UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji kesan pengajaran menggunakan Strategi Model
Peringkat Kefahaman Numerasi (SMPKN) terhadap pencapaian dan sikap murid
Tingkatan 2 dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik berayat. Kajian ini merupakan
kajian kuantitatif dengan reka bentuk kajian kuasi eksperimen. Sampel kajian terdiri
daripada dua buah kelas berjumlah 66 murid Tingkatan 2 yang dipilih secara rawak
kelompok daripada sebuah sekolah di daerah Larut, Taiping. Seramai 33 orang murid
sebagai kumpulan eksperimen menjalani pengajaran menggunakan SMPKN manakala
seramai 33 orang murid sebagai kumpulan kawalan menjalani pengajaran
menggunakan Strategi Pengajaran Konvensional (SPKON). Dua jenis instrumen
digunakan bagi mengumpul data iaitu Ujian Pra dan Pasca Penyelesaian Masalah
Matematik Berayat dan Soal Selidik Sikap terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik
Berayat. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif iaitu min dan sisihan piawai,
disusuli dengan analisis statistik inferensi menggunakan Analisis Kovarian. Dapatan
kajian menunjukkan bahawa apabila pra ujian pencapaian dijadikan kovariat, didapati
terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan [F(1,63) = 584.858, p .05] bagi min markah
pasca ujian di antara kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan. Seterusnya,
apabila skor soal selidik pra sikap terhadap penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat
dijadikan kovariat [F(1, 63) = 0.039, p .05], didapati tidak terdapat perbezaan
signifikan bagi kedua-dua min skor soal selidik pasca tersebut di antara kedua-dua
kumpulan. Walau bagaimanapun, terdapat peningkatan dari segi min markah sikap
terhadap penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat murid kumpulan eksperimen dalam
pra-pasca ujian. Kesimpulannya, SMPKN dapat meningkatkan pencapaian murid
dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat tetapi SMPKN ini kurang memberi
impak kepada sikap terhadap penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat kerana domain
afektif mengambil tempoh yang lebih lama untuk menunjukkan kesan terhadap
intervensi tersebut. Implikasinya, SMPKN merupakan satu strategi alternatif yang
perlu dijadikan amalan dalam pengajaran penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat
agar pencapaian domain kognitif dan afektif dapat dicapai. |
References |
Abdol Reza, L., Aida Suraya, M. Y., & Kamariah, A. B. (2017). Comparison of new mathematics teaching methods with traditional method. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 1285-1297.
Abdul Halim, A., Nur Liyana, Z. A., & Marlina, A. (2015). Analysis of students‟s errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 132-142.
Abdul Jalil, O & Bahtiar, O. (2005). Aplikasi pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme dalam pengajaran karangan berpandu. Masalah Pendidikan, 28, 221-232.
Adam, P. (2006). Exploring social constructivism: Theories and practicalities. Journal Education, 34(3), 243-257.
Aiken, L. R. (2000). Rating scales and checklists: Evaluating behavior, personality, and attitudes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Akyuz, D. Dixon, J. K., & Stephan, M. (2013). Improving the quality of mathematics teaching with effective planning practices. Teacher Development: An International Journal of Teaches’ Professional Development, 17(1), 92-106.
Ali, A. A., & Reid, N. (2012). Understanding mathematics some key factors. European Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 283-299.
Ali, T. (2011). Exploring students‟ learning difficulties in secondary mathematics classroom in Gilgit-Baltistan and teachers‟ effort to hel students overcome these difficulties. Bulletin of Educations and Research, 33(1), 47-69.
Anderson, J. (2014). Forging new opportunities for problem solving in Australian mathematics classrooms through the first national mathematics curriculum. Dalam Yeping, L. & Glenda, L. (Eds.), Mathematics Curriculum in School Education, Dordrecht: Springer.
Anstey, M. (2003). Multiliteracies and the for resources model. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Arief, B. W., & Adhetia, M. (2019). Analysis of junior high school students errors in solving mathematical problems for the topic of circle. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 61-68.
Arsaythamby, V., & Shamsuddin, M. (2011). Hubungan sikap, kebimbangan, dan tabiat pembelajaran dengan pencapaian matematik tambahan. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 26(1), 15-32.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen. C. (2006). Introduction to research in education. California: Thomson Wadsworth.
Asiahwati, A. (2017). Hubungan antara gred matematik SPM dengan tahap numerasi pelajar lepasan menengah dalam bidang nombor. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 12, 1-19.
Asman, D. & Markowitz, Z. (2001) The use of real word knowledge in solving mathematical problem. Dibentangkan di 25ᵗʰ Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht, Netherlands.
Aunio, P., Heiskari, P., Van Luit, J., & Vuorio, J. (2015). The development of early numeracy skills in kindergarten in low-average and high-performance groups. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 13(1), 3-16.
Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton Inc.
Ayu, E., & Effandi, Z. (2014). Kesan penggunaan perisian geogebra ke atas keupayaan penyelesaian masalah dan pencapaian matematik pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(1), 51-64.
Azizi, Y. & Elanggovan, S. (2008). Kepentingan Kefahaman Konsep dalam Matematik. Permasalahan dalam pendidikan sains dan matematik. Skudai, Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Azizi, Y., Jamaludin, R., Shahrin, H., Mohd Ali, I., Hamdan, A. K., Yusof, B., & Raja Roslan, R. A. R. (2010). The effects of various modes of absenteeism problem in school on the academic performances of students in secondary schools. European Journal of School On The Academic Performance of Students in Secondary Schools, 12,4.
Azlena, Z., & Munir, S. (2004). Meningkatkan potensi minda. Bentong: PTS Publications & Distributors.
Azurah, M. J., & Effandi, Z. (2015). Analisis kesilapan bagi tajuk pecahan dalam kalangan murid tahun empat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(2), 1-17. Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2012). Program Literasi dan Numerasi (Linus). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. (2016). Program Literasi dan Numerasi (Linus). Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Bahariah, B., Baharizah, B., Nurul Jannah, A., Nurazreen, M. T., & Mohd Nazri, M. H. (2017). Matematik Tingkatan 2. Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Putrajaya: Rimbunan Ilmu Sdn. Bhd.
Baharudin, O., Kamarulzaman, K., & Nordin, M. (2002). Faktor Kecemerlangan dan Kemunduran Pelajar di Sekolah Menengah dalam Matematik: Satu Tinjauan. Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Dalam V. S. Ramachandran (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, (p.71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Batanero, C. (2002). The role of models in understanding and improving statistical literacy. International Statistical Review, 70, 37-40.
Baroody, A. J. (2006). Why children have difficulties mastering the basic number facts and how to help them. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13, 22-31.
Bernando, A. B. I. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to understanding and solving word problems in mathematics. Educational Psychology, 19, 149-163.
Beswick, K., & Goos, M. (2012). Measuring pre-service primary teachers knowledge for teaching mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 70-90.
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for „flipping out‟: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15-21.
Bigham, R., & Reavis, C. (2001). Preferred leadership frames of principals in implementing a statewide teacher appraisal system. Contemporary Education, 72(2), 52-57.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608-645.
Boonen, A. J. H., Reed, H. C., Schoonenboom, J., & Jolles, J. (2016). It‟s not math lesson-we‟re learning to draw! Teachers‟ use of visual representations in instructing word problem solving in sixth grade of elementary school. Frotliner Learning Research, 4(5), 55-82.
Bragg, L. (2007). Students‟ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning Mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29-44.
Brown, M. A. (2003). The key role of educational research in the development and evaluation of the National Numeracy Strategy. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 663-680.
Brunner, J. S. (1996). Towards a theory of instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Sciences, 6(1), 33-44.
Callingham, R., Colin, C. & Watson, J. M. (2016). Explaining student achievement: The influence of teachers‟ pedagogical content knowledge in statistics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1339-1357.
Canas, A. J., Reiska, P., & Mollits, A. (2017). Developin higher-order thinking skills with concept mapping: A case of pedogic frailty. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 9(3), 348-365.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Cargnelutti, E., Tomasetto, C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2017). How is anxiety related to math performance in young students? A longitudinal study of Grade 2 to Grade 3 children. Cognition and Emotion, 31(4), 755-764.
Charles, R.I., Lester, F.K., & O‟Daffer, P. (1997): How to evaluate progress in problem solving NCTM. Reston: Virginia.
Charles, R.I., Lester, F.K., & O‟Daffer, P. (1987): How to evaluate progress in problem solving: Reston, VA; NCTM.
Ching, B. H. H. (2017). Mathematics anxiety and working memory: Longitudinal associations with mathematical performance in Chinese children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 99-113.
Chong, C. K., & Tan, S. Y. (2003). Hubungan antara sikap, minat dan persepsi dengan prestasi matematik pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Confucian, Kuala Lumpur. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Chooi Yoong, C., Kamarulzaman, M., Phoay Eng, K., & Kien Cheng, Y. (2011). Matematik Tingkatan 4. Malaysia: Cerdik Publications Sdn.Bhd.
Chris, T., & Birgit, L. (2017). How useful are closed captions for learning mathematics via online video? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 229-243.
Chua, Y. P. (2012). Kaedah dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Kaedah Penyelidikan Buku 2 (edisi Ke-2). Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Clarice, J. C., Alyssa B, D., Ferdinand T, A. (2019). Anxiety towards mathematics and mathematics performance of grade 7 learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 6, 344-359.
Clarke, B.A., & Clarke, D. M. (2004). Mathematics teaching in Grades K-2: Painting A Picture of Challenging, Supportive and Effective Classrooms. Dalam R.N Rubenstien & G.W Bright (Eds.), Perspectives On The Teaching of Mathematics (66th Yearbook of The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. Dalam Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd ed. p. 45-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Coakes, S. J., Steed, L., & Ong, C. (2009). SPSS: Analysis without Anguish: Version 16 for Windows. Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of the mind in the mathematics education. Journal For Research in Mathematics Educations, 23, 2-33.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. 5th ed. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Conklin, W. (2012). Higher-Order Thinking Skill to Develop 21st Century Learners. California: Shell Education.
Costu, S., Aydin, S., & Filiz, M. (2009). Students‟ conceptions about browser-gamebased learning in mathematics education: TTNetvitamin case. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1848-1852.
Cremin, T., Pamela, B., & Anna, C. (2006). Pedagogy and possibility thinking in the Early Years. Thinking skills and creativity, 1(2), 108-119.
Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, N., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving words problem. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 405-438.
Davis, R. B. (1984). Learning mathematics: the cognitive science approach to mathematics education. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Dewey, J. (1938). How we think : Revised and expanded edition with foreword by Maxine Greene. Boston, MA. Houghton: Mifflin.
Duru, A. & Koklu, O. (2011). Middle school students‟ reading comprehension of mathematics texts and algebraic equations. International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(5), 447-468.
Earle, L. W. (2003). Watching and Learning 3, Final Report of The External Evaluation of England’s National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education University.
Effah, M., Othman, L., Abd Aziz, A. S., & Mohd Uzi, D. (2013). Kesan modul konstruk pengetahuan berstruktur (KPB) terhadap anjakan sikap terhadap pembelajaran biologi pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 3(2), 91-105
Effandi, Z. (2003). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif ke atas pelajar Matrikulasi. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Effandi, Z., & Norazah, M. N. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 27-30.
Effandi, Z., Chin, L. C., & Daud, M. Y. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning on students‟s mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathematics. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 272-275.
Effandi, Z., & Norulbiah, N. (2011). A preliminary analysis of students‟ problem – posing ability and its relationship to attitudes towards problem solving. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 3(9), 866-870.
Effandi, Z., Normalizam, M. Z., Nur Amalina, A., & Ayu, E. (2012). Mathematics anxiety and achievement among secondary school students. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(11), 1828-1832.
Effandi, Z., Lohgheswary, N., Nopiah, Z. M., Aziz, A. A., & Samah, F. N. D. A. (2019). Development of the engineering mathematics lab module with mathematica. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(6), 1840-1846.
Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a Philosophy of Mathematics, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Ernest, P. (2015). The social outcomes of learning mathematics: Standard, unintended or visionary? International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 3(3), 187-192.
Fatimah, S. (1996). Skim penyelesaian masalah bagi guru matematik KBSM. Kertas yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Penilaian KBSM. IAB: KPM.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N, E., & Huyn, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Fritz, A., Haase, V. G., & Rasanen, P. (Eds.). (2019). International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Finelli, R., Courey, S. J., & Hamlett, C. L. (2004). Expanding Schema-Based Transfer Instruction to Help Third Graders Solve Real-Life Mathematical Problems. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 419- 445.
Gal, I., Grotluschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and „vulnerable‟ learners: A critical review of a neglected field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(2), 377-394.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. 6th ed. New York: Longman Publishing.
Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2007). Educational research: An introduction 8th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Garcia-Garcia, J., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2020). Intra-mathematical connection made by high school students in performing calculus tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 227-252.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W (2019). Education Research: Competencies for analysis and applications. 12th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2018). Metodologi Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan dan Analisis Kajian (Kedua). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Ginsburg, L. Manly, M., & Schmitt,M. J. (2006). The components of numeracy. Cambridge, MA: National Center for The Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Diperoleh daripada: http://www.ncsall.net/fileadmin/resources/research/opnumercay.pdf
Goldin, G. A. (1992). Meta-analysis of problem-solving studies: a critical response. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(3): 274-283.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Othani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105-123.
Griffin, C. C., & Jitendra, A. K. (2009). Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Education Research, 102, 187- 202.
Groontenboer, P. J. (2008). Mathematical belief change in preservice primary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 479-497.
Gunderson, E. A., Park, D., Maloney, E. A., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Reciprocal relations among motivational frameworks, math anxiety, and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19(1), 21-46.
Guven, B., & Cabakcor, B. O. (2013). Factors influencing mathematical problemsolving achievement of seventh grade Turkish students. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 131-137.
Habibah, E. (2004). Relationship between coping and university adjustment and academic achievement amongst first year undergraduates in a Malaysian Public University. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 3(11), 379-392.
Halim, F., & Sin Chieng, L. (2016). Hubungan antara diterminasi kendiri, personality big five dengan motivasi pencapaian dan pencapaian akademik. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 30(2), 114-116.
Ham, S. H., & Cha, Y.-K. (2009). Positioning education in the information society: The transnational diffusion of the information and communication technology curriculum. Comparative Education Review, 53(4), 535-557.
Hariah, M. (2012). Aplikasi pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam reka bentuk pengajaran berasaskan komputer: pengaruhnya terhadap pencapaian berdasarkan aras kognitif pelajar. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pembangunan dan Pendidikan Lestari. Institut Pendidikan Guru Kampus Tuanku Bainun, Bukit Mertajam, Pulau Pinang.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2016). The complexity of teaching density in middle school. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(1), 1-24.
Havice, W. L. (1999). College students attitudes toward oral lectures and intergrated media presentations. Journal of Technology Studies. 25(1), 51-56.
Hawk, T. F., & Shah, A. J. (2007). Using learning style instruments to enchance student learning. Decision Science Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 1-19.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., & Stigler, J. W. (2002). A knowledge base for the teaching profession. Educational Reseacher, 31(5), 3-15.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). For teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal Summer, 42(2), 371-406.
Hong, J., Horng, J. S., Lin, L., Chang, S. H., Chu, H. C., & Lin, C. (2005). A study of influential factors for creative teaching. Pembentangan kertas bagi the international conference on redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practise held, (p.1-11) di National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
Hutkemri, Z., & Effandi, Z. (2012). The effect of using geogebra on conceptual and procedural knowledge of high school mathematics students. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 102-106.
Hussain, A., Said, A., Hilal, A., & Muna, A. (2012). Educational assessment attitudes competence, knowledge, and practice: an exploratory study of muscat teachers in the Sultanate of Oman. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 217-232.
Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191- 212.
Ifada, N. (2017). Factors affecting the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching and mathematical beliefs of prospective primary teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 12(3), 243-264.
Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Jain, P., & Rogers, M. (2019). Numeracy as critical thinking. Adults Learning Mathematics: An International Journal, 14(1), 23-33.
Jarwan, F. (2002). Teaching thinking: Concepts and applications. 1st ed. Al Ain: University Book House.
Jayapraba. G., & Kanmani, M. (2013). Metacognitive awareness in science classroom of higher secondary students. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 4(3), 1-8.
Johari, H., & Yeong, W. C. (2010). Keupayaan dan Kelemahan Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Lima. Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10316/2/Yeong Wai Chung.pdf. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Johari, S., Nor Hidayah, A. G., Nor Hasniza, I., & Abdul Halim, A. (2014). Penyelesaian masalah rutin dan bukan rutin dalam pendidikan matematik. Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik, (p. 11-13). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Jong, S. K. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7-19.
Joseph P, A., & Lawrence A. B. (2016). Using constructivist teaching strategies to enchance academic outcomes of students with special needs. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(2), 392-398.
Kadijevich, D. (2006). Developing trustworthy TIMSS background measures: A case study on mathematics attiude. The teaching of Mathematics, 2, 41-51.
Kad Laporan PISA. (2018). Pencapaian Malaysia dalam PISA 2018. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada moe.gov.my/images/KPM/UKK/2019/12_Dis/KAD_LAPORAN_PISA_2018_la stest.pdf
Kadir Bahar, A., & June Maker, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between mathematical creativity and mathematical achievement. Asia Pacific Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 3(1), 33-47.
Kahan, J. A., & Wyberg, T. R. (2003). Mathematics as sense making. Dalam H.L Schoen & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving grades 6-12. US: NCTM.
Kantowski, M. G. (1977). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8, 163-180.
Kantowski, M. G. (1981). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 163-180.
Karnasih, I. (2015). Analisis kesalahan Newman pada soal cerita matematis (Newman‟s error analysis in mathematical word problems). Jurnal PARADIKMA, 8(1), 37- 51.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2001). Pembangunan Pendidikan 2001-2010. Kuala Lumpur: AG Grafik Sdn.Bhd.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2010). Bengkel kajian semula Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2011). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Negara 2013-2025. Putrjaya, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Dicapai daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary- Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdf.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). ManualAm-NKRA. Instrumen saringan numerasi (lisan dan bertulis). Manual Am Numerasi Saringan 1 Tahun 1. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Negara 2013-2025. Putrjaya, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Dicapai daripada http://www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file/PPP/Preliminary- Blueprint-ExecSummary-BM.pdf.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 (Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah, Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Matematik Tahun Enam. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Aplikasi Di Sekolah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Matematik Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran Tingkatan 2. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Analisis prestasi murid matematik TIMSS 2015. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim. H., & Shahril, M. (2020). Enchancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity studies, 13(2), 270- 291.
Kheshinee, B., & Maslawati, M. (2020). Preschool teachers self-efficacy in the teaching of English as a second language validity and reliability of questionnaire. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 2472-2481.
Khor, M. K., & Ruzlan, M. A. (2017). GeoGebra: Towards realizing 21st century learning in mathematics education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 6, 93-115.
Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Students in Mathematics, 47, 101-116.
Kilpatrick, J., & Swafford, J. (2002). Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kim, R. Y., Ham, S. H., & Paine, L. W. (2011). Knowledge expectations in mathematics teacher preparation programs in South Korea and United States: Towards Internation Dialogue. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 48-61.
Korhonen, J., Nyroos, M., Jonsson, B., & Eklof, H. (2017). Additve and multiplicative effects of working memory and test anxiety on mathematics performance in grade 3 students. Educational Psychology, 1, 24.
Kruger, K. (2013). Higher-Order Thinking. New York: Hidden Sparks Inc.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1996). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in junior and senior high school. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., Treglia, M., & lage, J. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway t creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lai, K. L. (2007). Penyelesaian masalah matematik sekolah rendah dengan menggunakan strategi melukis gambar rajah. Diperoleh daripada ipbl.edu.my/portal/penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2007/bengkel/laibengkelIPBLfp.
Lazim, M. A., Abu Osman, M. T., & Wan Salihin, W. A. (2004). The statistical evidence in describing the students‟ beliefs about mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 1-12.
Lee, T. T., & Kamisah, O. (2013). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pe dagogical agents on students‟s understanding and motivation in the learning of Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 395-421.
Leikin, R. (2009). Bridging research and theory in mathematics education with research and theory in creativity and giftedness. Dalam Leikin, R., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (Eds.). Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students. (Bahagian IV- synthesis, Bab. 23, p. 385-411). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publisher.
Lester, F. K. (1978). Mathematical problem solving in the elementary school: Some Educational and Psychological Considerations In Mathematics Problem Solving. Columbus, Ohio: Eric.
Levine, G., & Parkinson, S. (2014). Experimental methods in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lili, W., Kamisah, O., & Siti Mistima, M. (2019). Opsyen guru matematik sekolah rendah sebagai moderator dalam hubungan berstruktur antara pengetahuan asas PdP dengan amalan pengajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 44(2), 30-40.
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., Disessa, A. A., Grasser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93-104.
Lim, C. H. (2007). Pengkajian Pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Shah Alam: Mc Graw-Hill Education.
Lin, Y., Liu, K., Byon, E., Qian, X., Liu, S., & Huang, S. (2018). A collaborative learning framework for estimating many individualized regression model in a heterogeneous population. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 67(1), 328-341.
Ludlow, A. S. (2004). Metaphor and numerical diagrams in the arithmetical activity of a fourth grade class. Journal Research Mathematics Education, 35, 34-56.
Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (2009). Critical numeracy. Numeracy in the news. Australia: Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania.
Ma‟rof, R., & Haslinda, A. (2003). Psikologi. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Shah Alam: Mc Graw-Hill.
MacGregor, M., & Moore, R. (1991). Teaching mathematics in the multicultural classroom. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.
Mahaletchumy, K. (2019). Penggunaan kaedah buck dalam menyelesaikan masalah berayat matematik. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(31), 56-66.
Maree, J. G., & Claasen, N. C. W. (1998). Development of a study orientation questionnaire in Mathematics. South African Journal of Psychology, 28(2), 101- 110.
Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., & Way, J. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 1-18.
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9), 696-699.
Masita, M. (2002). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian dalam mata pelajaran dalam kalangan aliran teknik dan vokasional di Sekolah Menengah Teknik dan Vokasional Negeri Johor. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Mayer, R. E. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. Dalam E. A. Silver, (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives, (p.123- 138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. New York: Harper Collins.
Mayer, R. E (2001). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Freeman.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory into Practise, 41, 226- 232.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in mathematics learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Mazlini, A., & Zainah, Y. (2007). Metakognisi dan penyelesaian masalah dalam matematik. Dalam Effandi, Z., Norazah, N., & Sabri, A. (2007). Trend pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.
Mazlini, A. & Effandi, Z. (2012). Pengetahuan konseptual dalam kalangan bakal guru matematik, Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 12-22.
Mazlini, A., & Nurul Sarah, J. (2016). Keupayaan murid cemerlang akademik tingkatan empat dalam menyelesaikan masalah algebra bukan rutin. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 6(1), 2232-0393.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. Dalam Grouws, D. A. (Eds.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (p. 575-596). New York: MacMillan.
Meelissen, M., & Doornekamp, B. (2004). TIMSS-2003 Nederland: Leeprestaties in exacte vakken in het voortgezet onderwijs. [TIMSS-2003 The Netherlands. Students‟ achievement in mathematics and science in grade 8, secondary education]. Enschede: University of Twente
Melihan, U. (2017). Invenstigating mathematics teacher candidates‟ knowledge about problem solving strategies through problem posing. Journal of Education and Practise, 8(8), 218-236.
Miller. S. P., & Kaffar, J. B. (2011). Developing addition and regrouping competence among second grade students with learning difficulties. Investigation in Mathematics Learning, 4(1), 24-49.
Mohd Afifi, B. S., Nor‟ain, M. T., & Mazlini, A. (2016). Walking, Explore Race And Flying Fox Adventure Activity in Learning Statistics: Effect on Leadership Skills. Jurnal Didaktik Matematik, 3(2), 1-8.
Mohd Azarul, M. M., Ahmad Fauzi, M. A., Rozita Radhiah, S., & Siti Salina, M. (2019). Analysis of year four pupils‟ difficulties in solving mathematical problems involving fraction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 9(11), 156-159.
Mohd Majid, K. (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Sahrul, S. Y., Nurul Farahaein, M., & Narimah, S. (2020). Tahap persepsi, penilaian dan kompetensi pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (PBM) dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan enam di daerah Pontian. Jurnal perspektif, 12(2), 20-32.
Mohd Uzi, D. (2006). Pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik melalui penyelesaian masalah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Zuri, G., Aznan, C. A., & Zainuddin, M. I. (2014). Masalah pembelajaran. Tanjung Malim, Perak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Mohini, M. (2008). Proses tingkah laku metakognitif dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik. Projek Sarjana Muda. Fakulti Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Mohini, M., & Salawati, A. (2011). Tahap kemahiran metakognitif dalam penyelesaian masalah dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan 2 dalam persekitaran geometri interaktif bagi tajuk transformasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik, 3, 20- 32.
Mok, S. S. (2008). Pengurusan Hal Ehwal Pelajar. Puchong: Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn.Bhd.
Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16(1), 19-32.
Moodaley, R. R., Grobler, A. A., & Lens, W. (2006). Study orientation and casual attribution in mathematics achievement. South African Journal of Psychology, 36(3), 634-655.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P. & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 International results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College. Dicapai daripada http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/T11_IR_Mathematics_FullBoo k. pdf.
Mullis, I. V. S.,& Martin, M. O. (2019). Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Assessment Framework. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and Internation Association for The Evalution of Educational Achievement (IEA).
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teacher‟s knowledge and how it develops. Dalam Richardson, V. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching, (p. 433-436). New York: Macmillan.
Munirah, G. (2015). Kepekaan nombor, numerasi dan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) dalam pendidikan matematik sekolah rendah. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Munirah, G., Seffetullah, K., Shahabuddin, H., & Santi, S. (2016). Enabling pupils to conceive part-whole relations of numbers and develops number sense: Year one primary schools in Malaysia. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 7(3), 1-20.
Murata, A., & Kattubadi, S. (2012). Grade 3 students‟ mathematics through modeling: Situation models and solution models with mutli-digit subtraction problem solving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 15-28.
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: Evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 125-142.
Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1981). Research methods in the social sciences: Alternative second edition without statistics. New York, NY: St. Martin Press.
Nahid, G. (2013). Teachers‟s Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics with Manipulatives. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 137-159.
Nandy, K. (2012). Understanding and Quantifying EFFECT SIZES. Dicapai daripada https://www.sonnet.ucla.edu/sites/default/files/son_files/RESEARCH/effect_size _4-9-2012.pdf.
Nasrin, A., & Nasreen, A. (2018). Learning in mathematics: Difficulties and perception of students. Journal of Educational Research, Dept. of Education, IUB, Pakistan, 21(1), 147-163.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendation for School Mathematics of the 1980s. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Handbook: NCTM goals, leaders, and positions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principle and Standards For School Mathematics. Reston, V.A: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2012). Reflections of a second career mathematics teacher. V.A : NCTM.
Neo, M. & Rafi, A. (2007). Designing interactive multimedia curriculam to enhance teaching and learning in the Malaysian classroom- from teacher-led to student centered experiences. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(1), 51-59.
Newman, M. A. (1977). An analysis of sixth-grade pupils‟ errors on written mathematical tasks. Victorian Institute for Educational Research Bulletin, 39, 31-43.
Nilgun, A., & Hulya, O. (2012). Misconceptions in linear algebra: the case of undergraduate student. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2989-2994.
Nik Aziz, N. P. (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan Matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Nik Azis, N. P. (2014). Pengembangan nilai dalam pendidikan matematik dan sains. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Nik Nazlin, N. A., & Maliah, S. (2013). Case studies in a passive 235 learning environment: Some Malaysian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, 26(3), 173-196.
Nik Nur Fadhlillah, A. R., Azurah. M. J., Desi, A., & Yee, C. Y. (2014). Keupayaan penyelesaian masalah matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan 2. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(2), 1-13.
Nooriza, K. & Effandi, Z. (2015). Integrasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik, analisis keperluan guru (Integration of higher order thinking skills in the teaching and learning of mathematics: Teachers‟ needs analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), 1-12.
Noor Erma, A., & Kwan Eu, L. (2014). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian matematik tambahan tingkatan 4. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik Januari, 2(1), 1-10.
Noor Shah, S. (2005). Pengajaran matematik sekolah rendah dan menengah: Teori dan Pengkaedahan: Petaling Jaya: Harmoni Publication & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Noor Shah, S., & Sazelli, A. G (2008). Teaching Mathematics in Secondary Schools: Theories and practices. Tanjung Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nor‟ain, M.T., Noorshah, S., Nurulhuda, A. R., Asmayati, Y., Hasimah, A., Mohd Uzi, D., Mohd Mustamam, A. K. (2012). Mapping The level of Scientific Reasoning Skills To Instructional Methodologies Among Sciences, Mathematics And Engineering Undergraduates. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(3), 147-153.
Nor‟ain, M. T., Nurulhuda. A. R, Noor Shah, S., Asmayati, Y., Hasimah, A., Mohd Uzi, D., & Mohd. Mustamam, A. K. (2013). Kemahiran Penaakulan Saintifik dan Stail Pengajaran Pensyarah: Indikasi Awal Ke Arah Peningkatan Kualiti Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Institusi Pengajian Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 3(1), 48-59.
Nor‟ain, M. T., Marzita, P., Mazlini, A., Mohd Faizal Nizam, L. A. & Amalina, I. (2015). Persepsi dan amalan pengajaran guru matematik dalam penyelesaian masalah algebra. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 12-22.
Noraini, I. (2005). Pedagogi dalam pendidikan matematik. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd.
Noraini, I. (2006). Exploring the effects of TI-84 plus on achievement and anxiety in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 66-78.
Noraini, I. (2009). Penyelesaian masalah daya penggerak dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Matematik. Sungai Petani: Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. Diperoleh daripada: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c892/2a8908248676496d9bf82f930926ba629f5e
Noraini, I. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Education.
Noraini, I. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur; McGraw Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Norazilawati, A., Nik Azmah, N. Y., & Rosnidar, M. (2012). Implementation of constructivist approach in science. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 2(2), 78-91.
Norizatul Azila, A. L. (2009). Peranan bahasa dalam penyelesaian masalah Matematik bukan rutin di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 2. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Norrahipah, R. (2000). Hubungan antara kemahiran berfikir dan kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dengan pencapaian dalam mata pelajaran matematik. Tesis Sarjana, Universti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Norzeliana, I., Saniah, S., & Nor Hasnida, G. (2011). Factors that influence students in mathematics achievement. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(3), 49-54.
Norulbiah, N., & Effandi, Z. (2016). Keupayaan Pelajar Dalam Menjana Masalah, Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematik dan Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 4(1), 1-16.
Novotna, J., Eisenmann, P., Pribyl, J., Ondrusova, J., & Brehovsky, J. (2014). Problem solving in school mathematics based on heuristic strategies. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(1), 1-6.
Nur Amira, M. Z. (2016). Kesan pengajaran menggunakan strategi KBAT-KR terhadap pencapaian, kesedaran kognitif dan sikap terhadap penyelesaian masalah algebra. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nur Lisa, Z., Sabariah, S., & Muralindran, M. (2018). Computational thinking: A strategy for developing problem solving skills and higher order thinking skills (HOTS). International Journal of Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 1265-1278
Nurulwahida, A., Hairul Nizam, I., & Ridzuan, H. (2014). Kesan Penerapan Kepelbagaian Kecerdasan dan Kemahiran Berfikir Analitis Melalui Aktiviti Pengayaan Bermodul, Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29, 141- 153.
Nyross, M., Jonsson, B., Korhonen, J., & Eklof, H. (2015). Children‟s mathematical achievement and how it relates to working memory, test anxiety and selfregulation: A person-centred approach. Education Inquiry, 6(1), 26026.
O‟Donoghue, J. (2002). Numeracy and Mathematics. Mathematics Social Bulletin, 48, 47-55.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2016). Programme for International Student Assessment. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Orton, A. (1992). Learning mathematics: Issues, theory and classroom practice. London: Cassell Villiers house.
Oughton, H. (2018).“Disrupting dominat discourse: A (Re) Introduction to social practice theories of adult numeracy”. Diperoleh daripada https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/02d5/c4ac116af6aa441591d795ea6147e436c4f. pdf?_ga=2.34224354.2137639891.1609985453-20044855.1591598727
Ozkan, E. M., & Ozkan, A. (2012). Misconception in exponential numbers in IST and IIND level primary school mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 11-21.
Ozgen, K. (2013). Mathematical connection skill in the context of problem solving: the case of pre-service teachers. NWSA-Education Sciences, 8(3), 323-345.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 104.
Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
Parmjit, S. & Lau, N. K. (2006). Mathematical problem solving: Where are we heading? Journal of Education Research Universiti Malaya, 26, 39-50.
Papanastasiou, C. (2002). School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data Cyprus. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 28, 71-86.
Patton, J. R., Cronin, M. E., Bassett, D. S., & Koppel, A. E. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 178-187.
Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013-2025). Pendidikan Prasekolah hingga Lepas Menengah. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Peter, O. I., Abiodun, A. P., & Jonathan, O. O. (2010). Effect of constructivism instructional approach on teaching practical skills to mechanical related trade students in western Nigeria technical colleges. International NGO Journals, 5(3), 59-64.
Phang, F. A., Mohd Salleh, A., Mohammad Bilal, A., Salmiza, S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains: satu analisis sorotan tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.
Phonapicat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students‟ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3169-3174.
Piaget, J. (1970). Equilibration of cognitive structure. New York: Viking Press.
Piez, C. M., & Voxman, M. H. (1997). Multiple representations Using different perspectives to form a clearer picture. The Mathematics Teacher, 90(2), 164-166.
Polya, G. (1954). Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press. Programme for International Student Assessment. (2003). The PISA Framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skilss. Paris: OECD.
Programme for The International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), Numeracy Expert Group. (2009). PIAAC Numeracy: Conceptual Framework (OECD Education Working Paper No.35). Paris: OECD.
Programme for International Student Assessment. (2012). Results in Focus What 15- year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Diperoleh daripada http:////www.oecd.org/pisa,/keyfindings,/pisa-2012-results-overview, pdf.
Ptotheroe, N. (2007). What does good math instruction look like? Principal, 7(1), 51-54.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2012). Pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Radzali, R., Meerah, T. S., & Zakaria, E. (2010). Hubungan antara kepercayaan marematik, metakognisi, dan perwakilan masalah dengan kejayaan penyelesaian masalah matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 1-7.
Rafiza, A. R. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran aktif secara kolaboratif atas talian. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(3), 34-46.
Raja Abdullah, R. I., & Daud, I. (2018). Aplikasi „konsep 4 c‟ pembelajaran abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru pelatih pengajian agama institute pendidikan guru kampus Dato Razali Ismail. Asian People Journal, 1, 45-65.
Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-Google classroom for senior high school students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137-158.
Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of experimental child psychology, 141, 83-100.
Rastogi, S. (1991). Mathematical weakness, cause & remedy. New Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554.
Rita, N., & Mulia, Puta. (2016). Using task like PISA‟s problem to support student‟s creativity in mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 31-42.
Rivalland, J. (2000). Policies and practices: Students with literacy difficulties. Dalam Louden, W., Chan, L., Elkins, J., Greaves, D., House, H., Milton, M., Nichols, S., Rivalland, J., & Van, K.C. (2000). Mapping the territory primary students with learning difficulties: Literacy and Numeracy, 3, (p.41-65). Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Rohani, A. W., Riyan, H., & Effandi, Z. (2014). Analisis Kesilapan dalam Pembelajaran Pengamiran. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 2(2), 14-30.
Roslina, R., T. Subahan, M. M., & Effandi, Z. (2010). Hubungan antara kepercayaan matematik, metakognisi dan perwakilan masalah dengan kejayaan penyelesaian masalah matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 1-7.
Ruffell, M., Mason, J., & Allen, B. (1998). Studying attitude to mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35(1), 1-18.
Samsudin, D. (2004). Visualisasi dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik berayat. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Salman, M. F., Ayinla, J. O., Adeniyi, C. O., Ogundele, L. O., & Ameen, S. K. (2012). Effect of Problem-Solving Instructional Strategy on Senior Secondary School Students‟ Attitude toward Mathematics in Ondo, Nigeria. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2(7), 1056-1066.
Salawati, S. (2013). Kemahiran penyelesaian masalah dalam tajuk nombor bulat dan pecahan dalam kalangan murid tahun lima. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor.
Salleh, M. J., & Ayudin, A. R. (2010). Innovations of history education in the high school, ICSS, Malaysia. HISTORIA- International Journal of History Education, 11(2), 73-88.
Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers‟ beliefs. Early Child Development Improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-120.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985a). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What‟s all the fuss about metacognition? Dalam Schoenfeld, A. H (Eds.). Cognitive science and mathematics education, (p. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. Dalam Grouws, D. (Eds.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (p. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of profiency im teaching mathematics. International handbook of mathematics teacher education, 2, 321- 354.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. Dalam Santos-Trigo, L., & Moreno-Armella, L. International Perspectives on Problem Solving Research in Mathematics Education, a special issue, The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10 (1&2), 9-34.
Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 274-286.
Schunk, D. H. (2008). Learning theories: An educational perspective. 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hill.
Schwandt, T. A. (1997). Qualitative Inquary: A Dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sealander, K. A., Johnson, G. R., Lockwood, A. B., & Medina, C. M. (2012). Concrete- Semiconcrete-asbtract (CSA) instruction. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(1), 53-65.
Selvamarry, U., Nor‟ain, M. T., & Abd. Halim. A. (2012). Analisis jenis kesilapan dan strategi penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik dalam kalangan pelajar tingkatan dua: satu kajian kes. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 4(1), 60-74.
Setyaningrum, W., Mahmudi, A., & Murdanu, M. (2018). Pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics pre-service teachers: Do they know their students? Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1097(1), 012098.
Shara Nor, R., Noor Shah, S., & Mohd Uzi, D. (2012). Analisis jenis kesilapan melalui kaedah Newman Error dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik dalam kalangan murid tahun 5. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 2(2), 18-36.
Sharma, Y. (2014). The effect of strategy and mathematics anxiety on mathematical creativity of school student. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 25-37.
Sharifah Fauziah Hanim, S. Z., Farah Eliza, M. R., & Ismin Izwani, Z. A. (2012). Student-centred learning in mathematics constructivism in the classroom. Journal of International Education Research-Fourth Quarter, 8(4), 319-327.
Shukla, D. D& Dusungnoen, A. P. (2016). Student‟s perceived level and teacher‟s teaching strategies of higher order thinking skills: A study on higher educational institution in Thailand. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12), 211-219.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-115.
Sin, N. M., Talib, O., & Norishah, T. P. (2013). Merging of game principle and learning strategy using apps for science subjects to enchance student interest and understanding. Journal of Technology Science and Engineering, 63(2), 7-12.
Siti Azian Azrol Nasoha, B. (2013). Pembinaan modul pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (PBM BIO-SCORE) dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian dan pemikiran kritis pelajar. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Siti Hajjar, M. K. (2008). Strategi-strategi dalam penyelesaian masalah berperkataan dalam kursus statistik. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.
Siti Rahaimah, A., & Noraini, I. (2014). Numerasi Sekolah Rendah. Tanjung Malim: Penerbitan Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Siti Rahaimah, A. (2016). Analisis kefahaman numerasi murid sekolah rendah. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Tanjung Malim.
Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. The Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Journal National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), 12(2), 88-95.
Skwarchuk, S. L., Sowinski, C., & LeFevre, J. A. (2014). Formal and informal home learning activities children‟s early numeracy and literacy skills: The development of a home numeracy model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 121, 63- 84.
Star, J. R., & Newton, K. J. (2009). The nature and development of experts‟ strategy flexibility for solving equation. ZDM- The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(5), 557-567.
Star, J. R., & Gabriel, J. S. (2013). Procedural and conceptual knowledge: Exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 13(2), 169-181.
Steen, L. A. (2000). Numeracy: The new literacy for a data-drenchea society. Educational Leadership, 57, 2.
Steen, L. A. (2011). Reflection on the tenth anniversary of mathematics and democracy. Numeracy Advancing Education in Qualitative, 4(1), 1.
Stinson, B.M., & Claus, K. (2000). The effects of electronic classrooms on learning English composition: A middle ground between traditional instruction and computer based instruction. Technological Horizons in Education, 27(8), 106- 107.
Sukiman, S., Noor Shah, S., & Mohd Uzi, D. (2012). Pengajaran kemahiran berfikir: persepsi dan amalan guru matematik semasa pengajaran dan pembelajaran di bilik darjah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 2(1), 18-36.
Susanti, E., Kusumah, Y.S., Sabandar, J., & Darhim. (2014). Computer-assisted realistic mathematics education for enhancing students‟ higher-order thinking skills (experimental study in Junior High School in Palembang, Indonesia). Journal of Education and Practise, 5(18), 51-58.
Syed Abdul Halim, S. Z., & Mohini, M. (2010). Keupayaan dan sikap dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik bukan rutin. Jurnal Teknologi(Sains Sosial), 53, 47-62.
Syed Mohd Hashim, S. I., Mohd Afif, B. S., Afan Akhbar, M., & Jacinta, J. (2014). Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik Berayat Fokus Kepada Nombor Negatif. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 7, 68-85.
Tai, L. H. (2005). Problem solving abilities and strategies in solving multistep mathematical problems among form two students. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). The relationship of math anxiety and gender. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 130-134.
Thamby Subahan, M. M., & Tarzimah, T. (2010). Students‟ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142-151.
Tee, H. T. (2018). Matematik (Dwibahasa). Modul Dinamik. Taman Bukit Serdang, Selangor: Cemerlang Publications Sdn. Bhd.
Tengku Zawawi, T. Z., Ramlee, M., & Abdul Razak, H. (2009). Pengetahuan pedagogi is kandungan guru matematik bagi tajuk pecahan: kajian kes di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34(1), 131-153.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. California: The Autodesk Foundation.
Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role on institutional habits. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423-432.
Thomson, P., & Sefton-Green, J. (2011). Researching Creative Learning. London: Routledge.
Tobias, S. (1985). Test anxiety: Inference, defective skills, and cognitive capacity. Educational Psychologist, 20, 135-142.
Torner, G., Schoenfeld, A. H. & Reiss, K. M. (2007). Problem solving around the world: Summing up the state of the art. Special Issue in ZDM Mathematics Education, 39, 5-6.
Travers, K. J., Pikaart, L., & Runion, G. E. (1977). Mathematical teaching. New York: Harper & Row.
Tripathi, P. N. (2009). Problem solving in mathematics: A tool for cognitive development. Proceedings of episteme 3 International Conference to Review Research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (p. 168-173). Mumbai, India.
Tuan Siti Humaira, T. H., & Mohamad Amir Shah, A. (2016). Analisis kesalahan Newman dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik Tahun 3. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 6(2), 69-84.
Tuovinen, J. E., & Paas, F. (2004). Exploring multidimensional approaches to the efficiency of instructional. Conditions. Instructional Science, 32, 133-152.
Vignarajah, Wong, S. L., & Kamariah, B. (2008). The shift in the role of teachers in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 33-41.
Wahyudi, A. T., Subanti, S., & Usodo, B. (2017). Behaviour analysis of students in solving mathematics word problem. Journal of Physics, 943, 1-7.
Watson, J. M. (2008). The early numeracy test in finish children norms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 47(5), 369-378.
Wan Ting, W., & Mohd Effendi Ewan, M. M. (2020). Kemahiran penyelesaian masalah berayat matematik melalui model bar: sorotan literature bersistematik. Malaysia Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 144-159.
Westwood, P. (2008). What teacher need to know about numeracy. Australia: Australia Council of Education Research. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER press.
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy, literacy and newman‟s error analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129-148.
Wilson, L. B., & Clark, R. G. (1988). Comparative programming language. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Wilson, J.W., Fernandez, M. L., & Hadaway, N. (1993). Mathematical problem solving. Dalam P.S. Wilson (Eds.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (p. 57-78). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Willis, S. (1998). Which numeracy?. Unicorn. 24(2), 32-42.
Wong, L. M. (2013). The Use of Geogebra In Collaborative Learning In Mathematics. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Wood, E. F. (1999). Math anxiety and elementary teachers: What does research tell us? For the learning of mathematics, 8(1), 8-13.
Wu, S.S., Young, C. B., & Menon, V. (2012). The neurodevelopment basis of math anxiety. Psychological Science, 23(5), 492-501.
Yahaya, A., Koay, T. Y., Maakip, I., Voo, P., & Rathakrishnan, B. (2017). Hubungan di antara dimensi personality, konsep kendiri dan pengaruh keluarga ke atas pencapaian pelajar di Rancangan Skim Felda, Johor. Southeast Asia Psychology Journal, 5, 1-11.
Yang, S. C. (2001). Synergy of constructivism and hypermedia from three constructivist perspectives: Social, semiotic, and cognitive. Educational Computing Research, 24(4), 321-362.
Yudariah, M. Y., Hamidreza, K., Zalaeha, I., & Roselainy, A. R. (2005). Fostering mathematical thinking in the learning of multivariable calculus through computer-based tools. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5534- 5540.
Yujin, L., Robert, M. C., & Mary Margaret, C. (2018). Mathematics teachers‟ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90.
Yu, J. H., Luo, Y., Sun, Y., & Strobel, J. (2012). A conceptual K-6 teacher competency model for teaching engineering. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Science, 56, 243-252.
Zabani, D. (2013). Status pencapaian pelajar dalam TIMSS dan Pisa: Satu refleksi. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Zainun, S. (1991). Latar belakang dan sikap pelajar-pelajar Melayu dan kaitannya dengan prestasi dalam mata pelajaran Matematik Moden. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Zainun, I., Zanaton, I., & Norziah, O. (2013). Kesan pembelajaran Koperatif Model STAD ke atas sikap terhadap matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 1(1), 11- 18.
Zan, R., & Martino, P. (2007). Attitude towards mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monopgraph, 3, 157-168.
Zarimah, Z. & Nor‟ain, M. T. (2011). Proses Metakognisi Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Matematik Bukan Rutin. Jurnal Sains dan Matematik, 1(1), 10-26.
Zirbel, E. L. (2006). Teaching to promote deep understanding and instigate conceptual change. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 38, 1220.
Zuraidi, A. K. (1999). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tahap pencapaian mata pelajaran matematik pelajar aliran saster. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |