Abd, M., Bunyamin, H., Talib, C. A., Ahmad, N. J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Surif, J. (2020).
Current Teaching Practice of Physics Teachers and Implications for Integrated
Stem Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 18–28.
Abed, M. G. (2015). A Consideration to Two Main Ethical Issues In Educational
Research, and How May These Be Addressed. I-Manager’s Journal on
Educational Psychology, 8(3), 1–14.
Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of Constructivist Approach on Academic Achievement
in Science at Secondary Level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22),
1074–1079.
Ahmad, S., Basri, R., Bakar, K., Ali Bashah, A. R., Mohamed Idris, Z. I. M., Miskan,
M., Jaafar, M. S., Zainal Abidin, A. F., Mohd Zabir, Z., & Kamari, R. (2017).
Modul Multimedia Dalam PdPc STEM Abad 21 (N. Mamad (ed.)). Bahagian
Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan,
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating Informal STEM Education: Issues and
Challenges in Context. New Directions for Evaluation, 161, 17–33.
Allison, J. M. (2018). W & M ScholarWorks Project Based Learning to Promote 21St
Century Skills : An Action Research Study. The College of William and Mary.
Alston, G. L., & Griffiths, C. L. (2015). Instructional Design and Assessment, A
Methodology for Assessing Skill-Based Educational Outcomes in a Pharmacy
Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7), 1–13.
Ambo, N., Siew, N. M., & Crispina Gregory K Han. (2018). Developing an Integrated
Project-Based Learning and STEM Learning Module For Fostering Creativity
Among Fifth Graders. International Journal of Current Research, 10(09),
73466–73473.
Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A Comparative Analysis of Models of
Instructional Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.
Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The Impact of The
Use of STEM Education Approach on The Blended Learning to Improve
Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research,
8(3 B), 24–32.
Atasoy, S., Kucuk, M., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2011). Remedying Science Student Teachers
’ Misconceptions of Force and Motion Using Worksheets Based on
Constructivist Learning Theory. Energy Education Science and Technology
Part B : Social and Educational Studies, 3(4), 653–668.
Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Tahunan Bahagian
Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan 2017.
Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “ steAm ” dalam
Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah
Usability of " steAm " Module in Teaching and Learning of Visual Arts
Education in Primary School. KUPAS SENI Jurnal Pendidikan Seni, 6(May),
65–79.
Bajuri, M. R., Maat, S., & Halim, L. (2017). Relationship between Creative Thinking
Skills with Learning Achievement on Physics Concept Application. Seminar
Pendidikan Serantau VIII, 193–198.
Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM Learning: Students’ Achievements
in Assignments According to The P3 Task Taxonomy—Practice, Problem
Solving, and Projects. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 28(1), 121–144.
Barker, B. S., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. F. (2014). Examining Fidelity of Program
Implementation in a STEM-Oriented Out-of-School Setting. International
Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 39–52.
Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology Meets Engineering:
An Interdisciplinary STEM Module for Middle and Early Secondary School
Students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–7.
Barrio-Perotti, R., Blanco-Marigorta, E., Fernández-Francos, J., & Galdo-Vega, M.
(2010). Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of The Physics of Water
Rockets. European Journal of Physics, 31(5), 1131–1147.
Bartholomew, S. R., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Factors Influencing Student Success on
Open-Ended Design Problems. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 28(3), 753–770.
Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High School Student Perceptions of the
Utility of the Engineering Design Process: Creating Opportunities to Engage in
Engineering Practices and Apply Math and Science Content. Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720.
Besar, P. S. N. P. H. (2018). Situated Learning Theory : The Key to Effective
Classroom Teaching ? International Journal for Educational, Social, Political
& Cultural Studies, 1(May), 49–60.
Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in
STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,
February, 1–27.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative
Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brickman, P., & Cannon, J. B. (2015). Helping Students Save : Assigning. Journal of
College Science Teaching, 44(November), 39–41.
Bruhl, J. (2008). Teaching Engineering to the Disinterested : A Case Study in Teaching
Engineering Principles to Non-Engineering Majors. American Society for
Engineering Education, October, 1–15.
Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2017). Membangunkan Pendekatan Bersepadu Pendidikan STEM
di Malaysia (Issue September).
Burke, A. (2011). How To Use Groups Effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching,
11(2), 87–95.
Burriss, K., & Snead, D. (2017). Middle School Students’ Perceptions Regarding the
Motivation and Effectiveness of Homework. School Community Journal, 27(2),
193–210.
Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The
Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5),
545–547.
Castle, M., Cleveland, C., Gordon, D., Jones, L., Zelinski, M., Winter, P., Chang, J.,
Senegar-mitchell, E., Coutifaris, C., Shuda, J., Mainigi, M., & Woodruff, T. K.
(2016). Reproductive Science for High School Students : A Shared Curriculum
Model to Enhance Student Success 1. Biology of Reproduction, 95(June), 1–4.
Çelik, H. C., Ertas, H., & Ilhan, A. (2018). The Impact of Project-Based Learning on
Achievement and Student Views: The Case of AutoCAD Programming Course.
Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 67.
Center for Teaching Innovation Cornell University. (2019). Innovation Awards Rubric.
Innovation Awards Rubric.
https://teaching.cornell.edu/resourceextorfile/innovation-awards-rubric
Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the Project Based (PBL) Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education on Academic Achievement
and Career Interests of Vocational High School Students. PEGEM Journal of
Education and Instruction, 8(2), 281–306.
Chacko, P., Appelbaum, S., Kim, H., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J. K. (2015). Integrating
Technology in STEM Education. Journal of Technology and Science
Education, 5(1), 5–14.
Chin, J., Kamarthi, S., & Duggan, C. (2014). Engineering Based Learning : A Paradigm
Shift for High School STEM Teaching. International Journal of Engineering
Education, 30(4), 876–887.
Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The Effects of An
Afterschool STEM Program on Students’ Motivation and Engagement.
International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1).
Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated Cognition and Learning Environments.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st
Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning From Theory to
Practice. In 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning
From Theory to Practice (Issue January). Springer Nature.
Chue, S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2013). The Proof of the Pudding?: A Case Study of an “At-
Risk” Design-Based Inquiry Science Curriculum. Research in Science
Education, 43(6), 2431–2454.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth).
Routledge.
Covacevich, C. (2014). How to Select An Instrument for Assessing Student Learning.
Inter-American Development Bank.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method
Approaches (Fourth). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cuenca, L., Ruiz, L., Gordo, M., & Poler, R. (2016). Rubric to Assess The Competence
of Innovation, Creativity and Entrepreneurship in Bachelor Degree. Brazilian
Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13, 118–123.
Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Kurikulum
Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan 4.
Ministry of Education Malysia.
Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016a). Panduan
Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam
Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Curriculum Development Division Ministry of
Education Malaysia.
Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016b). Sharing
Malaysian Experience In Participation Of Girls In STEM Education (S. B. Ng
(ed.)). UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE).
Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). Kurikulum
Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan
Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 3. In Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.
Ministry of Education Malysia.
Cwikla, J., Milroy, S., Reider, D., & Skelton, T. (2014). Pioneering Mars: Turning The
Red Planet Green with Earth’s Smallest Settlers. American Biology Teacher,
76(5), 300–305.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding Science Teachers’
Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units Through a
Phenomenological Multiple Case Study. International Journal of STEM
Education, 5(4).
Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan
(Second). Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Dawes, J. (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to The Number of Scale
Points Used ? International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–78.
de Podesta, M. (2007). A Guide to Building and Understanding the Physics of Water
Rockets. National Physical Laboratory.
Dib, C. Z. (1988). Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Education : Concepts/
Applicability. Cooperative Networks in Physics Education, 300–315.
Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., Stewart, C. O., Chappell, S., & Hathcock, S. (2014). The
Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary
Students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 483–506.
Dijkstra, J., Latijnhouwers, M., Norbart, A., & Tio, R. A. (2016). Assessing The “I” in
Group Work Assessment: State of the Art and Recommendations for Practice.
Medical Teacher, 38(7), 675–682.
Drake, S., & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st
Century Capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–
50.
Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal
Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes. Educational
Researcher, 44(4), 237–251.
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High
School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiryand
Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 23(1), 116–137.
Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering
Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. The Research Journal for
Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.
Eddy, P. L., Hao, Y., Markiewicz, C., & Iverson, E. (2018). Faculty Change Agents as
Adult Learners: The Power of Situated Learning. Community College Journal
of Research and Practice, 8926.
Education Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). Guidelines on Extra-curricular
Activities in Schools. Education Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM Education K-12: Perspectives on Integration.
International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8.
English, L. D., King, D., & Smeed, J. (2017). Advancing Integrated STEM Learning
Through Engineering Design: Sixth-grade Students’ Design and Construction
of Earthquake Resistant Buildings. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3),
255–271.
Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting Integrated STEM in the Elementary
Classroom: A Professional Development Approach Centered on an Engineering
Design Challenge. International Journal of STEM Education (2017), 4(6), 1–
16.
Evans, M. A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2014). Interest-driven
Learning Among Middle School Youth in an Out-of-school STEM Studio.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 624–640.
Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How An Integrative STEM Curriculum Can Benefit
Students in Engineering Design Practices. International Journal of Technology
and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129.
Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lou, S. J. (2017). Why Do Students Present Different Design
Objectives in Engineering Design Projects? International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 1–22.
Felzmann, H. (2009). Ethical Issues in School-based Research. Research Ethics
Review, 5(3), 104–109.
Fernandes, G. W. R., & Ferreira, C. A. (2018). Conceptions of The Nature of Science
and Technology : a Study with Children and Youths in a Non-Formal Science
and Technology Education Setting. Research in Science Education, 48, 1071–
1106.
Frank, B., & Strong, D. S. (2010). Development of a Design Skill Assessment Tool.
Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference
(CEEA), July, 1–7.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., K.Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &
Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active Learning Increases Student Performance in
Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. PNAS Journal, 10(23), 8410–8415.
Galvan, M. E., & Coronado, J. M. (2014). Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning :
Promoting Differentiated Instruction. National Teacher Education Journal,
7(4).
Gelmez Burakgazi, S., Yildirim, A., & Weeth Feinstein, N. (2016). Communicating
Science to Impact Learning? A Phenomenological Inquiry into 4th and 5th
Graders’ Perceptions of Science Information Sources. Journal of Science
Education and Technology, 25(2), 244–262.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step-by-step: A Simple Guide and
Reference (Fourth). Allyn & Bacon.
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a Case Study and What Is It Good For? American Political
Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.
Ghadiri Khanaposhtani, M., Liu, C. C. J., Gottesman, B. L., Shepardson, D., &
Pijanowski, B. (2018). Evidence That an Informal Environmental Summer
Camp Can Contribute to the Construction of the Conceptual Understanding and
Situational Interest of STEM in Middle-school Youth. International Journal of
Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 8(3), 227–
249.
Gisev, N., Hons, B. P., Bell, J. S., Ph, D., Chen, T. F., & Ph, D. (2013). Interrater
Agreement and Interrater Reliability : Key Concepts , Approaches , and
Applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 9(3), 330–338.
Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM
Learning Environments. In School of Engineering Working Papers (School of
Engineering Working Papers).
Green, A. J., Tanford, S., & Swift, A. (2018). Determinants of Student Satisfaction with
Using Instructional Technology : The Role of Active Learning Determinants of
Student Satisfaction with Using Instructional Technology : The Role of Active
Learning. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 30(1), 1–10.
Guzey, S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The Impact of
Design-Based STEM Integration Curricula on Student Achievement in
Engineering, Science, and Mathematics. Journal of Science Education and
Technology, 26, 207–222.
Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding
for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research
in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748.
Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the
Effectiveness of Integrative STEM Education: Teacher and Administrator
Professional Development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73–90.
Head, G. (2020). Ethics in Educational Research: Review Boards, Ethical Issues and
Researcher Development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–
83.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Studies.
Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67.
Heil, D. R., Pearson, G., & Burger, S. E. (2013). Understanding Integrated STEM
Education: Report on a National Study. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 1–15.
Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Museum and the Needs of
People. CECA Conference, October, 15–22.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional Media
and Technologies for Learning (Seventh). Merill Prentice Hall.
Hiong, L. C. (2018). Keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM Dalam Peningkatan Pencapaian
Topik Nutrisi Di Sekolah Luar Bandar. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 15(i), 1–
14.
Hoban, S., Delany, M., & NASA. (2011). NASA’S Best Students Beginning
Engineering, Science and Technology, An Educator’s Guide to the Engin.
Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., & Pérez-Gil, J. A.
(2016). A Simulation Study of Threats to Validity in Quasi-experimental
Designs: Interrelationship Between Design, Measurement, and Analysis.
Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUN), 1–9.
Hortman, M., & Johnson, C. (2017). Water Rocket Design/Build/Test Lab.
Hortman, M. L. (2017). Development Of An EXCEL® Rocket Simulator For
Application In Middle School, High School, And University STEM Education.
Central Washington University.
Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating Engineering Design
Challenges into STEM Courses. In Digital Commons @ USU.
Huegele, V., Hill, K., & Terry, B. (2008). Adventures In Rocket Science (1st ed.).
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Explorer Institute.
Hung, L. J., Abdullah, F. A. P., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2013). Aplikasi Konsep Fizik
Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Yang Berasaskan STEM Bagi Pelajar
Tingkatan Enam Atas. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable
Education, 470–481.
Huri, N. H. D., & Karpudewan, M. (2019). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Integrated
STEM-lab Activities in Improving Secondary School Students’ Understanding
of Electrolysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 495–508.
Ishii, N. (2006). Water Rockets Educator’s Manual. In N. Ishii (Ed.), Water Rockets
Educator’s Manual (Vol. 34, Issue 11). Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,
Space Education Center.
Isman, A. (2011). Instructional Design in Education : New Model. The Turkish Online
Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 136–142.
Izwani, N., Shapri, M., Nidzam, C., & Ahmad, C. (2019). The development of Bio-
Gamyx module for teaching and learning Biology. Jurnal Pendidikan Sais &
Matematik Malaysia, 9(2), 1–8.
Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. (2018). Pilot Analysis of the Impacts
of Soft Robotics Design on High-school Student Engineering Perceptions.
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, October, 1–22.
Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting
Interviews: Tips for Students new to the Field of Qualitative Research. The
Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1–10.
Jamali, S. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2017). Self-efficacy, Scientific
Reasoning, and Learning Achievement In The STEM Project-Based Learning
Literature. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(2), 29–43.
Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology,
Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999-2013: A
Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 10(3), 155–163.
Jin, S.-H., Song, K., Shin, D. H., & Shin, S. (2015). A Performance-Based Evaluation
Rubric for Assessing and Enhancing Engineering Design Skills in Introductory
Engineering Design Courses * KI-IL A Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric
for Assessing and Enhancing Engineering Design Skills in Introductory Engi.
International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1007–1020.
Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., & Karukka, M. (2003). The Standard of User-centered
Design and the Standard Definition of Usability: Analyzing ISO 13407 Against
ISO 9241-11. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 46, 53–60.
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity
and Educational Consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained.
British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403.
Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review : Can Robots Reshape
K-12 STEM Education ? IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics
and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), 1–8.
Kasim, N. H., & Ahmad, C. N. C. (2018). PRO-STEM Module: The Development and
Validation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social
Sciences, 8(1), 728–739.
Keith, W. (2013). This Is Rocket Science! The Physics Teacher, 51(6), 362–363.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM
Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.
Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Khalid, S. N., Musa, M., Rahmat, F., Mohamed, N. A., & Rahmat, N. A. A. (2019).
Pembangunan dan Penilaian Modul Pengajaran STEM bagi Bidang
Pembelajaran Statistik dan Kebarangkalian dalam KSSM Matematik Tingkatan
Dua. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 15(2), 25–34.
Khalil, N. M., & Othman, K. (2017). STEM-21CS Module : Fostering 21st Century
Skills through Integrated STEM. K-12 STEM Education, 3(3), 225–233.
Khaliq, S., Alam, M. T., & Mushtaq, M. (2015). An Experimental Study to Investigate
the Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) for Teaching Science at
Elementary Level. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive
Education and Development, 4(1), 43–55.
Kiang, T. S., & Sangguro, S. A. (2015). Meneroka Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran
Proses Sains Asas dalam Kalangan Muird Tahun 4 dan Tahun 5 di Daerah
Tuaran. Jurnal Penyelidikan Kent, 14, 97–110.
Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the Use of the ASSURE Model by K–12
Teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153–168.
Kitchen, J. A., Sadler, P., Sonnert, G., Kitchen, J. A., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2018).
The Impact of Summer Bridge Programs on College Students ’ STEM Career
Aspirations. Journal of College Student Development, 59(6), 698–715.
Knowles Teacher Initiative. (2017). Knowles Engineering Design Process
Performance Assessment Rubric. Resource Downloads.
https://knowlesteachers.org/knowles-academy/engaging-math-and-sciencestudents-
in-engineering-design
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing
Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Source: Academy of Management
Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential Learning Theory: A Dynamic, Holistic
Approach to Management Learning, Education and Development. In S. J.
Armstrong & C. V Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Management
Learning, Education and Development (First, pp. 42–68). SAGE.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2018). Eight Important Things to Know About The
Experiential Learning Cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and
Development. Prentice Hall.
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass
Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic
Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.
Kubat, U., & Guray, E. (2018). To STEM or not to STEM? That is not the question.
Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3), 388–399.
Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative Learning : What Is It ? Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491–495.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2008). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
In Learning in Doing : Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspective (18th
ed., Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press.
Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., &
Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance
Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876.
Leung, A. (2020). Boundary Crossing Pedagogy in STEM Education. International
Journal of STEM Education, 7(15), 1–11.
Li, H., Öchsner, A., & Hall, W. (2017). Application of Experiential Learning to
Improve Student Engagement and Experience in a Mechanical Engineering
Course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 3797(November), 1–11.
Lie, R., Selcen Guzey, S., & Moore, T. J. (2018). Implementing Engineering in Diverse
Upper Elementary and Middle School Science Classrooms: Student Learning
and Attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, September, 1–14.
Lin, K.-Y., Yu, K.-C., Hsiao, H., Chang, Y.-S., & Chien, Y.-H. (2020). Effects of Webbased
versus Classroom-based STEM Learning Environments on The
Development of Collaborative Problem-solving Skills in Junior High School
Students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 21–
34.
Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented
STEM Practical Activities in Cultivating Middle School Students’ Attitudes
toward Technology and Technological Inquiry Ability. Research in Science and
Technological Education, 38(1), 1–18.
Ling Chia, P., & Maat, S. M. (2018). An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Attitudes
towards Integration of STEM in Malaysia 45. International Journal of
Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 2600–7495.
Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Labadin, J., & Aziz, N. A. (2017). Preliminary investigation:
Teachers Perception on Computational Thinking Concepts. Journal of
Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–9), 23–29.
Liu, C. C., & Falk, J. H. (2014). Serious Fun: Viewing Hobbyist Activities through a
Learning Lens. International Journal of Science Education, Part B:
Communication and Public Engagement, 4(4), 343–355.
Liu, Y. C., Lu, S. J., Kao, C. Y., Chung, L., & Tan, K. H. (2019). Comparison of AR
and physical Experiential Learning Environment in Supporting Product
Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Business Management,
11(259), 1–10.
Lockette, P. von, Acciani, D., Courtney, J., Diao, C., Riddell, W., Dahm, K., & Harvey,
R. (2006). Bottle Rockets and Parametric Design in a Converging-Diverging
Design Strategy. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference
Proceedings, 1–13.
Madihie, A., & Noah, S. M. (2013). An Application of the Sidek Module Development
in Rebt Counseling Intervention Module Design for Orphans. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1481–1491.
Mahfar, M., Noah, S. M., & Senin, A. A. (2019). Development of Rational Emotive
Education Module for Stress Intervention of Malaysian Boarding School
Students. SAGE Open, 9(April-June), 1–16.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers ’ perception of STEM integration and
education : a systematic literature review. International Perception of STEM
Integration and Education : A Systematic Literature Review, 6(2), 1–16.
Mark Sanders. (2009). STEM,STEMEducation,STEMmania. The Technology Teacher,
December/January, 20–27.
Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts Science and
Technology/ Engineering Curriculum Framework. In D. P. Driscoll (Ed.),
Massachusetts Department of Education. Massachusettes Department of
Education.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, & Chester, M. D.
(2016). 2016 Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum
Framework Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Members.
Massimo, A. (2015). STEM Education and The Curriculum: Issues, Tensions and
Challenges. International STEM High-Level Policy Forum on “Evidence-Based
Science Education in Developing Countries", 1–22.
Matias, I., Pombo, N., Garcia, N., Lamas, D., & Tomberg, V. (2018). Scaffolding
Students on Connecting STEM and Interaction Design: Case study in Tallinn
University Summer School. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference
(EDUCON), May, 979–987.
McFadden, J., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Engineering Design in The Elementary Science
Classroom: Supporting Student Discourse during an Engineering Design
Challenge. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education.
Springer Netherlands.
McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semistructured
Interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1–10.
Meece, J. L. (2002). Child and Adolescent Development for Educators (Second).
McGraw Hill.
Meng, C. C., & Idris, N. (2016). Form Four Science Students ’ Perceptions of the
Quality of Learning Experiences Provided by Assessments in STEM Related
Subjects. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education,
5(2012), 50–56.
Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the
engineering design process. International Journal of Educational Technology,
24(3), 293–316.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research : A Guide to Design and Implementation.
Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A
Methods Sourcebook (Third). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Miller, B. G., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM
experiences: snow snakes’ impact on students and the community. Cultural
Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 31–58.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013a). Melindungi masa instruksional: kembali
kepada yang asas (First). Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013b). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan malaysia
2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Ministry of
Education Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Promoting Science, Technology, Engineering
and Mathematics (STEM) Education. In Annual Report 2015 Malaysian
Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018a). Inisiatif Pengukuhan Pendidikan STEM
2018. In Penerangan Dasar Pendidikan Tahun 2018. Ministry of Education
Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018b). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia
2013-2025, Laporan Tahunan 2018.
SPI Bil 6 Tahun 2019 Pelaksanaan KSSM Menengah Atas dan Pakej Mata Pelajaran
Tahun 2020, 1 (2019).
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021a). Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama
Penuh. Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh.
https://www.moe.gov.my/korporat/bahagian-dan-unit/bahagian-pengurusansekolah-
berasrama-penuh-dan-sekolah-kecemerlangan
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021b). Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. Sekolah
Berasrama Penuh. https://www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/pendidikanmenengah/
sekolah-berasrama-penuh
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021c). Senarai Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. Bilangan
Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/statistikmenu/
bilangan-sekolah-berasrama-penuh
Moazzen, I., Miller, M., Wild, P., Jackson, L., & Hadwin, A. (2014). Engineering
Design Survey. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education
Association, 1–7.
Mohamed Arip, M. A. S. (2018). Pembinaan dan Pengujian Modul. I Psychology and
Counselling Academy.
Mohd Hafiz, N. R., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering Design Process in STEM
Education : A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research
in Business & Social Sciences, 9(5), 676–697.
Mohd Kusnan, R., Tarmuji, N. H., & Omar, M. K. (2020). Sorotan Literatur
Bersistematik: Aktiviti Pemikiran Komputasional dalam Pendidikan di
Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH),
5(12), 112–122.
Mohd Noor, K. B. (2008). Case Study: A Strategic Research Methodology. American
Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604.
Mohd Shukri, A. A., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Daud, N. (2019). Implementing a Celik
Stem Module in Empowering Eighth-Graders’ Creative Thinking. International
Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(32), 219–237.
Mohr-schroeder, M. J., Little, D. L., & Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing Middle
School Students ’ Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences : See
Blue STEM Camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.
Molin, F., Cabus, S., Haelermans, C., & Groot, W. (2019). Toward Reducing Anxiety
and Increasing Performance in Physics Education: Evidence from a
Randomized Experiment. Research in Science Education, May.
Molloy, K., Moore, D. R., Sohoglu, E., & Amitay, S. (2012). Less Is More : Latent
Learning Is Maximized by Shorter Training Sessions in Auditory Perceptual
Learning. PLoS One, 7(5), 1–13.
Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the State of the Art of STEM
Integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10.
Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016).
Preparing Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 889–897.
Morris, B. J., Owens, W., Ellenbogen, K., Erduran, S., & Dunlosky, J. (2019).
Measuring informal STEM learning supports across contexts and time.
International Journal of STEM Education, 6(40), 1–12.
Moseley, C., Summerford, H., Paschke, M., Parks, C., & Utley, J. (2019). Road to
collaboration: Experiential learning theory as a framework for environmental
education program development. Applied Environmental Education &
Communication, March, 1–21.
Munip, H. (2012). Aplikasi Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Reka Bentuk
Pengajaran Berasaskan Komputer : Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pencapaian
Berdasarkan Aras Kognitif Pelajar. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pembangunan
Dan Pendidikan Lestari, September, 19–20.
Museum of Science. (2020). The Engineering Design Process. Museum of Science.
https://www.eie.org/overview/engineering-design-process
Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis
on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science
Letters, 22(12), 4225–4288.
Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts,
challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–
223.
National Academies of Sciences. (2016). Developing a National STEM Workforce
Strategy: A Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2014). STEM
Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research
(M. Honey, G. Pearson, & H. Schweingruber (eds.)). The National Academies
Press.
Ng, C. H., & Adnan, M. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-Based
Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. IOP Conference
Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1–6.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States
(2013). The National Academies Press.
Noah, S. M., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul Bagaimana Membina Modul
Latihan dan Modul Akademik. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) : What Students Know and Can Do: Vol.
I.
OECD Country Delegates. (2005). The Role of National Qualifications Systems in
Promoting Lifelong Learning Report from Thematic Group 2 : Standards and
quality assurance in qualifications with special reference to the recognition of
non-formal and informal learning.
Omri, H., Tojid, A. M., Ali, S. M., Yunus, M. H., Sigam, C. J., Zakaria, A., & Zakaria,
Z. M. (2018). Modul Pertandingan Roket Air Sekolah Menengah. In S. Jemain
(Ed.), Modul Pertandingan Karnival STEM Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Peringkat Kebangsaan (pp. 23–42). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Expanding The Framework of Internal and External
Validity in Quantitative Research. Annual Meeting of The Association for The
Advancement of Educational Research (AAER), 21, 63.
Özcan, H., & Koca, E. (2019). The Impact of Teaching the Subject “Pressure” with
STEM Approach on the Academic Achievements of the Secondary School 7th
Grade Students and Their Attitudes Towards STEM. Education and Science,
44(198), 201–227.
Padirayon, L. M., Pagudpud, M. V, & Cruz, J. S. D. (2019). Exploring constructivism
learning theory using mobile game. The International Conference on
Information Technology and Digital Applications, 1–6.
Parno, Yuliati, L., Munfaridah, N., Ali, M., Indrasari, N., & Rosyidah, F. U. N. (2020).
The impact of STEM-based guided inquiry learning on students’ scientific
literacy in the topic of fluid statics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,
1481(1), 1–11.
Pathan, R. R., Dheepak, A., & Tijare, S. (2016). Design and Development of Water
Rocket. National Conference on Innovative Trends in Engineering &
Technology, 1–5.
Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Internal and external validity: can you apply
research study results to your patients? Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia,
44(3), 183.
PBLWorks Buck Institute for Education. (2020). Creativity & Innovation Rubric for
PBL. Creativity & Innovation Rubric for PBL.
https://my.pblworks.org/resource/document/6_12_creativity_innovation_rubri
c_non_ccss
Perbal, B. (2017). Neuroscience and psychological studies sustain the cognitive
benefits of print reading. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, 9(11),
1–4.
Akta 611,Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001, Pub. L. No. 611, 137 (2001).
Petnuchova, J. (2012). Non-Formal and Informal Education: Where Does It Go in the
Slovak Republic? US-China Education Review, 6, 614–625.
Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh, S. (2014). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada
Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar Dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan
Tesis. Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA, 2(4), 63–71.
Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and
learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.
Piaw, C. Y. (2016). Mastering Research Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Pitriana, P., Agustina, R. D., Zakwandi, R., Ijharudin, M., & Kurniawan, D. T. (2018).
Fun Science : Roket Air Sebagai Media Edu-Sains untuk Meningkatkan
Motivasi Belaj ar Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan
Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 2(1), 1–7.
Planetarium Negara Malaysia. (2018). Peraturan Umum dan Syarat-Syarat Kejohanan
Roket Air Kebangsaan 2018 (KRK2018) (2018th ed.). Planetarium Negara.
Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods Is the CVI
an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity ? Appraisal and Recommendations.
Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459–467.
Popovic, G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Implications of Informal Education Experiences
for Mathematics Teachers ’ Ability to Make Connections Beyond Formal
Classroom. School of Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 129–140.
Potter, P., & France, B. (2018). Informing a pedagogy for design and problem-solving
in hard materials by theorising technologists’ learning experiences.
International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 101–120.
Prastyaningrum, I., & Imansari, N. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Mata
Kuliah Teori Medan. Jupiter (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro), 1(2), 56.
Purzer, S., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An
exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with
scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9), 1–12.
Quick, K., & Blue, C. (2019). Using Situated Learning Theory to Build an Interactive
Learning Environment to Foster Dental Students’ Professionalism: An Ignite
Project. Journal of Dental Education, 83(3), 334–341.
Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews:
An ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563–566.
Rahim, F., Iksan, Z., Othman, O., Nasyrudin, W., Huda, S. N., Arsad, N., Sham, A.,
Abu Hanifah, S., & Mohd Hanafiah, M. (2014). Pemerkasaan Ulul Albab
melalui modul STEM bersepadu STEMind. The Online Journal of Islamic
Education, Special Issue, 1–12.
Rajuldevi, M. K., Veeramachaneni, R., & Kare, S. (2008). Warehousing in theory and
practice: A case study at ÖoB, Clas Ohlson, Stadium, Åhlens Mahesh.
Ramli, A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Jamaluddin, R., &
Abdullah, N. (2017). Teachers ’ Readiness in Teaching STEM Education. Man
In India, 97(13), 343–350.
Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement STEM? From
Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 2222–6990.
Rasul, M. S., Zahriman, N., Halim, L., & Rauf, R. A. (2018). Impact of Integrated
STEM SMART Communities Program on Students Scientific Creativity.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, November(Special Issue on i-
CITE 2018), 80–89.
Razali, R. M., & Ayob, A. (2018). Keberkesanan Pengunaan Modul Interaktif Terhadap
Pencapaian Membaca Murid Pemulihan. International Journal of Education,
Psychology and Counseling, 3(19), 34–56.
Remziye Ergül, N., & Kargin, K. (2014). The Effect Of Project Based Learning On
Students’ Science Success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136,
537–541.
Reynante, B. M., Selbach-allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the
Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and
Epistemologies. Science & Education, April, 1–19.
Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti,
M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018).
Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer
informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1),
1–14.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research (Second). Blackwell Publishing.
Ruey-Shyy Shieh, & Wheijen Chang. (2014). Fostering Student’s Creative and
Problem-solving Skills Through a Hands-on Activity. Journal of Baltic Science
Education, 13(5), 650–661.
Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The
one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation,
16(6), 309–314.
Saghir, A., Hussain, A., Batool, A., Sittar, K., & Malik, M. (2016). Play and Cognitive
Development: Formal Operational Perspective of Piaget’s Theory. Journal of
Education and Practice, 7(28), 72–79.
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM Related After-School Program
Activities and Associated Outcomes on Student Learning. Educational
Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 309–322.
Samat, N. A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Ali, M., Abdullah, A. H., Talib, C. A., &
Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2019). Chem-a module based on stem approach in
chemical bond. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,
7(6), 700–710.
Sanders, M. (2012). Integrative STEM Education As Best Practice. 7th Biennial
International Technology Education Research Conference, 2, 103–117.
Saper, N., Ain, N., Daud, M., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan
Modul I-Sc (Islamic Spiritual Counseling) ke atas Pelajar Bermasalah Tingkah
Laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9, 32–43.
Saunders-smits, G. N., & Kat, R. De. (2009). 3,2,1, Launch! SEFI 37th Annual
Conference 2009, July, 1–7.
Schnittka, C. G., Evans, M. A., Won, S. G. L., & Drape, T. A. (2016). After-School
Spaces: Looking for Learning in All the Right Places. Research in Science
Education, 46(3), 389–412.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective (P. Smith (ed.);
6 Edition). Pearson.
Seçken, N., & Ural, E. (2011). The effect of constructivist approach on students ’
understanding of the concepts related to hydrolysis. Porcedia Social and
Behavorial Sciences, 15, 235–240.
Setiawaty, S., Fatmi, N., Rahmi, A., Unaida, R., Hadiya, I., Muhammad, I., & Permana
Sari, R. (2018). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
Learning on Student’s Science Process Skills and Science Attitudes.
Technology and Sustainable Development, 14, 2–17.
Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM
learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’
interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and
Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211.
Shearer, D. A., & Vogt, G. L. (2011). Rockets Educator Guide. In M. Solomon (Ed.),
New York. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher
education and professional development needs for the implementation of
integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM
Education, 4(1), 13.
Shukri, A. A. M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Daud, N. (2020). Integrated STEM-based
module: Relationship between students’ creative thinking and science
achievement. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 173–180.
Siekmann, G., & Korbel, P. (2016). Defining “STEM” skills: review and synthesis of
the literature.
Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and inservice
teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.
SpringerPlus, 4(8), 1–20.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.
STEM Task Force Report. (2014). INNOVATE: A Blueprint for Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education.
Strimel, G. J., Bartholomew, S. R., Kim, E., & Zhang, L. (2018). An Investigation of
Engineering Design Cognition and Achievement in Primary School. Journal for
STEM Education Research, October, 173–201.
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’
engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM
education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education,
41(10), 1387–1407.
Stump, S. L., Bryan, J. A., & Mcconnell, T. J. (2016). Making STEM Connections.
Mathematics Teacher, 109(8), 576–583.
Sulaiman, I. (2018). Pembinaan Dan Pengujian Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran
Berasaskan Peta Pemikiran Bagi Topik Nisbah, Kadar dan Kadaran. Universiti
Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, S., Wiyanto, W., & Supartono, S. (2016). Preliminary Analysis
of Assessment Instrument Design to Reveal Science Generic Skill and
Chemistry Literacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in
Education (IJERE), 5(4), 331.
Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and
management. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231.
Syarkowi, A., & Hendri, M. (2019). The challenge of implementing STEM for senior
high school students in the city border of Jambi. Journal of Physics: Conference
Series, 1280(5), 1–5.
Syukri, M., Mohtar, L. E., & Lilia, H. (2018). The Impact of Engineering Design
Process in Teaching and Learning to Enhance Students ’ Science Problem-
Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1, 66–75.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting
Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education,
48(6), 1273–1296.
Tek, O. E., Safiee, N., Jusoh, Z. M., Salleh, S. M., & Noor, A. M. H. M. (2017). STEM
Education Through Project-Based Inquiry Learning : An Exploratory Study On
Its Impact Among Year 1 Primary Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &
Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 43–51.
Theng, T. C., & Kassim, A. P. D. A. H. (2009). Kefahaman dan Aplikasi Konsep Asid-
Bes dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Sains Johor Bahru. Jurnal Sains
Dan Matematik, 1(1), 22–29.
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A.,
Boeve-De Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L.,
Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van De Velde, D., Van Petegem, P.,
& Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of
Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Jourrnal of STEM
Education, 3(1), 2.
Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian
approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational
Development, 45(March), 42–53.
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on
Elementary Students ’ Attitudes toward Science. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395.
Tomita, N., Watanabe, R., & Nebylov, A. V. (2007). Hands-on education system using
water rocket. Acta Astronautica, 61(11–12), 1116–1120.
Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice
Investigators. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 7.
Ultanir, E. (2012). An Epistemological Glance at the Constructivist Approach:
Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International
Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212.
United States General Accounting Office. (1990). Program Evaluation and
Methodology Division: Case Study Evaluations. In United States General
Accounting Office (Issue November, pp. 1–133). Program Evaluation and
Methodology Division (PEMD).
Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8:
integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
Vossen, T. E., Henze, E. H. T. I., & Driel, M. J. D. V. J. H. Van. (2019). Student and
teacher perceptions of the functions of research in the context of a design -
oriented STEM module. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, May, 1–30.
Vrioni, A., Mavroudi, A., & Ioannou, I. (2020). Promoting Authentic Student
Assessment For STEM Project-Based Learning Activities Promoting Authentic
Student Assessment For STEM Project-Based Learning Activities.
International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies
and Learning, September, 117–126.
Vu, P., & Feinstein, S. (2017). An exploratory multiple case study about using gamebased
learning in STEM classrooms. International Journal of Research in
Education and Science, 3(2), 582–588.
Walker, S. E. (2006). Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection.
Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2), 216–221.
Wallace, C. S., & Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to Teach Elementary Science in an
Experiential, Informal Context: Culture, Learning, and Identity. Science
Education, 99(1), 174–198.
Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry
pedagogy on students ’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in
Human Behavior, 49(August), 658–669.
Watkins, R., Meiers, M. W., & Visser, Y. L. (2012). Assessing Needs. The World Bank.
Watts, F., Garcia-Carbonell, A., & Andreu-Andres, A. (2013). Innovation
Competencies Development - INCODE Barometer and User Guide. Turku
University of Applied Science.
Wei, L. M. (2020). Hubungan antara tahap pengaplikasian kemahiran algoritma dengan
tahap kemahiran menulis murid tahun 5. Proceedings of International
Conference on The Future of Education IConFEd), November 2020, 15–24.
Wilkinson, D., & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments A Guide For
Researchers (First Edit). RoutledgeFalmer.
Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching. In NEA
Research Best Practices (Issue July).
Wu, Y.-T., & Anderson, O. R. (2015). Technology-enhanced stem (science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. Journal of Computers in
Education, 2(3), 245–249.
Xu, J. (2013). Why Do Students Have Difficulties Completing Homework? The Need
for Homework Management. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1),
98–105.
Xuan Quang, L., Huy Hoang, L., Dinh Chuan, V., Hoai Nam, N., Thi Tu Anh, N., Thi
Hong Nhung, V., & Amparo Oliveros Ruiz, M. (2015). Integrated Science,
Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active
Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British
Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 11(2), 1–12.
Yaki, A. A., Saat, R. M., Renuka, V., & Zulnaidi, H. (2019). Enhancing Science
Achievement Utilising an Integrated STEM Approach. Malaysian Journal of
Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 181–205.
Yang, E. E., & Houston, B. L. (2016). Understanding the Physics of Water Rockets
Using Wireless Sensors. The 2016 IAJC/ISAM Joint International Conference,
978–979.
Yildiz, S. G., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2018). The effects of engineering design processes on
spatial abilities of middle school students. International Journal of Technology
and Design Education, December, 1–22.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Method in Evaluation Research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–
290.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (Sixth).
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational
Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.
Yu, K., Lin, K., & Hung, K. (2010). Teaching science through technology : A
confluence of knowledge, design and construction. World Transactions on
Engineering and Technology Education, 8(4), 436–441.
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index
Calculation. Education In Medicine, 11(2), 49–54.
Zailan, N. A., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Hanri, C., Ibrahim, N. H., Osman, S., Ismail, N., &
Azelee, N. I. W. (2019). Assessment and Evaluation of Non-Formal STEM
Education Programs. International Journal of Recent Technology and
Engineering, 7(685), 762–768.
Zainal, N. F. A., Din, R., Abd Majid, N. A., Nasrudin, M. F., & Abd Rahman, A. H.
(2018). Primary and Secondary School Students Perspective on Kolb-based
STEM Module and Robotic Prototype. International Journal on Advanced
Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4–2), 1394.
Zainal, Z. (2007). The Case Study as a Research Method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9(June),
1–6.
Zhai, L. (2019). An Inquiry Teaching Mode Based on STEM Education. International
Journal of Engineering Science Research, 14(17), 44–58.