UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This study was aimed at developing an online assessment module to assist lecturer in
using Kahoot! and to determine the effects of Kahoot! on students’ performance in the
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI). This study was also intended to evaluate
respondents’ perceptions about KOA. The study used quantitative approach with quasiexperimental
design. The respondents of this study were 200 (120 female; 80 male)
Semester 1 undergraduate student-teachers in the Early Childhood Education
programme who enrolled in the KAQ1023 course in the 2017/2018 session. Four
classes were involved in this study, two classes were for the control group Paper and
Pencil Assessment (PPA) and another two for the experimental group Kahoot! Online
Assessment (KOA). Assignment of classes to the control and treatment groups were
done through simple random sampling. The 100 respondents from the KOA group were
also involved in answering the Likert-type questionnaire measuring their perception
about Kahoot!. The achievement data f rom the pre and post-test were analysed using
the SPANOVA while data from the questionnaire were analysed using factor analysis
and descriptive statistics. The findings indicated that there were improvements in
achievement for both KOA and PPA groups, but the gain in achievement for KOA
group was significantly higher. The Huynh-Feldt values indicates that there was a main
effect of the group [F (1.88, 372.89) = 710.80, p |
References |
Albee, B. L. (2015). Technology Use Of Online Instructors With High Self-Efficacy A Multiple Case Study.
Alvarado, N. C., Coelho, D., & Dougherty, E. (2016a). Mobile apps for ELLs: Supporting language learning with engaging digital tools. Argentinian Journal of Applied Lingustics.
Alvarado, N. C., Coelho, D., & Dougherty, E. (2016b). Mobile apps for ELLs: Supporting language learning with engaging digital tools. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 43–58. Retrieved from http://www.faapi.org.ar/ajal/issues/401/Espinosa.html
Azizan, F. Z. (2010). Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia. Proceedings of Regional Conference on Knowledge Integration in ICT 2010, 454– 466. http://library.oum.edu.my/oumlib/sites/default/files/file_attachments/odlresources/ 4334/blended-learning.pdf
Baggaley, J. (2013). MOOC rampant. Distance Education, 34(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835768
Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory, 1175–1184.
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: Designing for 21st Century Learning. Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_1.x
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Assessment and Classroom Learning Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment (Vol. 5). https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (Vol. 21). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brigham, T. J. (2015). An Introduction to Gamification: Adding Game Elements for Engagement An Introduction to Gamification: Adding Game Elements for Engagement. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 34(4), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2015.1082385
Buchanan, T. (2002). Online assessment: Desirable or dangerous? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.33.2.148
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (n.d.). EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH.
Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, ; Ranchana. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google forms on the Student’s Perception in the Classrooms Response System. In IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957
Charteris, J., Quinn, F., Parkes, M., Fletcher, P., & Reyes, V. (2016). e-Assessment for learning and performativity in higher education: A case for existential learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2595
Chetty, P. (2015). Factor analysis using SPSS. Retrieved from https://www.projectguru.in/publications/factor-analysis-using-spss/
Christensen, L. L., & Rogers, C. M. (2013). Leadership for Access to Technologybased Assessment. Journal of Special Education Leadership.
Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan Ujian Univariat dan Multivariat. McGraw Hill Education.
Clark, D.R. (2012). Design Methodologies: instructional, thinking, agile, system, or x problem? Retrieved from http://nwlink.com/~donclark/design/design_models.html
Cocea, M. (2006). Assessment of motivation in online learning environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 4018 LNCS, 414–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/11768012_61
Collins, K. (2015). Kahoot! is gamifying the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.wired.co.uk/article/kahoot-gaming-education-platform-norway
Croteau, J. L. (2014). Online Formative Assessments as Predictors of Student Academic Success. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8616.2008.00521.x Malik,
Dede, C. (2011). Reconceptualizing Technology Integration to Meet the Necessity of Transformation. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.20yy.v5n1p4-16
Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(4), 17–28.
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Durak, G., & Ataizi, M. (2016). The ABC ’ s of Online Course Design According to Addie Model, 4(9), 2084–2091. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040920
Education, M. of. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025 (Preschool to post secondary education). Education, 27(1), 1–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Education, M. of H. (2015). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia (Vol. 2025). https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijis.20120206.05
Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st Century Skills: What Are They and How Do We Assess Them? Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales, (1992), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9792
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. California: Corwin, A SAGE Company.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903415150
Heath, N. M., Lawyer, S. R., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2007). Web-Based Versus Paperand- Pencil Course Evaluations, 34(4), 259–261.
Hertel, G., Naumann, S., Konradt, U., & Batinic, B. (2002). Personality Assessment via Internet: Comparing Online and Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires. Online Social Science, 115–133.
Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(3).
Hoskins, S. L., & Van Hooff, J. C. (2005). Motivation and ability: Which students use online learning and what influence does it have on their achievement? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00451.x
Ibrahim, H. W.-Z. (2015). Compare and contrast between PPT and CBT. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/270266723/Paper-and-Pencil-Test
Icard, B. (2014). Educational technology best practices. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 11(3), 37–42. Retrieved from http://itdl.org/Journal/Mar_14/Mar14.pdf#page=41
Iwamoto, D. H., & Taitano, E. J. (2017). ANALYZING THE EFFICACY OF THE TESTING EFFECT USING KAHOOT TM ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE, (April), 80–93.
Jaganathan, M. (2016). Kahoot! Electrify your class with a Game-Based Classroom Response System.
Johns, K. (2015). Engaging and Assessing Students with Technology: A Review of Kahoot! The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006- 9005-2
Johnson-Martin, P. (2014). The effect of training on teacher’s computer self-efficacy and technology practices: A descriptive study. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-99010- 014&site=ehost-live
Kahoot. (2017). World’s Largest Kahoot takes place at FETC, Florida with 1072 players. Retrieved from http://blog.getkahoot.com/post/108839864902/worldslargest- kahoot-takes-place-at-fetc
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2011). A Guide for Novice Researchers on Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies in Information Systems Research, 6.
Lim, E. C., Ong, B. K., Wilder-Smith, E. P., & Seet, R. C. (2006). Computer-based Versus Pen-and-paper Testing : Students ’ Perception, 35(9), 599–603.
Lim, E. P. Y., & Tan, A. (1999). Educational Assessment in Singapore. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992810
Ling, S. S., Lan, O. L., Suah, S. L., & Ong, S. L. (2012). Investigating Assessment Practices of In-service Teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Science, 4(1), 91–106. Retrieved from http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_724.pdf
Marina, P. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
Mayrath, M. C., Carke-Midura, J., Robinson, D. H., & Schraw, G. (2012). Technology- Based Assessments for 21st Century Skills :Theoretical and Practical Implications from Modern Research. United States of America: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
Nasri, N., Roslan, S. N., Sekuan, M. I., Bakar, K. A., & Puteh, S. N. (2010). Teachers’ perception on alternative assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.006
Noraini, M. N., Wong, K., Mohd Azli, Y., & Norazilawati, A. (2016). Blended learning: its implementation and promote continuing e-learning environment among student-teachers. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 3(11), 12–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.11.003
Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers and Education, 54(3), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.032
Pearson Official Website of Assessment. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/largescaleassessment/developingassessments. html
Piaw, C. Y. (2012). Replacing paper-based testing with computer-based testing in assessment : Are we doing wrong ?, 64, 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.077
Piaw Chua, Y. (2012). Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testing motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1580–1586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020
Popham, B. Y. W. J. (2002). Right Tas Wrong Tool.
Prineas, M., & Cini, M. (2011). Assessing learning in online education: The role of technology in improving student outcomes, (October), 1--18.
Ray, K. (2016). Why Technology-Based Assessment Fill an Important Role in Instruction. Retrieved from http://www.centerdigitaled.com/blog/whytechnology- based-assessments-fill-an-important-role-in-instruction.html
Ren, C., & Wagner, J. (2016). Kahoot ! The Electric Journal for English as a Second Language, 20(2).
Robles, M., & Braathen, S. (2002). Online assessment techniques. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 44(1), 39–49. Retrieved from http://www.acousticslab.org/dots_sample/module2/RoblesAndBraathen2002.pdf
Shaw, M. (2015). THE EFFECTS OF FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE PEER FEEDBACK ON BUSINESS STUDENTS ’ PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS.
Star, T. (n.d.). Pact to prepare students for 21st century learning - Education.
Stewart, V. (2013). Assessing 21st-Century Skills and Competencies Around the World. Retrieved from http://asiasociety.org/global-cities-educationnetwork/ assessing-21st-century-skills-and-competencies-around-world
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: a review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000318091
Syndicate, M. examination. (2012). Pentaksiran oleh Lembaga Peperiksaan.
United States Department of Education, O. of E. technology. (2011). Transforming American Education National Education Technology Plan 2010 Learning Powered by Technology National Education Technology Plan 2010. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.102
Ushida, E. (2005). The Role of Students ’ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses The Role of Students ’ Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning in Online Language Courses, 23(1), 49–78.
Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2013). Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0673-x
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21 st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2015). The effect of points and audio on concrentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation and classroom dynamics using Kahoot!, 2006.
Wang, A. I., & Lieberoth, A. (2016). The effect of points and audio on concentration, engagement, enjoyment, learning, motivation, and classroom dynamics using Kahoot! Proceedings of 10th European Conference on Game Based Learning (ECGBL) 6-7 October 2016, Paisley, Scotland, 738–747.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033- 295X.92.4.548
White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods. Retrieved from https://www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/img/downloads/Quasi- Experimental_Design_and_Methods_ENG.pdf
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10thed.).New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |