UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Sahabuddin Basri
Title :Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics: intervensi tahap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi tingkatan empat
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2022
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK), hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan [Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG [F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan. Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi.

References

Abdu Raheem, B. O. (2012). The influence of gender on secondary school students’

academic performance in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences,

31(1), 93-98. diambil daripada

https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893018

 

Abdulatip, Suratsih, Henuhili Rahayu, Henuhili, V., & Rahayu, T. (2015).

Penyusunan bahan ajar genetika dalam bentuk modul pembelajaran berbasis

fenomena lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3(1), 59-64.

 

Abu Bakar, N. (1995). Penilaian afektif. Kajang, Malaysia: Masa Enterprise.

 

Ada, E. E. (2019). The effect of gender, self concept, socioeconomic status ofparents

and type of school on students general academic achievement & students

achievement in Biology:A case study of senior secondary school students in

the Calabar Municipality, Nigeria. International Journal of Trend in Scientific

Research and Development, 3(2), 194-201. doi:10.31142/ijtsrd20278

 

Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating students progress: Principles of

test and measurement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Ahmed, M. A., Opatola, Y. M., Yahaya, L., & Sulaiman, M. M. (2018). Identification

of alternative conceptions of genetics held by senior school students in Ilorin,

Nigeria, using a three-tier diagnostic test. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1),

97-104.

 

Akmalia, R. M., & Sri Nurhayati, P. (2013). Pengembangan modul ipa terpadu

berkarakter tema pemanasan global untuk siswa smp/mts. Unnes Science

Education Journal, 2(1), 203-208. doi:10.15294/USEJ.V2I1.1824

 

Akyurek, E., & Afacan, Ö. (2012). Determining the 8th grade students’

misconceptions in the unit of “Cell Division” by using Roundhouse

diagramming. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları

Dergisi, 2(3), 47-58. diambil daripada

http://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/70/55

 

Alonemarera, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada

materi genetika menggunakan certainty of response indeks (Cri). Jurnal Biotek,

8(2), 109-122. doi:10.24252/jb.v8i2.16320

 

Altunoğlu, B. D., & Şeker, M. (2015). The understandings of genetics concepts and

learning approach of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Educational and

Social Research, 5(1), 61-66. doi:10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61

 

Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development

in REBT counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia -

Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(2013), 1481-1491.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.777

 

Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The use of a creative problem solving

based genetic mutation module in higher education. International Journal of

Higher Education, 10(3), 33-45. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33

 

Amir Hoseyn, M. D. (2012). Kagan cooperative learning model: The bridge to foreign

language learning in the third millennium. Theory and Practice in Language

Studies, 2(6), 1134-1140. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1134-1140

 

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey:

Prentice Hall.

 

Ang, C. T., & Lee, L. W. (2016). Instrumen penilaian kualiti untuk modul pengajaran :

Pengujian ciri psikometrik. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik,

4(4), 25-43. diambil daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/8209/5680

 

Anggraini, A., & Sukardi, S. (2015). Pengembangan modul prakarya dan

kewirausahaan materi pengolahan berbasis product-oriented bagi peserta didik

smk. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 287. doi:10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6484

 

Ardiansyah, R., Corebima, A. D., & Rohman, F. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar

mutasi genetik pada matakuliah genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori,

Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 927-933.

 

Ari, D., & Sadi, O. (2019). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on students'

achievement in genetics, self-efficacy, and conceptions of learning Biology.

Inquiry in Education, 11(2), 1-20.

 

Arman, I. M. (2020). Effectiveness of blending the Posner and Stepans models of

conceptual change in correcting misconceptions in 9th grade students.

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 10-17.

doi:10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v7i4p102

 

Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw

classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Rozavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education.

New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA ditinjau dari konsep diri dan minat

belajar siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40-45.

doi:10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293

 

Atilboz, N. G. (2004). Understanding levels and concept misconceptions of high

school 1 year students on mitosis and Parsley division topics. Gazi Eğitim

Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 147-157.

 

Aydin, G., & Balim, A. G. (2013). Students’ misconceptions related to subjects of cell

division and heredity. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2,

338-348.

 

Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change

strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.

 

Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals' attitudes

toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian

Psychologist, 39(1), 76-87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371

 

Barroso, C., Carrion, G. C., Roldan, J. L., & Wang, H. (2010). Applying maximum

likehood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL model

and employee behavior model. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, & J.

Henseler (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and

applications (pp. 427-448). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

 

Basri, S. (2007). Miskonsepsi berkaitan konsep asas genetik dalam kalangan bakal

guru Pendidikan Sains (Biologi) (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.

 

Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucchi, K. (1993). Interaction processes and student

outcomes in cooperative learning groups. The Elementary School Journal,

94(1), 19-32. doi:10.1086/461748

 

Batzli, J. M., Smith, A. R., Williams, P. H., McGee, S. A., Dósa, K., & Pfammatter, J.

(2014). Beyond Punnett squares: Student word association and explanations of

phenotypic variation through an integrative quantitative genetics unit

investigating anthocyanin inheritance and expression in Brassica rapa fast

plants. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 410-424.

doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0232

 

Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–An effective approach of

teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary &

Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1(6), 65-74. diambil daripada

http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf

 

Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. New

York: Wiley.

 

Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22-28.

 

Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying educational research: A

practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.

 

Bozdağ, H. C., & Ok, G. (2019). Determination of the knowledge awareness and

misconceptions of sixth grade students about the cell with four tier test.

Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 200-226.

doi:10.17984/adyuebd.413369

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY:

Springer.

 

Broadwell, M. M. (1969). Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian, 20(41), 1-3.

diambil daripada

http://www.wordsfitlyspoken.org/gospel_guardian/v20/v20n41p3_image.html

 

Buerah, T., Shanah, N., & Hamimah, A. N. (2015). Delinkuen pelajar dan cadangan

penyelesaiannya menerusi model pembangungan sahsiah remaja/pelajar

muslim bersepadu. Jurnal Hadhari, 7(2), 11-30.

 

Castro‐Faix, M., Duncan, R. G., & Choi, J. (2020). Data‐driven refinements of a

genetics learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1),

3-39. doi:10.1002/tea.21631

 

Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2014). Determination of knowledge and misconceptions of

pre-service elementary science teachers about the greenhouse effect by

drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 452-456.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.355

 

Chan, S., & Pollard, D. E. (2001). An encyclopaedia of translation: Chinese - English,

English - Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

 

Chapman, A., & Georgiou, M. (2021). Powerful knowledge building and conceptual

change research: Learning from research on 'historical accounts' in England

and Cyprus. In A. Chapman (Ed.), Knowing history in schools (pp. 72-96).

London: UCL Press.

 

Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary

students in Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Cell

Biology Education, 4(1), 97-104. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042

 

Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary

students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education.

Education, 2(3), 41-47. doi:10.5923/j.edu.20120203.04

 

Chen, Y. T., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Analyzing with Posner’s conceptual change

model and Toulmin’s model of argumentative demonstration in senior high

school students’ mathematic learning. International Journal of Information

and Education Technology, 6(6), 457-464. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.732

 

Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some

misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199.

doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1

 

Chi, M. T., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change.

In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in

theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

 

Cimer, S. O. (2017). What makes a change unsuccessful through the eyes of teachers.

International Education Studies, 11(1), 81. doi:10.5539/ies.v11n1p81

 

Clapper, T. C. (2015). Cooperative-based learning and the zone of proximal

development. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 148-158.

doi:10.1177/1046878115569044

 

Clark, D. C., & Mathis, P. M. (2000). Modeling mitosis & meiosis: A

problem-solving activity. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 204-206.

doi:10.2307/4450874

 

Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American

Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. doi:10.1119/1.12989

 

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.).

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed.). Boston:

McGraw Hill.

 

Cox, J. (2020, May 6). How to use the RoundRobin discussion teaching strategies.

diambil daripada

https://www.unige.ch/innovations-pedagogiques/application/files/1115/8877/8

105/Jorg_Balsiger_SocDur_How_to_Use_the_Round_Robin_Discussion_Tea

ching_Strategies.pdf

 

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of education measurement. New Jersey:Prentice

Hall.

 

Dabell, J. (2019, January 27). The RoundRobin. Diambil pada 1 Januari, 2021,

daripada https://johndabell.com/2019/02/16/the-round-robin/

 

Defi Firman, S. (2014). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan miskonsepsi siswa sma pada

materi genetika (Master's thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung,

Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/12639/

 

Dewi Murni. (2013). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep substansi

genetika menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding

Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 1(1), 205-2011.

 

Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting

contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts.

International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26.

doi:10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26

 

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in

biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235-247.

diambil daripada

https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380539915_Dikmenli.pdf

 

Dixit, S., Bhardwaj, U. D., & Aniyan, A. T. (2020). A quasi-experimental study to

evaluate the effectiveness of self-instructional module (SIM) regarding

non-communicable diseases (NCD) among nursing officers in terms of

knowledge. International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 6(4),

8-12. doi:10.24321/2455.9318.201926

 

Dorji, J., Tamang, S., Tshewang, T., Dorji, T., & Dorji, T. Y. (2018). Genetic

diversity and population structure of three traditional horse breeds of Bhutan

based on 29 DNA microsatellite markers. Plos One 13(6), 1-11.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199376

 

Duda, H. J. (2016). International Conference On Education. Malang, Indonesia:

Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang.

 

Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels:

Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. doi:10.1002/tea.20186

 

Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2010). Designing project-based instruction to foster

generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education,

95(1), 21-56. doi:10.1002/sce.20407

 

Duncan, R. G., Castro-Faix, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Informing a learning progression

in genetics: Which should be taught first, Mendelian inheritance or the central

dogma of molecular biology? International Journal of Science and

Mathematics Education, 14(3), 445-472. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9568-3

 

Duncan, R. G., Choi, J., Castro-Faix, M., & Cavera, V. L. (2017). A study of two

instructional sequences informed by alternative learning progressions in

genetics. Science & Education, 26(10), 1115-1141.

doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9932-0

 

Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for

deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th

grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.

doi:10.1002/tea.20312

 

Dwisetyaningrum, Y., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pengembangan modul

fisika sma berbasis science technology society pada materi elastisitas untuk

meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa. INKUIRI: Jurnal

Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 29-39. doi:10.20961/inkuiri.v8i1.31806

 

Ebel, R. I. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall,

Inc.

 

Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. USA:

Sage Publication, Inc.

 

Emre, I., & Bahsi, M. (2006). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about cell

division. Research of Eastern Anatolia Region, 4(3), 70-73.

 

Eryilmaz, M., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2018). Individual flipped learning and cooperative

flipped learning: Their effects on students’ performance, social, and computer

anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432-442.

doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1522652

 

Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among

pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121-128.

doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6

 

Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in

biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of

Educational Research, 16(2), 139-147. doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8

 

Fadlillah, M. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa PG-PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah

Ponorogo terhadap PAUD di Kabupaten Ponorogo,. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal

Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 117-127.

 

Fairuz, M., Mohammad, S., & Mohd Sollah, M. (2019). Persepsi pelajar terhadap

Modul Cerita Nahu (MCN). Asia Pasific Online Journal of Arabic Studies,

3(1), 116. Retrieved from

http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/APOJAS/article/view/21816

 

Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer

tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.

doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331

 

Fauzi, A., & Mitalistiani, M. (2018). High school biology topics that perceived

difficult by undergraduate students. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian

Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 73-84. doi:10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1242

 

Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017).

Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A

mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2),

271-298. doi:10.1002/tea.21419

 

Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain:

Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.).

doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1400-4

 

Gallagher, J. M., & Reid, D. K. (2002). The learning theory of Piaget & Inhelder. NE:

Author Choice Press.

 

Garba, A., Ismail, N., Osman, S., & Rameli, M. R. (2020). Exploring peer effect on

mathematics anxiety among secondary school students of Sokoto state,

Nigeria through photovoice approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics,

Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 2-12. doi:10.29333/ejmste/112622

 

Geldsetzer, P., & Fawzi, W. (2017). Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper

2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge. Journal

of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 12-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.015

 

Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher

education: A review. Higher Education, 2(1), 15-32. doi:10.1007/bf00162534

 

González, N., & Rossi, A. (2016). Examining pedagogical knowledge content on

mitosis in a university context. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education,

Social and Technological Sciences, 3(2), 79-106. doi:10.4995/muse.2016.4653

 

Grace, E. N. (2017). Facilitating students understanding of biological phenomena

using conceptual change instructional model in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria.

Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 8(4), 2775-2780.

doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2017.0366

 

Greager, J., & Murray, D. (1991). The use of modules in college teaching. Nichols

Publishing Co., Inc.

 

Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational

Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. diambil daripada

http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov04/vol62/num03/

With-Boys-and-Girls-in-Mind.aspx

 

Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s

“learning for mastery”. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8-31. diambil

daripada https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.4219/jaa-2007-704

 

Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Universitas Riau International

Conference on Science and Environment 2020 (URICSE-2020). Riau,

Indonesia: IOP Publishing.

 

Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful

review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 21(2), 197-209. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210210

 

Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., &

Mappouras, D. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based

intervention on human reproduction in relation to students’ gender, prior

knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological

Education, 50(3), 261-274. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1067241

 

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer om partial least

squares structural equation modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Hakim, A., Liliasari, L., Kadarohman, A., & Syah, Y. M. (2016). Effects of the

natural product mini project laboratory on the students conceptual

understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 27-36. diambil

daripada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10165a

 

Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: An Ontario perspective. Journal of

Teaching and Learning, 8(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004

 

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000).

Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting

interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2),

316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316

 

Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students’ conception of genetic phenomena

and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism.

CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), 1-9. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-01-0014

 

Hasnah, M., Zaidatun, T., & Baharuddin, A. (2014, August). Pengaruh gaya kognitif

terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Kertas dibentangkan pada Konvensyen

Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. diambil

daripada

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270272732_PENGARUH_GAYA_

KOGNITIF_TERHADAP_PENCAPAIAN_PELAJAR

 

Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Nik Yusuff, N. A., & Mansor, R. (2017). Development

of higher order thinking skills module in science primary school: Needs

analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social

Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society,

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,

7(2), 624-628.

 

Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2002). Young children's thinking about biological world

(1st ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

 

Hayashi, Y., Fukamachi, K. I., & Komatsugawa, H. (2015, April). Collaborative

learning in computer programming courses that adopted the flipped

classroom. Kertas dibentangkan pada 2015 International Conference on

Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei. diambil

daripada https://ieeexplore.ieee.org

 

Helmers, M. J., Youngquist, T. D., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2019). Novel use if

conceptual change framework improves video on challenging science topic.

Journal of Extension, 57(1), 1-4. Retrieved from

https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/files/publication/novel_use_of

_conceptual_change_framework_improves_video_on_challenging_science_to

pic.pdf

 

Hemmerich, J. A., Van Voorhis, K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Anomalous evidence,

confidence change, and theory change. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1534-1560.

doi:10.1111/cogs.12289

 

Heri, S., Steven, O., & Mutiara, G. P. (2018). Isu kesetaraan gender dalam optik

feminist. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 121-140. diambil daripada

journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudent

 

Hobri, Dafik, & Anowar, H. (2018). The implementation of learning together in

improving students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of

Instruction, 11(2), 483-496. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11233a

 

Hobri. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pengembangan (Aplikasi pada penelitian

pendidikan matematika). Jember, Indonesia: Pena Salsabila.

 

Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics : A critical thinking approach

(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.

 

Jibrin, A. G., & Zayum, D. S. (2012). Effect of concept mapping teaching strategy on

the academic achievement of senior secondary school students in genetics.

Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 1(1), 49-53. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270592954

 

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Impact ff cooperative-team learning on

performance and retention (NOOO1 4-87-K-021 8). diambil daripada

University of Minnesota website:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235154420_Impact_of_Cooperative-

Team_Learning_on_Performance_and_Retention_of_Navy_Air-Traffic_Contr

oller_Trainees

 

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1990). Circles of learning :

Cooperation in the classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MI: Interaction Book Co.,.

 

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning:

Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory.

Retrieved from

https://karlsmithmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-

Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf

 

Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived

difficulty school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166.

doi:10.1080/00219266.1980.10668983

 

Juhairiah, J., Danaryanti, A., & Sukmawati, R. A. (2018). Pengembangan buku siswa

dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi persamaan linear satu variabel

untuk siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Edu-Mat: Jurnal Pendidikan

Matematika, 6(1). doi:10.20527/edumat.v6i1.5129

 

Juwantara, R. A. (2019). Analisis teori perkembangan kognitif Piaget pada tahap anak

usia operasional konkret 7-12 tahun dalam pembelajaran matematika.

Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 27.

doi:10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v9i1.3011

 

Kagan, S. (2003). A brief history of Kagan structures. diambil daripada

https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/256/A-Brief-Hi

story-of-Kagan-Structures

 

Kalaian, S., Kasim, R., & Nims, J. (2018). Effectiveness of small-group learning

pedagogies in engineering and technology education: A meta-analysis.

Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 20-35. doi:10.21061/jte.v29i2.a.2

 

Karsono, A. D. (1993). Konsep dan sistem pendidikan jarak jauh. Kuala Lumpur,

Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Kerlinger, E. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt,

Rinehart and Wiston.

 

Khaerunnisa, E. (2016). Studi deskriptif adversity quotient matematis. Jurnal

Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 83-92.

 

Khaerunnisa. (2020). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah melalui

pendekatan kolaboratif. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra,

13(1), 61-66. doi:10.30651/st.v13i1.3762

 

Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a

computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils' learning

outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2),

207-213. doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000031259.76872.f1

 

Kilıç, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A cross-national study of

students’ understanding of genetics concepts: Implications from similarities

and differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International,

2016, 1-14. doi:10.1155/2016/6539626

 

Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the use of the ASSURE model by K–12

teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153-168.

doi:10.1080/07380569.2016.1203208

 

King, C. J. (2009). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science

in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5),

565-601. doi:10.1080/09500690902721681

 

Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research.

doi:10.4135/9781412985659

 

Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D. N.,

Vanlaar, G., Reynolds, C., & Namusisi, S. (2016). How do student and

classroom characteristics affect attitude toward mathematics? A multivariate

multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 1-21.

doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123

 

Knippels, M. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning

and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112.

doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976

 

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),

Criticism and the growth of knowledge (p. 231–278). Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

 

Kumandaş, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2018). Misconceptions in biology: A

meta-synthesis study of research, 2000–2014. Journal of Biological Education,

53(4), 350-364. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798

 

Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö., & Aktaş, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structures

and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of

pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 04(09), 572-587.

doi:10.4236/ce.2013.49083

 

Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092

 

Laila Puspita. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains

sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan

IPA, 5(1), 79-88. doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530

 

Laimeheriwa, B. M. (2018). The genetic research methods and its role in aquaculture

on Indonesia. Oceanography & Fisheries Open access Journal, 8(3), 1-23.

doi:10.19080/ofoaj.2018.08.555738

 

Laninga‐Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Garandeau, C. F., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., &

Vollebergh, W. A. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial

and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development,

90(5), 637-653. doi:10.1111/cdev.13228

 

Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2018). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2017 Biologi 2

4551/2. diambil daripada Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia website:

http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2017/BIOLOGI%2

02%20(4551_2).pdf

 

Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re‐visiting

students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science

Education, 26(2), 195-206. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072782

 

Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and

inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of

Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. doi:10.1080/095006900289949

 

Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes? — young

people's understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education,

34(2), 74-79. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655689

 

Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000c). What's in a cell? — young

people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an

individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129-132.

doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655702

 

Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in

gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,

136(6), 1123-1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276

 

Linke, R. D., & Venz, M. I. (1979). Misconceptions in physical science among

non-science background students: II. Research in Science Education, 9(1),

103-109. doi:10.1007/bf02359149

 

Longden, B. (1982). Genetics—are there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of

Biological Education, 16(2), 135-140. doi:10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439

 

Luksa, T., Radanovis, I., Garasis, D., & Sertis Peris, M. (2016). Misconceptions of

primary and high school students related tothe biological concept of human

reproduction,cell life cycle and molecular basis of heredity. Journal of Turkish

Science Education, 13(3), 143-160. diambil daripada

https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/845394.Luksa_i_sur_2016.pdf

 

Machová, M., & Ehler, E. (2021). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in

genetics: Origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 1-14.

doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136

 

Majzub, R. M., & Rais, M. M. (2010). Boys’ underachievement: Male versus female

teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 685-690.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.093

 

Marshall, P. A. (2008). Mapping linked genes in drosophila melanogaster using data

from the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross. The American Biology Teacher,

70(9), 554-556. doi:10.2307/27669342

 

Marshall, P. (2006). The power to transform: Leadership that brings learning and

schooling to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

 

Mbajiorgu, N. M., Ezechi, N. G., & Idoko, E. C. (2007). Addressing nonscientific

presuppositions in genetics using a conceptual cha

 

McGuirk, P. M., & O'Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human

geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography

(pp. 246-273). (pp. 246-273). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.

 

Meade, M. E., Wammes, J. D., & Fernandes, M. A. (2018). Drawing as an encoding

tool: Memorial benefits in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging

Research, 44(5), 369-396. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2018.1521432

 

Mensah, F. K., & Kiernan, K. E. (2010). Gender differences in educational attainment:

Influences of the family environment. British Educational Research Journal,

36(2), 239-260. doi:10.1080/01411920902802198

 

Mertens, T. R., & Walker, J. O. (1992). A paper-& pencil strategy for teaching

mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting examination

performance. The American Biology Teacher, 54(8), 470-474.

doi:10.2307/4449552

 

Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. diambil

daripada

https://www.questia.com/library/104586992/goals-goal-structures-and-pattern

s-of-adaptive-learning

 

Mital, S., Musunuru, K., Garg, V., Russell, M. W., Lanfear, D. E., Gupta, R. M., …

Hickey, K. T. (2016). Enhancing literacy in cardiovascular genetics: A

scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation:

Cardiovascular Genetics, 9(5), 448-467. doi:10.1161/hcg.0000000000000031

 

Mohd Majid, K. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (4th ed.). Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan

Bahasa & Pustaka.

 

Mohd Syaubari, O., & Ahmad Yusuf, K. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan

instrumen komposisi pengajaran guru pendidikan islam sekolah rendah yang

mengintegrasikan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) menerusi pengajaran

akidah. Sains Humanika, 10(3). doi:10.11113/sh.v10n3.1297

 

Mohd Yusof, K., Wan Alwi, S., Sadikin, A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2015). Inculcating

sustainability among first-year engineering students using cooperative

problem-based learning. Sustainability in Higher Education, 67-95.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100367-1.00004-4

 

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective

instruction (3rd ed.). Michigan: Wiley.

 

Mosher, B. (2007, November 2). Is your learning about mastery or competency?

diambil daripada

https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2007/11/02/is-your-learning-about-mast

ery-or-competency/

 

Muela, F. J., & Abril, A. M. (2014). Genetics and cinema: Personal misconceptions

that constitute obstacles to learning. International Journal of Science

Education, 4(3), 260-280. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.817026

 

Muhammad Ridho, F. (2020). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan belajar melalui teknik

motivational interviewing untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik

kelas XI di SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung tahun pembelajaran 2019/2020

(Master's thesis, UIN Raden Intan, Lampung, Indonesia). diambil daripada

http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/12191

 

Muhammad Sabri, S., Nor Aziah, A., Zawawi, I., & Nurulhuda, O. (2012). Employing

design and development research (DDR) approaches in design and

development of online arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. The

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 108-119. Retrieved

from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ989018

 

Muhammad Wahyu, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran biologi berbasis

pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Journal of

Educational Science and Technology, 3(2), 102-112.

doi:10.26858/est.v3i2.3468

 

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi : Konsep, karakteristik,

implementasi, dan inovasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya.

 

Murray, G. T. (1985). The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK:

Pergamon Press Ltd.

 

Murtafiah, M., & Amin, N. (2018). Pengaruh gaya kognitif dan gender terhadap

kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan

Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1), 75-82. doi:10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2986

 

Musa, A. K., Dauda, B., & Umar, M. A. (2016). Gender differences in achievement

goals and performances in English Language and Mathematics of senior

secondary schools students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and

Practice, 7(27), 165-175. diambil daripada

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115862.pdf

 

Muslimin, M. S., Mohd Nordin, N., Mansor, A. Z., & Md Yunus, M. (2017). The

design and development of MobiEko: A mobile educational app for

microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction

(Special Issue), 221-255. doi:10.32890/mjli.2017.7804

 

Newman, D. L., Catavero, C. M., & Wright, L. K. (2012). Students fail to transfer

knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division.

CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-01-0003

 

Noperi, H., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2021). Pengembangan modul ilustratif

berbasis inkuiri terbimbing bermuatan pendidikan karakter. Science and

Physics Education Journal, 4(2), 70-81. doi:10.31539/spej.v4i2.2392

 

Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2012). Developing a social constructivist teaching and

learning module on DNA for high school students in Thailand. In Biology

Education for Social and Sustainable Development (pp. 233-240). Brill.

 

Noraini, N., Sarina, M. N., Rushami, Z. Y., & Abdul Aziz, O. (2016). Isu kesahan

dalaman terhadap kaedah penyelidikan kuasi eksperimen di dalam pendidikan

keusahawanan. Asean Entrepreneuship Journal, 2(2), 90-97.

 

Norhashim, A. S., Mazenah, Y., & Rose Alinda, A. (1998). Pengajaran bantuan

komputer. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Nowak, G. T. (1986). Western Michigan University career guidance inventory

manual. Michigan: Western Michigan University Testing and Evaluation

Services.

 

Nur Fazirah, R., & Eng Tek, O. (2008). Keberkesanan penggunaan modul nota

mitosis dan meiosis dan sikap pelajar terhadap penggunaannya bagi Biologi

Tingkatan 4 (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Nur Salimah, A., Huzili, H., Junainor, H., Nor Syamimi, M. A., Mohamad Hashim, 0.

O., & Kamarudin, H. (2018, February). Perception of teacher on cooperative

learning. Paper presented at Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on

Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017), Universiti Malaysia Perlis.

 

Nur Syarima, S., Mariny, A. G., & Yahaya, M. (2020). Kesahan dan

kebolehpercayaan instrumen ketara sedar sekolah (KSS) dan pendidikan abad

ke-21 (PAK21) berdasarkan analisis PLS-SEM. International Journal of

Education and Pedagogy, 2(4), 106-119.

 

Nurhazwani, M. S., Najwa Husna, S., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Exploring pre-university

students’ manipulative skills and understanding on mitosis. Jurnal Pendidikan

Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 1-8. diambil daripada

https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol10.1.1.2020

 

Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi, R. (2018). Preliminary studies of analyzing

misconception and scientific argumentation using diagnostic question clusters

(Dqcs) of molecular genetics concept. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi

Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 43-53. doi:10.15575/bioeduin.v8i2.3190

 

Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi. (2017). Analizing student biology education

misconception and scientific argumentation ability using diagnostic question

clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference

Series, 812, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012112

 

Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and

accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science,

11, 183-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279

 

Nwagbo, C., & Obiekwe, C. (2010). Effects of constructivist instructional approach

on students’ achievement in basic ecological concepts in biology. Journal of

Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 45(1), 26-35.

 

Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and

learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.

doi:10.9790/7388-05616670

 

Ong, E. T., & Tan, S. C. (2012). Keberkesanan kaedah “Numbered Heads Together”

terhadap pencapaian Biologi dalam kalangan pelajar di Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris. Jurnal Teknologi, 53(1), 35-46. doi:10.11113/jt.v53.112

 

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean

comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2),

236-246. doi:10.21449/ijate.656077

 

Othman, M. (2000). Prinsip psikoterapi dan pengurusan dalam kaunseling. Serdang,

Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university freshmen

students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and

meiosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677-3680.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126

 

Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school

students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers.

Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15.

doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890

 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using

IBM SPSS (6th ed.). China: Everbest Printing Co. Ltd.

 

Pasion, R. (2019). The efficacy of strategic intervention materials (SIMS) in teaching

social studies among third year high school students. SMCC Higher Education

Research Journal, 6(1), 175-187. doi:10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.11

 

Patrick, A. O. (2012). Unequal achievement of science undergraduates: Does sex

influence the differences? US-China Education Review, 6, 578-594. diambil

daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535484.pdf

 

Perez-Felkner, L. (2015). Attitude differences and gender. In R. Gunstone (Ed.),

Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 93-94). doi:

10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_351

 

Poh, B. T., & Ng, H. K. (2008). Kesan faktor jantina, etnik dan gaya kognitif ke atas

pencapaian Pengajian Am. Journal of Educators & Education, 23, 123-140.

 

Popi, S., Deby Putri, P., & Yesni, O. (2021, June 30). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika

"Analisis model pengembangan bahan ajar (4D, ADDIE, ASSURE, Hannafin

dan Peck)". Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/7bydx/

 

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982).

Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual

change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.

 

Prakash, M., Raj, B., Khanal, B., Krishna, R., & Belbase, S. (2021). Eighth grade

students’ misconceptions and errors in mathematics learning in Nepal.

European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1101-1121.

doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1101

 

Prastyo, D. D., Amin, M., & Susanto, H. (2021). Effectiveness of genetic module to

reduce misconception levels and improve cognitive learning outcomes of

grade XII students of SMA Negeri 5 Malang. Journal of Disruptive Learning

Innovation (JODLI), Vol. 2 (2), 2021, 2(2), 89-97.

 

Price, C. G., Knee, E. M., Miller, J. A., Shin, D., Mann, J., Crist, D. K., … Grotewold,

E. (2018). Following phenotypes: An exploration of mendelian genetics using

arabidopsis plants. The American Biology Teacher, 80(4), 291-300.

doi:10.1525/abt.2018.80.4.291

 

Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using

drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE—Life Sciences

Education, 14(1), es2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128

 

Radanoviš, I., Lukša, Ţ., Garašiš, D., Bastiš, M, Markoviš, N., Furlan, Z., Dolenec, T.,

Begiš,V., Kapov, S., Štigliš, N. & Petraţ, T., I., Lukša, T., Garašiš, D., Bastiš,

M., Markoviš, N., Furlan, Z., & Dolenec, T. (2011). External evaluation

exams in Biology in the eighth grade in the school year 2010/2011 - Main

examination. (pp. 1-114). diambil daripada National Center for External

Evaluation of Education, Zagreb website:

http://dokumenti.ncvvo.hr/OS/Izvjesca/izvjesce_bio_2010_2011.pdf

 

Rafiee, J., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Analisis keperluan kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah

alih terhadap sikap, minat dan pengetahuan asas matematik tahun 4. Jurnal

Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 9-15.

 

Rahdiyanta, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan modul [PDF]. diambil daripada

http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/staff/131569341

 

Ramli, I., Jamal, N., & Marinah, A. (2020). Analisis data dan pelaporan dalam

penyelidikan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Ria Rosita. (2018). Improving the high school students' appeal and effectiveness in

the history learning through inquiry based digital module design. Social

Science Learning Education Journal, 03(12), 01-09.

doi:10.15520/sslej.v3i12.2377

 

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Rodríguez Gil, S. G., Fradkin, M., & Castañeda-Sortibrán, A. N. (2019). Conceptions

of meiosis: Misunderstandings among university students and errors. Journal

of Biological Education, 53(2), 191-204.

doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1469531

 

Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan teori Piaget dan Vygotsky ruang

lingkup bilangan dan aljabar pada siswa mts plus Karangwangi. Prisma, 9(1),

65. doi:10.35194/jp.v9i1.886

 

Roini, C., & Sundari. (2018). Using certainty of responses index (CRI) for assessment

to identify graduate students’ misconceptions in genetics. Proceedings of the

1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning.

doi:10.5220/0008899502110217

 

Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent

learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. diambil daripada

American Association for the Advancement of Science website:

http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/papers/narst2006.pdf

 

Rosenberg, M. (2012, May 21). Beyond competence: It’s the journey to mastery that

counts. Learning Solutions Magazine. diambil daripada

www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/930/beyondcompetence-its-the-journ

ey-to-masterythat-counts

 

Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2007). Using a computer animation to

teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and

Technology, 17(1), 49-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9080-4

 

Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2005). Understanding molecular genetics

through a drawing-based activity. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4),

174-178. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655992

 

Rulina, S. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran koperatif tipe student facilitator and

explaning untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar ips terpadu. Wahana Inovasi,

3(2), 384-399. diambil daripada http://penelitian.uisu.ac.id/

 

Russel, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization

and evaluation of modular materials. New York: Publishing Company.

 

Sadiah, B. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap

konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel (Disertasi kedoktoran, Universiti

Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang). diambil daripada

http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/9964

 

Safrida, S., Dewi, C. R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Penggunaan modul dan media

animasi dalam mengurangi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem peredaran

darah di SMAN 5 Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pencerahan, 11(1), 39-45.

 

Saper, M. N., Mohd Daud, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan

kebolehpercayaan Modul I-Sc (Islamic spiritual counseling) ke atas pelajar

bermasalah tingkah laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9(1),

32-43. doi:10.24035/ijit.09.2016.004

 

Sharifah Alwiah, A. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas

kepada modul pengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. Pendidik dan Pendidikan,

3(1), 46-57. diambil daripada http://apjee.usm.my/vol03_1981.html

 

Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2014). A tri-part model for genetics

literacy: Exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics

dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485-507.

doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y

 

Sidek, M. N. (1997). Modul penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang: Universiti Putra

Malaysia.

 

Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina

modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra

Malaysia.

 

Siritunga, D., Montero-Rojas, M., Carrero, K., Toro, G., Vélez, A., &

Carrero-Martínez, F. A. (2011). Culturally relevant inquiry-based laboratory

module implementations in upper-division genetics and cell biology teaching

laboratories. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 287-297.

doi:10.1187/cbe.11-04-0035

 

Siti Ramdiah, & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students’

achievement, metacognitive and critical thinking skills. American Journal of

Educational Research, 2(8), 577-584. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-3

 

Siti Seri Kartini, M. Y., Salmiza, S., Hutkemri, & Yew, W. T. (2021). Development

and usability of B-Geo module in differentiation topic using ASSURE model

of instructional design. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous

Studies, 3(1), 94-117.

 

Siti Shahida, M. A., & Che Nidzam, C. A. (2014). Penggunaan modul pembelajaran

dan pengajaran berasaskan analogi terhadap pencapaian pelajar bagi topik

Enzim dalam biologi tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik

Malaysia, 4(2), 91-103.

 

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education, 43(1),

5-14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370

 

Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2),

315-342. doi:10.3102/00346543050002315

 

Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform

in education. Éducation et didactique, 2(2), 149-157.

doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.334

 

Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to

document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses.

Genetics, 191(1), 21-32. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137810

 

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning

on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A

meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.

doi:10.3102/00346543069001021

 

Sri Wardani, Sri Nurhayati, & Aulia Safitri. (2016). The effectiveness of the guided

inquiry learning module towards students. International Journal of Science

and Research (IJSR), 5(6), 1589-1594. doi:10.21275/v5i6.nov164512

 

Stefanski, K. M., Gardner, G. E., & Seipelt-Thiemann, R. L. (2016). Development of

aLacOperon concept inventory (LOCI). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(2),

1-11. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-07-0162

 

Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the

post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193-225.

doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731

 

Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns

in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81, 1-10.

doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453

 

Strand, S., & Boes, K. E. (2019). Drawing a link between genetic inheritance and

meiosis: A set of exercises for the undergraduate biology classroom. Journal

of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(2), 1-8.

doi:10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1733

 

Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In

R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive

psychology, and educational theory and practice (p. 147–176). Albany, NY:

SUNY Press.

 

Suherman, D. P., Purwianingsih, W., & Diana, S. (2018). Analisis hubungan

self-efficacy dan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar siswa sma berdasarkan

gender pada konsep genetika. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology

Education, 1(1), 14-20. doi:10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11450

 

Sulfemi, W. B. (2018). Hubungan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar IPS di SMP

Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutecno, 18(1), 1-12.

doi:10.31227/osf.io/u8nvd

 

Suratsih, Henuhili, V., Rahayu, T., & Hidayat, M. L. (2009). Pengembangan modul

pembelajaran genetika berbasis fenomena lokal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 28(2),

165-176.

 

Surendran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2019). Pembelajaran mod teradun berasaskan modul

interactive lecture dalam kalangan pelajar. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 22,

1-9. doi:10.32890/jps.22.2019.12672

 

Susanti, D., Fitriani, V., & Sari, L. Y. (2020). Validity of module based on project

based learning in media biology subject. Journal of Physics: Conference

Series, 1521, 042012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042012

 

Suwono, Hadi; Prasetyo, Triastono Imam; Lestari, Umie; Lukiati, Betty; Fachrunnisa,

Rifka; Kusairi, Sentot; Saefi, Muhammad; Fauzi, Ahmad; Atho'Illah,

Mochammad Fitri, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R.,

 

Saefi, S., & Atho'Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell biology diagnostic test (CBD-Test)

portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of

Biological Education, 55(1), 82-105.

 

Syaharom, A. (1990). Practical guide to educational research (Edisi terjemahan).

Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Tan, K. C. (2000). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to

evaluate secondary students’ conceptions of qualitative analysis (Disertasi

kedoktoran). Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia .

 

Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal of

Faculty of Education, 23, 259-266. diambil daripada

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6677/b6a7211f31f5ff9da14bede0b0c00a5004

15.pdf

 

Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2013). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A

linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science

Education, 44(1), 81-108. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9

 

Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2015). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics

learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in

Science Teaching, 53(9), 1385-1418. doi:10.1002/tea.21262

 

Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do

students retain or lose after instruction? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4),

ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310

 

Topcu, M. S., & Sahin-pekmez, E. (2009). Turkish middle school students’

difficulties in learning genetics concepts. Journal of Turkish Science

Education, 6(2), 55-62. diambil daripada

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2995/148cad2ebac1b7a8a09c39bbfa3bc789c7

9e.pdf

 

Tran, U. S., Hofer, A. A., & Voracek, M. (2014). Sex differences in general

knowledge: Meta-analysis and new data on the contribution of school-related

moderators among high-school students. Plos One, 9(10), e110391.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110391

 

Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’

misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2),

159-169. doi:10.1080/0950069880100204

 

Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif progresif. Surabaya,

Indonesia: Kencana.

 

Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary

students' conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2),

205-235. doi:10.1002/tea.20116

 

Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning

in genetics using a two‐tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of

Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. doi:10.1080/09500690902951429

 

Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science

program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching, 18(6), 489-495. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180603

 

Utomo, F. W., & Sugihartati, R. (2018). Diversitas persepsi masyarakat terhadap

pendidikan. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(2), 197-203.

doi:10.21831/socia.v15i2.22678

 

Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern language testing: A hand book (2nd ed.). New York:

Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

 

Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech high school students'

misconceptions about basic genetic concepts : Preliminary results. Journal of

Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738-745. diambil daripada

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312164010

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society : The development of higher psychological

processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.).

London, England: Harvard University Press.

 

Wan Norafifah, W. M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Flipped Classroom dalam pembelajaran

dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc) ke arah meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi

pelajar matrikulasi (Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris.

 

Webb, N. M., & Palincsar., A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C.

Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology.

Macmillan Library Reference USA: Prentice Hall International.

 

Weldon, L. C. (2014). Measuring difference in knowledge achievement and

satisfaction between viewing interactive and linear online learning modules

(Tesis sarjana). diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-1416

 

Williams, M., Montgomery, B. L., & Manokore, V. (2012). From phenotype to

genotype: Exploring middle school students' understanding of genetic

inheritance in a web-based environment. The American Biology Teacher,

74(1), 35-40. doi:10.1525/abt.2012.74.1.8

 

Wolyniak, M. J. (2013). Improved student linkage of Mendelian and molecular

genetic concepts through a yeast-based laboratory module. Biochemistry and

Molecular Biology Education, 41(3), 163-172. doi:10.1002/bmb.20679

 

Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases

students' understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular

Biology Education, 39(5), 344-351. doi:10.1002/bmb.20523

 

Yang, X., Hartman, M. R., Harrington, K. T., Etson, C. M., Fierman, M. B., Slonim,

D. K., & Walt, D. R. (2017). Using next-generation sequencing to explore

genetics and race in the high school classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education,

16(2), ar22. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-09-0281

 

Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and

remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of

Science Education, 20(4), 461-477. doi:10.1080/0950069980200406

 

Zalizan M. Jelas, M. J., Amla Salleh, S., Izwan Mahmud, M., Norzaini Azman, A.,

Hanizah Hamzah, H., Zaleha Abd. Hamid, A. H., & Rohana Jani, J. (2014).

Gender disparity in school participation and achievement: The case in

Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 62 – 68,

140, 62-68. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.387

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.