Antunes, R., Couto, N., Vitorino, A., Monteiro, D., Marinho, D. A., & Cid, L. (2019). Physical activity and affect of the elderly: Contribution to the validation of the Positive and Negative Affect Shedule (PANAS) in the Portuguese population. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 15(2).

Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 95–115.

Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Belynne, K., Viswanath, K., Vye, N., Schwartz, D., & Davis, J. (2004). Incorporating self regulated learning techniques into learning by teaching environments. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 26 (26). Cheok, A. D., & Fernando, O. N. N. (2012). Kawaii/Cute interactive media. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11(3), 295–309.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. Dale, J. P. (2016). Cute studies: An emerging field. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2(1), 5–13. Detective Pikachu [Image]. (2020). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detective_Pikachu

Dincer, S., & Doganay, A. (2017). The effects of multiple-pedagogical agents on learners’ academic success, motivation, and cognitive load. Computers and Education, 111, 74–100. Goldberg, B., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2015). Feedback source modality effects on training outcomes in a serious game: Pedagogical agents make a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 1–11.

Granot, E., Alejandro, T. B., & Russell, L. T. M. (2014). A socio-marketing analysis of the concept of cute and its consumer culture implications. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(1), 66–87.

Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2006). Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 64(4), 322–339. Heidig, S., & Clarebout, G. (2011). Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning? Educational Research Review 6(1), 27-54.

Hello Kitty [Image]. (2014). Retrieved from

https://www.pinclipart.com/downpngs/bJRmbo_permalink-to-clipart-hello-kitty-hello-kitty-icon/ Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). Resource requirements and costs of developing and delivering MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 113–133. Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295-323.

Johnson, A. M., Didonato, M. D., & Reisslein, M. (2013). Animated agents in K-12 engineering outreach: Preferred agent characteristics across age levels. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1807–1815. Johnson, W. L., & Lester, J. C. (2016). Face-to-face interaction with pedagogical agents, twenty years later. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 25–36.

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status, 1(1983), 383-434. Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The Impact of an Augmented Reality Application on Learning Motivation of Students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019.

Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3), 223–243.

Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. In Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2001 (pp. 43–46). IEEE Computer Society. Lieber-Milo, S., & Nittono, H. (2019). How the Japanese Term Kawaii Is Perceived Outside of Japan: A Study in Israel. SAGE Open, 9(3).

Li, J., Kizilcec, R., Bailenson, J., & Ju, W. (2016). Social robots and virtual agents as lecturers for video instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1222–1230.

Li, T., & Lynch, R. (2016). The relationship between motivation for learning and academic achievement among basic and advanced level students studying Chinese as a foreign language in years 3 to 6 at Ascot International School in Bangkok, Thailand. Scholar: Human Sciences, 8(1).

Liu, K., Chen, J. H., & Chang, K. M. (2019). A study of facial features of American and Japanese cartoon characters. Symmetry, 11(5). Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 5(2), 235–409.

Marcus, A., Kurosu, M., Ma, X., & Hashizume, A. (2017). Cuteness in Japan. In Springer Series on Cultural Computing (pp. 33–61). Springer. Martha, A. S. D., & Santoso, H. B. (2019). The design and impact of the pedagogical agent: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educators Online 16(1).

Mohanty, A. (2016). Affective Pedagogical Agent in E-Learning Environment: A Reflective Analysis. Creative Education, 7(4), 586–595. Miesler, L., Leder, H., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Isn’t it cute: An evolutionary perspective of baby-schema effects in visual product designs. International Journal of Design, 5(3), 17–30.

Nittono, H. (2010). A Behavioral Science Framework for Understanding Kawaii. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Kansei, (4), 5–8. Nittono, H., Fukushima, M., Yano, A., & Moriya, H. (2012). The Power of Kawaii: Viewing Cute Images Promotes a Careful Behavior and Narrows Attentional Focus. PLoS ONE, 7(9).

Nittono, H. (2016). The two-layer model of ‘kawaii’: A behavioural science framework for understanding kawaii and cuteness. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2(1), 79–95. Nittono, H., & Ihara, N. (2017). Psychophysiological Responses to Kawaii Pictures With or Without Baby Schema. SAGE Open, 7(2).

Noguchi, Y., & Tomoike, K. (2016). Strongly-motivated positive affects induce faster responses to local than global information of visual stimuli: An approach using large-size Navon letters. Scientific Reports, 6.

Occhi, D. J. (2012). Wobbly aesthetics, performance, and message comparing Japanese kyara with their anthropomorphic forebears. Asian Ethnology, 71(1), 109–132. Park, S. (2018). Virtual Pedagogical Agents for English Language Teaching and Learning. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1–9).

Pellitteri, M. (2018). Kawaii Aesthetics from Japan to Europe: Theory of the Japanese Cute and Transcultural Adoption of Its Styles in Italian and French Comics Production and Commodified Culture Goods. Arts, 7(3), 24.

Peñalver, J., Salanova, M., Martínez, I. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). Happy-productive groups: How positive affect links to performance through social resources. Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(3), 377–392.

Quinn, J. F. (2015). The affect of vision and compassion upon role factors in physician leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:442.

Return of Hanuman [Image]. (2007). Retrieved from http://wallpapers.fansshare.com/gallery/photos/14652645/bal-hanuman-movie/?displaying. Rodicio, H. G., & Sánchez, E. (2012). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning: A comparison of human tutoring and computer support. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(5), 423–439.

Sherman, G. D., Haidt, J., & Coan, J. A. (2009). Viewing Cute Images Increases Behavioral Carefulness. Emotion, 9(2), 282–286.

Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Jobst, V., Hornlein, A., Puppe, F., Pauli, P., & Muhlberger, A. (2015). The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 5–11. Sloan, R. (2015). Virtual character design for games and interactive media. New York: AK Peters/CRC Press.

Takamatsu, R. (2018). Measuring Affective Responses to Cuteness and Japanese kawaii as a Multidimensional Construct. Current Psychology, 1-13. Tenney, E. R., Poole, J. M., & Diener, E. (2016). Does positivity enhance work performance?: Why, when, and what we don’t know. Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press.

Vicneas, M., & Zamzuri, A. M. A. (2019). Different realism designs of 2d virtual agents and its arousal effect on students’ emotions in learning. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 5149–5158.

Vicneas, M., & Zamzuri, A. M. A. (2020). The effect of valence and arousal on virtual agent's designs in quiz based multimedia learning environment. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 903-920.

Volkswagen New Beetle [Image]. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.pngegg.com/en/png-tlqcf/download Yardimci, F., Bektaş, M., Özkütük, N., Muslu, G. K., Gerçeker, G. Ö., & Başbakkal, Z. (2017). A study of the relationship between the study process, motivation resources, and motivation problems of nursing students in different educational systems. Nurse Education Today, 48, 13–18.

Yu, Y. (2015). The role a motivational agent plays: the effects of a co-learner agent and an expert agent (Master's thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands).

White, W. B. (2015). The relationship between an affective instructional design, children’s attitudes toward mathematics, and math learning for kindergarten age children (Master's thesis, East Tennessee State University, United States) Withrow, S., & Danner, A. (2007). Character design for graphic novels. Switzerland: RotoVision SA

Wong, S. (2017). Yuru-kyara and Mascot Characters: Cute Aesthetics and the Empathic Effect of Kawaii in Japanese Commercials.