Analysis of Disaster Mitigation in Carita with Environmental Learning in Elementary School

Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh

QR Code Link :
Type :	conference_item
Subject :	P Language and Literature
ISSN :	1755-1307
Main Author :	Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh
Title :	Analysis of Disaster Mitigation in Carita with Environmental Learning in Elementary School

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :	2021
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study analyzes the profile of Carita people in the efforts of tsunami disaster mitigation and the role of environmental learning in coping with the disaster, then analyzes the use of environmental learning. The method used is a mixed method of qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative method measures various community readiness levels in performing disaster mitigation, whereas the qualitative method is utilized to obtain various further information from the communities using interview technique. There were 88 randomly selected respondents participating in this research. The study results indicate a low land utilization density (below 33%). Indicators suggest a good category, namely: people evacuate when a disaster occurs (86%), rescue during a disaster (96.59%), and try to find new livelihoods (82.95%). In addition, public knowledge of disaster evacuation route is at a good level (87.50%) and there is an increase of 39.77% respondents with improved knowledge after the tsunami disaster occurred. Environmental learning, in this case, plays an important role to provide information to the public relating the efforts in disaster mitigation. The conclusion is that community’s disaster mitigation readiness still requires some improvement through various efforts, one of them is environmental learning with learning media in elementary school.

References

Dahl K K B and Millora C M 2016 Lifelong learning from natural disasters: transformative groupbased learning at Philippine universities Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 35 648–63

Suppasri A, Latcharote P, Bricker J D, Leelawat N, Hayashi A, Yamashita K, Makinoshima F, Roeber V and Imamura F 2016 Improvement of Tsunami Countermeasures Based on Lessons from The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami — Situation After Five Years Coast. Eng. J. 58 1640011–30

Crow D A and Albright E A 2019 Intergovernmental relationships after disaster: state and local government learning during flood recovery in Colorado J. Environ. Policy Plan. 21 257–74

Kumala Dewi L P R and Dartanto T 2019 Natural disasters and girls vulnerability: is child marriage a coping strategy of economic shocks in Indonesia? Vulnerable Child. Youth Stud. 14 24–35

Puttinaovarat S and Horkaew P 2020 Internetworking flood disaster mitigation system based on remote sensing and mobile GIS Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk 11 1886–911

Flanagan B E, Gregory E W, Hallisey E J, Heitgerd J L and Lewis B 2011 A Social Vulnerability Index for Disaster Management J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 8

Anwar H Z, Yustiningrum E, Andriana N, Kusumawardhani D T P, Sagala S and Sari A M 2017 Measuring community resilience to natural hazards: case study of Yogyakarta province Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia (Springer) pp 609–33

Lucini B 2013 Social capital and sociological resilience in megacities context ed H Molin Valdés Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 4 58–71

Dwiningrum S I A 2017 Developing school resilience for disaster mitigation: a confirmatory factor analysis Disaster Prev. Manag. An Int. J. 26 437–51

Lai C S 2018 A study of fifth graders’ environmental learning outcomes in Taipei Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 4 252–62

Rahmayanti H, Ichsan I Z, Azwar S A, Purwandari D A, Pertiwi N, Singh C K S and Gomes P W P 2020 Difmol: Indonesian Students’ Hots and Environmental Education Model During Covid19 J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 15 10–9

Sigit D V, Miarsyah M, Komala R, Suryanda A, Ichsan I Z and Fadrikal R 2020 EECN: Analysis, potency, benefit for students knowledge and attitude to conserve mangroves and coral reefs Int. J. Instr. 13 125–38

Ichsan I Z and Rahmayanti H 2020 HOTSEP: Revised Anderson’s taxonomy in environmental learning of COVID-19 Eur. J. Educ. Res. 9 1257–65

Baxter P and Jack S J 2008 Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers Qual. Report, 13 544–59

Maguire B and Hagan P 2021 Disasters and Communities: Understanding Social Resilience Aust. J. Emerg. Manag.

Shiwaku K, Ueda Y, Oikawa Y and Shaw R 2016 School disaster resilience assessment in the affected areas of 2011 East Japan earthquake and tsunami Nat. Hazards 82 333–65

Allan P and Bryant M 2014 The attributes of resilience: a tool in the evaluation and design of earthquake-prone cities Int. J. Disaster Resil. Built Environ. 5 109–29

Lopez Caceres M L, Nakano S, Ferrio J P, Hayashi M, Nakatsuka T, Sano M, Yamanaka T and Nobori Y 2018 Evaluation of the effect of the 2011 Tsunami on coastal forests by means of multiple isotopic analyses of tree-rings Isotopes Environ. Health Stud. 54 494–507

De Costa R and Nandasena N A K 2020 Pohutukawa bio-shield on the coast of New Zealand as a tsunami mitigation strategy Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 24 1955–66

Sarker M A 2019 Numerical modelling of tsunami in the Makran Subduction Zone – A case study on the 1945 event J. Oper. Oceanogr. 12 S212–29

Xu J and Lu Y 2018 Towards an earthquake-resilient world: from post-disaster reconstruction to pre-disaster prevention Environ. Hazards 17 269–75

Irawan U S and Purwanto E 2020 Profile of Smallholder Oil-palm Plantation in Ketapang District, West Kalimantan (Bogor, Indonesia)

Raman R A 2016 Attitudes and Behavior of Ajman University of Science and Technology Students Towards the Environment IAFOR J. Educ. 4

Morganti L, Pallavicini F, Cadel E, Candelieri A, Archetti F and Mantovani F 2017 Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 29 95–102

Rogayan D E and Nebrida E E D 2019 Environmental awareness and practices of Science students: Input for ecological management plan Int. Electron. J. Environ. Educ. 9 106–19

Sigit D V, Azrai E P, Heryanti E, Ichsan I Z, Jajomi Y P and Fadrikal R 2019 Development Green Consumerism E-Book for Undergraduate Students (GC-EBUS) as learning media in environmental learning Indian J. Public Heal. Res. Dev. 10 2026–31

Ichsan I Z, Sigit D V, Miarsyah M, Ali A, Suwandi T and Titin 2020 Implementation supplementary book of green consumerism: Improving students hots in environmental learning Eur. J. Educ. Res. 9 227–37

Komala R, Lestari D P and Ichsan I Z 2020 Group investigation model in environmental learning: An effect for students’ higher order thinking skills Univers. J. Educ. Res. 8 9–14

Suryanda A, Azrai E P, Nuramadhan M and Ichsan I Z 2020 Analogy and critical thinking skills: Implementation learning strategy in biodiversity and environment topic Univers. J. Educ. Res. 8 45–50

Rogayan D J V. 2019 I Heart Nature: Perspectives of University Students on Environmental Stewardship Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 1

Ichsan, Zajuli I, Henita Rahmayanti A P, Sigit D V, Kurniawan E, Tanjung A, Panjaitan R G P, Pertiwi N and Singh C K S 2021 Thinking level in education: a complete revision of Anderson’s taxonomy Pedagogika 141 53–78

Miarsyah M, Rusdi, Aryani N D and Ichsan I Z 2019 MEBA: Development android-based ecosystem module for senior high school students Indian J. Public Heal. Res. Dev. 10 2114–8

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page