|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| This article aimed to design and develop Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) model and a questionnaire survey instrument for Malaysian schools using Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) in the Design and Development Research (DDR). In Phase 1, literature on PLCs was reviewed to identify the needs of the professional learning communities? model according to the local context. In Phase 2, an agreement of 14 experts on the questionnaire was obtained from FDM. In Phase 3, the evaluation of the questionnaire by 5 experts to assess the questionnaire?s usability was gathered. Based on the final results, a total of 121 items was accepted. The agreement of the experts was between (90% to 100%) and the value of the threshold, d was between (0.09 ? 0.18). In conclusion, FDM in DDR is significant to be applied in the development of a model, practical and cost-saving. ? 2021. Kamarudin Ismail, Rosnah Ishak & Siti Hajar Kamaruddin; published by UIKTEN. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution? NonCommercial?NoDerivs 4.0 License. |
| References |
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175 Blitz, C. L., & Schulman, R. (2016). Measurement Instruments for Assessing the Performance of Professional Learning Communities, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M. -., & Ali, M. H. (2020). Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy delphi method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154 doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104625 Burns, M. K., Naughton, M. R., Preast, J. L., Wang, Z., Gordon, R. L., Robb, V., & Smith, M. L. (2018). Factors of professional learning community implementation and effect on student achievement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(4), 394-412. doi:10.1080/10474412.2017.1385396 Cheng, C. -., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 174-186. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6 Chu, H. -., & Hwang, G. -. (2008). A delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826-2840. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034 Garbrah, W., Kankkunen, P., & Välimäki, T. (2020). Development and validation of gerontological nurse teacher scale. Nurse Education in Practice, 44 doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102763 Ghazali, Z., Lim, M. R. T., & A. Jamak, A. B. S. (2019). Maintenance performance improvement analysis using fuzzy delphi method: A case of an international lube blending plant in malaysia. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 25(1), 162-180. doi:10.1108/JQME-11-2016-0058 Hairon, S., Goh, J. W. P., Chua, C. S. K., & Wang, L. -. (2017). A research agenda for professional learning communities: Moving forward. Professional Development in Education, 43(1), 72-86. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1055861 Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). Why context matters: A comparative perspective on education reform and policy implementation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 17(3), 195-207. doi:10.1007/s10671-018-9231-9 Hunt, S. D., Sparkman, R. D., & Wilcox, J. B. (1982). The pretest in survey research: Issues and preliminary findings. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(2), 269-273. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Ismail, K., Ishak, R., & Kamaruddin, S. H. (2020). Professional learning communities in malaysian schools: A contemporary literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1535-1541. doi:10.13189/ujer.2020.080447 Jamaludin, K. A., Alias, N., Dewitt, D., & Razzaq, A. R. A. (2019). Framework for technical communication skills content development for students in malaysian vocational colleges: A fuzzy delphi study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(4), 36-44. doi:10.30880/jtet.2019.11.04.005 Lawnik, M., & Banasik, A. (2020). Delphi method supported by forecasting software. Information (Switzerland), 11(2) doi:10.3390/info11020065 Lund, B. D. (2020). Review of the delphi method in library and information science research. Journal of Documentation, 76(4), 929-960. doi:10.1108/JD-09-2019-0178 Manakandan, S. K., Ismai, R., Jamil, M. R. M., & Ragunath, P. (2017). Pesticide applicators questionnaire content validation: A fuzzy delphi method. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 72(4), 228-235. Retrieved from www.scopus.com McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Murray, T. J., Pipino, L. L., & Van Gigch, J. P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of delphi. Human Systems Management, 5(1), 76-80. doi:10.3233/HSM-1985-5111 Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Saedah, S., Norlidah, A., Dorothy, D., & Zaharah, H. (2013). Design and Developmental Research: Emergent Trends in Educational Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Sulaiman, H. F., Ismail, R., Mohd Yusoff, H., Anuar, N., Mohd Jamil, M. R., & Daud, F. (2020). Validation of occupational zoonotic disease questionnaire using fuzzy delphi method. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(2), 166-172. doi:10.1080/1059924X.2019.1666763 Zhang, J., & Sun, Y. (2018). Development of a conceptual model for understanding professional learning communities in china: A mixed-method study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(4), 445-457. doi:10.1007/s12564-018-9548-3 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |