UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| This paper reports on the findings of a study by design graduates on their belief and intention on ethical issues in the creative design industry. The study was conducted at two universities (University A and University B) in Malaysia, which included 120 undergraduates in design. A survey was conducted in which a questionnaire was distributed among respondents to determine their degree of agreement with respect to each argument in the questionnaire. The results of the data showed that the belief and intention of design graduates towards design ethics is poor, with the exception of the respondents of University A who have strong belief towards social, environmental and sustainability issues. These results indicate that a well-structured model of design ethics education and effective teaching mechanism for design ethics education should be in place. These would have an impact on students' belief and intention towards design ethics. As such, the research results serve as a cornerstone from which the current practice of teaching and learning of design ethics education can be more critically examined, so that more changes can be made to the existing curriculum that can help to develop designers with ethical characteristics. ? 2021 Moscow Polytechnic University. All rights reserved. |
| References |
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Balakrishnan, B., Tochinai, F., & Kanemitsu, H. (2019). Engineering ethics education: A comparative study of japan and malaysia. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(4), 1069-1083. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3 Bauman, Z., & May, T. (2001). Thinking sociologically. Thinking Sociologically, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Chan, J. K. H. (2018). Design ethics: Reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the anthropocene. Design Studies, 54, 184-200. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.005 Collins, H. (2010). Creative research: The theory and practice of research for the creative industries. lausanne. Creative Research: The Theory and Practice of Research for the Creative Industries, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cummings, M. L. (2006). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 701-715. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0065-0 D'Anjou, P. (2011). An alternative model for ethical decision-making in design: A sartrean approach. Design Studies, 32(1), 45-59. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.06.003 de Dios, A., & Kong, L. (2020). Handbook on the geographies of creativity. Handbook on the geographies of creativity (pp. 1-378) doi:10.4337/9781785361647 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Delany, C., Kosta, L., Ewen, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L., & Harms, L. (2016). Identifying pedagogy and teaching strategies for achieving nationally prescribed learning outcomes. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(5), 895-909. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1138450 Fahmi, F. Z., McCann, P., & Koster, S. (2017). Creative economy policy in developing countries: The case of indonesia. Urban Studies, 54(6), 1367-1384. doi:10.1177/0042098015620529 Flowerree, A. K. (2017). Agency of belief and intention. Synthese, 194(8), 2763-2784. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1138-5 Hoover, E., Brown, P., Averick, M., Kane, A., & Hurt, R. (2009). Teaching small and thinking large: Effects of including social and ethical implications in an interdisciplinary nanotechnology course. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 86-95. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Lathem, S. A., Neumann, M. D., & Hayden, N. (2011). The socially responsible engineer: Assessing student attitudes of roles and responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 444-474. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00022.x Latta, G. F., & Dugan, M. (2019). Comparing ethical decision-making among undergraduates: The impact of institutional values. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 19(2), 56-77. doi:10.33423/jhetp.v19i2.1443 Leiserowitz, A. A., Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2005). Do global attitudes and behaviors support sustainable development? Environment, 47(9), 22-38. doi:10.3200/ENVT.47.9.22-38 Marshall-Baker, A. (2011). Design futuring: Sustainability, ethics and new practice, by tony fry. Design/Architecture/Culture, 2(1), 138-140. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Parsons, G. (2016). The philosophy of design. The Philosophy of Design, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Perloff, R. M. (2016). The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the Twenty-First Century, , 576. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Salam, M., Awang Iskandar, D. N., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Service learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 573-593. doi:10.1007/s12564-019-09580-6 Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Taylor, C. (2011). Dilemmas and Connections: Selected Essays, Retrieved from www.scopus.com van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2019). Twenty-first century digital skills for the creative industries workforce: Perspectives from industry experts. First Monday, 24(1) doi:10.5210/fm.v24i1.9476 Wyer, R. S., & Albarracín, D. (2005). Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences. The Handbook of Attitudes, , 273-322. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Zhou, C., Otrel-Cass, K., & Børsen, T. (2015). Integrating ethics into engineering education. Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 159-173) doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8130-9.ch012 Retrieved from www.scopus.com |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |