UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :QC Physics
ISSN :18657923
Main Author :Mahanan, Mangai Solomon
Additional Authors :Chee, Ken Nee
Title :AR module for learning changes of matter in chemistry
Place of Production :Tanjung Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2021
Notes :International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Web Link :Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Internal Visualization challenges concerning sub-microscopic particles in chemistry often result in some difficulties in learning the change of state of matter. Therefore, this study aims at developing an augmented reality ProCAR module that utilizes a project-based learning approach to facilitate learning changes of matter. This study employs ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation and Evaluation) instructional design model. The quality of the module was evaluated by a group of 5 Chemistry teacher-educator experts of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia to identify the suitability of the module. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) percentages were determined and the feedback was analyzed based on thematic analysis. The result shows that 100% of its learning objectives, Content, Usability, and Assessment and 75% of its performances were good and reliable all having IRR value 75% and above. Such revealed that AR Module is potentially effective for the teaching of phase change to Secondary school students. Recommendations for future studies were highlighted. ? 2021. All Rights Reserved.

References

Adadan, E., & Ataman, M. M. (2021). Promoting senior primary school students’ understanding of particulate nature of matter through inquiry instruction with multiple representations. Education 3-13, 49(3), 317-329. doi:10.1080/03004279.2020.1854960

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, Ş., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers and Education, 142 doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103647

Astuti, T. N., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2020). Effect of 3D visualization on students' critical thinking skills and scientific attitude in chemistry. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 151-164. doi:10.29333/iji.2020.13110a

Badmus, O. T., & Omosewo, E. O. (2020). Evolution of STEM, STEAM and STREAM in africa: The implication of the knowledge gap. International Journal on Research in STEM Education, 2(2), 99-106. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Bahrum, S., Wahid, N., & Ibrahim, N. (2017). Integration of STEM education in malaysia and why to STEAM. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 645-654. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Bjorklund, D. F., & Causey, K. B. (2017). Children's thinking: Cognitive development and individual differences. Children's Thinking: Cognitive Development and Individual Differences, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Branch, R. M. (2010). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (pp. 1-203) doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Chee, K. N., Yahaya, N., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2017). Effectiveness of mobile learning application in improving reading skills in chinese language and towards post-attitudes. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(3), 210-225. doi:10.1504/IJMLO.2017.085347

Chong, C. J. (2019). Preliminary review on preparations in malaysia to improve stem education. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 14(5), 135-147. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Díaz, M. T. V., & González, M. G. (2016). Constructively aligned assessment: An integral approach to translation teaching and learning. Meta, 61(2), 276-298. doi:10.7202/1037760ar

Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). General instructional strategies. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, , 347-248. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5

Fahmina, S. S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Setyowati, W. A. E., Masykuri, M., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Dimension of chemical literacy and its influence in chemistry learning. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, , 1233(1) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012026 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Gamson, D. A., Eckert, S. A., & Anderson, J. (2019). Standards, instructional objectives and curriculum design: A complex relationship. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(6), 8-12. doi:10.1177/0031721719834022

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447-459. doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9

Gill, D., & Prowse, V. (2015). Cognitive ability, character skills, and learning to play equilibrium: A level-k analysis. J.Pol.Econ., Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Harta, J., Listyarini, R., Pemenang, F., Wijayanti, L., & Lee, W. (2020). Developing small scale chemistry practicum module to identify students’ ability in predict-observe-explain (POE) implementation. JKPK (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia), 5(1), 91-99. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Hoyt, W. T. (2010). Interrater reliability and agreement. The Reviewer's Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences, , 141-154. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Johnstone, A. H. (2009). Multiple representations in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2271-2273. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Jordan, P. W. (1998). An Introduction to Usability, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Kamat, V. V., Pathak, C., Bawa, M. S., Dash, N. K., & Kumar, S. (2018). Unit-6 Instructional Objectives, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1) doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131. Medical Teacher, 42(8), 846-854. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Lestari, T. P., Sarwi, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2018). STEM-based project based learning model to increase science process and creative thinking skills of 5th grade. Journal of Primary Education, 7(1), 18-24. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Luckin, R., & Fraser, D. S. (2011). Limitless or pointless? an evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(5), 510-524. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2011.042102

Mager, R. F. (1962). Preparing Instructional Objectives, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Mahanan, M. S., Talib, C. A., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2021). Online formative assessment in higher STEM education; A systematic literature review. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 47-62. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Meisner, J., Donnelly, W., & Masnier, R. R. (2007). Augmented reality technology. United States Patent, 2(12) Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Nersesian, E., Spryszynski, A., & Lee, M. J. (2019). Integration of virtual reality in secondary STEM education. Paper presented at the 2019 9th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, ISEC 2019, 83-90. doi:10.1109/ISECon.2019.8882070 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Nuić, I., & Glažar, S. A. (2020). The effect of e-learning strategy at primary school level on understanding structure and states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2) doi:10.29333/ejmste/114483

Olakanmi, E. E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 127-137. doi:10.1007/s10956-016-9657-x

Ozmen, H., & Kenan, O. (2007). Determination of the turkish primary students' views about the particulate nature of matter. Asia-Pacific Forum in Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1-15. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Pamenang, F. D. N., Harta, J., Listyarini, R. V., Wijayanti, L. W., Ratri, M. C., Hapsari, N. D., . . . Lee, W. (2020). Developing chemical equilibrium practicum module based on guided inquiry to explore students' abilities in designing experiments. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series, , 1470(1) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012097 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227-241. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Puspasari, Astuti, I., & Suratman, D. (2018). The development of problem-based practicum module to learn reaction rate and base-acid solution. JETL, 3(2), 206-218. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Rahim, A. F. A. (2020). Guidelines for online assessment in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education in Medicine Journal, 12(2), 59-68. doi:10.21315/eimj2020.12.2.6

Ramli, A. A., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2018). Q-STEM module promotes al-quran appreciation in teaching STEM. Paper presented at the Proceedings - 2017 7th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2017- in Conjunction with: 7th Regional Conference on Engineering Education and Research in Higher Education 2017, RCEE and RHEd 2017, 1st International STEAM Education Conference, STEAMEC 2017 and 4th Innovative Practices in Higher Education Expo 2017, I-PHEX 2017, 623-627. doi:10.1109/WEEF.2017.8466968 Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Ramli, A. A., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Bunyamin, M. A. H., Jamaluddin, R., & Abdullah, N. (2017). Teachers' readiness in teaching stem education. Man in India, 97(13), 343-350. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Robert, M. C., & Scott, W. S. (2013). Stem Project-Based Learning, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Sirakaya, M., & Cakmak, E. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality use on achievement, misconception and course engagement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 297-314. doi:10.30935/cet.444119

Slapničar, M., Devetak, I., Glažar, S. A., & Pavlin, J. (2017). Identification of the understanding of the states of matter of water and air among slovenian students aged 12, 14 and 16 years through solving authentic tasks. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 308-323. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156-168. doi:10.1039/c3rp00012e

Tsai, C. -. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: A study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 83-91. doi:10.1023/A:1009485722628

Uchegebu, R., Oguoma, C., Elenwoke, U., & Ogbuagu, O. (2016). Perception of difficult topics in chemistry curriculum by senior secondary school (II) students in imo state. AASCIT Journal of Education, 2(3), 19-23. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Wu, H. -., Lee, S. W. -., Chang, H. -., & Liang, J. -. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers and Education, 62, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)