UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Bautista, Joyce Leviste
Title :The development of Sustainable Professional Development framework for Early Childhood Education teachers in the Philippines
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Pusat Penyelidikan Perkembangan Kanak-kanak Negara
Year of Publication :2019
Notes :With cd\r\nPAKK
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Professional Development (PD) programs for Early Childhood Education (ECE) teachers’ foster higher  teaching quality and learning of children when sustained, meet the objectives and mission of  education. This qualitative study sought to identify the dimensions and domains of the Framework  for Sustainable Professional Development (FSPD) of ECE Teachers. This is to address the new  standards and policies for teacher quality that inform Continuous Professional Development (CPD) in  the Philippines and respond to the global demands. Sources of data included CPD frameworks of five  countries, two Philippines’ standards and policies related to CPD, two CPD program observations,  multiple CPD documents, and interviews. For the individual and focus group interviews purposive  sampling was used to select 25 participants which included ECE teachers, school administrators and  other CPD providers. The Stake’s Countenance Model incorporating SWOT analysis was employed to  examine and analyse data. Findings of the study revealed that the dimensions and domains of the  FSPD include: (1) the basis should be relevant, reflective, and result-oriented; (2) the core  elements should be learner-focused, content-focused, community of practice-focused, and  assessment-focused; and (3) the approaches should be developmental, systematic, collaborative, and  contextualized. The dimensions and domains of the FSPD formed the contents of a manual to better  guide the users. The content validation process was done with the help of twelve (12) experts using  the Validation Rubric. The results revealed that in terms of structure, organization, content, and  meaning the FSPD manual met the standards to a very high extent. Implication of this study will  address the need to unify and  synchronize efforts to sustain the PD of ECE teachers to help  improve instructional competence and ultimately improve children’s learning and development in the  21ˢᵗ century.

References

Alegado, P. J. E. (2018). Unraveling social epidemia through the lens of public education in the 

Philippines. World Council of Comparative Education Societies (WCCES) Chronicle, 2(1).

 

American Institutes of Research, Westat. (2015). Promising practices for moving towards sustaining 

high-quality and effective professional learning for teachers: lessons learned from tif 

implementation. Teacher Incentive Fund. Department of Education, United States of America. 

Retrieved from https://www.tlpcommunity.org/sites/default/files/resources/tif_paper_sustaina 

bility_v2for508.pdf

 

Anfara, J. A., & Mertens, S. B. (2012). Capacity building is a key to the radical transformation of 

middle grades schools. Middle School Journal, 43(3), 58-64. (Accession No. 70148650)

 

Archibald, S., Coggshall, J.G., Croft, A., & Goe, L. (2011). High-quality professional development 

for all teachers: effectively allocating resources. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center 

on Teacher Quality. Retrieved from 

http://www.gtlcenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/HighQualityProfessionalDeve lopment.pdf.

 

Askew, M., & Burns, C. (2005). Learning from practice: Teachers and researchers in joint inquiry. 

Paper presented at the 15th ICMI Study: The Education and Professional Development of Teachers of 

Mathematics, Aguas de Lindoia, Brazil.

 

Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten 

years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27 (1), 10-20.

 

Back, J., De Geest, E., Hirst, C., & Joubert, M. (2009). Final report: Researching effective CPD in 

mathematics education (RECME). Sheffield: NCETM.

 

Berg, L. (2009).  Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). n, MA: Allyn & 

Bacon.

 

Bevan, M. T. (2014). A method for phenomenological interviewing. Qualitative

Health Research, 24(1), 136-144.

 

Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to 

theories and methods (4th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Bogard, K., & Takanishi, R. (2005). Pre-K-3: An aligned and coordinated approach to education for 

children 3 to 8 years old. Social Policy Report, 19(3), 1-23.

 

Bridwell,  S.  D.  (2013).  A  constructive-developmental  perspective  on  the transformative 

learning of adults marginalized by race, class, and gender. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of 

Research and Theory, 63(2), 127- 146.

 

Campbell, Carol L., Teachers Teaching Teachers: A Sustainable and Inexpensive Professional   

Development   Program   to   Improve   Instruction (2014).Dissertations and Theses.Paper 2072.

 

Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, (2014). The Elements of Effective Professional 

Development. NSW Department of Education and Communities. Sydney, Australia.

 

Chae, E. K. (2014). Early Childhood Teacher Professional Development Using an Interdisciplinary 

Approach: Teaching English as a Foreign Language for Young Children in Korea (Dissertation). 

ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. ( UMI No. 3639036).

 

Chambers, F. C., Armour, K, Luttrell, S., Bleakley, W., Brennan, D., & Herold, F. (2012). Mentoring 

as a profession-building process in physical education teacher education. Irish Educational 

Studies, 31(3), 345-362.

 

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

46 (1). 50-62.

 

Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational 

Researcher, 18, 32-42.Calkins, L., Ehrenworth, M., & Lehman, C. (2012).  Pathways  to  the  common  

core:  Accelerating   achievement.

Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

 

Conzemius, A,, & Morganti-Fisher, T. (2012). More than a smart goal: Staying

focused on student learning. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

 

Coombs, S. & Denning, A. (2005) Designing Impact: Integrating accredited CPD activity  into  the  

workforce.  International  Professional  Development Association (IPDA) in Birmingham, UK, 9-10 

Dec., 2005.

 

Cranton, P., & Kasl, E. (2012). A response to Michael Newman’s “Calling transformative learning 

into question: Some mutinous thoughts”. Adult Education Quarterly: A Journal of Research and 

Theory, 62(4), 393-398.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 

Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research method: Choosing among five approaches 

(2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Day, J.P.. (1999), Exemplary Teacher voices on their own development. Phi Delta

Kappan, 92.8, 37-41.

 

Doerksen, C. G. (2012) A phenomenological study of schoolteachers adopting the international 

baccalaureate primary years programme (Doctoral dissertation).

 

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. 

Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

 

Darling-Hammond, L. & Richardson, N. (2010). Teacher learning: What matters?

Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.

 

Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective 

teaching. Stanford, CA. Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

 

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education. How America’s commitment to equity will 

determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers

College Press.

 

Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Kappan,

92(6), 68-71.

 

Desimone,  L.  (2009).  Improving  impact  studies  of  teacher’s  professional

development: Toward better conceptualizations and measure.

 

Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform on behalf of the National Co- ordinating  Childcare  

Committee,  (2002).  Quality  childcare  &  lifelong learning:  Model  framework  for  education,  

training  and  professional development in the early childhood care and education sector. OMNA 

Project. Ireland.

 

Driscoll, M. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

 

DuFour, R., & Mattos, M. (2013). How do principals really improve schools.

Educational Leadership, 70(7), 34-40.

 

Dusi, P., Girelli, C., Tacconi, G., & Sità, C. (2011). Doing research through descriptions of 

teachers. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1847-1854. Retrieved from 

doi:10.1016/.sbspro.2011.11.433

 

DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & DuFour, R. (2005). Recurring themes of professional learning communities 

and the assumptions they challenge. In R. DuFour, R. Eaker, & R. DuFour (Eds.), On common ground: 

The power of professional learning communities (pp. 155-175). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

 

Duze, C. O. (2013, February). The changing role of school leadership and teacher capacity building 

in teaching and learning. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 

3(1), 111-117.

 

Eilers, L. H., & D'Amico, M. (2012). Essential leadership elements in implementing common core 

state standards. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 78(4), 46-50.

 

Esthermsmth, (2017) Andragogy – Adult Learning Theory (Knowles), in Learning Theories, September 

30, 2017.

 

European  Commission  (2013).  Policies  on  teachers’  continuing  professional development (CPD): 

balancing provision with the needs of individual teachers,  schools  and  education  systems.  

Vienna,  Austria:  European

Commission, June 2013.

 

Fullan, M. (1997). What’s worth fighting for in the principalship. New York, NY:

Teachers College Press.

 

Day, J.P.. (1999), Exemplary Teacher voices on their own development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92.8, 

37-41.

 

Gaikhorst, L., Beishuizen, J. J., Zijlstra, B. J. H., & Volman, M. L. L. (2015). Contribution of a 

professional development programme to the quality and retention of teachers in an urban 

environment. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(1), 41–57.

 

Gamoran, A., W. Secada and C. Marrett (2000), “The organizational context of teaching and learning: 

changing theoretical perspectives”, in M. Hallinan (ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Education, 

Springer, New York.

 

Gonzales, L., & Vodicka, D. (2008). Professional learning: New strategies: Effective professional 

development should reflect what we know from data-driven improvement efforts. Leadership – 

Burlingame, 37(4), 8-12.

 

Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In

N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

 

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

 

Hannele, N., Nevgi, A., & Aksit, Fisun (2016) Active learning promoting student teachers’ 

professional competences in Finland and Turkey, European Journal of Teacher Education, 39:4, 

471-490, DOI: 10.1080/02619768.2016.1212835

 

Harvey, Gerry (2015) The Evolving Model of School Self-Evaluation in Ireland: How a Person’s 

Perception of Purpose and Power Determines Practice. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland 

Maynooth.

 

Hill, H. (2009). Fixing teacher professional development. Leading Edge. 470-476

 

Hipsher, C. A. (2014).  Educators’ perceptions regarding Common Core State

Standards and professional development (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved roQuest (UMI 3615145)

 

Hord, S. M., & Roussin, J. L. (2013). Implementing change through learning:

Concerns based concepts, tools, and strategies for guiding change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

 

Hunter, J. & Back, J. (2011). Facilitating sustainable professional development through lesson 

study. Teacher Education and Development. 2011, Vol. 13.1, 94–114.

 

Jenkins, P. T. (2012). Teacher and Principal Experiences of Effective Professional Development  

(Dissertation).  ProQuest  Dissertations  and  Theses.  (UMI Number: 3502620

http://search.proquest.com/docview/ 3502620?accountid=2909.

 

Jenkins, S., & Agamba, J. (2013). The missing link in the CCSS initiative: Professional development 

for implementation. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17(2), 69-79.

 

Kagan, S. L., Kauerz, K., & Tarrant, K. (2007). The early care and education teaching workforce of 

the fulcrum: An agenda reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

 

Kimble, Larry L., Yager, Robert E. & Yager, Stuart O. (2017) Success of a Professional-Development 

Model in Assisting Teachers to Change Their Teaching to Match the More Emphasis Conditions Urged in 

the National Science   Education   Standards, Journal   of   Science   Teacher Education, 17:3, 

309-322.

 

Kimmel, S. C. (2012). Collaboration as school reform: Are there patterns in the chaos of planning 

with teachers? School Library Research, 15, 1-12.

 

Kauerz, K. (2006). Ladders of learning: Fighting fade-out by advancing PreK-3rd alignment. 

Washington, DC: New America Foundation.

 

Kauerz, K., & Coffman, J. (2013) Framework for planning, implementing, and

evaluating PreK-3rd grade approaches.

 

Leahy, M. & Butler, D. (2015). Key Elements of a Sustainable Framework for

Teacher Professional Learning. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 

2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 

1355-1360). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education 

(AACE).

 

Learning  Forward.  (n.d.).  Definition  of  professional  development.  Retrieved November 1, 

2010,

 

Liu, P. (2013, Spring). Perceptions of the teacher-student relationship: A study of teachers and 

their students. International Education, 42(2), 21-40, 98.

 

Maeroff, G. (2006). Building blocks: Making children successful in the early years of school. New 

York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

 

Mcfarland, E. S., (2014). Teachers’ Perceptions of Professional Development: What do Teachers 

Really Want That Makes Them Willing to Change Professional Practice?. ProQuest LLC.

 

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.).

Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

 

Merriam, S. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1?: Issues of validity and reliability in 

qualitative research. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51- 60.

 

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

 

Mizell, H. (2012, December). Who are the advocates in your school? Journal of Staff Development, 

33(6), 46-49.

 

Mohammed, A. M. (2006). Creating opportunities for continuing professional development of teachers: 

The National Teachers’ Institute experience, A Lead Paper presented at the 1st National Conference 

of the Faculty of Education, University of Abuja, 17th-21st, October.

 

Muzaffar, M., & Malik, S. (2012). Attitude of teachers towards professional

development trainings. Language in India, 12(8), 304-322.

 

North Central Regional Educational Library. (2008). Using data to bring about

positive  results  in  school  improvement  efforts.  Retrieved  from 

http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/educatrs/profdevl/professional

development2prof.htm.

 

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). NAEYC Standards for Early 

Childhood Professional Preparation.

 

National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1993). A Conceptual Framework for Early 

Childhood Professional Development. The NAEYC.

 

NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10) [Computer software]. QSR International Pty 

Ltd.

 

OECD (2015), Resources invested in education. What Makes Schools Successful?

Resources, Policies and Practices – 5

 

OECD (2012), Quality Matters In Early Childhood Education And Care. OECD. Japan.

 

OECD  (2010).  Teachers’  professional  development  Europe  in  international comparison, An 

analysis of teachers’ professional development based on the OECD’s Teaching and Learning 

International Survey (TALIS). OECD. Belgium

 

OECD (2005), Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris: OECD.

 

Omotuyolel, C and Okudo, A. R. (2014). Professional Development of Early Childhood and Language 

Education Teachers for Sustainable Development Journal of Research & Method in Education 

(IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320– 7388,p-ISSN: 2320–737X Volume 4, Issue 2.

 

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014), TALIS 2013 Results: An International 

Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Paris, France. OECD Publishing.

 

Ovando, M., & Ramirez, A. (2007). Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance 

appraisal system: Enhancing students’ academic success.

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(1), 85-110.

 

Pitsoe, V. J., & Maila, W. M. (2012). Towards constructivist teacher professional

development. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 318-324. Retrieved from 

http://search.proquest.com.proxy1.ncu.edu/docview/1034108221?accountid=2 818 0 .

 

Phillips, V., & Hughes, R. (2012). Teacher collaboration: The essential ingredient.

Education Week, 32(13), 32-35.

 

Philippine National Research Center for Teacher Quality (2016). Philippine Professional Standards 

for Teachers; August, 2016. Manila, Philippines.

 

Poland, B. D. (1995. Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research.

Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 290 – 310.

 

Professional Regulation Commission, (2017). List of accredited cpd providers for professional 

teachers. DepEd LPs.

 

Professional Regulation Commission, (2018). CPD for teachers: Update on PRC license renewal. Deped 

Teachers’ Club.

 

Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in 

Accounting and Management, 8(3), 238-264.

 

Sackey, S. C. (2012, February). The 3 r’s of learning time: Rethink, reshape, reclaim.

Journal of Staff Development, 33(1), 46-48.

 

Schostak, J. (2011). Qualitative research – Some notes… Retrieved from 

http://www.enquirylearning.net/ELU/content%20resources/qualitativeresearch

.html

 

Sadowski, M. (2006). Core knowledge for PK-3 teaching: Ten components of effective instruction. 

Foundation for Child Development Policy to Action Brief.

 

Seaborne, P. (2008) PPD Impact Evaluation Report. London: TDA.

 

Singapore’s Achieving Excellence Through Continuing Professional Development: A CPD Framework for 

ECE Teachers (2012). Retrieved from

https://www.earlychildhoodworkforce.org/node/86

 

Singh, K., Schrape, J. and Kelly, J. (2012). Emerging strategies for a sustainable

approach to professional development. In M. Brown, M, Harnett & T. Stewart (Eds.),  Future  

challenges,  sustainable  futures.  Proceedings  Ascilite. Wellington 2012. (pp. 833-842).

 

Sheridan, S. M., Edwards, C. P., Marvin, C. A., & Knoche, L. L. (2009). Professional development in 

early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 

20(3), 377-401.

 

Smith, T. M., & Rowley, K. J. (2005). Enhancing commitment or tightening control: The function of 

teacher professional development in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 19(1), 126-153.

 

Stake, R.E. (1973). The countenance of educational evaluation. In P. Taylor & D. Crowley (Eds.), 

Reading in curriculum evaluation. Iowa: Wm. D. Brown.

 

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Stickney, C. A. (2012). Professional development leading to sustained change. (Dissertation) 

ProQuest (UMI Number: 3533558) (Dissertations and Theses).

 

Teague, G. M., & Anfara, Jr., V. A. (2012). Professional learning communities create sustainable 

change through collaboration. Middle School Journal, 44(2), 58- 64.

 

Thomas, D. R. (2013) A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis, School of 

Population Health, University of Auckland.

 

Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development 

effective? In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International 

perspectives (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Routledge.

 

Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional development in the United 

States: Trends and challenges. Dallas, TX. National Staff Development Council.

 

Whitehouse, C. (2011). Effective continuing professional development for Teachers.

Center for education research and policy: AQA. Manchester.

 

Willis, J. C.; Templeton & N. R. (2017). Investigating the Establishment and

Sustainability of Professional Learning Communities in Rural East Texas:

The Principals’ Perspectives.

 

Wiseman, D. L, (2012). The intersection of policy, reform, and teacher education.

Journal of Teacher Education, 63(2), 87-921.

 

World Bank SABER Annual Report (2014). Strengthening Education Systems to Achieve Learning for All. 

The World Bank Group.

 

Yaxley, H. (2015). Investing in sustainable professional development. We are proofed. PR community 

of practice. Chapter 22.

 

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:

SAGE, Inc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)