UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Siti Fazlyana Mat Husin
Title :Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran bilik darjah guru tahap satu di sekolah daerah Gombak
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan menentukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi amalan pentaksiran guru di dalam bilik darjah. Faktor-faktor yang ingin dikenal pasti ialah konsepsi pentaksiran dan personaliti guru. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif yang menggunakan soal selidik sebagai instrumen. Seramai 330 orang guru tahap satu dipilih sebagai responden melalui persampelan rawak berkadar. Sebanyak 30 daripada 68 buah sekolah rendah daerah Gombak, Selangor dipilih melalui persampelan rawak mudah. Data dianalisis melalui statistik deskripsi dan inferens. Dapatan deskripsi menunjukkan bahawa 6 daripada 10 subkonstruk didapati berada pada tahap yang tinggi. Analisis korelasi pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan kuat antara konsepsi pentaksiran dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.615,p=0.00). Namun begitu, hubungan yang signifikan, positif dan sederhana berlaku di antara personaliti dengan amalan pentaksiran (r=0.333,p=0.00) dan personaliti dengan konsepsi pentaksiran (r=0.334,p=0.00). Analisis regresi pelbagai menunjukkan bahawa konsepsi pentaksiran dan personaliti mampu menjelaskan 39.7% variasi dari amalan pentaksiran (R2=0.397,F(2,327)=107.468,p=0.00). Konsepsi pentaksiran mampu meramalkan amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.567,p=0.00) dan personaliti juga mampu meramalkan amalan pentaksiran (Beta=0.143,p=0.00). Kesimpulannya konsepsi pentaksiran dan personaliti mempunyai pengaruh ke atas amalan pentaksiran, dan peramal terbaik bagi amalan pentaksiran adalah konsepsi pentaksiran. Implikasi kajian ini adalah diharap pihak KPM dapat memantapkan lagi pengetahuan guru tentang konsepsi pentaksiran iaitu tentang tujuan pentaksiran dengan menyediakan latihan atau kursus bersesuaian kerana ia memberi pengaruh yang besar ke atas amalan pentaksiran guru.

References

A.R. Peterson. (2000). A Meta-Analysis of Variance Accounted for and Factor

Loadings in Exploratory Factor Analysis. Marketing Letters. 11(3), 261-275.

 

Abdul Halim al-Muhammadi. (2009). Manfaat ilmu cara terbaik hargai jasa guru:

pendidik pikul tanggungjawab berat bentuk generasi berdaya saing, pemimpin

masa depan. Berita Harian. him. 4 l.

 

Abdul Zubir Abdul Ghani. (2007). Pelaksanaan PBS di kalangan guru Tingkatan 3.

Tesis Ijazah Kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan.Universiti Malaya.

 

Abu Bakar Nordin. (1986). Asas Penilaian Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya: Longman

Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

 

Acar-Erdol, T., & Yildizli, H. (2018). Classroom assessment practices of teachers in

Turkey. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 587–602

 

Airasian, P. W. (1997). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Airasian, P. W. (2001). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and Applications (4th edition

ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

 

Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitude, personality and behaviour (2 nd ed.). New York: Open

University Press.

 

Akhbar Ibrahim & Siti Zaliha Reduan. (2002). Penilaian prestasi berasaskan sekolah:

Pelaksanaan dan kesediaan guru. Kertas kerja dibentangkan di Persidangan

Kebangsaan Penilaian Kemajuan Berasaskan Sekolah, Universiti Sains

Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.

 

Akhiar Pardi, Shamsina Shamsuddin dan Muhammad Kushairi Jusoh. (2012). Asas

Kepimpinan dan Perkembangan Profesional Guru. Kuala Lumpur: Freemind

Horizons Sdn. Bhd

 

Ali, A. (2006). Conducting Research in Education and the Social Sciences. Enugu:

Tashiwa Networks Ltd.

 

Ali, R.M., & Veloo, A. (2017). Teachers’ autonomy and accountability in assessing

Students’ physical education in school-based assessment. In I. H. Amzat & N.

P. Valdez (Eds.), Teacher development and towards professional empowerment

practices perspectives ccross borders (p. 71). Spingers

 

Alkharusi, H. (2011). Validity and reliability of the attitude toward educational

measurement inventory. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 612–

620

 

Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart &

Winston.

 

Angelo, T. (2001). Classroom assessment: Guidelines for success. Essays on Teaching

Excellence. http://teaching.uchicago.edu/pod/angelo.html

 

Aniza., & Zamri. (2015). Tahap Kemahiran Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah

Dalam Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah Berdasarkan Jantina,

Opsyen Dan Tempat Mengajar. Fakulti Pendidikan. UKM.

 

Ariston Shah Muhaimin. (2007). Keseragaman Antara Pernyataan Hasil

Pembelajaran Kursus dan Item Soalan Peperiksaan Akhir Fakulti Kejuruteraan

Awam dan Fakulti Kejuruteraan Elektrik UTM. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia:

Disertasi Sarjana

 

Asrul Azmin bin Masiron. (2010). Hubungan antara personaliti dan penghargaan

kendiri pelajar cemerlang akademik. MRSM Pontian.

 

Azhani Adnan. (2008). Personaliti Guru: Pengaruh ke atas Pengajaran dan

Pembelajaran. Tanjung Malim. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Azhari Mariani. (2016). Model Pengajaran Kreatif Berteraskan Kompetensi,

Personaliti Dan Rangsangan Kreativiti Guru Matematik Berpendekatan

Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur. Desertasi ijazah Doktor Falsafah (Pendidikan

Matematik)

 

Azizi Yahaya, Jamaludin Ramli & Mazeni Ismail. (2010). Stress dalam Kalangan Guru

Sekolah Menengah di Empat Buah Negeri di Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of

Educators and Education, Vol. 25, 103-136, 2010.

 

Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991). Assessing Construct Validity in

Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393203

 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2018). Jurnal Kurikulum. ISSN:1511-2942

 

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : A social cognitive

theory. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall.

 

Bandura, A. (1992). Self-efficacy mechanism in psychobiologic functioning. In R.

Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp.355-394).

Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

 

Bandura,A. (1991). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. In R. Schwarzer & R. A.

Wicklund (Eds.), Anxiety and self-focused attention (pp. 89-110). New York:

Harwood.

 

Barksdale-Ladd, M. A., & Thomas, K. F. (2000). What ís at stake in high-stakes testing:

Teachers and parents speak out. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 384-397.

 

Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment. In

H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher

beliefs (pp. 284–300). New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Barnes, N., Fives, H., & Dacey, C. M. (2017). U.S. teachers’ conceptions of the

purposes of assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 107-116.

doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.017

 

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and

jobperformance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

 

Biggs, J. (1995). Assessing for learning: some dimensions underlying new approaches

to educational assessment, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 41(1),

1-17.

 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in

Education, 5(1), 7 -73

 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J.

Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81-100). London: Sage.

 

Bonner, S. M. (2016). “Teachers perceptions about assessment: competing narrative

“, in Handbook of human and sosial conditions in assessment, eds G. T. L.

Brown and L. R. Harris. (New York, NY: Routledge), 21-39.

 

Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Teacher candidates’ perceptions about grading

and constructivist teaching. Educational Assessment, 14(2), 57–77.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903039411

 

Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment,

Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved October 7, 2010 from

http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9

 

Brown, G. T. L. (2002). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Unpublished Doctoral

Dissertation. University of Auckland, New Zealand.

 

Brown, G. T. L. (2004b). Measuring attitude with positively packed self- report ratings:

Comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports, 94,

1015e1024.

 

Brown, G. T. L. (2006). Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Validation of an

abridged instrument. Psychological Reports, 99, 166e170.

 

Brown, G. T. L. (2016). “Improvement and accountability functions of

assessment:impact on teachers’ thinking and action,” in Encyclopedia of

EducationalPhilosophy and Theory, ed A. M. Peters (Singapore: Springer), 1–

6.

 

Brown, G. T. L., & Gao, L. (2015). Chinese teachers’ conceptions of assessment for

and of learning : Six competing and complementary purp

 

Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of social and human

conditions in assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Brown, G. T. L., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009).

Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers'

conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles,

Policy & Practice, 16(3), 347-363. doi:10.1080/09695940903319737

 

Brown, G. T. L., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of

assessment: The impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and

Teacher Education, 27(1), 210-220.

 

Brown, G.T.L. (2009). Teachers’ self-reported assessment practices and conceptions:

Using Structural Equation Modelling to examine measurement and structural

models in T.Teo (ed), Structural Equation Modeling In Educational Research:

Concepts and applications, 243-266: Sense Publishers.

 

Brynt, N. C., & Barnes, L. L. B. (1997). Development and validation of the attitude

toward educational measurement inventory. Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 57(5), 870–875.

 

Butterfield, S., William, A., & Marr, A. (1999). Talking about assessment: mentorstudent

dialogues about pupil assessment in initial teacher training. Assessment

in Education, 6(2), pp.225-246

 

Chang, S. F. (1988). Teachers' Assessment Practices: Assessing Phase II Pupils'

Progress InKBSR English. Universiti Malaya, Petaling Jaya

 

Chappuis, S. (2008). The best value in formative assessment. Pages 14-19.

 

Chong Chee Keong, Muhammad Faizal A. Ghani & Zuraidah Abdullah. (2016).

Amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional di sekolah berprestasi tinggi

Malaysia: sebuah Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan Cina di Sarawak. Jurnal

kepimpinan pendidikan, 3 (1), 43-70.

 

Chua Yan Piaw, (2009). Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan: Ujian Regresi, Analisis

Faktor dan Analisis SEM. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Sdn. Bhd.

 

Chua Yan Piaw. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan-Asas Statistik Penyelidikan

(Buku 2), Edisi Ketiga. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill Education

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.

 

Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S., Shawn, M., & Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers’ assessment

practices: preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink, Educational Assessment,

3, 159-179.

 

Clower, C. E., & Bothwell, R. K. (2001). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship

between the Big Five and Inmate Recidivism. Journal of Research in Personality,

35(2), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2312

 

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical

practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5-

13. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5

 

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis:

Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical

Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 10, 1-9

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

 

Crooks, T. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review

of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.

 

David, A. Payne. (2003). Applied educational assessment. Wadsworth Thomson

Learning.

 

Desforges, C. (1989). Testing And Assessment. London: Cassell Education Limited.

 

DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development Theory and Applications. (2nd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications

 

Dochy, F., Gijbels, D., & Segers, M. (2006). Learning and the emerging new

assessment culture. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou

(Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present, and future trends (pp. 191-206).

Oxford, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

 

Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. (1981, 1986, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1996).

Productivity Environmental Preference Survey. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems

Inc.

 

Earl, Lorna M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to

maximize student learning

 

Faizah bt Abd. Ghani & Nagarajan Kupusamy. (2012). Hubungan Trait Personaliti dan

Kecekapan Guru Bimbingan dan Kaunseling Dalam Pelaksanaan

Perkhidmatan Bimbingan dan Kaunseling di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Pasir

Gudang Johor. Journal of Educational Psyachology & Counseling. (6) June

2012. 92-115

 

Feshbach, S., Weiner, B., & Bohart, A. C. (1996). Personality (4th ed.). Toronto: D.C.

Heath.

 

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief. attitude, intention and behavior: An

introduction of theory and research. Philippine: Adison-Wesley Publishing.

 

Follmer, D. J., & Stefanou, C. R. (2014). Examining the correspondence between a

direct and an indirect measure of executive functions: Implications for schoolbased

assessment. The School Psychologist, 68(3), 12-18.

 

Fraenkel, J.R., and Wallen, N.E., (1996), How to Design and Evaluate Research. USA:

Mc. Fraw-Hill Inc.

 

Fulmer, G. W., Lee, I. C. H., & Tan, K. H. K. (2015). Multi-level model of contextual

factors and teachers’ assessment practices: An integrative review of research.

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 22, 475–494.

doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1017445

 

Gay , L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Education research. Competencies for Analysis and

Applications, New Jersey.

 

Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin.(2018) . Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam

Pendidikan, Amalan Dan Analisis Kajian. Ed. Kedua. Kuala Lumpur:

Universiti Malaya.

 

Ghazali, D., & Sofean, H. (2015). Metodologi penyelidikan dan pendidikan (1st ed.).

Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: amalan

dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.

 

Gonzales, R. DLC (1999). Assessing thinking skills in the classroom: Types, techniques

and taxonomy of measures of thinking skills in higher education Philippines

Journal of Educational Measurement, 9 (1), 17-26.

 

Gonzales, R. & Fugan, C. (2012). Exploring the Conceptual and Psychometric

Properties of Classroom Assessment. The International Journal of Educational

and Psychological Assessment, 9(2).

 

Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015). Formative assessment and writing: A

meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 523-547.

 

Grounland, N. E. (1982). Constructing Achievement Test, 3rd Ed.. New Jwrsey:

Prentice Hall Inc: Engle Word Cliffs

 

Grubb, W.N. 2002. Who Am I: The Inadequacy of Career Information in The

Information Age. Berkeley: U.S.A.

 

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Pearson New

International Edition: Multivariat Data Analysis. Exploratory Data Analysis in

Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0_3

 

Hair, Jr.,J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (2010). Multivariate data

analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

 

Hale, G (1980). Effect of Item Disclosure on TOEFL Performance, “Research Report

No. 8, Educational Testing Servises: Princeton, NJ

 

Hashiroh Hussain & Norshuhada Shiratuddin. (2016). Kebolehpercayaan dan korelasi

elemen multimedia dan antara muka tablet dalam menilai penceritaan digital.

Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 31, 27–45.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/apjee2016.31.3

 

Hay/McBer.(1996). Scaled Competency Dictionary. Boston: Hay/McBer.

 

Heinstrom. J. (2003). Five Personality Dimensions and Their Insluence on Information

Behaviour. (9) 1. http://informationr.net/ir/9-1/paper165.html

 

Hill, M. F. (2002). Remapping the assessment landscape : primary teacher

reconstructing assessment in self-managing school. Hamilton, NZ: the

university of Waikato

 

Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Issues and non-issues in the fidelity-bandwidth

trade-off. Joumal of Organizational Behavior, 17(6),627-637

 

Hussein, A. (2014). Implementation of strategic education policy plan at micro-level

contexts: Management and leadership challenges. Malaysian Online Journal of

Educational Management

 

Idris, N. (2016). Penilaian pelaksanaan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah dalam

kalangan guru. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Jacob, R., and Parkinson, J. (2015). The Potential for School-Based Interventions That

Target Executive Function to Improve Academic Achievement:A Review.

Review of Educational Research, 85(4): 512-552.

 

Jacobs, L. C., & Chase, C. I. (1992). Developing And Using Tests Effectively. San

Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

 

John, O.P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy : history, measurement,

and theoritical perspectives. Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2,

102-138.

 

Jones, S., & Tanner, H. (2008). Assessment: A practical guide for secondary Teachers

(2nd ed.) London: Continuum.

 

Kapambwe, M. W. (2010). The implementation of school based continuous assessment

(CA) in Zambia. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(3), 099-107. Retrieved

from http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR

 

Karom Kingsoka. (2010) . Sikap yang Harus Dimiliki oleh Seorang Guru. Makalah

keperibadian guru.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018a). Laporan tahunan 2018 : Pelan

Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2011). Buku Panduan Pengurusan dan

Pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS), Sekolah Rendah. LP:

Kuala Lumpur.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan

Pendidikan Malaysia 2013 - 2025. Putrajaya: KPM.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Bilik

Darjah. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018b). Surat siaran bil. 14/2018: Pemansuhan

amalan peperiksaan pertengahan dan akhir tahun murid tahap 1 di sekolah

rendah KPM mulai tahun 2019

 

Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX:

Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing : A practical approach to design and evaluation.

Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.

 

Krejcie, R.V. dan Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sampel size for research

activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

 

Kumutha Raman & Hamida Yamat. (2014). A Case Study: Barriers Teachers Face in

Integrating ICT during English Lessons. Malaysian Online Journal of

Educational Technology, v2 n3 p11-19 2014

 

Laimah Sungap. (2017). Hubungan antara amalan pengurusan kurikulum, kepuasan

kerja dan komitmen kerja dalam kalangan ketua panitia berdasarkan prestasi

akademik sekolah menengah kawasan pendalaman atas Negeri Sabah. Journal

of global business and social entrepreneurship, 1(1), 58–72.

 

Lane, K. L., Oakes, W. P., Powers, L., Diebold, T., Germer, K., Common, E. A., &

Brunsting, N. (2015). Improving teachers' knowledge of functional assessmentbased

interventions: Outcomes of a professional development series. Education

and Treatment of Children, 38(1), 93-120.

 

Langford, P. H. (2003). A one-minute measure of the Big Five? Evaluating and

abridging Shafer's (1999a) Big Five markers. Personality and Individual

Differences, 35(5), 1127–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00323-

9

 

Lay, Y. F., & Hoon, K. C. (2012). Pengenalan kepada pendekatan kuantitatif dalam

penyelidikan pendidikan. Sabah: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

 

Lee, I. R., & Kemple, K. (2014). Preservice Teachers' Personality Traits and

Engagement in Creative Activities as Predictors of Their Support for Children's

Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 82-94.

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2012). Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran

Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS). LPM: Kuala Lumpur.

 

Lent, R. W., & Hackett, G. (1987). Career self-efficacy: Empirical status and future

directions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30(3), 347–382.

 

Lim Chong Hin. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantiatif dan kualitatif.

Selangor: McGraw- Hill (Malaysia).

 

Looi-Chin, C. & Soubakeavathi, R. (2013). English language assessment in Malaysia:

Teachers’ Practices In Test Preparation. Issues in Language Studies, 2(2), 24-

39.

 

M. David Miller et al. (2009). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. IV. Title.

LB3051. 1 545 2009

 

Maarof Redzuan dan Haslinda Abdullah. (2004). Psikologi. Ed 2. Kuala Lumpur: Mc

Graw Hill.

 

MacCallum et al. (1999). Sampel Size In Factor Analysis. Ohio state university.

 

Madaus, G. F (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.),

Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the National Society

for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 

Mahaya Salleh, Azizah Sarkowi, Mohd Fairuz Jafar, Zakaria Mohd Arif & Hariyanti

Abd Hamid. (2019). Tahap Literasi Guru Terhadap Pendekatan Dalam

Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah. Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan (ISPEN

2019 eISBN 978-967-2122-77-7).

 

Mahmood Nazar Mohamed (1990). Pengantar Psikologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan

Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., & Vignoles, A. (2015). A comparison of teacher and testbased

assessment for Spanish primary and secondary students. Educational

Research, 57(1), 1-21.

 

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us.

Instructional Science, 10, 177-200,

 

Martyn Long. (2000). The Psychology of Education. London & New York:

RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor & Francis Group

 

Mat Ali, M. A. (2006). Amalan Pentaksiran Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Universiti

Malaya: Tesis PhD.

 

McMillan, J. H. (2004). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective

instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education

 

McMillan, J. H. (2008). Assessment Essentials For Standard-Based Education (2nd

ed.). California: Corwin Press.

 

Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test

scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent?Educational Measurement: Issues and

Practice,8(1), 14–22.

 

Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmannn, I.J. (1984). Measurement and evaluation in education

and psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

 

Michaelides & Brown. (2009), Testing models of teachers’ conceptions of assessment

with samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. Paper presented at the biannual

conference of the International Test Commission, Hong Kong.

 

Mirian, B. M., & Zulnaidi, H. (2020). Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of

Assessment: Gender and Academic Qualification Comparisons. International

Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13217a

 

Mishel, W. (1968). Personality and Assessment. New York: Wiley.

 

Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbitan

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

 

Mohamad Najib, A. G. (2016). Prinsip asas penilaian program pendidikan. Johor:

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Press.

 

Mohd Azhar, M. A. (2006). Amalan pentaksiran di sekolah menengah. Tesis Ijazah

Kedoktoran tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

 

Mohd Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan

Bahasa Dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Majid Konting. (1993). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Majid Konting. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan

Bahasa & Pustaka.

 

Mohd. Nasir Masran. (2000). Guru cemerlang: Personaliti dan kurikulum. Kertas kerja

yang dibentang dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Penyelidikan dan Pembangunan

dalam pendidikan 2000, Berita Harian.

 

Moiinvaziri, M. (2015). University teachers' conception of assessment: A structural

equation modeling approach. American Institute of Science, 1(3), 75-85.

 

Mokhtar Ismail. (1995). Penilaian di Bilik kuliah dan makmal. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan

Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Moss, P. A., Girard, B. J., & Haniford, L. C. (2006). Chapter 4: Validity in Educational

Assessment. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 109–162.

doi:10.3102/0091732X030001109

 

Ng, See Ngean (1991). Pengukuran dan Penilaian dalam Pendidikan. Petaling Jaya :

Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

 

Noorlyda Abd Latib. (2012). Mengapa hasil pembelajaran harus ditentukan? Retrieved

fromhttp://www.slideshare.net/NoorlydaAbdLatip/hasilpembelajarankpd4033

presentation.

 

Nor Haiza. (2010). Rekod berterusan untuk mengesan perkembangan kanak-kanak.

Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/37749354/rekod-berterusan-untukmengesan-

perkembangan-kanak-kanak.

 

Nor Hasnida Md Ghazali, Baharim Yaakub dan Afian Akhbar Mustam. (2012). Why

do We Need to Change? Teachers’ attitude towards School-based Assessment

System. London’s First International Conference on Social Sciences and

Humanities in the Islamic World

 

Nor Shafrin Ahmad, Fadzilah Amzah & Rahimi Che Aman. (2009) . Kemahiran

komunikasi guru pelatih Universiti Sains Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidik dan

Pendidikan 24: 125-142.

 

Noraini Idris dan Nik Azis Nik Pa, (2008). Perjuangan Memperkasakan Pendidikan Di

Malaysia: Pengalaman 50 Tahun Merdeka. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan

 

Noraini Idris. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill

Education.

 

Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan (2nd ed.). Malaysia: McGraw-

Hill Education (Malaysia).

 

Noraini, Idris. (2005). Pedagogy in Mathematics Education. Second Edition. Kuala

Lumpur: UtusanPublication Sdn. Bhd.

 

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Retrieved

December 2012 from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/eff.html (accessed

17/7/2012).

 

Pajares, F., and Miller, M. D. (1994). The role of self efficacy and self concept beliefs

in mathematical solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,

86, 193–203.

 

Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative Teaching and Its Assessment. Faculty of

Education, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA

 

Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Gombak. (2017). Laporan Pelaksanaan Dialog Prestasi

Program LINUS 2.0. Saringan 2

 

Popham, W. J. (2000). Modern educational measurement: Practical guidelines for

educational leaders (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, PPK. (2001). ISBN 983-2340-36-5 1. Study skills. I.

Judul. 371.30281

 

Ramlah Ab Khalid, Jamil Ahmad & Analisa Hamdan. (2015). Pembentukan Sikap

Positif Guru Terhadap Pelaksanaan Aktiviti Pentaksiran. Journal of

Personalized Learning 1(1):77-84.

 

Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A

10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal

of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212.

 

Ravikumar A/L K.Varatharaj. (2015). Autonomi Guru Dan Amalan Pentaksiran Dalam

Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (Kssr) Di

Sekolah Kluster. Desertasi Ijazah Doktor Falsafah.

 

Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational High School Teachers'

Difficulties in Implementing the Assessment in Curriculum. International

Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33-48. Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia.

 

Richard DLC Gonzales. (2010). Exploring the Conceptual and Psychometric

Properties of Classroom Assessment Practices Questionnaire: Findings from

Three Countries. University of Santo Tomas

 

Rietveld, T., & Van Hout, R. (1993). Statistical Techniques for the Study of Language

and Language Behaviour. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter

 

Robert B. Ewen. (2014). An Introduction To Theories of Personality. Psychology Press

Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017.

 

Robinson-Karpius, S. E. R. (2006). Testing and measurement: A user-friendly guide.

London: Sage Publications

 

Rohani Abdul Hamid, &Khiruddin Ahmad (2003). Using Performance Data To

Improve Learning : A Cae Study Of The E-Monitoring Programme Of The

Terengganu State Education Department. Proceedings of the ELTC ETeMS

Conference 2003: Managing Curricular Change, 2–4 December 2003,

Putrajaya.

 

Rohaya Talib & Mohd Najib Abd Ghafar. (2008). Pembinaan dan pengesahan

instrumen bagi mengukur tahap literasi pentaksiran guru sekolah menengah di

Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Pasca Ijazah 2008, 25-27

November 2008, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

 

Rosseni Din. (2014). Pembinaan & Permodelan Sistem Pengajaran. Bangi: Penerbit

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Russell, M.K. & Airasian, P.W. (2012). Classroom Assessment: Concepts and

Applications, (7thEdition). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

 

Sabitha Marican. (2006). Penyelidikan sains sosial: pendekatan pragmatik. Batu

Caves: Edusystem Sdn. Bhd.

 

Samuelowicz, K. (1999). Academics’ Educational Beliefs and Teaching Practices.

Unpublished PhD thesis, GriffithUniversity, Brisbane.

 

Sanchez, M. T., & Brisk, M.E. (2004). Teachers’ assessment practices and

understandings in bilingual program. NABE Journal of Research and Practice,

2(1), 1993-208.

 

Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business – A skill building approach. (2nd

Ed). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research and Markets: Research Methods for Business - A Skill

Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521

 

Sh. Siti Hauzimah Wan Omar, (2018) Pengetahuan, kemahiran, sikap dan masalah guru

dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran bilik darjah bahasa Melayu di sekolah rendah.

Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu ; Malay Language Education (MyLEJ), 9 (1).

pp. 56-67. ISSN 2180-4842.

 

Shahril @ Charil Marzuki,Zainun Ishak, Lee Pau Wing & Saedah Siraj. (1993).

Pendidikan di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors

Sdn. Bhd.

 

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational

Researcher, 29 (7), 4-14.

 

Sheridan, J.C. & Lyndall, G.S. (2001). SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish version 10.0

For Windows. Singapore. John Wiley & Sons, Australia, Ltd.: 150-55.

 

Spencer, Lyle M. & Signe M. Spencer. (1993). Competence At Work: Models for

Superior Performance, John Wiley & Sons. Inc, New York.

 

Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage Publications.

 

Stamp, D. (1987). Evaluation of the formation and stability of student teacher attitudes

to measurement and evaluation practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,

Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

 

Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to

suc-cess in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.

https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700414

 

Stiggins, R. J. (1999). Evaluating classroom assessment training in teacher education

programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 18 (1), 23-27.

 

Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An Introduction to student-involved assessment for learning.

New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall

 

Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1984). The use of performance assessment in the

classroom. Portland: Northwest regional educational lab.

 

Stiggins, R.J., (2002). Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning,

Knowing What Student Know. In Committee on the Foundation of &

Information Studies, University of California, Los Angles, USA.

 

Stiggins, R.J., and N. Conklin. (1992). In Teachers’ Hands: Investigating the Practice

of Classroom Assessment. Albany NY: SUNY Press.

 

Suah, S. L., & Ong, S. L. (2012). Investigating assessment practices of in-service

teachers. International online journal of educational science, 4(1), 91-106.

 

Suah, See Ling, Ong Saw Lan & Shuki Osman. (2010). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran

Pelajar: Amalan Guru-guru di Malaysia. Malaysian Education Deans’ Council

Journal, 5, 68-83.

 

Syed Ismail Syed Mustapa dan Ahmad Subki Miskon. (2010). Guru Dan Cabaran

Semasa. Selangor: Penerbitan Multimedia.

 

Syed Jaafar Bin Syed Ali. (2014). Kompetensi Guru Dalam Pengajaran Amali

Teknologi Pembinaan Di Kolej Vokasional. Fakulti Pendidikan Teknikal dan

Vokasional: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn, Malaysia.

 

Syofia Ulah, Zamri Mahamod, Jamaluddin Badusah & Hamidah Yamat. (2012) .

Amalan komunikasi interpersonal direktif guru Bahasa Indonesia ketika

memulakan pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu 2: 71-83.

 

Tabachnick, B., G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multiveriate statistics (6th editions).

USA: Pearson.

 

Tallman. R and Bruning. N. (2008). Relating employees’ psychological contracts to

their personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(6) 688-712.

 

Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research

In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and

learning, New York: Macmillan. p. 127-146.

 

Vlachou, M. A. (2018). Classroom assessment practices in middle school science

lessons: A study among Greek science teachers. Cogent Education, 5(1).

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455633

 

Warren, E., & Nisbet, S. (1999). The relationship between the purported use of

assessment techniques and beliefs about the uses of assessment. In J. M. Truran,

& K. M. Truran (Eds.), 22nd Annual conference of the Mathematics Education

and Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 22 (pp. 515e521). Adelaide, SA:

MERGA

 

Wiliam, D. (2001). An overview of the relationship between assessment and the

curriculum. In D. Scott (Ed.) Curriculum and assessment (pp. 165-181).

Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.

 

Yan, Z., & Cheng, C. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitudes, intentions and practices

regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128-136.

 

Yong, A.G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide To Factor Analysis: Focusing

On Explotary Factor Analysis. Tutorials In Quantitative Methods For

Psychology, 9(2), 79–94

 

Yusof Boon dan Mohd Musa Shaharudin. (2011). Kepimpinan Guru besar dalam

Pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) di Sekolah Kebangsaan

Daerah Kota Tinggi, Johor. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Zakaria. Norsiah & Rahman. (2018).The Influence Of Spiritual Intelligence Towards

Work-Life Balance Among Teachers. Conference: The 8th National Human

Resource Management Conference 2018 at: Kedah

 

Zamri Mahamod, Mohamed Amin Embi & Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff. (2010).

Strategi pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dan Inggeris pelajar cemerlang. Bangi:

Penerbitan Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Zulelawati Bujang., Yusni Zaini Yusof. (2015). Tret personaliti dan hubungan dengan

prestasi akademik bakal guru di sebuah institusi latihan perguruan. Jurnal

BITARA (Khas). vol.8:171-180

 

Zulkifli Awang. (2012). Strategi pengajaran mata pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani yang

berkesan. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti

Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)