UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The depletion of natural resources and increasing food consumption together with their food waste showing the urge to practice the sustainable food processing. The instrument of sustainable food processing (i-KProM) questionnaire was used to determine the right practices constructs for TVET students’ in sustainable food processing and the related predictive factor. This study was conducted in TVET institutional in Perak which offering the Certification of Food Processing and Quality Control. An Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) for validity test and reliability test was used to measure the instrument and give an empirical verification of the construct validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Literature search and pilot study within the population were carried out and appropriate item was extracted. Initially, 37 items developed for sustainable food processing practices, however, only 23 items were remaining as an item investigate and 14 items found as not sufficient as required for EFA. For an independent variable of the research, 36 items remain which include five factors extracted. The sustainable food processing instrument (i-KProM) have been approved to have sufficient validity and reliability.
Keywords: Sustainable Food Processing, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Technical and Vocational Training |
| References |
Ahamad, N. R., & Ariffin, M. (2018). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice towards sustainable consumption among university students in Selangor, Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, (1-11), S235255091830023X–. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.006. Ahmad, H. (2004). Pengukuran kecergasaan motor. Tanjong Malim: Quantum. Ahmad, J. H., Mustafa, H., & Abdul Hamid, H. A., Wahab, J. A. (2011). Pengetahuan, sikap dan amalan masyarakat Malaysia terhadap isu alam sekitar. AKADEMIKA : Jurnal Sains Kemasyarakatan Dan Kemanusiaan, 81(3), 103–115. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. Alders, R. G., Ratanawongprasat, N., Schönfeldt, H., & Stellmach, D. (2018). A planetary health approach to secure, safe, sustainable food systems: workshop report. Food Security, 10(2), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0780-9. Ali, M. H., & Suleiman, N. (2016). Sustainable food production: Insights of Malaysian halal small and medium sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 303–314. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.06.003. Aschemann-Witzel, J., de Hooge, I., Amani, P., Bech-Larsen, T., & Oostindjer, M. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(6), 6457–6477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066457 Augustin, M. A., Riley, M., Stockmann, R., Bennett, L., Kahl, A., Lockett, T., Cobiac, L. (2016). Role of food processing in food and nutrition security. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 56, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2016.08.005. Aziz, A. N. A., Musa, D., & Rashid, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial Intention among TVET Students: Examining the Relationship with the Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation. 9th National Conference in Education - Technical & Vocational Education and Training (CiE-TVET) 2019, 483-495. Ball, H. L. (2019). About Research: Conducting Online Surveys. Journal of Human Lactation, 089033441984873. doi:10.1177/0890334419848734. Besar, T. A., Hassan, M. S. H., Bolong, J., & Abdullah, R. (2013). Exploring the levels of knowledge, attitudes and environment-friendly practices among young civil servants in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(July), 21–38. Brown, J. D. (2009) Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA. Shiken: JALT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13, 20-25. Callegaro, M., Manfreda, L. K., & Vehovar, V. (2015). Web Survey Methodology. London: Sage Publications. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative And Quantitative Methods. Milton, Old: John Wiley & Son Australia. Chin, C. K., Munip, H., Miyadera, R., Thoe, N. K., Ch’ng, Y. S., & Promsing, N. (2019). Promoting Education for Sustainable Development in Teacher Education integrating Blended Learning and Digital Tools: An Evaluation with Exemplary Cases. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), em1653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99513. Derahim, N., Hashim, H. S., & Ali, N. (2011). Tahap Kelestarian Pelajar Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia ke Arah Kampus Lestari. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.669 Etse, D., & Ingley, D. (2016),"Higher education curriculum for sustainability", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 17 Iss 2 pp. 269 – 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2015-0121. Fincham, J. E. (2008). Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(2), 43. doi:10.5688/aj720243. Garnett, T. (2013). Food sustainability: Problems, perspectives and solutions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 72(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665112002947. Gossling, S., Garrod, B., Aall, C., Hille, J., & Peeters, P. (2011). Food management in tourism: Reducing tourism’s carbon “foodprint.” Tourism Management, 32(3), 534–543. Gunders, D., & Bloom, J. (2017). Wasted: How America is losing up to 40 percent of its food from farm to fork to landfill. Natural Resources Defense Council. https://www.nrdc.org/resources/wasted-how-america-losing-40-percent-its-food-farm-fork-landfill on 22nd June 2020 Greyson, D. L., & Johnson, J. L. (2016). The role of information in health behavior: A scoping study and discussion of major public health models. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 2831-2841. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |