UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) is a new trend in flexible education due to its flexibility to study anything, anywhere and anytime. It has the potential to attract a huge number of learners to study courses unlimitedly via the online platform. This is a design and development study where a Chemistry MOOC was developed in an OpenLearning platform using ADDIE Instructional Design Model. The purpose of this study is to (1) identify the validity of the e-content module and e-assessment module in the Chemistry MOOC, (2) identify the reliability of the e-content module and e-assessment module in the Chemistry MOOC and (3) gauge undergraduate students? perceptions on the MOOC, especially the instructional design elements, the acceptance and usage barrier. Instruments involved in the study are content validity evaluation form, module reliability questionnaire and perception questionnaire. Four content experts and 23 undergraduate students were involved in evaluating the validity and reliability of the modules during the pilot study. A total of 129 undergraduate students participated in the real study as the respondents for the perception questionnaire. The content validity index for both the e-content and e-assessment module is 1.00, meanwhile, the reliability index for the e-content module and e-assessment module is 0.94 and 0.97, respectively. The overall mean score on the perception, instructional design elements, acceptance and usage barrier is 3.87 (SD = 0.53), 3.91 (SD = 0.62), 3.83 (SD = 0.52) and 2.80 (SD = 0.92) respectively. In conclusion, the results show that Chemistry MOOC is valid and reliable for self-learning online material for chemistry concepts. Students? perception mean scores on the Chemistry MOOC are moderately high, indicating that they positively perceive the MOOC developed. Improvement can be made to ensure a better quality of MOOC before carrying out the summative evaluation on the effectiveness of the Chemistry MOOC. ? 2021 EdUHK APFSLT. |
| References |
Ahmad Fesol, S. F., Salam, S., & Shaarani, A. S. (2017). An evaluation of students‘ perception on MOOC instructional design elements. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(10), 173-179. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 126-141. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149 Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. Distance Learners in Higher Education: Institutional Responses for Quality Outcomes, , 97-112. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View., Retrieved from www.scopus.com Azmi, N. A., & Rasalli, R. I. Z. (2018). Kesediaan penggunaan massive open online course (MOOC) dalam kalangan pelajar sijil pengoperasian perniagaan, kolej komuniti ledang. (the readiness of using massive open online course (MOOC) among students in ledang community college). Proceedins of International Conference on Global Education VI (ICGE VI), , 1932-1942. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Daud, M. Y., Zulkifli, F. N., Rahman, M. J. A., & Khalid, F. (2017). Kesediaan pelajar siswazah menggunakan MOOC dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. (the readiness of postgraduate students to use MOOC in the teaching and learning). Proceedings Seminar Pendidikan Serantau Ke-Viii 2017, , 636-651. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3), 319-339. doi:10.2307/249008 Davis, H., Dickens, K., Leon, M., Del Mar Sanchéz Vera, M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for universities and learners: An analysis of motivating factors. Paper presented at the CSEDU 2014 - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, , 1 105-116. doi:10.5220/0004844901050116 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Paper presented at the L@S 2014 - Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, 41-50. doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (0000). Multivariate data analysis, 6th ed., 2006. New Jersey: Prentice Hall International., Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hamid, S. N. M., Lee, T. T., Taha, H., Rahim, N. A., & Sharif, A. M. (2021). E-content module for chemistry massive open online course (mooc): Development and students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 67-92. doi:10.3926/jotse.1074 Hamidon, Z. (2014). Tahap pengekalan, enrolmen dan proses pembelajaran dalam kursus MOOC: Satu tinjauan awal. (retention level, enrolment and learning process in MOOC: A preliminary study). Paper Presented at Seminar Kebangsaan Sepanjang, Dewan Tun Hussein Onn, PWTC, KL., Retrieved from www.scopus.com Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2018). A classification of barriers that influence intention achievement in MOOCs doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_1 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hervatta, N. (2016). Designing the interaction among learners and educators in MOOCs (order no. 10111621). Available from Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global.(1799665050)., Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: Expectations and reality. MOOCs: Expectations and Reality, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers and Education, 98, 157-168. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016 Kamarudin, N., Tien, L. T., Sharif, A. M., Taha, H., & Rahim, N. A. (2020). Pembangunan dan persepsi pelajar terhadap modul e-pentaksiran untuk massive open online course (MOOC) kimia. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 8(2), 109-121. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60. doi:10.1177/002200275800200106 Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882 Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7 SPECIAL ISSUE), 74-93. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041 Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017 Mackness, J., Mak, S., & Williams, R. (2010). The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC. Networked Learning Conference, , 266-274. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Mohammadi, M., Moenikia, M., & Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). The role of advance organizer on english language learning as a second language. Paper presented at the Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, , 2(2) 4667-4671. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.747 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Murray, D. J. -. (2014). Participants' perceptions of a MOOC. Insights: The UKSG Journal, 27(2), 154-159. doi:10.1629/2048-7754.154 Ni, L. B., Rohadi, N. S. B., & Alfana, H. B. (2016). Advance organizer: Cognitive instructional strategy. International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications, 6(2), 53-57. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Noah, S. M., & Ahmad, J. (2005). PembinaanModul: Bagaimanamembinamodullatihandanmodulakademik. Serdang, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Normandi Atiaja Atiaja, L., & Segundo Guerrero Proenza, R. (2016). MOOCs: Origin, characterization, principal problems and challenges in higher education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(1), 65-76. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489-497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Siemens, G. (2013). Massive open online courses: Innovation in education? Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice, , 5-15. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Sukhbaatar, O., Choimaa, L., & Usagawa, T. (2018). Students' perception and experience of massive open online courses in mongolia. Creative Education, 9(12), 1818-1828. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425-478. doi:10.2307/30036540 Wang, Y., & Baker, R. (2015). Content or platform: Why do students complete MOOCs? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17-30. Retrieved from www.scopus.com |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |