UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Izkair, Ayad Shihan
Title :The model of intention and actual use of mobile learning in Iraqi higher education institutions
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence the intention to use, the influence of intention to use on the actual use, and subsequently to formulate the model of intention and actual use of mobile learning in higher education institutions (HEI) in Iraq. The UTAUT model was mainly used in this study to explore the factors that affected the intention to use mobile learning. It is important for universities to acknowledge the influential factors of intention to use mobile learning in higher education institutions (HEI), particularly in Iraq. The quantitative study has been used in this study, a survey method involving 323 respondents from the universities in Iraq. Ten experts from Iraq and Malaysia have validated the findings of the study. The Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was used in this research for data analysis which consists of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Measurement Model, and Structural Model. The result indicated that Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Performance Expectancy, Facilitating Conditions, Perceived Enjoyment, Self-efficacy, and Satisfaction have a significant impact on the intention to use mobile learning. Furthermore, the result revealed that the intention to use mobile learning significantly affects the actual use of mobile learning. Personal innovativeness and Quality of service (QoS) have an insignificant impact on the intention to use mobile learning. Moreover, gender and experience have been identified as moderator variables in this study. This study is significant to the field of discipline as it will provide a roadmap for universities to recognise the important factors that affect the intention to use and acceptance of mobile learning.

References

Abbad, M. M., Morris, D., & de Nahlik, C. (2009). Looking under the Bonnet:

Factors affecting student adoption of E-learning systems in Jordan. International

Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1–25.

 

Abdulsattar, O. A. (2017). Performance in Construction Industry In Post- Conflict

Situations – Iraq As A Case Study. American Journal of Engineering Research

(AJER), 6(9), 188–195.

 

Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of MLearning:

An Investigation in Higher Education. International Review of

Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82–107.

 

Abu-Al-Aish, Ahmad, & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance

of M-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. International Review of

Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82–107.

 

Afonso, C. M., Roldán, J. L., Sánchez-Franco, M., & Gonzalez, M. D. la O. (2012).

The moderator role of Gender in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of

Technology ( UTAUT ): A study on users of Electronic Document Management

Systems. 7th International Conference on Partial Least Squares and Related

Methods, 1–8.

 

Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive

absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly,

24(4), 665–694.

 

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A Conceptual and Operational Definition of

Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology. Information

Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204

 

Agrebi, S., & Jallais, J. (2015). Explain the intention to use smartphones for mobile

shopping. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 16–23.

 

Agudo-peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-garcía, Á., & Pascual-miguel, F. J. (2014).

Computers in Human Behavior Behavioral intention , use behavior and the

acceptance of electronic learning systems : Differences between higher

education and lifelong learning. 34, 301–314.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035

 

Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. Action

Control, 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

 

Al-Azawei, A., & Alowayr, A. (2020). Predicting the intention to use and hedonic

motivation for mobile learning: A comparative study in two Middle Eastern

countries. Technology in Society, 62, 101325.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101325

 

Al-Ghraibah, O. B. (2020). Online Consumer Retention In Saudi Arabia During

COVID 19: The Moderating Role Of Online Trust. Journal of Critical Reviews,

7(9), 2464–2472.

 

Al-Harbi, K. A. S. (2011). e-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and

challenges. Applied Computing and Informatics, 9(1), 31–46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2010.03.002

 

Al-Zoubi, M. I. S. (2016). Factors That Influence Mobile Learning Acceptance in

Higher Education Institutions in Dubai. Account and Financial Management

Journal, 1(6), 392–400. https://doi.org/10.18535/afmj/v1i6.03

 

Alawadhi, S., & Morris, A. (2008). The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of

e-government services in Kuwait. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii

International Conference on System Sciences, (March 2016).

https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2008.452

 

Ali, R. A., & Arshad, M. R. M. (2016a). Perspectives of Students’ Behavior Towards

Mobile Learning (M-learning) in Egypt: an Extension of the UTAUT Model.

Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 6(4), 1109–1114.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.60992

 

Ali, R. A., & Arshad, M. R. M. (2016b). Understanding intention to use mobile

learning: a perspective of the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of

technology. International Journal of Advanced and Apllied Sciences, 3(7), 81–

88. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2016.07.013

 

Aliaga, M., & Gunderson, B. (2000). Introduction to Quantitative research. Doing

Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Publications, 1–11.

 

Alkhalaf, S., Drew, S., Alghamdi, R., & Alfarraj, O. (2012). E-Learning system on

higher education institutions in KSA : attitudes and perceptions of faculty

members. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47(Citc 2010), 1199–

1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.800

 

Almaiah, M. A., & Alismaiel, O. A. (2019). Examination of factors influencing the

use of mobile learning system: An empirical study. Education and Information

Technologies, 24(1), 885–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9810-7

 

Almatari, A. Y., Iahad, N. A., & Balaid, A. S. (2012). Factors influencing students’

intention to use Mlearning Journal. Journal of Information Systems Research and

Innovation, 7(5), 515–543.

 

Alsswey, A., Al-Samarraie, H., El-Qirem, F. A., & Zaqout, F. (2020). M-learning

technology in Arab Gulf countries: A systematic review of progress and

recommendations. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2919–2931.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10097-z

 

Althunibat, A. (2015). Determining the factors influencing students’ intention to use

m-learning in Jordan higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 65–

71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.046

 

Awang, Z. (2014). A Handbook on Structural Equation Modeling for Academicians

and Practitioner (1st ed.). Bandar Baru Bangi, kuala lumpur, Malaysia: MPWS

Rich Resources.

 

Azeez, N. D., & Lakulu, M. M. (2018). Evaluation framework of M-government

services success in Malaysia. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information

Technology, 96(24).

 

Bakhsh, M., Mahmood, A., & Sangi, N. A. (2017). Examination of factors influencing

students and faculty behavior towards m-learning acceptance: An empirical

study. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 34(3),

166–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-08-2016-0028

 

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Psychological Review, 84(2).

 

Barnes, S. J., & Vidgen, R. T. (2002). AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH TO THE

ASSESSMENT OF E-COMMERCE QUALITY. Journal of Electronic

Commerce Research, 3(3), 114–127.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.770400

 

Bere, A. (2014). Exploring determinants for mobile learning user acceptance and use:

An application of UTAUT. ITNG 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International

Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, 84–90.

https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2014.114

 

Bombaes, A. (2017). Student’s Intentions to Use M-Learning: An Empirical

Perspective from the Philippines. Business and Economic Research, 8(1), 68.

https://doi.org/10.5296/ber.v8i1.12305

 

Bomhold, C. R. (2013). Educational use of smart phone technology: A survey of

mobile phone application use by undergraduate university students. Program,

47(4), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-01-2013-0003

 

Briz-ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-m, J. A., & Jos, F. (2017).

Computers in Human Behavior Learning with mobile technologies e Students ’

behavior. 72, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027

 

Briz-Ponce, L., Pereira, A., Carvalho, L., Juanes-Méndez, J. A., & García-Peñalvo, F.

J. (2017). Learning with mobile technologies – Students’ behavior. Computers in

Human Behavior, 72, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.027

 

Camilleri, M. A. (2019). Exploring the Behavioral Intention To Use E-Government

Services: Validating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

(Im), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.33965/its2019_201901l004

 

Carter, S., & Yeo, A. C. M. (2016). Mobile Apps usage by Malaysian Business

Undergraduates and Postgraduates: Implications for Consumer. Unsw.

https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020116.n103

 

Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer selfefficacy

and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education.

Computers and Education, 60(1), 148–158.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008

 

Chaka, J. G., & Govender, I. (2017). Students’ perceptions and readiness towards

mobile learning in colleges of education: A Nigerian perspective. South African

Journal of Education, 37(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n1a1282

 

Chang, C. C. (2013). Exploring the determinants of e-learning systems continuance

intention in academic libraries. Library Management, 34(1), 40–55.

https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121311298261

 

Chen, C., & Huang, T. (2012). Computers & Education Learning in a u-Museum :

Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers &

Education, 59(3), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.003

 

Chen, H. R., & Tseng, H. F. (2012). Factors that influence acceptance of web-based elearning

systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in

Taiwan. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 398–406.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.007

 

Cheng, Y. M. (2015). Towards an understanding of the factors affecting m-learning

acceptance: Roles of technological characteristics and compatibility. Asia Pacific

Management Review, 20(3), 109–119.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2014.12.011

 

Cheng, Y. S., Yu, T. F., Huang, C. F., Yu, C., & Yu, C. C. (2011). The Comparison of

Three Major Occupations for User Acceptance of Information Technology:

Applying the UTAUT Model. IBusiness, 03(02), 147–158.

https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2011.32021

 

Cheung, C., Lee, M., & Chen, Z. (2002). Using the Internet as a Learning Medium:

University Student Adoption of an FaBWeb. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii

International Conference on System Sciences, 00(c), 1–9.

 

Chiu, Y. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). The roles of social factor and internet self-efficacy

in nurses’ web-based continuing learning. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 446–

450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.013

 

Chong, J. L., Chong, A. Y. L., Ooi, K. B., & Lin, B. (2011). An empirical analysis of

the adoption of m-learning in Malaysia. International Journal of Mobile

Communications, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2011.037952

 

Chow, M., Herold, D. K., Choo, T. M., & Chan, K. (2012). Extending the technology

acceptance model to explore the intention to use Second Life for enhancing

healthcare education. Computers and Education, 59(4), 1136–1144.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.011

 

Choy, L. T. (2014). The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology:

Comparison and Complimentary between Qualitative and Quantitative

Approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99–104.

https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-194399104

 

Chu, R. J. chun. (2010). How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the

effects of e-learning among higher aged adults - Analyses of gender and age

differences. Computers and Education, 55(1), 255–264.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.011

 

Chua, P. Y., Rezaei, S., Gu, M. L., Oh, Y. M., & Jambulingam, M. (2018).

Elucidating social networking apps decisions: Performance expectancy, effort

expectancy and social influence. Nankai Business Review International, 9(2),

118–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-01-2017-0003

 

Chung, H.-H., Chen, S.-C., & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). A Study of EFL College Students’

Acceptance of Mobile Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,

176, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.479

 

Chung, N., & Kwon, S. J. (2009). The effects of customers’ mobile experience and

technical support on the intention to use mobile banking. Cyberpsychology and

Behavior, 12(5), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0014

 

Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a

measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.

https://doi.org/10.1520/E2368-10

 

Cruz, Y., Boughzala, I., & Assar, S. (2014). Technology acceptance and actual use

with mobile leraning: First stage for studying the influence of learning styles on

the behavioral intention. ECIS 2014 Proceedings - 22nd European Conference

on Information Systems, 0–16.

 

Dadayan, L., & Ferro, E. (2005). When technology meets the mind: A comparative

study of the technology acceptance model. In International Conference on

Electronic Government. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 137–144.

 

Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of

information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems,

13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

 

Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new

enduser information systems: Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of

Technology.

 

Davis, Fred D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of

Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management

Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

 

Davis, Fred D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic

Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social

Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-

1816.1992.tb00945.x

 

Davis, J. L., & Davis, H. (2007). Perceptions of career and technology and training

and development students regarding basic personal computer knowledge and

skills. College Student Journal, 41(1), 69–79.

 

De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2012).

Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning

management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers and Education,

58(2), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.013

 

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for

the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

 

Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an e-learning product: Factors for

student/customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, 56(1), 87–96.

 

Dorner, D. G., & Gorman, G. E. (2011). Contextual factors affecting learning in Laos

and the implications for information literacy education. Information Research,

16(2), 1–23.

 

Dragana, Z., Manasijevic, D., Nikolic, D., & Miloševic, I. (2015). Computers in

Human Behavior The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of Mlearning

? ivkovic. 51, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.041

 

Dudwick, N., Kuehnast, K., Jones, V. N., & Woolcock, M. (2006). Analyzing Social

Capital in Context: A Guide to Using Qualitative Methods and Data. World Bank

Institute, Washington.

 

Dulle, F. W., & Minishi-Majanja, M. K. (2011). The suitability of the unified theory

of acceptance and use of technology (utaut) model in open access adoption

studies. Information Development, 27(1), 32–45.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666910385375

 

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). A Study of Normative and Informational Social

Influences Upon Individual Judgment. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1),

109–132.

 

Enaizan, O., Eneizan, B., Almaaitah, M., Al-Radaideh, A. T., & Saleh, A. M. (2020).

Effects of privacy and security on the acceptance and usage of EMR: The

mediating role of trust on the basis of multiple perspectives. Informatics in

Medicine Unlocked, 21, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2020.100450

 

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An

Introduction to Theory and Research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

 

Gan, C. (2016). An empirical analysis of factors influencing continuance intention of

mobile instant messaging in China. Information Development, 32(4), 1109–1119.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915591298

 

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2008). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide

and reference. In BrJHaematol.

 

Ghalandari, K. (2012). The Effect of Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy,

Social Influence and Facilitating Conditions on Acceptance of E-Banking

Services in Iran: the Moderating Role of Age and Gender. Middle-East Journal

of Scientific Research, 12(6), 801–807.

https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2012.12.6.2536

 

Hair, Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least

squares structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes.

 

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate Data

Analysis: A global perspective. In Upper Saddle River (7th ed.).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019

 

Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford university press.

 

Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn, P. P., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive

Decisions about Adoption of Information Technology in Small Business: Theory

and Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 171–195.

https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.171

 

Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning

systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12),

10959–10966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028

 

Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2010). Cultures and Organizations. Software of the

Mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York:

McGraw Hill.

 

Huan, Y., Li, X., Aydeniz, M., & Wyatt, T. (2015). Mobile Learning Adoption: An

Empirical Investigation for Engineering Education.

 

Huang, J. H., Lin, Y. R., & Chuang, S. T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile

learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Electronic

Library, 25(5), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710829569

 

Huang, T. K. (2015). Exploring the antecedents of screenshot-based interactions in

the context of advanced computer software learning. Computers and Education,

80, 95–107.

 

Ibrahim, R., & Jaafar, A. (2011). User acceptance of educational games: A revised

unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). World Academy

of Science, Engineering and Technology, 77(5), 551–557.

 

Iqbal, S., & Bhatti, Z. A. (2017). What drives m-learning? An empirical investigation

of university student perceptions in Pakistan. Higher Education Research and

Development, 36(4), 730–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1236782

 

Iqbal, S., & Qureshi, I. A. (2012). M-learning adoption: A perspective from a

developing country. International Review of Research in Open and Distance

Learning, 13(3), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1152

 

Islam, A. K. M. (2012). The Role of Perceived System Quality as Educators’

Motivation to Continue E-learning System Use. AIS Transactions on Human-

Computer Interaction, 4(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijfcst.2014.4403

 

Islam, A. K. M. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the

university context. Computers and Education, 69, 387–399.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.037

 

Islam, A. K. M. (2014). Sources of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with a learning

management system in post-adoption stage: A critical incident technique

approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 249–261.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.010

 

Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An acceptance of

mobile learning for higher education students in Thailand. The Sixth

International Conference on ELearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Thailand,

(December), 17–18. Retrieved from

http://ijcim.th.org/SpecialEditions/v17nSP3/36_Full_Kallaya Jairak_Online.pdf

 

Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal

innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of

Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143–158.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9081-2

 

Jose Carlos Sanchez-Prieto, Susana Olmos-Miguelanez, F. J. G.-P. (2016).

MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention

using an expanded TAM model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061

 

Kang, M., Liew, B. T., Lim, H., Jang, J., & Lee, S. (2015). Investigating the

Determinants of Mobile Learning Acceptance in Korea Using UTAUT2.

Emerging Issues in Smart Learning, 209–216.

 

Kao, C. P., Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Elementary school teachers’ motivation

toward web-based professional development, and the relationship with Internet

self-efficacy and belief about web-based learning. Teaching and Teacher

Education, 27(2), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.010

 

Kim, M. K., Chang, Y., Wong, S. F., & Park, M. C. (2015). The effect of perceived

risks and switching barriers on the intention to use smartphones among nonadopters

in Korea. Information Development, 31(3), 258–269.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666913513279

 

King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model.

43, 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003

 

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. In

Guilford publications.

 

Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Van Buuren, H. (2013). What

stimulates teachers to integrate ICT in their pedagogical practices? the use of

digital learning materials in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1),

217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.008

 

Krejcie, R. V, & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

 

Kuan, H. H., Vathanophas, V., & Bock, G.-W. (2003). The Impact of Usability on the

Intention of Planned Purchases in E-commerce Service Websites. PACIS 2003

Proceedings, 26.

 

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning?

ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344009000202

 

Kuo, K. M., Liu, C. F., & Ma, C. C. (2013). An investigation of the effects of

technology readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM. International Journal

of Human Resource Studies, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.131

 

Lee, H., Chung, N., & Jung, T. (2015). Examining the Cultural Differences in

Acceptance of Mobile Augmented Reality: Comparison of South Korea and

Ireland. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14343-9_35

 

Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and

student satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283.

 

Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Ma, C. Y. (2011). A model of organizational employees’

e-learning systems acceptance. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(3), 355–366.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.09.005

 

Liang, J. C., Wu, S. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Nurses’ Internet self-efficacy and

attitudes toward web-based continuing learning. Nurse Education Today, 31(8),

768–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.11.021

 

Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward

mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity

theory approach. Computers and Education, 54(2), 446–454.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.029

 

Liu, C. H., & Huang, Y. M. (2015). An empirical investigation of computer

simulation technology acceptance to explore the factors that affect user intention.

Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(3), 449–457.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0402-7

 

Liu, L. W., Chang, C. M., Huang, H. C., & Chang, Y. L. A. (2016). Verification of

social network site use behavior of the university physical education students.

Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(4),

793–805. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1232a

 

Liu, Y. (2011). Solving the Puzzle of Mobile Learning Adoption.

 

Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An

empirical study. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1211–1219.

 

Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation

modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to

choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,

57(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2014.2312452

 

Lu, H., Hu, Y. P., Gao, J. J., & Kinshuk. (2016). The effects of computer selfefficacy,

training satisfaction and test anxiety on attitude and performance in

computerized adaptive testing. Computers and Education, 100, 45–55.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.012

 

Lu, J. (2014). Are Personal Innovativeness and Social Influence Critical to Internet

Research Article information? Internet Research, 24(2), 134–159.

 

Lu, June, Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences

and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of

Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003

 

Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students’ ICT skills and their

adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,

29(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.298

 

Mahat, J., Ayub, A. F. M., Luan, S., & Wong. (2012). An Assessment of Students’

Mobile Self-Efficacy, Readiness and Personal Innovativeness towards Mobile

Learning in Higher Education in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 64, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.033

 

Mahazir I., I., Norazah, M. N., Ridzwan, C. R., & Azwin Arif, A. A. (2013).

Relationship between the Acceptance of Mobile Learning for AutoCAD Course

and Learning Style in Polytechnic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,

102(Ifee 2012), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.731

 

Marangunic, N., & Granic, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature

review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1),

81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

 

Marchewka, J., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An Application of the UTAUT Model for

Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software.

Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 10.

 

Marshall, B., Mills, R., & Olsen, D. (2008). The Role Of End-User Training In

Technology Acceptance. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS), 12(2),

1–8. https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v12i2.4384

 

Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & Popovic, A. (2014). Understanding the internet banking

adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived

risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.06.002

 

Mills, L. A., Knezek, G., & Khaddage, F. (2014). Computers in Human Behavior

Information Seeking , Information Sharing , and going mobile : Three bridges to

informal learning q. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 324–334.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.008

 

Miloševic, I., Zivkovic, D., Manasijevic, D., & Nikolic, D. (2015). The effects of the

intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning. Computers in Human

Behavior, 51, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.041

 

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in

Iran. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 191–207.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.006

 

Mohammed, M. A., Huda, I., & Maslinda, M. N. (2015). Electronic information

sharing between public universities and ministry of higher education and

scientific research: A pilot study. Journal of Theoretical and Applied

Information Technology, 77(2), 151–163.

 

Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web

context. Information and Management, 38(4), 217–230.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6

 

Morad, A. H. (2019). The Reality of University Education in Iraq: Problems and

Solutions Through Adoption of Credit Hours System. Engineering and

Technology Journal, 37(4 C), 487–491.

 

Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption

decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 375.

 

Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Gender and age differences

in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of

planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 69–

84.

 

Murali, R., & Manimekalai, J. (2012). Adoption of mobile technology in a learning

environment. In International Conference on Emerging Trends of Computer &

Information Technology (ICETCIT), 29–33, India.

 

Nanayakkara, C. (2007). A Model of User Acceptance of Learning Management

Systems : a study within Tertiary Institutions in New Zealand. The International

Journal of Learning, 13(12), 223–232. Retrieved from

http://ijl.cgpublisher.com/product/pub.30/prod.1263

 

Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative

Approaches 6th Edition. Pearson International Edition, USA.

 

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.

 

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2017). Mobile-based assessment: Investigating

the factors that influence behavioral intention to use. Computers and Education,

109, 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.005

 

Okai-Ugbaje, S., Ardzejewska, K., Imran, A., Yakubu, A., & Yakubu, M. (2020).

Cloud-Based M-Learning: A Pedagogical Tool to Manage Infrastructural

Limitations and Enhance Learning. International Journal of Education and

Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 16(2), 48.

 

Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships

among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior,

22(5), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006

 

Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2015). M-learning adequacy and perceptions of

students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational

Technology, 46(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12136

 

Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., & Garrido-Moreno, A. (2013).

Perceived playfulness, gender differences and technology acceptance model in a

blended learning scenario. Computers and Education, 63, 306–317.

 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using

SPSS. In Step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program.

 

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A multiple-item

scale for measuring consumer perc. Journal of Retailling, 64(1), 12.

 

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Alternative scales for

measuring service quality: A comparative assessment based on psychometric and

diagnostic criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201–230.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90033-7

 

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Malhotra, A. (2005). ES-QUAL: A multiple-item

scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3),

213–233. Retrieved from https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/articles/4x51hm21q

 

Park, S. Y., Nam, M., & Cha, S. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to

use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British

Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x

 

Park, Y. (2011). A Pedagogical Framework for Mobile Learning: Categorizing

Educational Applications of Mobile Technologies into Four Types. The

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78–

102. https://doi.org/10.3394/0380-1330(2006)32

 

Pedersen, P. E. (2005). Adoption of mobile Internet services: An exploratory study of

mobile commerce early adopters Per E. Pedersen Agder University College.

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 15(3), 203–

222. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327744joce1503_2

 

Pellas, N. (2014). The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive selfregulation

and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs:

Evidence from the virtual world of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior,

35, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048

 

Peng, H., Su, Y. J., Chou, C., & Tsai, C. C. (2009). Ubiquitous knowledge

construction: Mobile learning re-defined and a conceptual framework.

Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 171–183.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843828

 

Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Adapting the technology acceptance

model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. Computers in

Human Behavior, 30, 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045

 

Poong, Y. S., Yamaguchi, S., & Takada, J. I. (2017). Investigating the drivers of

mobile learning acceptance among young adults in the World Heritage town of

Luang Prabang, Laos. Information Development, 33(1), 57–71.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916638136

 

Pynoo, B., Devolder, P., Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Duyck, W., & Duyck, P. (2011).

Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning

environment: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1),

568–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005

 

Qawasmeh, F. M., Darqal, N., & Qawasmeh, I. F. (2013). The role of organization

culture in achieving organizational excellence: Jadara University as a case study.

International Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2(7), 5–19.

 

Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002). Assessing the validity of IS success

models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems

Research, 13(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96

 

Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N. H., & Lo, M. C. (2010). The role of quality factors in

intention to continue using an e-learning system in Malaysia. Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5422–5426.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.885

 

Rashotte, L. (2007). Social Influence. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1–3.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss154

 

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. In Elements of diffusion.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753-35

 

Sabah, N. M. (2016). Exploring students’ awareness and perceptions: Influencing

factors and individual differences driving m-learning adoption. Computers in

Human Behavior, 65, 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.009

 

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016).

Informal tools in formal contexts: Development of a model to assess the

acceptance of mobile technologies among teachers. Computers in Human

Behavior, 55, 519–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.002

 

Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017).

MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention

using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061

 

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A skill-building approach. New

York: John Willey and Son.

 

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building

Approach. In John Wiley & Sons.

 

Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning

experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and

Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001

 

Shin, W. S., & Kang, M. (2015). The use of a mobile learning management system at

an online university and its effect on learning satisfaction and achievement.

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16(3), 110–

130. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.1984

 

Siron, R., & Tasripan, M. A. H. (2012). A study of workplace stress amongst

managers and administrators. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference

on Management, 969–983.

 

Solomon, M. (2013). Consumer Behavior: Buying, having, and being. 3rd ed.

Australia: Pearson.

 

Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). Causal Relationships between Perceived Enjoyment and

Perceived Ease of Use: An Alternative Approach. Journal of the Association for

Information Systems, 7(9), 618–645. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00100

 

Tan, G. W. H., Ooi, K. B., Leong, L. Y., & Lin, B. (2014). Predicting the drivers of

behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks

approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 198–213.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.052

 

Tang, Y., & Tseng, H. W. (2013). Distance learners’ self-efficacy and information

literacy skills. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 517–521.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.08.008

 

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2013). User acceptance towards web-based learning

systems: Investigating the role of social, organizational and individual factors in

european higher education. Procedia Computer Science, 17, 189–197.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.026

 

Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). The effects of individual differences on elearning

users’ behaviour in developing countries: A structural equation model.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.089

 

Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). Computer based assessment: Gender

differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6),

2108–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005

 

Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2011). Using SERVQUAL to assess the

quality of e-learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1272–

1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.009

 

Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a

generic portal in The Netherlands. Information and Management, 40(6), 541–

549.

 

Varshney, U., & Vetter, R. (2002). Mobile commerce: Framework, applications and

networking support. Mobile Networks and Applications, 7(3), 185–198.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014570512129

 

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control,

Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.

Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

 

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research

agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

 

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology

Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2),

186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

 

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2016). Studies Linked

references are available on JSTOR for this article : A Theoretical Extension of

the Technology Acceptance Model : Four Longitudinal Field Studies. 46(2),

186–204.

 

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field

Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption

Decision-Making Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision

Processes, 83(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2896

 

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance

of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.

 

Wahsh, M. A., & Dhillon, J. S. (2015). An investigation of factors affecting the

adoption of cloud computing for E-government implementation. 2015 IEEE

Student Conference on Research and Development, SCOReD 2015, 323–328.

https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2015.7449349

 

Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and

age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal

of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

8535.2007.00809.x

 

Wu, I. L., & Chen, J. L. (2005). An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in

the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of

Human Computer Studies, 62(6), 784–808.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003

 

Wu, Y.-L., Tao, Y.-H., & Yang, P.-C. (2008). The use of unified theory of acceptance

and use of technology to confer the behavioral model of 3G mobile

telecommunication users. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 11(5),

919–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2008.10701351

 

Xin, X. (2004). A Model of 3G Adoption. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings. Paper 329.

 

Yang, S. (2012). EXPLORING COLLEGE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES AND SELFEFFICACY

OF MOBILE LEARNING. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of

Educational Technology, 11(4), 148–154.

 

Yuen, A., & Ma, W. (2002). Gender differences in teacher computer acceptance.

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 365–382.

https://doi.org/Issn 1059-7069

 

Zaremohazzabieh, Z., Samah, B. A., Omar, S. Z., Bolong, J., & Shaffril, H. A. M.

(2014). Fisherman’s acceptance and use of information and communication

technology integration in Malaysia. Exploring the moderating effect of age and

experience. Journal of Applied Sciences 14 (9).

 

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a meansend

model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

 

Zhang, X., Ordóñez, P., Pablos, D., & Xu, Q. (2014). Computers in Human Behavior

Culture effects on the knowledge sharing in multi-national virtual classes : A

mixed method. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 491–498.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.021

 

Zhang, Y. (2005). DISTANCE LEARNING RECEPTIVITY. Quarterly Review of

Distance Education, 6(1), 1–29.

 

Zhou, G., & Xu, J. (2007). Adoption of Educational Technology: How Does Gender

Matter? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,

19(2), 140–153. Retrieved from

http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE19(2).pdf#page=40

 

Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2003). Business research

methods 7th Edition. CA.: Thompson Learning.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.