UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Main Author :Laily Fazlin Khiril
Title :The effects of Kahoot! online assessment on students performance in a higher education institution
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This study was aimed at developing an online assessment module to assist lecturer in using Kahoot! and to determine the effects of Kahoot! on students’ performance in the Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). This study was also intended to evaluate respondents’ perceptions about KOA. The study used quantitative approach with quasiexperimental design. The respondents of this study were 200 (120 female; 80 male) Semester 1 undergraduate student-teachers in the Early Childhood Education programme who enrolled in the KAQ1023 course in the 2017/2018 session. Four classes were involved in this study, two classes were for the control group Paper and Pencil Assessment (PPA) and another two for the experimental group Kahoot! Online Assessment (KOA). Assignment of classes to the control and treatment groups were done through simple random sampling. The 100 respondents from the KOA group were also involved in answering the Likert-type questionnaire measuring their perception about Kahoot!. The achievement data f rom the pre and post-test were analysed using the SPANOVA while data from the questionnaire were analysed using factor analysis and descriptive statistics. The findings indicated that there were improvements in achievement for both KOA and PPA groups, but the gain in achievement for KOA group was significantly higher. The Huynh-Feldt values indicates that there was a main effect of the group [F (1.88, 372.89) = 710.80, p

References

Albee, B. L. (2015). Technology Use Of Online Instructors With High Self-Efficacy A

Multiple Case Study.

 

Alvarado, N. C., Coelho, D., & Dougherty, E. (2016a). Mobile apps for ELLs:

Supporting language learning with engaging digital tools. Argentinian Journal of

Applied Lingustics.

 

Alvarado, N. C., Coelho, D., & Dougherty, E. (2016b). Mobile apps for ELLs:

Supporting language learning with engaging digital tools. Argentinian Journal of

Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 43–58. Retrieved from

http://www.faapi.org.ar/ajal/issues/401/Espinosa.html

 

Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia.

Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT 2010, 454–

466. http://library.oum.edu.my/oumlib/sites/default/files/file_attachments/odlresources/

4334/blended-learning.pdf

 

Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835768

 

Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory, 1175–1184.

 

Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing

for 21st Century Learning. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_1.x

 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment and Classroom Learning Assessment and

Classroom Learning. Assessment (Vol. 5).

https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Vol. 21).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

 

Brigham, T. J. (2015). An Introduction to Gamification: Adding Game Elements for

Engagement An Introduction to Gamification: Adding Game Elements for

Engagement. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 34(4), 471–480.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2015.1082385

 

Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional

Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 148–154.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.148

 

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (n.d.). EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT

Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH.

 

Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, ; Ranchana. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google

forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. In IEEE.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957

 

Charteris, J., Quinn, F., Parkes, M., Fletcher, P., & Reyes, V. (2016). e-Assessment for

learning and performativity in higher education: A case for existential learning.

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 112–122.

https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2595

 

Chetty, P. (2015). Factor analysis using SPSS. Retrieved from

https://www.projectguru.in/publications/factor-analysis-using-spss/

 

Christensen, L. L., & Rogers, C. M. (2013). Leadership for Access to Technologybased

Assessment. Journal of Special Education Leadership.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Ujian Univariat dan

Multivariat. McGraw Hill Education.

 

Clark, D.R. (2012). Design Methodologies: instructional, thinking, agile, system, or x

problem? Retrieved from

http://nwlink.com/~donclark/design/design_models.html

 

Cocea, M. (2006). Assessment of motivation in online learning environments. Lecture

Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial

Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4018 LNCS, 414–418.

https://doi.org/10.1007/11768012_61

 

Collins, K. (2015). Kahoot! is gamifying the classroom. Retrieved from

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/kahoot-gaming-education-platform-norway

 

Croteau, J. L. (2014). Online Formative Assessments as Predictors of Student Academic

Success. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2008.00521.x Malik,

 

Dede, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing Technology Integration to Meet the Necessity of

Transformation. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(1), 4–16.

https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.20yy.v5n1p4-16

 

Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal

of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 17–28.

 

Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the

classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153–159.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989

 

Durak, G., & Ataizi, M. (2016). The ABC ’ s of Online Course Design According to

Addie Model, 4(9), 2084–2091. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040920

 

Education, M. of. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025 (Preschool to post

secondary education). Education, 27(1), 1–268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

 

Education, M. of H. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher

Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia (Vol. 2025).

https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijis.20120206.05

 

Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment

strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653

 

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.

Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595

 

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess

Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249.

https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

 

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in

higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4),

2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

 

Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting

Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales, (1992), 82–88.

https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9792

 

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and

authentic learning. California: Corwin, A SAGE Company.

 

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to

achievement. Educational Psychology.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903415150

 

Heath, N. M., Lawyer, S. R., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2007). Web-Based Versus Paperand-

Pencil Course Evaluations, 34(4), 259–261.

 

Hertel, G., Naumann, S., Konradt, U., & Batinic, B. (2002). Personality Assessment via

Internet: Comparing Online and Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires. Online Social

Science, 115–133.

 

Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate

in E-Learning Experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3).

 

Hoskins, S. L., & Van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use

online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British

Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 177–192.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00451.x

 

Ibrahim, H. W.-Z. (2015). Compare and contrast between PPT and CBT. Retrieved

from https://www.scribd.com/document/270266723/Paper-and-Pencil-Test

 

Icard, B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of

Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 11(3), 37–42. Retrieved from

http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_14/Mar14.pdf#page=41

 

Iwamoto, D. H., & Taitano, E. J. (2017). ANALYZING THE EFFICACY OF THE

TESTING EFFECT USING KAHOOT TM ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE,

(April), 80–93.

 

Jaganathan, M. (2016). Kahoot! Electrify your class with a Game-Based Classroom

Response System.

 

Johns, K. (2015). Engaging and Assessing Students with Technology: A Review of

Kahoot! The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-

9005-2

 

Johnson-Martin, P. (2014). The effect of training on teacher’s computer self-efficacy

and technology practices: A descriptive study. Dissertation Abstracts

International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from

http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-99010-

014&site=ehost-live

 

Kahoot. (2017). World’s Largest Kahoot takes place at FETC, Florida with 1072

players. Retrieved from http://blog.getkahoot.com/post/108839864902/worldslargest-

kahoot-takes-place-at-fetc

 

Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality

traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement.

Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001

 

Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2011). A Guide for Novice Researchers on Experimental and

Quasi-Experimental Studies in Information Systems Research, 6.

 

Lim, E. C., Ong, B. K., Wilder-Smith, E. P., & Seet, R. C. (2006). Computer-based

Versus Pen-and-paper Testing : Students ’ Perception, 35(9), 599–603.

 

Lim, E. P. Y., & Tan, A. (1999). Educational Assessment in Singapore. Assessment in

Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(3), 391–404.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992810

 

Ling, S. S., Lan, O. L., Suah, S. L., & Ong, S. L. (2012). Investigating Assessment

Practices of In-service Teachers. International Online Journal of Educational

Science, 4(1), 91–106. Retrieved from

http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_724.pdf

 

Marina, P. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science

education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers

& Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004

 

Mayrath, M. C., Carke-Midura, J., Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (2012). Technology-

Based Assessments for 21st Century Skills :Theoretical and Practical Implications

from Modern Research. United States of America: IAP-Information Age

Publishing.

 

Nasri, N., Roslan, S. N., Sekuan, M. I., Bakar, K. A., & Puteh, S. N. (2010). Teachers’

perception on alternative assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,

7(C), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.006

 

Noraini, M. N., Wong, K., Mohd Azli, Y., & Norazilawati, A. (2016). Blended learning:

its implementation and promote continuing e-learning environment among

student-teachers. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(11),

12–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.11.003

 

Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment:

Practitioner cases. Computers and Education, 54(3), 715–721.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.032

 

Pearson Official Website of Assessment. (2017). Retrieved from

http://www.pearsonassessments.com/largescaleassessment/developingassessments.

html

 

Piaw, C. Y. (2012). Replacing paper-based testing with computer-based testing in

assessment : Are we doing wrong ?, 64, 655–664.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.077

 

Piaw Chua, Y. (2012). Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and

testing motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1580–1586.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020

 

Popham, B. Y. W. J. (2002). Right Tas Wrong Tool.

 

Prineas, M., & Cini, M. (2011). Assessing learning in online education: The role of

technology in improving student outcomes, (October), 1--18.

 

Ray, K. (2016). Why Technology-Based Assessment Fill an Important Role in

Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.centerdigitaled.com/blog/whytechnology-

based-assessments-fill-an-important-role-in-instruction.html

 

Ren, C., & Wagner, J. (2016). Kahoot ! The Electric Journal for English as a Second

Language, 20(2).

 

Robles, M., & Braathen, S. (2002). Online assessment techniques. Delta Pi Epsilon

Journal, 44(1), 39–49. Retrieved from

http://www.acousticslab.org/dots_sample/module2/RoblesAndBraathen2002.pdf

 

Shaw, M. (2015). THE EFFECTS OF FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE PEER

FEEDBACK ON BUSINESS STUDENTS ’ PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY AND

EFFECTIVENESS.

 

Star, T. (n.d.). Pact to prepare students for 21st century learning - Education.

 

Stewart, V. (2013). Assessing 21st-Century Skills and Competencies Around the

World. Retrieved from http://asiasociety.org/global-cities-educationnetwork/

assessing-21st-century-skills-and-competencies-around-world

 

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation

and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher

Education, 30(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000318091

 

Syndicate, M. examination. (2012). Pentaksiran oleh Lembaga Peperiksaan.

 

United States Department of Education, O. of E. technology. (2011). Transforming

American Education National Education Technology Plan 2010 Learning

Powered by Technology National Education Technology Plan 2010. E-Learning

and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.102

 

Ushida, E. (2005). The Role of Students ’ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language

Learning in Online Language Courses The Role of Students ’ Attitudes and

Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses, 23(1),

49–78.

 

Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2013). Promoting Formative Assessment in Online

Teaching and Learning. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve

Learning, 57(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x

 

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks

for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies.

Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

 

Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2015). The effect of points and audio on concrentration,

engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation and classroom dynamics using

Kahoot!, 2006.

 

Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2016). The effect of points and audio on concentration,

engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using

Kahoot! Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Game Based Learning

(ECGBL) 6-7 October 2016, Paisley, Scotland, 738–747.

 

Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion.

Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-

295X.92.4.548

 

White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods. Retrieved

from https://www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/img/downloads/Quasi-

Experimental_Design_and_Methods_ENG.pdf

 

Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10thed.).New York: Pearson Education,

Inc.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.