UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan kesan strategi pengajaran integrasi Kandungan,
Perwakilan dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi (KP-KBAT) terhadap pencapaian dan
sikap murid tingkatan 4 dalam penyelesaian masalah algebra. Reka bentuk kajian yang
digunakan ialah kuasi eksperimen ujian pra-pasca kumpulan kawalan tidak setara.
Sampel kajian terdiri daripada dua buah kelas berjumlah 42 murid Tingkatan 4 yang
dipilih secara rawak berkelompok daripada sebuah sekolah di daerah Kulim Bandar
Baharu, Kedah. Kumpulan eksperimen (24 murid) menjalani pengajaran strategi KPKBAT
manakala kumpulan kawalan (18 murid) menjalani Strategi Pengajaran
Konvensional (SPK) bagi topik Ungkapan dan Persamaan Kuadratik. Dua jenis
instrumen digunakan bagi mengumpul data iaitu Ujian Pra dan Pasca Pencapaian
Ungkapan dan Persamaan Kuadratik dan Soal Selidik Sikap terhadap Penyelesaian
Masalah. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif iaitu min dan sisihan piawai,
disusuli dengan analisis statistik inferensi menggunakan Analisis Kovarian
(ANCOVA). Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa apabila pra ujian pencapaian
dijadikan kovariat, didapati tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan [F(1, 39) = 0.78 ,
p > 0.05] bagi markah ujian pasca antara kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.
Walau bagaimanapun, kumpulan eksperimen [(min = 17.00, s.p. = 4.93)] menunjukkan
min markah pencapaian yang lebih tinggi daripada kumpulan kawalan [(min = 16.56,
s.p. = 4.58)]. Seterusnya, apabila skor soal selidik pra sikap terhadap penyelesaian
masalah dijadikan kovariat, didapati terdapat perbezaan signifikan [F(1, 39) = 9.53, p
< 0.05] bagi skor soal selidik pasca antara kumpulan eksperimen dan kawalan.
Kumpulan eksperimen (min = 64.75, s.p. = 5.42) menunjukkan min skor soal selidik
yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kumpulan kawalan [(min = 60.39, s.p. = 5.40)].
Kesimpulannya, pengajaran menggunakan strategi KP-KBAT tidak memberi kesan
terhadap pencapaian murid, tetapi ia memberi kesan ke atas sikap murid terhadap
penyelesaian masalah bagi topik Ungkapan dan Persamaan Kuadratik. Implikasinya,
strategi KP-KBAT merupakan satu strategi alternatif dalam pengajaran penyelesaian
masalah algebra dan boleh diaplikasi secara umumnya dalam pengajaran dan
pembelajaran matematik kerana sikap positif terhadap penyelesaian masalah matematik
boleh memberi impak terhadap prestasi murid. |
References |
Abdul Jalil Othman & Bahtiar Omar (2005). Aplikasi pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme dalam pengajaran karangan berpandu. Masalah Pendidikan, 28, 221-232.
Abrahamson, D. (2006). Mathematical representations as conceptual composites: Implications for design. In Proceedings of the twenty eighth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 2, 464-466.
Adiguzel, T., & Akpinar, Y. (2004). Improving school children's mathematical word problem solving skills through computer-based multiple representations. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 27(1), 19-23.
Aiken L. R. (1996). Rating Scales and Checklists: Evaluating Behavior, Personality, and Attitudes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Akkus, O., & Cakiroglu, E. (2009). The effects of multiple representations-based instruction on seventh grade students‘algebra performance. Proceedings CERME 6, 420 – 429. Dicapai daripada http://fractus.uson.mx/Papers/CERME6/wg4-01- akkus-cakiroglu.pdf.
Amirali, M. (2010). Students‘ conceptions of the nature of mathematics and attitudes towards mathematics learning. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 4(1), 27-41.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwol, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Arslan, C., Yavuz, G., & Deringol-Karatas, Y. (2014). Attitudes of Elementary School Students towards Solving Mathematics Problems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 557-562.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen. C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. California: Thomson Wadsworth.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton Inc.
Azizi Yahaya & Shahrin Hashim (2010). Bab 6: Sumbangan sikap terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Matematik. Dlm. Yusof Boon & Seth Sulaiman (Ed.), Permasalahan dalam pendidikan Sains dan Matematik (hlm. 109-122). Johor: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Azrul Fahmi Ismail & Marlina Ali (2007). Analisis kesilapan dalam tajuk ungkapan algebra di kalangan pelajar tingkatan empat. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor, 17 (1), 20-30.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2012). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Spesifikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan 4. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum (2016). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Barnet, J. C., Sowder, L., & Vos, K. E. (1980). Textbook problems: supplementing and understanding them. In Krulik, S.(Ed.), Problem solving in school mathematics: NCTM yearbook 1980, 334-371.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
Bodner, G. M., & Domin, D. S. (2000). Mental models: The role of representations in problem solving in chemistry. University Chemistry Education, 4, 24-30.
Bohner, G., & Wänke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Burden, R. L. (2010). What is a thinking school? Creative Teaching & Learning, 1 (2), 22-26.
Campbell & Stanley (1963). Dalam Nurulwahida Azid @ Aziz, Hairul Nizam Ismail & Ridzuan Hashim (2014). Kesan Penerapan Kepelbagaian Kecerdasan dan Kemahiran Berfikir Analitis Melalui Aktiviti Pengayaan Bermodul, Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, Vol. 29, 141–153.
Capraro, M. M., & Joffrion, H. (2006). Algebraic equations: Can middle-school students meaningfully translate from words to mathematical symbols? Reading Psychology, 27, 147-164.
Charles, R., Lester, F., & O'Daffer, P. (1987), How to Evaluate Progress in Problem Solving, Reston, VA: NCTM.
Charles, L., Lester, F., & O‘Daffer, P. (1997). How to evaluate progress in problem solving NCTM. Reston: Virginia.
Chazan, D. (1996). Algebra for all students?: The algebra policy debate. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 455-477.
Cheang Chooi Yoong, Kamaruzaman Moidunny, Khaw Phoay Eng, Yong Kien Cheng.(2011). Matematik Tingkatan 4. Malaysia: Cerdik Publications Sdn. Bhd.
Coakes, S. J., Steed, L., & Ong, C. (2009). SPSS: analysis without anguish: version 16 for Windows: Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, (2?? ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Association Pub.
Çokçali?kan, H. (2012). A Study On Inservice Teachers’attitudes Toward And Beliefs About Mathematical Problem Solving. Tesis Ph.D, Middle East Technical University). Dicapai daripada https://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12615078/index.pdf.
Confrey, J. (1981). Concepts, processes and mathematics instruction. For the learning of Mathematics, 2(1), 8-12.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Curriculum Development Centre (2011). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah, Spesifikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan 1, Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Curriculum Development Centre (2012). Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah, Spesifikasi Kurikulum Matematik Tingkatan 4, Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Dicapai melalui: http://www.gov.moe.my
Curriculum Development Centre (2013). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam Sains dan Matematik (Higher Order Thinking in Sciences and Mathematics (HOTsSM). Dicapai melalui: http://www.gov.moe.my
Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Dewey, J. (1938). How we think. (revised and expanded edition.) Houghton: Mifflin.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ?Me and maths‘: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students‘ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48.
Ee Ah Meng (1996). Pendidikan di Malaysia 1 : falsafah pendidikan, guru dan sekolah. Alam : Fajar Bakti.
Effandi & Abd Razak (2006). Kesan Pembelajaran Koperatif ke atas Pelajar Martikulasi Dalam Matapelajaran Matematik. Jurnal Teknologi, 45(1), 43-62. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/jt.v45.347.
Effandi Zakaria & Normah Yusoff (2009). Attitudes and problem-solving skills in algebra among Malaysian matriculation college students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 232-245.Gagne, R. M. (1985). The condition of learning and theory of instruction 4th edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Effandi Zakaria & Norulbiah Ngah (2011). A preliminary analysis of students' problem- posing ability and its relationship to attitudes towards problem solving.Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(9), 866-870.
Egodawatte, G. (2011). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in algebra, (Tesis Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan). University of Toronto.
Fatimah Saleh (2013). Penggunaan perwakilan dan visualisasi untuk meningkatkan kebolehan pelajar menyelesaikan masalah matematik. Laporan Akhir Projek Penyelidikan Jangka Pendek.
Foy, P., Arora, A. & Stanco, G. M. (2013). TIMSS 2011 User Guide for the International Database Released Items Mathematics - Eight Grade. chestnut Hill. MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N., E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational research: An introduction. 8th Ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). EducationResearch: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.
Geist, E. (2010). The anti-anxiety curriculum: Combating math anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(1), 24-31.
Godino, J. D. (2013). Mathematical concepts, their meanings, and understanding. In L. Puig y A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of XX Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (v.2, m/s. 417-425), Valencia: Universidad de Valencia.
Goldin, G. A. (2002). Representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (m/s 197-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Goldin, G. A., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics (m/s 1-23). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Goldin, G. A. & Kaput, J. J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics. In L.P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G.A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (m/s 397-430), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldin, G. A.(1992). On developing a unified model for the psychology of mathematical learning and problem solving. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on the International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol 3, 235-261, University of New Hampshire.
Goodykoontz, E., N. (2008). Factors That Affect College Students’ Attitude Toward Mathematics. Ph.D Tidak Diterbitkan, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing representation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(5), 361-367.
Guler, G., & Çiltas, A. (2011). The visual representation usage levels of mathematics teachers and students in solving verbal problems. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(11), 145-154.
Guven, B., & Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematical problem- solving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 131-137.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hiebert, J. & Carpenter, T. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.). Handbook of research on maehmatics teaching and learning, New York: Macmillan.
Hwang et. at. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191- 212.
Ismail Salleh (2008). Pendekatan pengajaran Algebra sekolah menengah: konseptual atau prosedural. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Jahr, E. (2004). What is a mathematical concept?. International Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematic Education, 28.Dicapai daripada http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME28/SO/SO036_Jahr.pdf.
Jayapraba & Kanmani (2013). Metacognitive awareness in science classroom of higher secondary students. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 49-56.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Allyn & Bacon.
Kadijevich, D. (2006). Developing trustworthy TIMSS background measures: A case study on mathematics attitude. The Teaching of Mathematics, 2, 41–51.
Kamarudin & Siti Hajar (2004). Pedagogi: Asas Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Kayazano Enterprise.
Kandemir, M.A., & H. G?r, (2009). The use of creative problem solving scenarios in mathematics education: views of some prospective teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sceinces, 1, 1628-1635. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.286.
Kaput (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Strasser, & B. Winkelman (Eds.), Didactics in Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline, 379-397. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Negara 2013-2025. Putrajaya, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary-Blueprint- ExecSummary-BM.pdf.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah Hingga Lepas Menengah).
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 1.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (KPM). (2016). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 2.
Kieran, C. (1992). The Learning and Teaching of School Algebra. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (ms. 390-419). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kilpatrick, Swafford, & Findell (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kislenko, Grevholm & Lepik (2007). Mathematics is important but boring students' beliefs and attitudes towards mathematics. In Relating practice and research in mathematics education: proceedings of NORMA 05, Fourth Nordic Conference on Mathematics Education, Trondheim, 2nd-6th September 2005. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.
Krishnan & Ruhizan (2009). Problem based learning in Engineering Education at Malaysian polytechnics: A proposal. In Engineering Education (ICEED), 2009 International Conference on, 122-124.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1996). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in junior and senior high school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lai, K. L. (2007). Penyelesaian masalah matematik sekolah rendah dengan menggunakan strategi melukis gambar rajah. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang Tahun 2007. 1-8.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lesh, R., Post, T. & Behr, M. (1987). Dienes revisited: multiple embodiments in computer environment. In I. Wirsup, & R. Streit (Eds.), Development in School Mathematics Education around the World, 647-680. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Lester, F. K. (1978). Mathematical problem solving in the elementary school: Some educational and psychological considerations. In Mathematical problem solving: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 53-86). ERIC Center Columbus, OH.
Lester, F. K. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem- solving instruction. In L. Santos-Trigo & L. Moreno-Armella, International Perspectives on Problem Solving Research in Mathematics Education, a special issue. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1&2), 245–278.
Lester, F., & Kehle, P.,E. (2003). From problem solving to modeling: The evolution of thinking about research on complex mathematical activity. Dalam R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching, 501-518. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. McGraw-Hill Education.
Mahayon Abas (2005). Kefahaman Ungkapan Algebra Pelajaar Tingkatan Empat. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Mayer (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver, (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, 123-138.
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9), 696-699.
Mazlini Adnan & Nurul Sarah Jalil (2016). Keupayaan Murid Cemerlang Akademik Tingkatan Empat Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Algebra Bukan Rutin. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 6(1), 58 - 67.
Mark A. Freitag (2014). Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers : A Process Approach. Brook/Cole
Meelissen, M., & Doornekamp, B. (2004). TIMSS-2003 Nederland: Leerprestaties in exacte vakken in het voortgezet onderwijs. [TIMSS-2003 The Netherlands. Students‘ achievement in mathematics and science in grade 8, secondary education]. Enschede: University of Twente.
Meriam, I. (1997). The effects of Team Games Tournament (TGT) on the attitudes of year four students toward Mathematics in SRK Sekaan Kecil, Matu, Sarawak. Proceedings of International Conference on Cooperative Learning and Constructivism in Science and Mathematics Education, 23-33.
Mohiadin (1999) Konstruktivisme: aplikasinya dalam reka bentuk pembelajaran berasaskan laman Web. In Y. Hashim & R. Man (Eds.) Teknologi Instruksi Dan Pendidikan Bestari: Persediaan Dan Cabaran Dalam Alaf Baru. Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia. pp: 1-14.
Mohamed, L., & Waheed, H. (2011). Secondary students‘ attitude towards mathematics in a selected school of Maldives. International Journal of humanities and social science, 1(15), 277-281.
Mullis, Martin, Foy & Arora (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Dicapai daripada http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_FullB ook.pdf.
Murata, A., & Kattubadi, S. (2012). Grade 3 students‘ mathematization through modeling: Situation models and solution models with mutli-digit subtraction problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 15-28.
Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1981). Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Alternative second edition without statistics. New York, NY: St. Martin Press.
Nandy, K. (2012). Understanding and Quantifying EFFECT SIZES. Dicapai daripada https://www.sonnet.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/son_files/RESEARCH/effect_si ze_4-9-2012.pdf.
Nardi & Steward (2003). Is mathematics TIRED? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345-367.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Handbook: NCTM goals, leaders, and positions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council Of Teachers Mathematics. (2000). Principle And Standards For School Mathematics. Reston, V.A: NCTM.
Nik Aziz Nik Pa (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Noor Erma Abu & Leong Kwan Eu (2014). Hubungan Antara Sikap, Minat, Pengajaran Guru dan Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya Terhadap Pencapaian Matematik Tambahan Tingkatan 4. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1-10.
Nor'ain Mohd. Tajudin (2008). Effects of Using Graphic Calculators in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics on Students’ Performance and Metacognitive Awareness. Tesis Ph.D, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin & Chinnappan (2016). The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks. International Journal of Instruction, v9 n2 p199-214.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah (2015a). Model strategi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran penyelesaian masalah algebra untuk murid sekolah menengah Malaysia. Kod Penyelidikan: FRGS 2013-0059-107-02. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Faizal Lee Abdullah & Amalina Ibrahim (2015b). Persepsi dan amalan pengajaran guru matematik dalam penyelesaian masalah algebra. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 12-22.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, Noor Shah Saad, Nurulhuda Abd. Rahman, Asmayati Yahaya, Hasimah Alimon, Mohd. Uzi Dollah & Mohd. Mustamam Abd Karim (2012a). Mapping the Level of Science, Mathematics and Engineering Undergraduate. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 2(3), 147 - 153.
Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, Noor Shah Saad, NurulHuda Abd. Rahman, Asmayati Yahaya, Hasimah Alimon, Mohd. Uzi Dollah & Mohd Mustamam Abd Karim (2011). Pemetaan tahap kemahiran penaakulan saintifik terhadap metadologi instruksi dalam kalangan pelajar siswazah sains, matematik dan kejuruteraan. Tanjong Malim, Perak : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Noraini Idris (2006). Exploring the effects of TI-84 plus on achievement and anxiety in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 66-78.
Noraini Idris (2010). Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Mc Graw Hill.
Norazilawati Abdullah, Nik Azmah Nik Yusof & Rosnidar Mansor (2012). Pelaksanaan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2 (1). pp. 78-91. ISSN 2232-0393
Norhatta Mohd & Tengku Farah Petri Tengku Mahmood (2011). The Effects of Attitude Towards Problem Solving in Mathematics Achievements. Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 5(12), 1857-1862.
Nurulhuda & Md Nasir (2013). “Konsep, Pendekatan Dan Aplikasi Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran”, “Pemikiran Kritis dan Kreatif, Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nur Amira Mohd Zukee (2016). Kesan Pengajaran Menggunakan Strategi KBAT-KR Terhadap Pencapaian, Kesedaran Metakognitif dan Sikap Terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah Algebra. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
O'Connell, S. (2000). Introduction to Problem Solving: Strategies for the Elementary Math Classroom. Portsmouth: N.H. Heinemann.
Ontario Ministry of Education (2007). The Ontario mathematics curriculum. Grades 11 and 12. Dicapai daripada http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/math1112currb.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 Results. Retrieved 4 January 2013, http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results.htm.
Pallant (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Papanastasiou, C. (2000). Effects of attitudes and beliefs on mathematics achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(1), 27-42.
Pape, S. J., & Tchoshanov, M. A. (2001). The role of representation (s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory into practice, 40(2), 118-127 DOI:10.1207/s15430421tip4002_6.
Parmjit, S., & Lau, N. K. (2006). Mathematical problem solving: Where are we heading? Journal of Educational Research, University Malaya, 26, 39-50.
Pelan Pendidikan Malaysia (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pendidikan Malaysiua 2013- 2025, September 2012. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Patton, J. R., Cronin, M. E., Bassett, D. S., & Koppel, A. E. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 178- 187.
Paul, S. (2013). Attitude Of Secondary School Students Towards Mathematics In Relation To Their Problem-Solving Ability In Mathematics. Conflux Journal of Education, 1(6). Dicapai daripada http://cjoe.naspublishers.com/vol_1_issue_6.html.
Peter, Abiodun & Jonathan (2010). Effect of constructivism instructional approach on teaching practical skills to mechanical related trade students in western nigeria technical colleges, International NGO Journals, 5 (3): 59-64.
Phang, Mohd Salleh, Mohammad Bilal & Salmiza (2014). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan Tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.
Piaget, J. (1970). Equilibration of cognitive structure. New York: Viking Press.
PISA (2012). Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know
Polya, G. (1954). Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday. Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. Polya, G. (1980). On solving mathematical problems in high school. In S. Krulik (Ed). Problem Solving in School Mathematics, (pp.1-2). Reston, Virginia: NCTM.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2004). Huraian sukatan pelajaran Matematik KBSM, Tingkatan 4. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2011). Huraian sukatan pelajaran Matematik KBSM, Tingkatan 1. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Rajendran, N. S. (2010). Teaching & Acquiring Higher-Order Thinking Skills: Theory & Practice. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Rastogi, S. (1991). Mathematical weakness, causes & remedy. Mittal Publications.
Rick Billstein, Shlomo Libeskind, Johnny W. Lott (2013). A Problem Solving Approach to Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers. Pearson Education, Inc
Rigney, J. W., & Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305- 311.
Rosengrant, D., Van Heuleven, A., & Etkina, E. (2006). Students‘ use of multiple representations in problem solving. Dalam P. Heron, L. McCullough & J. Marx, Physic Education Research Conference (2004 AIP Conference Proceedings). 177-181. Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
Roslina Radzali, T. Subahan Mohd Meerah & Effandi Zakaria (2010). Hubungan antara kepercayaan matematik, metakognisi dan perwakilan masalah dengan kejayaan penyelesaian masalah matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 1-7.
Sabri Ahmad, Tengku Zawawi, Tengku Zainal & Aziz Omar (2006). Isu-isu Dalam Pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88(4), 535-547.
Schoenfeld A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D.Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Vol. 2. Tools and Processes in Mathematics Teacher Education, (pp. 321-354), Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. In L. Santos-Trigo & L. Moreno-Armella, International Perspectives on Problem Solving Research in Mathematics Education, a special issue, The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1&2), 9-34.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 334-370. New York: Macmillan.
Seeger, F., Voight, I. & Werschescio, V. (1998). Representations in the mathematics classroom: reflections and constructions. In F. Seeger, I. Voight, & V. Werschescio, (Eds.). The Culture of the Mathematics Classroom, 308-343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selvamary, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin & Abd. Halim Amat@Kamarudin (2012). Analisis Jenis Kesilapan dan Strategi Penyelesaian Masalah Berayat Matematik dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Dua : Satu Kajian Kes. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik. 4(1), 60-74.
Shiakalli & Zacharos (2014). Building meaning through problem solving practices: the case of four-year olds. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 58-73.
Sinclair, M. (1998), Algebraic problem solving using spreadsheets: A unit for grade 9. Dicapai daripada http://mathforum.org/workshops/sum98/participants/sinclair/ problem/intro.html.
Stephen, J.? Mourat A. (2001).The role of representation(s) in developing mathematical understanding. Theory Into Practice, 40(2), 118-125.
Stacey. K, Chick. H & Kendal . M (2004). The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra The 12?? ICMI Study.
Stix, A. (1994). Pic-jour math: Pictorial journal writing in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 41, 264-264.
Stylianou, D.A. (2002). On the interaction of visualization and analysis: the negotiation of a visual representation in expert problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 303-317.
Suh, J., & Moyer, P. S. (2007). Developing students' representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155-173.
Suydam, M. N. (1980). Untangling clues from research on problem solving. In S. Krulik (Ed.), Problem solving in school mathematics, 34-50. Reston, V.A: NCTM.
Syed Abdul Hakim Syed Zainuddin & Mohini Mohamed (2010). Keupayaan dan Sikap Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik Bukan Rutin. http://www.jurnalteknologi.utm.my/index.php/jurnalteknologi/article/view/113 /103.
Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2005). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8, 16–21, Dicapai daripada http://www.rapidintellect.- com/AEQweb/cho25344l.htm.
TIMSS (2007). International mathematics report: Findings from IEA?S repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eight grade. Boston: International Study Centre, Lynch School of Education.
TIMSS (2011). International mathematics report: Findings from IEA?S repeat of the third international mathematics and science study at the eight grade. Boston: International Study Centre, Lynch School of Education.
Törner, G., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Reiss, K. M.(Eds.)(2007). Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. Special Issue in ZDM Mathematics Education, 39, 5–6.
Traiton & Midgett (2001). Learning through problem solving: A powerful approach to teaching mathematics. Teaching Children in mathematics Education, 7(9), 532- 36.
Tripathi, P. N. (2009). Problem solving in mathematics: A tool for cognitive development. Proceedings of epiSTEME 3 International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (ms. 168-173). Mumbai. India.
Vighnarajah, Wong Su Luan & Kamariah Abu Bakar. (2008). The shift in the role of teachers in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 33- 41.
Wagner, T. (2010). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need--and what we can do about it. Basic Books.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction. (6?? ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Wilson, L. B., & Clark, R. G. (1988). Comparative programming language. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Wong (2013). The Use Of Geogebra In Collaborative Learning In Mathematics. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Yang, S. C. (2001). Synergy of constructivism and hypermedia from three constructivist perspectives: social, semiotic, and cognitive. Edutational Computing Research, 24(4): 321-362.
Yimer, A. (2004). Metacognitive and cognitive functioning of college students during mathematical problem solving. Tesis Ph.D, Illinois State University.
Wilson, J. W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. In P.S. Wilson (Ed), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (ms. 57-78). New York: MacMillan.
Zaida Sangit (2007). Kesilapan dalam ungkapan algebra di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Zarimah Zainal & Nor’ain Mohd. Tajudin (2011). Proses Metakognisi Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik Bukan Rutin. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik. 1(1), 10-26.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |