UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :K Law
ISSN :2222-6990
Main Author :Saslina Kamaruddin
Additional Authors :Wan Rosalili Wan Rosli
Zaiton Hamin
Ahmad Ridhwan Abd Rani
Rafizah Abu Hassan
Title :Non-criminalisation of cyberstalking and its impact on justice for victims: some evidence from Malaysia
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
In the digital era, some real-world crimes have now transcended into cyberspace. Cybercrime such as cyberstalking is one of them and is considered as an emerging threat in Malaysia. Its prevalence in the reported statistics is merely a tip of an iceberg as many cases may not be reported. Cyberstalking may lead to a chain of psychological trauma and more severe crimes such as identity theft, rape, and even murder. However, despite its serious ramifications, the absence of any specific law to curb such criminality is regrettable and glaring in the Malaysian legal landscape. Hence, this paper aims at examining the technological and social factors contributing to such illegality, the rationales for the non-criminalisation and its implication for the victim's sense of justice. This paper adopts a qualitative methodology, of which the primary data is generated from semi-structured interviews with relevant respondents. The data triangulation is obtained from experts at two relevant ministries. The secondary data are the relevant cyber law, the Penal Code, books, academic journals, online databases and library-based sources. The findings revealed that the catalysts for cyberstalking are varied and that such crime has not been specifically criminalised in the Malaysian cyber laws or traditional legal framework. Such a legal lacuna calls into question not only the adequacy of the current law in dealing with such crime but also the availability of legal protection and non-denial of justice for cyberstalking victims as envisaged by the National Cyber Security Policy 2006 and the Sustainable Development Goals No.16. Keywords: Cyberstalking, Causal Factors, Manufactured Risks, Criminalisation, Individual Responsibility, Victims, Justice

References

Aa, S. (2011). International (Cyber) Stalking. R. M. Letschert, & J. J. M. van Dijk (Eds.), The New Faces of Victimhood: Globalization, Transnational Crimes and Victim Rights. (pp. 191-213).

Ahlgrim, B. M. (2015). Cyber Stalking: Impact of Gender, Cyber Stalker – Victim and Proximity. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of North Dakota.USA.

Bell, J. (1987). Doing Your Research Project – A Guide for First-Time Researchers in Education and Social Science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Bertaux, D. (1981). From the Life-History Approach to the Transformation of Sociological Practice. Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences. 29–45. London: Sage.

Crouch, M., McKenzie, H. (2006). The Logic of Small Samples in Interview-based Qualitative Research. Social Science Information. Vol. 45 No. 4 pp: 483-499.

Fissel, E. R., & Reyns, B. W. (2020). The Aftermath of Cyberstalking: School, Work, Social, and Health Costs of Victimization. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 70-87.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods. Vol. 18 No. 1 pp: 59-82

Hamin, Z., & Rosli, W. R. W. (2020). Whither the Protection for Cyberstalking Victims? Some Evidence from Malaysia. Environment–Behaviour Proceedings Journal 5(S11), 53-58.

Hamin, Z., & Rosli, W. R. W. (2017). Managing Cyber Stalking in Electronic Workplaces. International Conference on Business and Social Science (ICoBSS). 20 February 2017 – 1 March 2017, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia.

Haron, H., Yusof, F. (2010). Cyber Stalking: The Social Impact of Social Networking Technology. International Conference on Education and Management Technology (ICEMT 2010).

Heinrich, P., A. (2015). Generation Istalk: An Examination of the Prior Relationship between Victim of Stalking and Offenders, Theses, Dissertations and Capstones, Paper 917.

Kalaitzaki, A. (2020). Cyberstalking Victimization and Perpetration Among Young Adults: Prevalence and Correlates. In Recent Advances in Digital Media Impacts on Identity, Sexuality, and Relationships (pp. 22-38). IGI Global.

Khan, S., Khan, N., & Tan, O. (2020, February). Efficiency of Legal and Regulatory Framework in Combating Cybercrime in Malaysia. In Understanding Digital Industry: Proceedings of the Conference on Managing Digital Industry, Technology and Entrepreneurship (CoMDITE 2019), July 10-11, 2019, Bandung, Indonesia (p. 333). Routledge.

Matt, S. (2000). Qualitative Interviewing, in Dawn Burton (Ed.). Research Training for Social Scientists. London: SAGE Publications.

Amanda, M. N. (2002). Stalking to Cyber stalking, a Problem Caused by the Internet, Law and the Internet, Fall 2002 papers, Georgia State University College of Law, 140 Decatur St., Atlanta, Georgia 30303 http://gsulaw.gsu.edu/lawand/papers/fa02/medlin/.

Miftha, A., Conrad, M., & Gibson, M. (2019). Cyber Stalking is a Social Evil: From the Indian Women's Perspective. Retrieved online from

https://uobrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10547/623527/Cyberstalkingisasocialevil.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Bryce, J., Fanqueira, V., Marrington, A. (2016). Forensic Investigation of Cyberstalking Cases Using Behavioural Evidence Analysis. Digital Investigation, Vol. 16 pp: 96-103.

O’Shea, B., Julian, R., Prichard, J., & Kelty, S. (2019). Challenges in Policing Cyberstalking: A Critique of the Stalking Risk Profile in the Context of Online Relationships. In Online Othering (pp. 331-353). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Papakitsou, V. (2020). Cyberstalking, A New Crime: The Nature of Cyberstalking Victimization. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health, 3(3), 197-202.

Reyns, B. W. (2019). Online Pursuit in the Twilight Zone: Cyberstalking Perpetration by College Students. Victims & Offenders, 14(2), 183-198.

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Smoker, M., & March, E. (2017). Predicting Perpetration of Intimate Partner Cyberstalking: Gender and the Dark Tetrad. Computers in Human Behaviour, 72, 390-396.

Todd, C., Bryce, J., & Franqueira, V. N. (2020). Technology, Cyberstalking and Domestic Homicide: Informing Prevention and Response Strategies. Policing and Society, 1-18.

Vasiu, I., Vasiu, L. (2013) Cyberstalking Nature and Response Recommendations, Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. Vol. 2 No. 5 pp: 226-234.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.