalam kalangan pelajar Pintar Cerdas Akademik (PCA) berdasarkan jantina dan jenis sekolah (Differences in the emotional stability among academically talented students base on gender and different type of schools). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education.25, 153–167.
Ghani, M.A F., Siraj, S., Mohd, N., and Elham, F. (2011). School effectiveness and improvement practices in excellent schools in Malaysia and Brunei. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.15, 1705–1712.
Ghofur, A. (2017). Creative Teaching. Okara: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 6(2).
Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and Learning Science in the 21st Century: Challenging Critical Assumptions in Post-Secondary Science. Education Sciences, 8(1), 12.
Glense, G., & Peshkin, A. (1991). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, New York. Longman.
González, M. Á., González, M. Á., Martín, M. E., Llamas, C., Martínez, Ó., Vegas, J., ... & Hernández, C. (2017). Teaching and learning physics with smartphones. In Blended Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 866- 885). IGI Global.
Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. J. (2001). Life history research in educational settings: Learning from lives. Open University Press.
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study.
Griffiths, S. (2008). The experience of creative activity as a treatment medium. Journal of Mental Health, 17(1), 49-63.
Hadi, A. Z. S. A., Ramlee, M. R., & Amin, N. M. (2018). Enhancing Teaching and Learning Methodology with Computing Visualization in Studies of Qiraat (Malaysia).
Haenen, J. (2001). Outlining the teaching–learning process: Piotr Gal'perin's contribution. Learning and Instruction, 11(2), 157-170.
Halverson, R., Kelley, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). How principals make sense of complex artifacts to shape local instructional practice. In W. K. Hoy & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement (pp. 153 – 188).Greenwich, CT: George F. Johnson.
Hannafin, M.J. and Peck, K.L. (1988) The design development and evaluation of instructional software. Macmillan. Publishing Company, New York.
Haq, R., Shamim-ur-Rasool, S., & Anwar, M. N. (2012). A comparison of creative thinking abilities of high and low achievers secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 23-28.
Haring-Smith, T. (2006). Creativity research review: Some lessons for higher education. Peer Review, 8(2), 23.
Harpaz, Y. Teaching and learning: Analysis of the relationships.
Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). CK design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19(4), 181.
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Mehta, R. (2017). Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 140-153.
Hidayat, T., Susilaningsih, E., & dan Cepi, K. (2018). The Effectiveness of Enrichment Test Instruments Design to Measure Students’ Creative Thinking Skills and Problem-Solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
Ho, M. K., MacGlashan, J., Littman, M. L., & Cushman, F. (2017). Social is special: A normative framework for teaching with and learning from evaluative feedback. Cognition, 167, 91-106.
Hoadley, C., & Cox, C. (2009). What is design knowledge and how do we teach it. Educating learning technology designers: Guiding and inspiring creators of innovative educational tools, 19-35.
Hooda, m., & devi, r. (2017). Relationship of creative thinking abilities with family environment and intelligence among senior secondary school students. International education and research journal, 3(7).
Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), 23606.
Ilias, K. (2012). Kesejahteraan Sekolah dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Sekolah Berasrama Penuh (SBP) dan Maktab Rendah Sains Mara (MRSM) di Malaysia. Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjung Malim.
Isman, A., Çaglar, M., Dabaj, F., & Ersözlü, H. (2005). A New Model for the World of Instructional Design: A New Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 4(3), 33-39.
Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096-1126.
Jenkins, E. W. (2006). The student voice and school science education. Studies in Science Education, 42(1), 49–88.
Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23 (1), 41–57.
Jidesjö, A., & Danielsson, Å. (2016). Student experience and interest in science: Connections and relations with further education. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(1), 36-55.
Johansson?Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Çetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121- 146.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83.
Johari Surif, Nor Hasniza Ibrahim & Yusof Arshad. (2007). Visualisasi Dalam Pendidikan Sains : Ke Arah Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Yang Berkesan. Jurnal Pendidikan. 2, 26-40. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Skudai : Malaysia.
John, E. B., & Meera, K. P. (2014). Effect of cooperative learning strategy on the creative thinking skills of secondary school students of Kozhikode District. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 70-74.
Jung, E., Song, G., & Le, M. (2017, January). Role of Form-making Exercises in Design Education For Creative Thinking. Hice (Hawaii International Conference On Education).
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222.
Kelley, D., & Kelley, T. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Pub.
Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 205-221.
Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140.
Khalidah, K. A., Rohani, S., and Mashitah, S. (2014). Ethical Values and Commitment Towards Achieving Excellence : A Study on Public Boarding School Students In Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum. 22(S), 33–50.
Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309-322.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
Kostaris, C., Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., Giannakos, M. Í., & Pelliccione, L. (2017). Investigating the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 ICT teaching and learning: An action research study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 261.
Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of STEM. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 21-28.
Krulik, S., Rudnick, J. A., & Milou, E. (2003). Teaching mathematics in middle school: A practical guide. Allyn and Bacon.
Kyle, D. (1980). Curriculum decisions: Who decides what?. Elementary School Journal, 81(2), 77 – 85.
Laporan TIMSS 2015- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study ISBN 978-983-3444-96-0. Laporan TIMSS 2015- Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study Laman sesawang : www.moe.gov.my
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
Leverenz, C. S. (2014). Design thinking and the wicked problem of teaching writing. Computers and Composition, 33, 1-12.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry, 75. Sage.
Lindahl, B. (2003). Lust attläranaturvetenskapochteknik? En longitudinellstudieomvägen till gymnasiet. Dissertation (Göteborg studies in educational sciences 196), Göteborg, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
Lugmayr, A. (2011, September). Applying design thinking as a method for teaching in media education. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 332-334). ACM.
Lyons, T. (2006). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (6), 591–613.
Mali, A., & Kumar, P. (2017). Creative Thinking of Secondary School Students in Relation to their School Type and Residential Background. Educational Quest, 8, 435.
Mali, A., & Kumar, P. (2017a). Creative thinking and socio-Demographic variables of secondary school students. IJAR, 3(4), 824-828.
Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A. & Patrick, H. (2009). ‘We learn how to predict and be a scientist’: Early science experiences and kindergarten children’s social meanings about science. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 312–369.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685.
Mardiana, H., Dharma, U. B., & No, J. I. B. (2017). Forecasting Social Media As Potential Tool For Teaching And Learning Process In The Classroom. Jurnal Sains Terapan Dan Teknologi, 2(2).
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Data collection methods. Designing qualitative research, 97-150.
McCutcheon, G. (1980). How do elementary school teachers plan? The nature of planning and influences on it. The elementary school journal, 81(1), 4-23.
Melles, G., Anderson, N., Barrett, T., & Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2015). Problem Finding through Design Thinking in Education. In Inquiry-Based Learning for Multidisciplinary Programs: A Conceptual and Practical Resource for Educators (pp. 191-209). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Case study research and case study applications in education.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative case study research. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 39-54.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (3rd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Designing your study and selecting a sample. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, 73-104.
Meyer, C.B. (2001). A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13(4): 329– 352.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., Huberman, M. A., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (13), 1499–1521.
Milne, I. (2010). A sense of wonder, arising from aesthetic experiences, should be the starting point for inquiry in primary science. Science Education International, 21(2), 102–115.
OECD/PISA (2006). PISA 2006 technical report. Publication 02/02/2009. OECD 2009. Oppenheim, A. N. (2000). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017.
Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 22-28.
Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-Century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6-19.
Muhriz, T. ’Abidin, Abdullah, A., and Jan, W. S. W. (2011). Pilihan, persaingan dan peranan sektor swasta dalam sistem sekolah Malaysia.
Nachiappan, S., Osman, Z., Hassan, N. M., Jamil, N., Hussein, H., Othman, M., & Suffian, S. (2018). An Analysis of the Criteria and Effectiveness of Using Teaching Aids in Preschool Science and Technology Components in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(1), 63–82.
Najihah Mustaffa, Zaleha Ismail, Zaidatun Tasir & Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohamad Said (2017). Integrating Algebraic Thinking in Problem-Based Learning Among Secondary School Students. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Doctor of Philosophy.
Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Harvard University Press.
Norton, P., & Hathaway, D. (2015). In search of a teacher education curriculum: appropriating a design lens to solve problems of practice. Educational Technology, 3-14.
Nurjaman, A., & Sari, I. P. (2017). The Effect Of Problem Posing Approach Towards Students’mathematical Disposition, Critical & Creative Thinking Ability Based On School Level. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 69-76.
Nwachukwu, T. A., & Iordaah, T. A. (2016). Effect Of Training On Junior And Senior Secondary School Students’creative Thinking Performance. Sustainable Human Development Review, 1(4).Oaks, Ca: Sage.
OECD. (2013). Pisa 2012 Assessment And Analytical Framework-Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Oecd.
Owen, C. (2007). Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use. Design Research Quarterly, 2(1), 16-27.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Payne, D., & Zimmerman, T. (2010). The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science teacher Education. The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education, 81–94.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
Pendleton-Jullian, A. M., & Brown, J. S. (2015). Design unbound: Evolving design literacy pathways of efficacy. CreateSpace (distributor).
Peng, C. F., & Nadaraja, S. (2016). Pelaksanaan Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif Dan Kritis Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Komsas Di Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 4(2), 10-24.
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Pinnegar, S., & Daynes, J. G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically. Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology, 3-34.
PISA 2015- Programme For International Student Assessment ISBN 978-983-3444-97- 7 PISA 2015- Programme For International Student Assessment. Laman sesawang : www.moe.gov.my/v/bppdp
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2012). Design thinking research. Springer
Preja, C. A., Grosu, E. F., & Grosu, V. T. (2017). The Development Of Creative Thinking In Children In Secondary Schools. Gymnasium, 15(1).
Pugh, K. J. & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art, and Experience: Constructing science pedagogy from Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9–27.
Pukdeewut, S., Chantarasombat, C., & Satapornwong, P. (2013). Creative Thinking Development Program for Learning Activity Management of Secondary School Teachers. International Education Studies, 6(12), 82.
Rahman, S., Surat, S., & Azmi, N. H. (2017). Creativity and Teaching Strategies in Institution of Higher Learning. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 865-868.
Razali, F. B., Talib, O. B., & Othman, A. B. (2017). Aplikasi Kemahiran Proses Sains Dalam Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah Untuk Mata Pelajaran Biologi. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(3), 38-46.
Razik, T. (1966). Recent findings and developments in creativity studies. Theory into Practice, 5(4), 160-165.
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important?. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330-348.
Reilly, E. M. (2018). Performance in Math and Science by English Language Learners. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-5.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Rizk, N. M. H., Attia, K. A. M., & Al-Jundi, A. A. H. (2017). The Impact of Metacognition Strategies in Teaching Mathematics among Innovative Thinking Students in Primary School, Rafha, KSA. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 103.
Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. John Wiley & Sons.
Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. 2nd. Edition. Blackwell Publishing. Malden.
Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2017). People, passions, problems: The role of creative exemplars in teaching for creativity. In Creative contradictions in education (pp. 143-164). Springer, Cham.
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). 21st century. Educational leadership, 67(1), 16-21.
Saçkes, M., Cabe Trundle, K., Bell, R. L. & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217–235.
Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye?. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352.
Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamic interactional view. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, 111-138.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Seale, C. (2002). Quality issues in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1(1), 97-110.
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
Sequeira, A. H. (2012). Introduction to concepts of teaching and learning.
Shute, V. J., & Torres, R. (2012). Where streams converge: Using evidence-centered design to assess Quest to Learn. Technology-based assessments for 21st century skills: Theoretical and practical implications from modern research, 91124.
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications Limited.
Soper, J. C., Walstad, W. B., Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., Madaus, G. F., & Vanfossen, P. J. (2003). Views from the Classroom : Teachers ’. Theory & Research in Social Education, 28(3), 391–410.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. Guilford Press. Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom and its relations to intelligence and creativity. Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development, 142-159.
Taber, K. S., & Akpan, B. (Eds.). (2016). Science Education: An International Course Companion. Springer.
Tan, L. S., Lee, S. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., Koh, E. R., & Tan, K. C. K. (2016). Fostering Creativity in the Classroom for High Ability Students: Context Does Matter. Education Sciences, 6(4), 36.
Teh, N. C., Isa, N. H., & Omar, A. (2018). Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills in Literature Class via Critical Thinking Module (CTM). ASIAN TEFL, 1(1).
Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6): 511–521
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, 43.
Türkmen, H., & Sertkahya, M. (2015). Creative Thinking Skills Analyzes Of Vocational High School Students. Journal Of Educational & Instructional Studies In The World, 5(1).
Vani, K. S. (2016). A Study of Creative Thinking of Secondary School Teachers in West Godawari District. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(8).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Watson, A. D. (2015). Design thinking for life. Art Education, 68(3), 12-18.
Wellington, J. (2001). What is science education for? Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 1(1), 23–38.
Weisman, D. L. (2012). An essay on the art and science of teaching. The American Economist, 57(1), 111-125.
Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.). (1986). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. CUP Archive.
Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of Learning and Teaching: What Do They Mean for Educators? Working Paper. National Education Association Research Department.
Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. Sage.
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zhang, X., Wang, H., & Guo, D. (2018). Embodied Cognition From the Perspective of Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural Theory. Philosophy, 8(8), 362-367.
Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261.
Ziman, J. (2002). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge University Press.
Zulkpli, Z., Mohamed, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Assessing Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge in Teaching Thinking Skills. Sains Humanika, 9(1-4).
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |