Math teachers’ pedagogical practices: an index to students learning outcomes

Capua, Roger De Guzman

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	L Education (General)
Main Author :	Capua, Roger De Guzman
Title :	Math teachers’ pedagogical practices: an index to students learning outcomes

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :	2021
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study focused on teachers’ pedagogical practices as an index to students learning outcomes. It catered to five key problems, such as assessing the students on their teacher’s knowledge and delivery of the lessons, which was confirmed positively by a majority of the students-respondents. Aligned with this is on teachers’ method and strategies and the ability to convert lessons into productive outcomes evidenced by the responses where the majority were positive responses. There were areas of difficulties confirmed, foremost of which were teachers’ lack of focus on the nature of the problems, which responded in the follow–up interview was overcome by considering the conduct of a rigid interviews and exercises. Further surfaced were caused by difficulties students encountered, which is teachers’ lack of focus on the tenor of problems under study. To cap up the study’s context is an interview focusing on students’ feelings and responses to the subject where the common contention was on students’ demand toward the clear lesson.

References

[1] Patahuddin, S. M., Beddu, U. H., & Ramful, A. (2015). Affordances and constraints by mathematical tasks,questions, prompts, and teacher actions: Insights from a lesson on fractions. In The 7th ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education: In pursuit of quality mathematics education for all (pp.579-586). Philippine Council of Mathematics Teachers Educators (MATHTED, Inc.

[2] Wong, K. Y. (2015). Effective mathematics lessons through an eclectic Singapore approach: Yearbook 2015, Association of Mathematics Educators. World Scientific.

[3] Stein, M. K., Silver, E. A., & Smith, M. S. (2013). Mathematics reform and teacher development: A community of practice perspective. In Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 27-62). Routledge.

[4] Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics (pp.139-171). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

[5] Schoenfeld, A. (2009). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Colección Digital Eudoxus, (7).

[6] Miller, S. P., & Hudson, P. J. (2007). Using evidence‐based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 47-57.

[7] Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student Attraction, Persistence, and Retention in STEM Programs: Successes and Continuing Challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46-59.

[8] Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 371-404.

[9] Clements, D. H., Agodini, R., & Harris, B. (2013). Instructional Practices and Student Math Achievement: Correlations from a Study of Math Curricula. NCEE Evaluation Brief. NCEE, 2013-4020. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

[10] Ferrini-Mundy, J., Floden, R., McCrory, R., Burrill, G., & Sandow, D. (2005). Knowledge for teaching school algebra: Challenges in developing an analytic framework. American Education Research Association. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

[11] Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide?.

[12] Martin, D. B. (2008). E (race)ing race from a national conversation on mathematics teaching and learning: The national mathematics advisory panel as white institutional space. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), 387-398.

[13] Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. J. (2012). Fractions: Could they really be the gatekeeper’s doorman?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247-253.

[14] Cross, D. I. (2009). Alignment, cohesion, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(5), 325-346.

[15] Hill, H. C. (2010). The nature and predictors of elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 513-545.

[16] Steele, M. D., & Hillen, A. F. (2012). The content-focused methods course: A model for integrating pedagogy and mathematics content. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 1(1), 53-70.

[17] Chedister, M. (2013). The effects of a professional development program on teachers’ beliefs and teaching of mathematical proofs (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University).

[18] Graeber, A., & Tirosh, D. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge: Useful concept or elusive notion. In International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 1 (pp. 115-132). Brill Sense.

[19] Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: A systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and teacher education, 34, 12-25.

[20] Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special. Journal of teacher education, 59(5), 389-407.

[21] Purnomo, Y. W., Suryadi, D., & Darwish, S. (2017). Examining pre-service elementary school teacher beliefs and instructional practices in mathematics class. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 629-642.

[22] OVIAWE, J. I., & Uddin, P. S. O. (2020). Impact of geometrical construction on students’ creativity skills for sustainable development. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 7(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol7.2.5.2020

[23] Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Lubienski, S. T. (2013). Measuring mathematical knowledge for teaching: a longitudinal study using two measures. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(3), 211-236.

[24] Yerizon, Y., Ahda, Y., & Amsari, D. (2019). The influence of contextual approach to students’ problem solving ability of Class IX of SMP Negeri 1 Bayang. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol6.2.1.2019

[25] Zangori, L., Vo, T., Forbes, C. T., & Schwarz, C. V. (2017). Supporting 3rd-grade students’ model-based explanations about groundwater: A quasi-experimental study of a curricular intervention. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1421-1442.

[26] Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1, 371-404.

[27] Lester, F. K. (Ed.). (2007). Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. IAP.

[28] Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2008). Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system. Educational researcher, 37(2), 65-75.

[29] Charalambous, C. Y. (2010). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and task unfolding: An exploratory study. The Elementary School Journal, 110(3), 247-278.

[30] Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2013). Is it just a bad class? Assessing the long‐term stability of estimated teacher performance. Economica, 80(319), 589-612.

[31] Abdirad, H., & Dossick, C. S. (2016). BIM curriculum design in architecture, engineering, and construction education: a systematic review. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 21(17), 250-271.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page