A Comparative Study of Boosters between Genders in the Introduction Section

Mazlin Mohamed Mokhtar

Abstract

Although there are several studies conducted by linguistics researchers on the differences between the linguistic styles of female and male writers, there are not many studies conducted on the use of boosters in academic writing. Boosters are used to convince and emphasize statements made. This study analyzes the regularity of boosters used in the Introduction section of Ten Research Articles (RAs). The influence of gender differences in the use of specific boosters will also be looked at. A document analysis method was chosen as the 10 RAs were analyzed as the corpus in this study. The findings showed that male writers used more boosters than female writers. Even though the number of words for the female writers was more than the male writers, it did not affect the number of boosters used in the Introduction section of those articles. In conclusion, it can be deduced from the analysis that both the female and male writers used boosters to highlight their claims or their beliefs regardless of their gender, while the use of boosters was more evident among the male RAs as the male writers seemed to be more direct in illustrating and mentioning their claims.

References

Ali, S. M., & Krish, P. (2016). Gender-Specific English Language Use of Malaysian Blog Authors. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 21-35. DOI:http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-02

Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta) discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58–68. DOI:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.09.001

Akbas, E., & Hardman, J. (2018). Strengthening or weakening claims in academic knowledge construction: A comparative study of hedges and boosters in postgraduate academic writing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(4).

Amir, Z., Abidin, H., Darus, S., & Ismail, K. (2012). Gender differences in the language use of Malaysian teen bloggers. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 105-124.

Bacang, B. C., Rillo, R. M., & Alieto, E. O. (2019). The Gender Construct in the Use of Rhetorical Appeals, Hedges, and Boosters in ESL Writing: A Discourse Analysis. Online Submission, 25, 210-224.

Batool, S. F., Majeed, H., & Zahra, T. (2019). An Investigation of Hedges and Boosters in Pakistani Opinion Articles: A Corpus-based Study. Corporum: Journal of Corpus Linguistics–CJCL, 2(1), 1-12.

Hamid, B. D. H. A., Yasin, M. S. M., Bakar, K. A., Keong, Y. C., & Jalaluddin, A. (2008).Linguistic sexism and gender role stereotyping in Malaysian English language textbooks. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 45-78.

Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus-based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 102-115.

Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication, 10( 3), 185-205. UK: Pergamon Press Plc.

Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3), 349-382.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press

Hyland, K. (2008). ‘Small bits of textual material’: A discourse analysis of Swales’ writing. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 143–160.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London and New York: Continuum.

Hyon, S. (2008). Convention and inventiveness in an occluded academic genre: A case study of retention–promotion–tenure reports. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 175-192. DOI:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.003

Keong, Y. C., Gill, S. K., & Noorezam, M. (2012). Gender Differences and Culture in English Short Message Service Language among Malay University Students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 18(2), 67-74.

Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44–57.

Lewin, B. A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of toning down in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 163-178. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.08.001

Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Deñas, P., & Lafuente-Millán, E. (eds.). (2010). Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.

Mahamod, Z., Azhar, M. Q. A., & Hassan, H. (2019). Knowledge Differences, Attitudes and Practices Using Six Thinking Hats by Gender and Specialization in the Malay Language Primary School Teachers. Creative Education, 10(10), 2186-2200. DOI:http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1010158

Recski, L. (2005). Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: a functional account of dissertation defenses. English for Specific Purposes, 24(1), 5–23. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.07.001

Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325–338

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0

Yeung, L. (2007). In search of commonalities: Some linguistic and rhetorical features of business reports as a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 156–179.

Zafar, S. (2018). A Metadiscourse Study of Boosters and Hedges in Research Article Abstracts: Study of Boosters and Hedges in Research Article Abstracts. CORPORUM: Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 29-41.