UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The main purpose of this study is to investigate in-service teachers' familiarization of the CEFR-aligned school-based assessment (SBA) in the Malaysian secondary ESL classroom. It also intends to explore teachers' knowledge, understanding, and perceptions of the CEFR-aligned SBA. The study also examined the implementation of the SBA and the challenges that TESL teachers faced embracing the CEFR-aligned SBA in their ESL classroom. An exploratory mixed-method research design was employed. Data were collected by administering a survey to 108 in-service teachers, and 12 in-service teachers participated in the interview. The results show that the in-service teachers have rather a good level of familiarization with CEFR-aligned SBA and a moderate level of awareness and comprehension of the CEFR-aligned SBA. However, the in-service teachers are aware of the importance of CEFR-aligned SBA to assist students to improve their proficiency. In-service teachers exhibit a good understanding of selecting the appropriate assessment tools and methods to assess students' learning. In-service teachers expressed their struggles and concerns regarding implementing CEFR-aligned SBA effectively, including lack of training, sourcing for good materials to teach, students' negative attitude towards the teaching and learning process, students' attendance, time constraint and their workload. In conclusion, the implementation of the CEFR-aligned SBA is crucial as it is a national agenda and teachers' involvement in executing the assessment is obligatory. ? Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. |
| References |
Anderson, R. S. (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? the shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1998(74), 5-16. doi:10.1002/tl.7401 Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL teachers' assessment literacy and their reflective teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425-436. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11129a Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and challenges of english language education reform in malaysian primary schools. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 22(3), 65-78. doi:10.17576/3L-2016-2203-05 Bourque, L. B., & Fielder, E. P. (1995). How to conduct self-administered and mail surveys. How to Conduct Self-Administered and Mail Surveys, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956-983. doi:10.3102/0002831215587754 Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, 10 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Chapman, D. W., & Snyder Jr., C. W. (2000). Can high stakes national testing improve instruction: Reexamining conventional wisdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(6), 457-474. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00020-1 Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1999). Peer and teacher assessment of the oral and written tasks of a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 301-314. doi:10.1080/0260293990240304 Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. Handbook of Formative Assessment, , 3-17. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Policy frameworks for new assessments. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 301-339) doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_6 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Darmi, R., Saad, N. S. M., Abdullah, N., Behak, F. P., Zakaria, Z. A., & Adnan, J. N. I. (2017). Teachers’ views on students’ performance in english language proficiency courses via CEFR descriptors. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3(8), 363-370. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Domingo, J., Martínez, H., Gomariz, S., & Gámiz, J. (2014). Some limits in peer assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(1), 12-24. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Don, Z. M. (2015). English Language Proficiency, Graduate Employability and the Role of CEFR.ASEAN Seminar 2015 on “Best Practices in English Teaching in ASEAN Universities”, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2017). Formative assessment to support students’ competences in inquiry-based science education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2) doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1673 Hamzah, M. O., & Sinnasamy, P. (2009). Between the ideal and reality: Teachers' perception of the implementation of school-based oral english assessment. The English Teacher, 38, 13-30. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hancock, C. R., & Brooks-Brown, S. (1994). Teaching, Testing, and Assessing: Making the Connection, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Knight, P. T. (2002). Being a Teacher in Higher Education, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Kruger, D. (1988). An Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Li, L. (2017). The role of anonymity in peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 645-656. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766 Little, D. (2013). The common european framework of references for languages: Purpose, origin, ethos and implications. Paper Presented at the CEFR Conference, , 29-30. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Liu, X., & Li, L. (2014). Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(3), 275-292. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.823540 Lo, Y. Y. (2018). English teachers’ concern on common european framework of reference for languages (CEFR): An application of CBAM. Jurnal Kurikulum Dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(1), 46-58. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Malakolunthu, S., & Hoon, S. K. (2010). Teacher perspectives of school-based assessment in a secondary school in kuala lumpur. Paper presented at the Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, , 9 1170-1176. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.302 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Matsuno, S. (2017). Adoptability of peer assessment in ESL classroom. Creative Education, 8, 1292-1301. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Mohtar, T. M. T. (2010). The use of Alternative Assessment to Sustain Teaching and Learning, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Mousavi, S. A. (2002). An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language Testing, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Nigel, P. (2001). An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(3), 235-246. doi:10.1080/02602930120052396 Pantiwati, Y., & Husamah. (2017). Self and peer assessments in active learning model to increase metacognitive awareness and cognitive abilities. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 185-202. doi:10.12973/iji.2017.10411a Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Punch, M. (1994). Politics and ethics in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, , 83-97. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Chi, L. J. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 452-463. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311 Singh, C. K. S., & Samad, A. A. (2013). Portfolio as an assessment tool and its implementation in malaysian ESL classrooms: A study in two secondary schools. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(4), 1255-1273. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Student-Involved Assessment for Learning, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Stillman, G. (2001). The impact of school-based assessment on the implementation of a modelling/applications-based curriculum: An australian example. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 20(3), 101-108. doi:10.1093/teamat/20.3.101 Swaran Singh, C. K., Lebar, O., Kepol, N., Rahman, R. A., & Mukhtar, K. A. M. (2017). An observation of classroom assessment practices among lecturers in selected malaysian higher learning institutions. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 23-61. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Toledo-Pereyra, L. H. (2012). Research design. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 25(5), 279-280. doi:10.3109/08941939.2012.723954 Torrance, H. (1995). Teacher involvement in new approaches to assessment. Evaluating Authentic Assessment, , 44-56. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Uri, N. F. M., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2018). Implementation of CEFR in malaysia: Teachers’ awareness and the challenges. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(3), 168-183. doi:10.17576/3L-2018-2403-13 Weiss, D. M., & Belland, B. R. (2016). Transforming schools using project-based learning, performance assessment, and common core standards. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2) Retrieved from www.scopus.com |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |