Abd, M., Bunyamin, H., Talib, C. A., Ahmad, N. J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Surif, J. (2020).

Current Teaching Practice of Physics Teachers and Implications for Integrated

Stem Education. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5A), 18–28.

 

Abed, M. G. (2015). A Consideration to Two Main Ethical Issues In Educational

Research, and How May These Be Addressed. I-Manager’s Journal on

Educational Psychology, 8(3), 1–14.

 

Adak, S. (2017). Effectiveness of Constructivist Approach on Academic Achievement

in Science at Secondary Level. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(22),

1074–1079.

 

Ahmad, S., Basri, R., Bakar, K., Ali Bashah, A. R., Mohamed Idris, Z. I. M., Miskan,

M., Jaafar, M. S., Zainal Abidin, A. F., Mohd Zabir, Z., & Kamari, R. (2017).

Modul Multimedia Dalam PdPc STEM Abad 21 (N. Mamad (ed.)). Bahagian

Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan,

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Allen, S., & Peterman, K. (2019). Evaluating Informal STEM Education: Issues and

Challenges in Context. New Directions for Evaluation, 161, 17–33.

 

Allison, J. M. (2018). W & M ScholarWorks Project Based Learning to Promote 21St

Century Skills : An Action Research Study. The College of William and Mary.

 

Alston, G. L., & Griffiths, C. L. (2015). Instructional Design and Assessment, A

Methodology for Assessing Skill-Based Educational Outcomes in a Pharmacy

Course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(7), 1–13.

 

Ambo, N., Siew, N. M., & Crispina Gregory K Han. (2018). Developing an Integrated

Project-Based Learning and STEM Learning Module For Fostering Creativity

Among Fifth Graders. International Journal of Current Research, 10(09),

73466–73473.

 

Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A Comparative Analysis of Models of

Instructional Design. Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.

 

Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The Impact of The

Use of STEM Education Approach on The Blended Learning to Improve

Student’s Critical Thinking Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research,

8(3 B), 24–32.

 

Atasoy, S., Kucuk, M., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2011). Remedying Science Student Teachers

’ Misconceptions of Force and Motion Using Worksheets Based on

Constructivist Learning Theory. Energy Education Science and Technology

Part B : Social and Educational Studies, 3(4), 653–668.

 

Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Tahunan Bahagian

Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh dan Sekolah Kecemerlangan 2017.

 

Bahrum, S., & Ibrahim, M. N. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Modul “ steAm ” dalam

Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Seni Visual Sekolah Rendah

Usability of " steAm " Module in Teaching and Learning of Visual Arts

Education in Primary School. KUPAS SENI Jurnal Pendidikan Seni, 6(May),

65–79.

 

Bajuri, M. R., Maat, S., & Halim, L. (2017). Relationship between Creative Thinking

Skills with Learning Achievement on Physics Concept Application. Seminar

Pendidikan Serantau VIII, 193–198.

 

Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM Learning: Students’ Achievements

in Assignments According to The P3 Task Taxonomy—Practice, Problem

Solving, and Projects. International Journal of Technology and Design

Education, 28(1), 121–144.

 

Barker, B. S., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. F. (2014). Examining Fidelity of Program

Implementation in a STEM-Oriented Out-of-School Setting. International

Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 39–52.

 

Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology Meets Engineering:

An Interdisciplinary STEM Module for Middle and Early Secondary School

Students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1–7.

 

Barrio-Perotti, R., Blanco-Marigorta, E., Fernández-Francos, J., & Galdo-Vega, M.

(2010). Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of The Physics of Water

Rockets. European Journal of Physics, 31(5), 1131–1147.

 

Bartholomew, S. R., & Strimel, G. J. (2018). Factors Influencing Student Success on

Open-Ended Design Problems. International Journal of Technology and Design

Education, 28(3), 753–770.

 

Berland, L., Steingut, R., & Ko, P. (2014). High School Student Perceptions of the

Utility of the Engineering Design Process: Creating Opportunities to Engage in

Engineering Practices and Apply Math and Science Content. Journal of Science

Education and Technology, 23(6), 705–720.

 

Besar, P. S. N. P. H. (2018). Situated Learning Theory : The Key to Effective

Classroom Teaching ? International Journal for Educational, Social, Political

& Cultural Studies, 1(May), 49–60.

 

Bozkurt Altan, E., & Tan, S. (2020). Concepts of creativity in design based learning in

STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,

February, 1–27.

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design : The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science.

 

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative

Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

 

Brickman, P., & Cannon, J. B. (2015). Helping Students Save : Assigning. Journal of

College Science Teaching, 44(November), 39–41.

 

Bruhl, J. (2008). Teaching Engineering to the Disinterested : A Case Study in Teaching

Engineering Principles to Non-Engineering Majors. American Society for

Engineering Education, October, 1–15.

 

Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2017). Membangunkan Pendekatan Bersepadu Pendidikan STEM

di Malaysia (Issue September).

 

Burke, A. (2011). How To Use Groups Effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching,

11(2), 87–95.

 

Burriss, K., & Snead, D. (2017). Middle School Students’ Perceptions Regarding the

Motivation and Effectiveness of Homework. School Community Journal, 27(2),

193–210.

 

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Dicenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The

Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5),

545–547.

 

Castle, M., Cleveland, C., Gordon, D., Jones, L., Zelinski, M., Winter, P., Chang, J.,

Senegar-mitchell, E., Coutifaris, C., Shuda, J., Mainigi, M., & Woodruff, T. K.

(2016). Reproductive Science for High School Students : A Shared Curriculum

Model to Enhance Student Success 1. Biology of Reproduction, 95(June), 1–4.

 

Çelik, H. C., Ertas, H., & Ilhan, A. (2018). The Impact of Project-Based Learning on

Achievement and Student Views: The Case of AutoCAD Programming Course.

Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 67.

 

Center for Teaching Innovation Cornell University. (2019). Innovation Awards Rubric.

Innovation Awards Rubric.

https://teaching.cornell.edu/resourceextorfile/innovation-awards-rubric

 

Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the Project Based (PBL) Science, Technology,

Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education on Academic Achievement

and Career Interests of Vocational High School Students. PEGEM Journal of

Education and Instruction, 8(2), 281–306.

 

Chacko, P., Appelbaum, S., Kim, H., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J. K. (2015). Integrating

Technology in STEM Education. Journal of Technology and Science

Education, 5(1), 5–14.

 

Chin, J., Kamarthi, S., & Duggan, C. (2014). Engineering Based Learning : A Paradigm

Shift for High School STEM Teaching. International Journal of Engineering

Education, 30(4), 876–887.

 

Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The Effects of An

Afterschool STEM Program on Students’ Motivation and Engagement.

International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1).

 

Choi, J., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated Cognition and Learning Environments.

Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(2), 53–69.

 

Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st

Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning From Theory to

Practice. In 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning

From Theory to Practice (Issue January). Springer Nature.

 

Chue, S., & Lee, Y.-J. (2013). The Proof of the Pudding?: A Case Study of an “At-

Risk” Design-Based Inquiry Science Curriculum. Research in Science

Education, 43(6), 2431–2454.

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (Sixth).

Routledge.

 

Covacevich, C. (2014). How to Select An Instrument for Assessing Student Learning.

Inter-American Development Bank.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method

Approaches (Fourth). SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Cuenca, L., Ruiz, L., Gordo, M., & Poler, R. (2016). Rubric to Assess The Competence

of Innovation, Creativity and Entrepreneurship in Bachelor Degree. Brazilian

Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13, 118–123.

 

Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Kurikulum

Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah Spesifikasi Kurikulum Fizik Tingkatan 4.

Ministry of Education Malysia.

 

Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016a). Panduan

Pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam

Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Curriculum Development Division Ministry of

Education Malaysia.

 

Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016b). Sharing

Malaysian Experience In Participation Of Girls In STEM Education (S. B. Ng

(ed.)). UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE).

 

Curriculum Development Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). Kurikulum

Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan

Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 3. In Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Ministry of Education Malysia.

 

Cwikla, J., Milroy, S., Reider, D., & Skelton, T. (2014). Pioneering Mars: Turning The

Red Planet Green with Earth’s Smallest Settlers. American Biology Teacher,

76(5), 300–305.

 

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding Science Teachers’

Implementations of Integrated STEM Curricular Units Through a

Phenomenological Multiple Case Study. International Journal of STEM

Education, 5(4).

 

Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan

(Second). Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Dawes, J. (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to The Number of Scale

Points Used ? International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–78.

 

de Podesta, M. (2007). A Guide to Building and Understanding the Physics of Water

Rockets. National Physical Laboratory.

 

Dib, C. Z. (1988). Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Education : Concepts/

Applicability. Cooperative Networks in Physics Education, 300–315.

 

Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., Stewart, C. O., Chappell, S., & Hathcock, S. (2014). The

Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary

Students. Research in Science Education, 44(3), 483–506.

 

Dijkstra, J., Latijnhouwers, M., Norbart, A., & Tio, R. A. (2016). Assessing The “I” in

Group Work Assessment: State of the Art and Recommendations for Practice.

Medical Teacher, 38(7), 675–682.

 

Drake, S., & Reid, J. (2018). Integrated Curriculum as an Effective Way to Teach 21st

Century Capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–

50.

 

Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal

Qualities Other Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes. Educational

Researcher, 44(4), 237–251.

 

Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban High

School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiryand

Design-Based Afterschool Program. Journal of Science Education and

Technology, 23(1), 116–137.

 

Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering

Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. The Research Journal for

Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

 

Eddy, P. L., Hao, Y., Markiewicz, C., & Iverson, E. (2018). Faculty Change Agents as

Adult Learners: The Power of Situated Learning. Community College Journal

of Research and Practice, 8926.

 

Education Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

of the People’s Republic of China. (2012). Guidelines on Extra-curricular

Activities in Schools. Education Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong

Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China.

 

English, L. D. (2016). STEM Education K-12: Perspectives on Integration.

International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8.

 

English, L. D., King, D., & Smeed, J. (2017). Advancing Integrated STEM Learning

Through Engineering Design: Sixth-grade Students’ Design and Construction

of Earthquake Resistant Buildings. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3),

255–271.

 

Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting Integrated STEM in the Elementary

Classroom: A Professional Development Approach Centered on an Engineering

Design Challenge. International Journal of STEM Education (2017), 4(6), 1–

16.

 

Evans, M. A., Lopez, M., Maddox, D., Drape, T., & Duke, R. (2014). Interest-driven

Learning Among Middle School Youth in an Out-of-school STEM Studio.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 624–640.

 

Fan, S. C., & Yu, K. C. (2017). How An Integrative STEM Curriculum Can Benefit

Students in Engineering Design Practices. International Journal of Technology

and Design Education, 27(1), 107–129.

 

Fan, S. C., Yu, K. C., & Lou, S. J. (2017). Why Do Students Present Different Design

Objectives in Engineering Design Projects? International Journal of

Technology and Design Education, 28(4), 1–22.

 

Felzmann, H. (2009). Ethical Issues in School-based Research. Research Ethics

Review, 5(3), 104–109.

 

Fernandes, G. W. R., & Ferreira, C. A. (2018). Conceptions of The Nature of Science

and Technology : a Study with Children and Youths in a Non-Formal Science

and Technology Education Setting. Research in Science Education, 48, 1071–

1106.

 

Frank, B., & Strong, D. S. (2010). Development of a Design Skill Assessment Tool.

Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association Conference

(CEEA), July, 1–7.

 

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., K.Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., &

Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active Learning Increases Student Performance in

Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. PNAS Journal, 10(23), 8410–8415.

 

Galvan, M. E., & Coronado, J. M. (2014). Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning :

Promoting Differentiated Instruction. National Teacher Education Journal,

7(4).

 

Gelmez Burakgazi, S., Yildirim, A., & Weeth Feinstein, N. (2016). Communicating

Science to Impact Learning? A Phenomenological Inquiry into 4th and 5th

Graders’ Perceptions of Science Information Sources. Journal of Science

Education and Technology, 25(2), 244–262.

 

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step-by-step: A Simple Guide and

Reference (Fourth). Allyn & Bacon.

 

Gerring, J. (2004). What is a Case Study and What Is It Good For? American Political

Science Review, 98(2), 341–354.

 

Ghadiri Khanaposhtani, M., Liu, C. C. J., Gottesman, B. L., Shepardson, D., &

Pijanowski, B. (2018). Evidence That an Informal Environmental Summer

Camp Can Contribute to the Construction of the Conceptual Understanding and

Situational Interest of STEM in Middle-school Youth. International Journal of

Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 8(3), 227–

249.

 

Gisev, N., Hons, B. P., Bell, J. S., Ph, D., Chen, T. F., & Ph, D. (2013). Interrater

Agreement and Interrater Reliability : Key Concepts , Approaches , and

Applications. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 9(3), 330–338.

 

Glancy, A. W., & Moore, T. J. (2013). Theoretical Foundations for Effective STEM

Learning Environments. In School of Engineering Working Papers (School of

Engineering Working Papers).

 

Green, A. J., Tanford, S., & Swift, A. (2018). Determinants of Student Satisfaction with

Using Instructional Technology : The Role of Active Learning Determinants of

Student Satisfaction with Using Instructional Technology : The Role of Active

Learning. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 30(1), 1–10.

 

Guzey, S., Harwell, M., Moreno, M., Peralta, Y., & Moore, T. J. (2017). The Impact of

Design-Based STEM Integration Curricula on Student Achievement in

Engineering, Science, and Mathematics. Journal of Science Education and

Technology, 26, 207–222.

 

Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding

for Creative Product Possibilities in a Design-Based STEM Activity. Research

in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748.

 

Havice, W., Havice, P., Waugaman, C., & Walker, K. (2018). Evaluating the

Effectiveness of Integrative STEM Education: Teacher and Administrator

Professional Development. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 73–90.

 

Head, G. (2020). Ethics in Educational Research: Review Boards, Ethical Issues and

Researcher Development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–

83.

 

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Studies.

Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67.

 

Heil, D. R., Pearson, G., & Burger, S. E. (2013). Understanding Integrated STEM

Education: Report on a National Study. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, 1–15.

 

Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist Learning Theory: The Museum and the Needs of

People. CECA Conference, October, 15–22.

 

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E. (2002). Instructional Media

and Technologies for Learning (Seventh). Merill Prentice Hall.

 

Hiong, L. C. (2018). Keberkesanan Modul Bio-STEM Dalam Peningkatan Pencapaian

Topik Nutrisi Di Sekolah Luar Bandar. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 15(i), 1–

14.

 

Hoban, S., Delany, M., & NASA. (2011). NASA’S Best Students Beginning

Engineering, Science and Technology, An Educator’s Guide to the Engin.

 

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Sanduvete-Chaves, S., & Pérez-Gil, J. A.

(2016). A Simulation Study of Threats to Validity in Quasi-experimental

Designs: Interrelationship Between Design, Measurement, and Analysis.

Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUN), 1–9.

 

Hortman, M., & Johnson, C. (2017). Water Rocket Design/Build/Test Lab.

 

Hortman, M. L. (2017). Development Of An EXCEL® Rocket Simulator For

Application In Middle School, High School, And University STEM Education.

Central Washington University.

 

Householder, D. L., & Hailey, C. E. (2012). Incorporating Engineering Design

Challenges into STEM Courses. In Digital Commons @ USU.

 

Huegele, V., Hill, K., & Terry, B. (2008). Adventures In Rocket Science (1st ed.).

National Aeronautics and Space Administration Explorer Institute.

 

Hung, L. J., Abdullah, F. A. P., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2013). Aplikasi Konsep Fizik

Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Yang Berasaskan STEM Bagi Pelajar

Tingkatan Enam Atas. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable

Education, 470–481.

 

Huri, N. H. D., & Karpudewan, M. (2019). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Integrated

STEM-lab Activities in Improving Secondary School Students’ Understanding

of Electrolysis. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(3), 495–508.

 

Ishii, N. (2006). Water Rockets Educator’s Manual. In N. Ishii (Ed.), Water Rockets

Educator’s Manual (Vol. 34, Issue 11). Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency,

Space Education Center.

 

Isman, A. (2011). Instructional Design in Education : New Model. The Turkish Online

Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 136–142.

 

Izwani, N., Shapri, M., Nidzam, C., & Ahmad, C. (2019). The development of Bio-

Gamyx module for teaching and learning Biology. Jurnal Pendidikan Sais &

Matematik Malaysia, 9(2), 1–8.

 

Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Kramer-Bottiglio, R. (2018). Pilot Analysis of the Impacts

of Soft Robotics Design on High-school Student Engineering Perceptions.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education, October, 1–22.

 

Jacob, S. A., & Furgerson, S. P. (2012). Writing Interview Protocols and Conducting

Interviews: Tips for Students new to the Field of Qualitative Research. The

Qualitative Report, 17(6), 1–10.

 

Jamali, S. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2017). Self-efficacy, Scientific

Reasoning, and Learning Achievement In The STEM Project-Based Learning

Literature. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 2(2), 29–43.

 

Jayarajah, K., Saat, R. M., & Rauf, R. A. A. (2014). A Review of Science, Technology,

Engineering & Mathematics (STEM) Education Research from 1999-2013: A

Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and

Technology Education, 10(3), 155–163.

 

Jin, S.-H., Song, K., Shin, D. H., & Shin, S. (2015). A Performance-Based Evaluation

Rubric for Assessing and Enhancing Engineering Design Skills in Introductory

Engineering Design Courses * KI-IL A Performance-Based Evaluation Rubric

for Assessing and Enhancing Engineering Design Skills in Introductory Engi.

International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(4), 1007–1020.

 

Jokela, T., Iivari, N., Matero, J., & Karukka, M. (2003). The Standard of User-centered

Design and the Standard Definition of Usability: Analyzing ISO 13407 Against

ISO 9241-11. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 46, 53–60.

 

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity

and Educational Consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.

 

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained.

British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403.

 

Karim, M. E., Lemaignan, S., & Mondada, F. (2015). A review : Can Robots Reshape

K-12 STEM Education ? IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics

and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), 1–8.

 

Kasim, N. H., & Ahmad, C. N. C. (2018). PRO-STEM Module: The Development and

Validation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social

Sciences, 8(1), 728–739.

 

Keith, W. (2013). This Is Rocket Science! The Physics Teacher, 51(6), 362–363.

 

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM

Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.

 

Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education.

Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.

 

Khalid, S. N., Musa, M., Rahmat, F., Mohamed, N. A., & Rahmat, N. A. A. (2019).

Pembangunan dan Penilaian Modul Pengajaran STEM bagi Bidang

Pembelajaran Statistik dan Kebarangkalian dalam KSSM Matematik Tingkatan

Dua. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis, 15(2), 25–34.

 

Khalil, N. M., & Othman, K. (2017). STEM-21CS Module : Fostering 21st Century

Skills through Integrated STEM. K-12 STEM Education, 3(3), 225–233.

 

Khaliq, S., Alam, M. T., & Mushtaq, M. (2015). An Experimental Study to Investigate

the Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) for Teaching Science at

Elementary Level. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive

Education and Development, 4(1), 43–55.

 

Kiang, T. S., & Sangguro, S. A. (2015). Meneroka Tahap Penguasaan Kemahiran

Proses Sains Asas dalam Kalangan Muird Tahun 4 dan Tahun 5 di Daerah

Tuaran. Jurnal Penyelidikan Kent, 14, 97–110.

 

Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the Use of the ASSURE Model by K–12

Teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153–168.

 

Kitchen, J. A., Sadler, P., Sonnert, G., Kitchen, J. A., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2018).

The Impact of Summer Bridge Programs on College Students ’ STEM Career

Aspirations. Journal of College Student Development, 59(6), 698–715.

 

Knowles Teacher Initiative. (2017). Knowles Engineering Design Process

Performance Assessment Rubric. Resource Downloads.

https://knowlesteachers.org/knowles-academy/engaging-math-and-sciencestudents-

in-engineering-design

 

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing

Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Source: Academy of Management

Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.

 

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential Learning Theory: A Dynamic, Holistic

Approach to Management Learning, Education and Development. In S. J.

Armstrong & C. V Fukami (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Management

Learning, Education and Development (First, pp. 42–68). SAGE.

 

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2018). Eight Important Things to Know About The

Experiential Learning Cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14.

 

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and

Development. Prentice Hall.

 

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass

Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic

Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.

 

Kubat, U., & Guray, E. (2018). To STEM or not to STEM? That is not the question.

Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(3), 388–399.

 

Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative Learning : What Is It ? Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491–495.

 

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2008). Situated Learning Legitimate Peripheral Participation.

In Learning in Doing : Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspective (18th

ed., Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press.

 

Leonard, J., Buss, A., Gamboa, R., Mitchell, M., Fashola, O. S., Hubert, T., &

Almughyirah, S. (2016). Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance

Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 860–876.

 

Leung, A. (2020). Boundary Crossing Pedagogy in STEM Education. International

Journal of STEM Education, 7(15), 1–11.

 

Li, H., Öchsner, A., & Hall, W. (2017). Application of Experiential Learning to

Improve Student Engagement and Experience in a Mechanical Engineering

Course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 3797(November), 1–11.

 

Lie, R., Selcen Guzey, S., & Moore, T. J. (2018). Implementing Engineering in Diverse

Upper Elementary and Middle School Science Classrooms: Student Learning

and Attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, September, 1–14.

 

Lin, K.-Y., Yu, K.-C., Hsiao, H., Chang, Y.-S., & Chien, Y.-H. (2020). Effects of Webbased

versus Classroom-based STEM Learning Environments on The

Development of Collaborative Problem-solving Skills in Junior High School

Students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 21–

34.

 

Lin, K. Y., Hsiao, H. S., Williams, P. J., & Chen, Y. H. (2020). Effects of 6E-oriented

STEM Practical Activities in Cultivating Middle School Students’ Attitudes

toward Technology and Technological Inquiry Ability. Research in Science and

Technological Education, 38(1), 1–18.

 

Ling Chia, P., & Maat, S. M. (2018). An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Attitudes

towards Integration of STEM in Malaysia 45. International Journal of

Electrical Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 2600–7495.

 

Ling, U. L., Saibin, T. C., Labadin, J., & Aziz, N. A. (2017). Preliminary investigation:

Teachers Perception on Computational Thinking Concepts. Journal of

Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–9), 23–29.

 

Liu, C. C., & Falk, J. H. (2014). Serious Fun: Viewing Hobbyist Activities through a

Learning Lens. International Journal of Science Education, Part B:

Communication and Public Engagement, 4(4), 343–355.

 

Liu, Y. C., Lu, S. J., Kao, C. Y., Chung, L., & Tan, K. H. (2019). Comparison of AR

and physical Experiential Learning Environment in Supporting Product

Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Business Management,

11(259), 1–10.

 

Lockette, P. von, Acciani, D., Courtney, J., Diao, C., Riddell, W., Dahm, K., & Harvey,

R. (2006). Bottle Rockets and Parametric Design in a Converging-Diverging

Design Strategy. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference

Proceedings, 1–13.

 

Madihie, A., & Noah, S. M. (2013). An Application of the Sidek Module Development

in Rebt Counseling Intervention Module Design for Orphans. Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1481–1491.

 

Mahfar, M., Noah, S. M., & Senin, A. A. (2019). Development of Rational Emotive

Education Module for Stress Intervention of Malaysian Boarding School

Students. SAGE Open, 9(April-June), 1–16.

 

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers ’ perception of STEM integration and

education : a systematic literature review. International Perception of STEM

Integration and Education : A Systematic Literature Review, 6(2), 1–16.

 

Mark Sanders. (2009). STEM,STEMEducation,STEMmania. The Technology Teacher,

December/January, 20–27.

 

Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006). Massachusetts Science and

Technology/ Engineering Curriculum Framework. In D. P. Driscoll (Ed.),

Massachusetts Department of Education. Massachusettes Department of

Education.

 

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, & Chester, M. D.

(2016). 2016 Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum

Framework Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Members.

 

Massimo, A. (2015). STEM Education and The Curriculum: Issues, Tensions and

Challenges. International STEM High-Level Policy Forum on “Evidence-Based

Science Education in Developing Countries", 1–22.

 

Matias, I., Pombo, N., Garcia, N., Lamas, D., & Tomberg, V. (2018). Scaffolding

Students on Connecting STEM and Interaction Design: Case study in Tallinn

University Summer School. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference

(EDUCON), May, 979–987.

 

McFadden, J., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Engineering Design in The Elementary Science

Classroom: Supporting Student Discourse during an Engineering Design

Challenge. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

Springer Netherlands.

 

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semistructured

Interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 1–10.

 

Meece, J. L. (2002). Child and Adolescent Development for Educators (Second).

McGraw Hill.

 

Meng, C. C., & Idris, N. (2016). Form Four Science Students ’ Perceptions of the

Quality of Learning Experiences Provided by Assessments in STEM Related

Subjects. International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education,

5(2012), 50–56.

 

Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the

engineering design process. International Journal of Educational Technology,

24(3), 293–316.

 

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research : A Guide to Design and Implementation.

Jossey-Bass.

 

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A

Methods Sourcebook (Third). SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Miller, B. G., & Roehrig, G. (2018). Indigenous cultural contexts for STEM

experiences: snow snakes’ impact on students and the community. Cultural

Studies of Science Education, 13(1), 31–58.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013a). Melindungi masa instruksional: kembali

kepada yang asas (First). Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013b). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan malaysia

2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Ministry of

Education Malaysia.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Promoting Science, Technology, Engineering

and Mathematics (STEM) Education. In Annual Report 2015 Malaysian

Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018a). Inisiatif Pengukuhan Pendidikan STEM

2018. In Penerangan Dasar Pendidikan Tahun 2018. Ministry of Education

Malaysia.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018b). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia

2013-2025, Laporan Tahunan 2018.

 

SPI Bil 6 Tahun 2019 Pelaksanaan KSSM Menengah Atas dan Pakej Mata Pelajaran

Tahun 2020, 1 (2019).

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021a). Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama

Penuh. Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Berasrama Penuh.

https://www.moe.gov.my/korporat/bahagian-dan-unit/bahagian-pengurusansekolah-

berasrama-penuh-dan-sekolah-kecemerlangan

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021b). Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. Sekolah

Berasrama Penuh. https://www.moe.gov.my/pendidikan/pendidikanmenengah/

sekolah-berasrama-penuh

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2021c). Senarai Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. Bilangan

Sekolah Berasrama Penuh. https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/statistikmenu/

bilangan-sekolah-berasrama-penuh

 

Moazzen, I., Miller, M., Wild, P., Jackson, L., & Hadwin, A. (2014). Engineering

Design Survey. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education

Association, 1–7.

 

Mohamed Arip, M. A. S. (2018). Pembinaan dan Pengujian Modul. I Psychology and

Counselling Academy.

 

Mohd Hafiz, N. R., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering Design Process in STEM

Education : A Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research

in Business & Social Sciences, 9(5), 676–697.

 

Mohd Kusnan, R., Tarmuji, N. H., & Omar, M. K. (2020). Sorotan Literatur

Bersistematik: Aktiviti Pemikiran Komputasional dalam Pendidikan di

Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH),

5(12), 112–122.

 

Mohd Noor, K. B. (2008). Case Study: A Strategic Research Methodology. American

Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604.

 

Mohd Shukri, A. A., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Daud, N. (2019). Implementing a Celik

Stem Module in Empowering Eighth-Graders’ Creative Thinking. International

Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(32), 219–237.

 

Mohr-schroeder, M. J., Little, D. L., & Schroeder, D. C. (2014). Developing Middle

School Students ’ Interests in STEM via Summer Learning Experiences : See

Blue STEM Camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 291–301.

 

Molin, F., Cabus, S., Haelermans, C., & Groot, W. (2019). Toward Reducing Anxiety

and Increasing Performance in Physics Education: Evidence from a

Randomized Experiment. Research in Science Education, May.

 

Molloy, K., Moore, D. R., Sohoglu, E., & Amitay, S. (2012). Less Is More : Latent

Learning Is Maximized by Shorter Training Sessions in Auditory Perceptual

Learning. PLoS One, 7(5), 1–13.

 

Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing the State of the Art of STEM

Integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5–10.

 

Moreno, N. P., Tharp, B. Z., Vogt, G., Newell, A. D., & Burnett, C. A. (2016).

Preparing Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities.

Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 889–897.

 

Morris, B. J., Owens, W., Ellenbogen, K., Erduran, S., & Dunlosky, J. (2019).

Measuring informal STEM learning supports across contexts and time.

International Journal of STEM Education, 6(40), 1–12.

 

Moseley, C., Summerford, H., Paschke, M., Parks, C., & Utley, J. (2019). Road to

collaboration: Experiential learning theory as a framework for environmental

education program development. Applied Environmental Education &

Communication, March, 1–21.

 

Munip, H. (2012). Aplikasi Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Reka Bentuk

Pengajaran Berasaskan Komputer : Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pencapaian

Berdasarkan Aras Kognitif Pelajar. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pembangunan

Dan Pendidikan Lestari, September, 19–20.

 

Museum of Science. (2020). The Engineering Design Process. Museum of Science.

https://www.eie.org/overview/engineering-design-process

 

Mustafa, N., Ismail, Z., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad Said, M. N. H. (2016). A meta-analysis

on effective strategies for integrated STEM education. Advanced Science

Letters, 22(12), 4225–4288.

 

Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts,

challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–

223.

 

National Academies of Sciences. (2016). Developing a National STEM Workforce

Strategy: A Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press.

 

National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. (2014). STEM

Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research

(M. Honey, G. Pearson, & H. Schweingruber (eds.)). The National Academies

Press.

 

Ng, C. H., & Adnan, M. (2018). Integrating STEM education through Project-Based

Inquiry Learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils. IOP Conference

Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1–6.

 

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States

(2013). The National Academies Press.

 

Noah, S. M., & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul Bagaimana Membina Modul

Latihan dan Modul Akademik. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) : What Students Know and Can Do: Vol.

I.

 

OECD Country Delegates. (2005). The Role of National Qualifications Systems in

Promoting Lifelong Learning Report from Thematic Group 2 : Standards and

quality assurance in qualifications with special reference to the recognition of

non-formal and informal learning.

 

Omri, H., Tojid, A. M., Ali, S. M., Yunus, M. H., Sigam, C. J., Zakaria, A., & Zakaria,

Z. M. (2018). Modul Pertandingan Roket Air Sekolah Menengah. In S. Jemain

(Ed.), Modul Pertandingan Karnival STEM Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia

Peringkat Kebangsaan (pp. 23–42). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2000). Expanding The Framework of Internal and External

Validity in Quantitative Research. Annual Meeting of The Association for The

Advancement of Educational Research (AAER), 21, 63.

 

Özcan, H., & Koca, E. (2019). The Impact of Teaching the Subject “Pressure” with

STEM Approach on the Academic Achievements of the Secondary School 7th

Grade Students and Their Attitudes Towards STEM. Education and Science,

44(198), 201–227.

 

Padirayon, L. M., Pagudpud, M. V, & Cruz, J. S. D. (2019). Exploring constructivism

learning theory using mobile game. The International Conference on

Information Technology and Digital Applications, 1–6.

 

Parno, Yuliati, L., Munfaridah, N., Ali, M., Indrasari, N., & Rosyidah, F. U. N. (2020).

The impact of STEM-based guided inquiry learning on students’ scientific

literacy in the topic of fluid statics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,

1481(1), 1–11.

 

Pathan, R. R., Dheepak, A., & Tijare, S. (2016). Design and Development of Water

Rocket. National Conference on Innovative Trends in Engineering &

Technology, 1–5.

 

Patino, C. M., & Ferreira, J. C. (2018). Internal and external validity: can you apply

research study results to your patients? Jornal Brasileiro De Pneumologia,

44(3), 183.

 

PBLWorks Buck Institute for Education. (2020). Creativity & Innovation Rubric for

PBL. Creativity & Innovation Rubric for PBL.

https://my.pblworks.org/resource/document/6_12_creativity_innovation_rubri

c_non_ccss

 

Perbal, B. (2017). Neuroscience and psychological studies sustain the cognitive

benefits of print reading. Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, 9(11),

1–4.

 

Akta 611,Akta Kanak-Kanak 2001, Pub. L. No. 611, 137 (2001).

 

Petnuchova, J. (2012). Non-Formal and Informal Education: Where Does It Go in the

Slovak Republic? US-China Education Review, 6, 614–625.

 

Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh, S. (2014). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada

Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar Dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan

Tesis. Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA, 2(4), 63–71.

 

Piaget, J. (1964). Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and

learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(3), 176–186.

 

Piaw, C. Y. (2016). Mastering Research Methods (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

 

Pitriana, P., Agustina, R. D., Zakwandi, R., Ijharudin, M., & Kurniawan, D. T. (2018).

Fun Science : Roket Air Sebagai Media Edu-Sains untuk Meningkatkan

Motivasi Belaj ar Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan

Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah, 2(1), 1–7.

 

Planetarium Negara Malaysia. (2018). Peraturan Umum dan Syarat-Syarat Kejohanan

Roket Air Kebangsaan 2018 (KRK2018) (2018th ed.). Planetarium Negara.

 

Polit, D. F., Beck, T., & Owen, S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods Is the CVI

an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity ? Appraisal and Recommendations.

Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459–467.

 

Popovic, G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). Implications of Informal Education Experiences

for Mathematics Teachers ’ Ability to Make Connections Beyond Formal

Classroom. School of Science and Mathematics, 115(3), 129–140.

 

Potter, P., & France, B. (2018). Informing a pedagogy for design and problem-solving

in hard materials by theorising technologists’ learning experiences.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 101–120.

 

Prastyaningrum, I., & Imansari, N. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Mata

Kuliah Teori Medan. Jupiter (Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro), 1(2), 56.

 

Purzer, S., Goldstein, M. H., Adams, R. S., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2015). An

exploratory study of informed engineering design behaviors associated with

scientific explanations. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(9), 1–12.

 

Quick, K., & Blue, C. (2019). Using Situated Learning Theory to Build an Interactive

Learning Environment to Foster Dental Students’ Professionalism: An Ignite

Project. Journal of Dental Education, 83(3), 334–341.

 

Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I learned to design and conduct semi-structured interviews:

An ongoing and continuous journey. Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563–566.

 

Rahim, F., Iksan, Z., Othman, O., Nasyrudin, W., Huda, S. N., Arsad, N., Sham, A.,

Abu Hanifah, S., & Mohd Hanafiah, M. (2014). Pemerkasaan Ulul Albab

melalui modul STEM bersepadu STEMind. The Online Journal of Islamic

Education, Special Issue, 1–12.

 

Rajuldevi, M. K., Veeramachaneni, R., & Kare, S. (2008). Warehousing in theory and

practice: A case study at ÖoB, Clas Ohlson, Stadium, Åhlens Mahesh.

 

Ramli, A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Jamaluddin, R., &

Abdullah, N. (2017). Teachers ’ Readiness in Teaching STEM Education. Man

In India, 97(13), 343–350.

 

Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can Education Institution Implement STEM? From

Malaysian Teachers’ View. International Journal of Academic Research in

Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 2222–6990.

 

Rasul, M. S., Zahriman, N., Halim, L., & Rauf, R. A. (2018). Impact of Integrated

STEM SMART Communities Program on Students Scientific Creativity.

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, November(Special Issue on i-

CITE 2018), 80–89.

 

Razali, R. M., & Ayob, A. (2018). Keberkesanan Pengunaan Modul Interaktif Terhadap

Pencapaian Membaca Murid Pemulihan. International Journal of Education,

Psychology and Counseling, 3(19), 34–56.

 

Remziye Ergül, N., & Kargin, K. (2014). The Effect Of Project Based Learning On

Students’ Science Success. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136,

537–541.

 

Reynante, B. M., Selbach-allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the

Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and

Epistemologies. Science & Education, April, 1–19.

 

Roberts, T., Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Cavalcanti,

M., Craig Schroeder, D., Delaney, A., Putnam, L., & Cremeans, C. (2018).

Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer

informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1),

1–14.

 

Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research (Second). Blackwell Publishing.

 

Ruey-Shyy Shieh, & Wheijen Chang. (2014). Fostering Student’s Creative and

Problem-solving Skills Through a Hands-on Activity. Journal of Baltic Science

Education, 13(5), 650–661.

 

Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The

one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation,

16(6), 309–314.

 

Saghir, A., Hussain, A., Batool, A., Sittar, K., & Malik, M. (2016). Play and Cognitive

Development: Formal Operational Perspective of Piaget’s Theory. Journal of

Education and Practice, 7(28), 72–79.

 

Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM Related After-School Program

Activities and Associated Outcomes on Student Learning. Educational

Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 309–322.

 

Samat, N. A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Ali, M., Abdullah, A. H., Talib, C. A., &

Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2019). Chem-a module based on stem approach in

chemical bond. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering,

7(6), 700–710.

 

Sanders, M. (2012). Integrative STEM Education As Best Practice. 7th Biennial

International Technology Education Research Conference, 2, 103–117.

 

Saper, N., Ain, N., Daud, M., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan

Modul I-Sc (Islamic Spiritual Counseling) ke atas Pelajar Bermasalah Tingkah

Laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9, 32–43.

 

Saunders-smits, G. N., & Kat, R. De. (2009). 3,2,1, Launch! SEFI 37th Annual

Conference 2009, July, 1–7.

 

Schnittka, C. G., Evans, M. A., Won, S. G. L., & Drape, T. A. (2016). After-School

Spaces: Looking for Learning in All the Right Places. Research in Science

Education, 46(3), 389–412.

 

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective (P. Smith (ed.);

6 Edition). Pearson.

 

Seçken, N., & Ural, E. (2011). The effect of constructivist approach on students ’

understanding of the concepts related to hydrolysis. Porcedia Social and

Behavorial Sciences, 15, 235–240.

 

Setiawaty, S., Fatmi, N., Rahmi, A., Unaida, R., Hadiya, I., Muhammad, I., & Permana

Sari, R. (2018). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

Learning on Student’s Science Process Skills and Science Attitudes.

Technology and Sustainable Development, 14, 2–17.

 

Shahali, E. H. M., Halim, L., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Zulkifeli, M. A. (2017). STEM

learning through engineering design: Impact on middle secondary students’

interest towards STEM. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and

Technology Education, 13(5), 1189–1211.

 

Shearer, D. A., & Vogt, G. L. (2011). Rockets Educator Guide. In M. Solomon (Ed.),

New York. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

 

Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher

education and professional development needs for the implementation of

integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM

Education, 4(1), 13.

 

Shukri, A. A. M., Ahmad, C. N. C., & Daud, N. (2020). Integrated STEM-based

module: Relationship between students’ creative thinking and science

achievement. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 173–180.

 

Siekmann, G., & Korbel, P. (2016). Defining “STEM” skills: review and synthesis of

the literature.

 

Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and inservice

teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science.

SpringerPlus, 4(8), 1–20.

 

Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications.

 

STEM Task Force Report. (2014). INNOVATE: A Blueprint for Science, Technology,

Engineering, and Mathematics in California Public Education.

 

Strimel, G. J., Bartholomew, S. R., Kim, E., & Zhang, L. (2018). An Investigation of

Engineering Design Cognition and Achievement in Primary School. Journal for

STEM Education Research, October, 173–201.

 

Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’

engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM

education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education,

41(10), 1387–1407.

 

Stump, S. L., Bryan, J. A., & Mcconnell, T. J. (2016). Making STEM Connections.

Mathematics Teacher, 109(8), 576–583.

 

Sulaiman, I. (2018). Pembinaan Dan Pengujian Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran

Berasaskan Peta Pemikiran Bagi Topik Nisbah, Kadar dan Kadaran. Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, S., Wiyanto, W., & Supartono, S. (2016). Preliminary Analysis

of Assessment Instrument Design to Reveal Science Generic Skill and

Chemistry Literacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in

Education (IJERE), 5(4), 331.

 

Sutton, J., & Austin, Z. (2015). Qualitative research: Data collection, analysis, and

management. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 68(3), 226–231.

 

Syarkowi, A., & Hendri, M. (2019). The challenge of implementing STEM for senior

high school students in the city border of Jambi. Journal of Physics: Conference

Series, 1280(5), 1–5.

 

Syukri, M., Mohtar, L. E., & Lilia, H. (2018). The Impact of Engineering Design

Process in Teaching and Learning to Enhance Students ’ Science Problem-

Solving Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1, 66–75.

 

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting

Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education,

48(6), 1273–1296.

 

Tek, O. E., Safiee, N., Jusoh, Z. M., Salleh, S. M., & Noor, A. M. H. M. (2017). STEM

Education Through Project-Based Inquiry Learning : An Exploratory Study On

Its Impact Among Year 1 Primary Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &

Matematik Malaysia, 7(2), 43–51.

 

Theng, T. C., & Kassim, A. P. D. A. H. (2009). Kefahaman dan Aplikasi Konsep Asid-

Bes dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Sains Johor Bahru. Jurnal Sains

Dan Matematik, 1(1), 22–29.

 

Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A.,

Boeve-De Pauw, J., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L.,

Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van De Velde, D., Van Petegem, P.,

& Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of

Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Jourrnal of STEM

Education, 3(1), 2.

 

Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian

approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational

Development, 45(March), 42–53.

 

Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The Effect of Integrative STEM Instruction on

Elementary Students ’ Attitudes toward Science. Eurasia Journal of

Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395.

 

Tomita, N., Watanabe, R., & Nebylov, A. V. (2007). Hands-on education system using

water rocket. Acta Astronautica, 61(11–12), 1116–1120.

 

Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative Interview Design: A Practical Guide for Novice

Investigators. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 7.

 

Ultanir, E. (2012). An Epistemological Glance at the Constructivist Approach:

Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International

Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212.

 

United States General Accounting Office. (1990). Program Evaluation and

Methodology Division: Case Study Evaluations. In United States General

Accounting Office (Issue November, pp. 1–133). Program Evaluation and

Methodology Division (PEMD).

 

Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8:

integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.

 

Vossen, T. E., Henze, E. H. T. I., & Driel, M. J. D. V. J. H. Van. (2019). Student and

teacher perceptions of the functions of research in the context of a design -

oriented STEM module. International Journal of Technology and Design

Education, May, 1–30.

 

Vrioni, A., Mavroudi, A., & Ioannou, I. (2020). Promoting Authentic Student

Assessment For STEM Project-Based Learning Activities Promoting Authentic

Student Assessment For STEM Project-Based Learning Activities.

International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication, Technologies

and Learning, September, 117–126.

 

Vu, P., & Feinstein, S. (2017). An exploratory multiple case study about using gamebased

learning in STEM classrooms. International Journal of Research in

Education and Science, 3(2), 582–588.

 

Walker, S. E. (2006). Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection.

Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2), 216–221.

 

Wallace, C. S., & Brooks, L. (2015). Learning to Teach Elementary Science in an

Experiential, Informal Context: Culture, Learning, and Identity. Science

Education, 99(1), 174–198.

 

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry

pedagogy on students ’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in

Human Behavior, 49(August), 658–669.

 

Watkins, R., Meiers, M. W., & Visser, Y. L. (2012). Assessing Needs. The World Bank.

 

Watts, F., Garcia-Carbonell, A., & Andreu-Andres, A. (2013). Innovation

Competencies Development - INCODE Barometer and User Guide. Turku

University of Applied Science.

 

Wei, L. M. (2020). Hubungan antara tahap pengaplikasian kemahiran algoritma dengan

tahap kemahiran menulis murid tahun 5. Proceedings of International

Conference on The Future of Education IConFEd), November 2020, 15–24.

 

Wilkinson, D., & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using Research Instruments A Guide For

Researchers (First Edit). RoutledgeFalmer.

 

Wilson, S. M., & Peterson, P. L. (2006). Theories of learning and teaching. In NEA

Research Best Practices (Issue July).

 

Wu, Y.-T., & Anderson, O. R. (2015). Technology-enhanced stem (science,

technology, engineering, and mathematics) education. Journal of Computers in

Education, 2(3), 245–249.

 

Xu, J. (2013). Why Do Students Have Difficulties Completing Homework? The Need

for Homework Management. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(1),

98–105.

 

Xuan Quang, L., Huy Hoang, L., Dinh Chuan, V., Hoai Nam, N., Thi Tu Anh, N., Thi

Hong Nhung, V., & Amparo Oliveros Ruiz, M. (2015). Integrated Science,

Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education through Active

Experience of Designing Technical Toys in Vietnamese Schools. British

Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 11(2), 1–12.

 

Yaki, A. A., Saat, R. M., Renuka, V., & Zulnaidi, H. (2019). Enhancing Science

Achievement Utilising an Integrated STEM Approach. Malaysian Journal of

Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 181–205.

 

Yang, E. E., & Houston, B. L. (2016). Understanding the Physics of Water Rockets

Using Wireless Sensors. The 2016 IAJC/ISAM Joint International Conference,

978–979.

 

Yildiz, S. G., & Ozdemir, A. S. (2018). The effects of engineering design processes on

spatial abilities of middle school students. International Journal of Technology

and Design Education, December, 1–22.

 

Yin, R. K. (1994). Method in Evaluation Research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283–

290.

 

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (Sixth).

SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational

Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 43–58.

 

Yu, K., Lin, K., & Hung, K. (2010). Teaching science through technology : A

confluence of knowledge, design and construction. World Transactions on

Engineering and Technology Education, 8(4), 436–441.

 

Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index

Calculation. Education In Medicine, 11(2), 49–54.

 

Zailan, N. A., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Hanri, C., Ibrahim, N. H., Osman, S., Ismail, N., &

Azelee, N. I. W. (2019). Assessment and Evaluation of Non-Formal STEM

Education Programs. International Journal of Recent Technology and

Engineering, 7(685), 762–768.

 

Zainal, N. F. A., Din, R., Abd Majid, N. A., Nasrudin, M. F., & Abd Rahman, A. H.

(2018). Primary and Secondary School Students Perspective on Kolb-based

STEM Module and Robotic Prototype. International Journal on Advanced

Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 8(4–2), 1394.

 

Zainal, Z. (2007). The Case Study as a Research Method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9(June),

1–6.

 

Zhai, L. (2019). An Inquiry Teaching Mode Based on STEM Education. International

Journal of Engineering Science Research, 14(17), 44–58.