UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan membangun dan mengkaji kesan Modul Basic Concepts in
Genetics (BCG) terhadap penguasaan dan kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik
pelajar Biologi. Konsep asas genetik yang dikaji ialah gen (KG), kromosom (KK),
hubungan gen, kromosom dan DNA (HGK) serta hubungan pembahagian sel dan
pewarisan (HPP). Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan reka bentuk kajian
pembangunan berpandukan Model Sidek dan Jamaludin. Reka bentuk kuasi
eksperimen digunakan bagi menentukan keberkesanan modul. Seramai 64 pelajar
tingkatan empat dari dua buah sekolah di daerah Tawau dipilih melalui persampelan
rawak berstrata yang terdiri daripada 34 pelajar kumpulan eksperimen dan 30 pelajar
kumpulan kawalan. Instrumen kajian ialah Soal Selidik Persepsi Terhadap Modul dan
Ujian Pencapaian Konsep Asas Genetik. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan
inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan Modul BCG mempunyai kesahan yang baik
dengan indeks kesahan 0.94. Hasil analisis terhadap persepsi pelajar menunjukkan
nilai yang tinggi terhadap kualiti kandungan modul [Min=4.27], keberkesanan
[Min=4.36] dan kepuasan [Min=4.40]. Ujian-t menunjukkan perbezaan yang
signifikan terhadap skor antara kumpulan kawalan dan eksperimen bagi konsep KG
[F=0.002, p=0.968], KK [F=8.59, p=0.005], dan HGK [F=3.95, p=0.051] manakala
tiada perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap konsep HPP [F=6.10 p=0.016]. Ujian-t juga
menunjukkan perbezaan yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki dan perempuan terhadap
konsep KK [F=8.29, p=0.005] namun tiada perbezaan yang signifikan antara jantina
pelajar terhadap skor ujian KG, HGK dan HPP. Ujian-U Mann-Whitney pula
menunjukkan terdapat perbezaan skor yang signifikan antara pelajar lelaki kumpulan
kawalan dan eksperimen terhadap konsep HGK [U=19.5, z=-2.73, p=0.006] tetapi
tiada perbezaan signifikan antara jantina bagi kedua-dua kumpulan terhadap konsep
KG, KK, dan HPP. Oleh itu, kerangka alternatif yang disingkirkan adalah masingmasing
tujuh dan empat daripada kumpulan eksperimen dan kumpulan kawalan.
Kesimpulannya, intervensi menggunakan Modul BCG dalam pengajaran terbukti
dapat mengurangkan kerangka alternatif. Implikasi hasil kajian ialah Modul BCG ini
sesuai penggunaannya bagi meningkatkan penguasaan konsep asas genetik pelajar
Biologi. |
References |
Abdu Raheem, B. O. (2012). The influence of gender on secondary school students’ academic performance in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences, 31(1), 93-98. diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2012.11893018
Abdulatip, Suratsih, Henuhili Rahayu, Henuhili, V., & Rahayu, T. (2015). Penyusunan bahan ajar genetika dalam bentuk modul pembelajaran berbasis fenomena lokal. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 3(1), 59-64.
Abu Bakar, N. (1995). Penilaian afektif. Kajang, Malaysia: Masa Enterprise.
Ada, E. E. (2019). The effect of gender, self concept, socioeconomic status ofparents and type of school on students general academic achievement & students achievement in Biology:A case study of senior secondary school students in the Calabar Municipality, Nigeria. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(2), 194-201. doi:10.31142/ijtsrd20278
Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1981). Evaluating students progress: Principles of test and measurement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. Ahmed, M. A., Opatola, Y. M., Yahaya, L., & Sulaiman, M. M. (2018). Identification of alternative conceptions of genetics held by senior school students in Ilorin, Nigeria, using a three-tier diagnostic test. KIU Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 97-104.
Akmalia, R. M., & Sri Nurhayati, P. (2013). Pengembangan modul ipa terpadu berkarakter tema pemanasan global untuk siswa smp/mts. Unnes Science Education Journal, 2(1), 203-208. doi:10.15294/USEJ.V2I1.1824
Akyurek, E., & Afacan, Ö. (2012). Determining the 8th grade students’ misconceptions in the unit of “Cell Division” by using Roundhouse diagramming. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(3), 47-58. diambil daripada http://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/70/55
Alonemarera, A. (2020). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pendidikan biologi pada materi genetika menggunakan certainty of response indeks (Cri). Jurnal Biotek, 8(2), 109-122. doi:10.24252/jb.v8i2.16320
Altunoğlu, B. D., & Şeker, M. (2015). The understandings of genetics concepts and learning approach of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(1), 61-66. doi:10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61
Amalia, M., & Sidek, M. N. (2013). An application of the Sidek module development in REBT counseling intervention module design for orphans. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84(2013), 1481-1491. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.777
Amar, G. I., Suranto, S., & Sajidan, S. (2020). The use of a creative problem solving based genetic mutation module in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(3), 33-45. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n3p33
Amir Hoseyn, M. D. (2012). Kagan cooperative learning model: The bridge to foreign language learning in the third millennium. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(6), 1134-1140. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.6.1134-1140
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ang, C. T., & Lee, L. W. (2016). Instrumen penilaian kualiti untuk modul pengajaran : Pengujian ciri psikometrik. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 4(4), 25-43. diambil daripada https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/8209/5680
Anggraini, A., & Sukardi, S. (2015). Pengembangan modul prakarya dan kewirausahaan materi pengolahan berbasis product-oriented bagi peserta didik smk. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(3), 287. doi:10.21831/jpv.v5i3.6484
Ardiansyah, R., Corebima, A. D., & Rohman, F. (2017). Pengembangan bahan ajar mutasi genetik pada matakuliah genetika. Jurnal Pendidikan : Teori, Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 927-933.
Ari, D., & Sadi, O. (2019). Effectiveness of cooperative learning on students' achievement in genetics, self-efficacy, and conceptions of learning Biology. Inquiry in Education, 11(2), 1-20.
Arman, I. M. (2020). Effectiveness of blending the Posner and Stepans models of conceptual change in correcting misconceptions in 9th grade students. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(4), 10-17. doi:10.14445/23942703/ijhss-v7i4p102
Aronson, E., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., Blaney, N., & Snapp, M. (1978). The Jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Rozavieh, A. (1972). Introduction to research in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Astuti, L. S. (2017). Penguasaan konsep IPA ditinjau dari konsep diri dan minat belajar siswa. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40-45. doi:10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293
Atilboz, N. G. (2004). Understanding levels and concept misconceptions of high school 1 year students on mitosis and Parsley division topics. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(3), 147-157.
Aydin, G., & Balim, A. G. (2013). Students’ misconceptions related to subjects of cell division and heredity. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2, 338-348.
Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(1), 55-64.
Bailey, J. (2004). The validation of a scale to measure school principals' attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in regular schools. Australian Psychologist, 39(1), 76-87. doi:10.1080/00050060410001660371
Barroso, C., Carrion, G. C., Roldan, J. L., & Wang, H. (2010). Applying maximum likehood and PLS on different sample sizes: Studies on SERVQUAL model and employee behavior model. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, & J. Henseler (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 427-448). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Basri, S. (2007). Miskonsepsi berkaitan konsep asas genetik dalam kalangan bakal guru Pendidikan Sains (Biologi) (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Tanjong Malim, Perak.
Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Delucchi, K. (1993). Interaction processes and student outcomes in cooperative learning groups. The Elementary School Journal, 94(1), 19-32. doi:10.1086/461748
Batzli, J. M., Smith, A. R., Williams, P. H., McGee, S. A., Dósa, K., & Pfammatter, J. (2014). Beyond Punnett squares: Student word association and explanations of phenotypic variation through an integrative quantitative genetics unit investigating anthocyanin inheritance and expression in Brassica rapa fast plants. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 410-424. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0232
Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–An effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies (IRJIMS), 1(6), 65-74. diambil daripada http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1707-1438677336.pdf
Black, J. A., & Champion, D. J. (1976). Methods and issues in social research. New York: Wiley.
Bloom, B. S. (1977). Favorable learning conditions for all. Teacher, 95(3), 22-28.
Borg, W. R., Gall, J. P., & Gall, M. D. (1993). Applying educational research: A practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
Bozdağ, H. C., & Ok, G. (2019). Determination of the knowledge awareness and misconceptions of sixth grade students about the cell with four tier test. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 200-226. doi:10.17984/adyuebd.413369
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Broadwell, M. M. (1969). Teaching for learning. The Gospel Guardian, 20(41), 1-3. diambil daripada http://www.wordsfitlyspoken.org/gospel_guardian/v20/v20n41p3_image.html
Buerah, T., Shanah, N., & Hamimah, A. N. (2015). Delinkuen pelajar dan cadangan penyelesaiannya menerusi model pembangungan sahsiah remaja/pelajar muslim bersepadu. Jurnal Hadhari, 7(2), 11-30.
Castro‐Faix, M., Duncan, R. G., & Choi, J. (2020). Data‐driven refinements of a genetics learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1), 3-39. doi:10.1002/tea.21631
Celikler, D., & Aksan, Z. (2014). Determination of knowledge and misconceptions of pre-service elementary science teachers about the greenhouse effect by drawing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 452-456. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.355
Chan, S., & Pollard, D. E. (2001). An encyclopaedia of translation: Chinese - English, English - Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Chapman, A., & Georgiou, M. (2021). Powerful knowledge building and conceptual change research: Learning from research on 'historical accounts' in England and Cyprus. In A. Chapman (Ed.), Knowing history in schools (pp. 72-96). London: UCL Press.
Chattopadhyay, A. (2005). Understanding of genetic information in higher secondary students in Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Cell Biology Education, 4(1), 97-104. doi:10.1187/cbe.04-06-0042
Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Education, 2(3), 41-47. doi:10.5923/j.edu.20120203.04
Chen, Y. T., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Analyzing with Posner’s conceptual change model and Toulmin’s model of argumentative demonstration in senior high school students’ mathematic learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 457-464. doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.732
Chi, M. T. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
Chi, M. T., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Cimer, S. O. (2017). What makes a change unsuccessful through the eyes of teachers. International Education Studies, 11(1), 81. doi:10.5539/ies.v11n1p81
Clapper, T. C. (2015). Cooperative-based learning and the zone of proximal development. Simulation & Gaming, 46(2), 148-158. doi:10.1177/1046878115569044
Clark, D. C., & Mathis, P. M. (2000). Modeling mitosis & meiosis: A problem-solving activity. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 204-206. doi:10.2307/4450874
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. doi:10.1119/1.12989
Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2011). Business research methods (11th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill.
Cox, J. (2020, May 6). How to use the RoundRobin discussion teaching strategies. diambil daripada https://www.unige.ch/innovations-pedagogiques/application/files/1115/8877/8 105/Jorg_Balsiger_SocDur_How_to_Use_the_Round_Robin_Discussion_Tea ching_Strategies.pdf
Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of education measurement. New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
Dabell, J. (2019, January 27). The RoundRobin. Diambil pada 1 Januari, 2021, daripada https://johndabell.com/2019/02/16/the-round-robin/
Defi Firman, S. (2014). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan miskonsepsi siswa sma pada materi genetika (Master's thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia). Retrieved from http://repository.upi.edu/12639/
Dewi Murni. (2013). Identifikasi miskonsepsi mahasiswa pada konsep substansi genetika menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung, 1(1), 205-2011.
Dewi, P. Y., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26. doi:10.31763/ijele.v1i1.26
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 235-247. diambil daripada https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380539915_Dikmenli.pdf
Dixit, S., Bhardwaj, U. D., & Aniyan, A. T. (2020). A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of self-instructional module (SIM) regarding non-communicable diseases (NCD) among nursing officers in terms of knowledge. International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 6(4), 8-12. doi:10.24321/2455.9318.201926
Dorji, J., Tamang, S., Tshewang, T., Dorji, T., & Dorji, T. Y. (2018). Genetic diversity and population structure of three traditional horse breeds of Bhutan based on 29 DNA microsatellite markers. Plos One 13(6), 1-11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199376
Duda, H. J. (2016). International Conference On Education. Malang, Indonesia: Graduate School, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Duncan, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959. doi:10.1002/tea.20186
Duncan, R. G., & Tseng, K. A. (2010). Designing project-based instruction to foster generative and mechanistic understandings in genetics. Science Education, 95(1), 21-56. doi:10.1002/sce.20407
Duncan, R. G., Castro-Faix, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Informing a learning progression in genetics: Which should be taught first, Mendelian inheritance or the central dogma of molecular biology? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 445-472. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9568-3
Duncan, R. G., Choi, J., Castro-Faix, M., & Cavera, V. L. (2017). A study of two instructional sequences informed by alternative learning progressions in genetics. Science & Education, 26(10), 1115-1141. doi:10.1007/s11191-017-9932-0
Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students' understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674. doi:10.1002/tea.20312
Dwisetyaningrum, Y., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pengembangan modul fisika sma berbasis science technology society pada materi elastisitas untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan hasil belajar siswa. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 29-39. doi:10.20961/inkuiri.v8i1.31806
Ebel, R. I. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Edward, G. C., & Richard, A. Z. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. USA: Sage Publication, Inc.
Emre, I., & Bahsi, M. (2006). Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about cell division. Research of Eastern Anatolia Region, 4(3), 70-73.
Eryilmaz, M., & Cigdemoglu, C. (2018). Individual flipped learning and cooperative flipped learning: Their effects on students’ performance, social, and computer anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432-442. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1522652
Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121-128. doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6
Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 139-147. doi:10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8
Fadlillah, M. (2018). Persepsi mahasiswa PG-PAUD Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo terhadap PAUD di Kabupaten Ponorogo,. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 2(1), 117-127.
Fairuz, M., Mohammad, S., & Mohd Sollah, M. (2019). Persepsi pelajar terhadap Modul Cerita Nahu (MCN). Asia Pasific Online Journal of Arabic Studies, 3(1), 116. Retrieved from http://mjs.um.edu.my/index.php/APOJAS/article/view/21816
Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331
Fauzi, A., & Mitalistiani, M. (2018). High school biology topics that perceived difficult by undergraduate students. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 73-84. doi:10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1242
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2017). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271-298. doi:10.1002/tea.21419
Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1400-4
Gallagher, J. M., & Reid, D. K. (2002). The learning theory of Piaget & Inhelder. NE: Author Choice Press.
Garba, A., Ismail, N., Osman, S., & Rameli, M. R. (2020). Exploring peer effect on mathematics anxiety among secondary school students of Sokoto state, Nigeria through photovoice approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 2-12. doi:10.29333/ejmste/112622
Geldsetzer, P., & Fawzi, W. (2017). Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, 12-16. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.015
Goldschmid, B., & Goldschmid, M. L. (1973). Modular instruction in higher education: A review. Higher Education, 2(1), 15-32. doi:10.1007/bf00162534
González, N., & Rossi, A. (2016). Examining pedagogical knowledge content on mitosis in a university context. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 3(2), 79-106. doi:10.4995/muse.2016.4653
Grace, E. N. (2017). Facilitating students understanding of biological phenomena using conceptual change instructional model in Enugu metropolis, Nigeria. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 8(4), 2775-2780. doi:10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2017.0366
Greager, J., & Murray, D. (1991). The use of modules in college teaching. Nichols Publishing Co., Inc.
Gurian, M., & Stevens, K. (2004). With boys and girls in mind. Educational Leadership, 62(3), 21-26. diambil daripada http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/nov04/vol62/num03/ With-Boys-and-Girls-in-Mind.aspx
Guskey, T. R. (2007). Closing achievement gaps: Revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s “learning for mastery”. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(1), 8-31. diambil daripada https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.4219/jaa-2007-704
Gusmalini, A., Wulandari, S., & Zulfarina. (2020). Universitas Riau International Conference on Science and Environment 2020 (URICSE-2020). Riau, Indonesia: IOP Publishing.
Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 197-209. doi:10.1002/tea.3660210210
Hadjichambis, A. C., Georgiou, Y., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Kyza, E. A., & Mappouras, D. (2015). Investigating the effectiveness of an inquiry-based intervention on human reproduction in relation to students’ gender, prior knowledge and motivation for learning in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 261-274. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1067241
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer om partial least squares structural equation modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hakim, A., Liliasari, L., Kadarohman, A., & Syah, Y. M. (2016). Effects of the natural product mini project laboratory on the students conceptual understanding. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(2), 27-36. diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10165a
Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: An Ontario perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1). doi:10.22329/jtl.v8i1.3004
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
Haskel-Ittah, M., & Yarden, A. (2018). Students’ conception of genetic phenomena and its effect on their ability to understand the underlying mechanism. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), 1-9. doi:10.1187/cbe.18-01-0014
Hasnah, M., Zaidatun, T., & Baharuddin, A. (2014, August). Pengaruh gaya kognitif terhadap pencapaian pelajar. Kertas dibentangkan pada Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. diambil daripada https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270272732_PENGARUH_GAYA_ KOGNITIF_TERHADAP_PENCAPAIAN_PELAJAR
Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Nik Yusuff, N. A., & Mansor, R. (2017). Development of higher order thinking skills module in science primary school: Needs analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 624-628.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (2002). Young children's thinking about biological world (1st ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Hayashi, Y., Fukamachi, K. I., & Komatsugawa, H. (2015, April). Collaborative learning in computer programming courses that adopted the flipped classroom. Kertas dibentangkan pada 2015 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, Taipei. diambil daripada https://ieeexplore.ieee.org
Helmers, M. J., Youngquist, T. D., & Grudens-Schuck, N. (2019). Novel use if conceptual change framework improves video on challenging science topic. Journal of Extension, 57(1), 1-4. Retrieved from https://www.nrem.iastate.edu/research/STRIPS/files/publication/novel_use_of _conceptual_change_framework_improves_video_on_challenging_science_to pic.pdf
Hemmerich, J. A., Van Voorhis, K., & Wiley, J. (2016). Anomalous evidence, confidence change, and theory change. Cognitive Science, 40(6), 1534-1560. doi:10.1111/cogs.12289
Heri, S., Steven, O., & Mutiara, G. P. (2018). Isu kesetaraan gender dalam optik feminist. Jurisprudence, 5(2), 121-140. diambil daripada journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Jurisprudent
Hobri, Dafik, & Anowar, H. (2018). The implementation of learning together in improving students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 483-496. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11233a
Hobri. (2010). Metodologi penelitian pengembangan (Aplikasi pada penelitian pendidikan matematika). Jember, Indonesia: Pena Salsabila.
Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics : A critical thinking approach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Jibrin, A. G., & Zayum, D. S. (2012). Effect of concept mapping teaching strategy on the academic achievement of senior secondary school students in genetics. Journal of Science, Technology & Education, 1(1), 49-53. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270592954
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Impact ff cooperative-team learning on performance and retention (NOOO1 4-87-K-021 8). diambil daripada University of Minnesota website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235154420_Impact_of_Cooperative- Team_Learning_on_Performance_and_Retention_of_Navy_Air-Traffic_Contr oller_Trainees
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1990). Circles of learning : Cooperation in the classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MI: Interaction Book Co.,.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Retrieved from https://karlsmithmn.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Johnson-Johnson-Smith- Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf
Johnstone, A. H., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166. doi:10.1080/00219266.1980.10668983
Juhairiah, J., Danaryanti, A., & Sukmawati, R. A. (2018). Pengembangan buku siswa dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi persamaan linear satu variabel untuk siswa sekolah menengah pertama. Edu-Mat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1). doi:10.20527/edumat.v6i1.5129
Juwantara, R. A. (2019). Analisis teori perkembangan kognitif Piaget pada tahap anak usia operasional konkret 7-12 tahun dalam pembelajaran matematika. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 9(1), 27. doi:10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v9i1.3011
Kagan, S. (2003). A brief history of Kagan structures. diambil daripada https://www.kaganonline.com/free_articles/dr_spencer_kagan/256/A-Brief-Hi story-of-Kagan-Structures
Kalaian, S., Kasim, R., & Nims, J. (2018). Effectiveness of small-group learning pedagogies in engineering and technology education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Technology Education, 29(2), 20-35. doi:10.21061/jte.v29i2.a.2
Karsono, A. D. (1993). Konsep dan sistem pendidikan jarak jauh. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Kerlinger, E. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.
Khaerunnisa, E. (2016). Studi deskriptif adversity quotient matematis. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 83-92.
Khaerunnisa. (2020). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis karya ilmiah melalui pendekatan kolaboratif. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 61-66. doi:10.30651/st.v13i1.3762
Kiboss, J. K., Ndirangu, M., & Wekesa, E. W. (2004). Effectiveness of a computer-mediated simulations program in school biology on pupils' learning outcomes in cell theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 207-213. doi:10.1023/b:jost.0000031259.76872.f1
Kilıç, D., Taber, K. S., & Winterbottom, M. (2016). A cross-national study of students’ understanding of genetics concepts: Implications from similarities and differences in England and Turkey. Education Research International, 2016, 1-14. doi:10.1155/2016/6539626
Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the use of the ASSURE model by K–12 teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153-168. doi:10.1080/07380569.2016.1203208
King, C. J. (2009). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565-601. doi:10.1080/09500690902721681
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research. doi:10.4135/9781412985659
Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D. N., Vanlaar, G., Reynolds, C., & Namusisi, S. (2016). How do student and classroom characteristics affect attitude toward mathematics? A multivariate multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 1-21. doi:10.1080/09243453.2016.1201123
Knippels, M. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108-112. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (p. 231–278). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumandaş, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2018). Misconceptions in biology: A meta-synthesis study of research, 2000–2014. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 350-364. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798
Kurt, H., Ekici, G., Aksu, Ö., & Aktaş, M. (2013). Determining cognitive structures and alternative conceptions on the concept of reproduction (The case of pre-service biology teachers). Creative Education, 04(09), 572-587. doi:10.4236/ce.2013.49083
Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
Laila Puspita. (2019). Pengembangan modul berbasis keterampilan proses sains sebagai bahan ajar dalam pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 79-88. doi:10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22530
Laimeheriwa, B. M. (2018). The genetic research methods and its role in aquaculture on Indonesia. Oceanography & Fisheries Open access Journal, 8(3), 1-23. doi:10.19080/ofoaj.2018.08.555738
Laninga‐Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Garandeau, C. F., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. A. (2019). Classroom popularity hierarchy predicts prosocial and aggressive popularity norms across the school year. Child Development, 90(5), 637-653. doi:10.1111/cdev.13228
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2018). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2017 Biologi 2 4551/2. diambil daripada Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia website: http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2017/BIOLOGI%2 02%20(4551_2).pdf
Lewis, J., & Kattmann, U. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re‐visiting students’ understandings of genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 195-206. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072782
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. doi:10.1080/095006900289949
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). All in the genes? — young people's understanding of the nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74-79. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655689
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000c). What's in a cell? — young people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129-132. doi:10.1080/00219266.2000.9655702
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276
Linke, R. D., & Venz, M. I. (1979). Misconceptions in physical science among non-science background students: II. Research in Science Education, 9(1), 103-109. doi:10.1007/bf02359149
Longden, B. (1982). Genetics—are there inherent learning difficulties? Journal of Biological Education, 16(2), 135-140. doi:10.1080/00219266.1982.9654439
Luksa, T., Radanovis, I., Garasis, D., & Sertis Peris, M. (2016). Misconceptions of primary and high school students related tothe biological concept of human reproduction,cell life cycle and molecular basis of heredity. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(3), 143-160. diambil daripada https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/845394.Luksa_i_sur_2016.pdf
Machová, M., & Ehler, E. (2021). Secondary school students’ misconceptions in genetics: Origins and solutions. Journal of Biological Education, 1-14. doi:10.1080/00219266.2021.1933136
Majzub, R. M., & Rais, M. M. (2010). Boys’ underachievement: Male versus female teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 685-690. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.093
Marshall, P. A. (2008). Mapping linked genes in drosophila melanogaster using data from the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross. The American Biology Teacher, 70(9), 554-556. doi:10.2307/27669342
Marshall, P. (2006). The power to transform: Leadership that brings learning and schooling to life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mbajiorgu, N. M., Ezechi, N. G., & Idoko, E. C. (2007). Addressing nonscientific presuppositions in genetics using a conceptual cha
McGuirk, P. M., & O'Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in human geography (pp. 246-273). (pp. 246-273). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.
Meade, M. E., Wammes, J. D., & Fernandes, M. A. (2018). Drawing as an encoding tool: Memorial benefits in younger and older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 44(5), 369-396. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2018.1521432
Mensah, F. K., & Kiernan, K. E. (2010). Gender differences in educational attainment: Influences of the family environment. British Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 239-260. doi:10.1080/01411920902802198
Mertens, T. R., & Walker, J. O. (1992). A paper-& pencil strategy for teaching mitosis & meiosis, diagnosing learning problems & predicting examination performance. The American Biology Teacher, 54(8), 470-474. doi:10.2307/4449552
Midgley, C. (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. diambil daripada https://www.questia.com/library/104586992/goals-goal-structures-and-pattern s-of-adaptive-learning
Mital, S., Musunuru, K., Garg, V., Russell, M. W., Lanfear, D. E., Gupta, R. M., … Hickey, K. T. (2016). Enhancing literacy in cardiovascular genetics: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 9(5), 448-467. doi:10.1161/hcg.0000000000000031
Mohd Majid, K. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (4th ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Mohd Majid, K. (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
Mohd Syaubari, O., & Ahmad Yusuf, K. (2018). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen komposisi pengajaran guru pendidikan islam sekolah rendah yang mengintegrasikan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi (KBAT) menerusi pengajaran akidah. Sains Humanika, 10(3). doi:10.11113/sh.v10n3.1297
Mohd Yusof, K., Wan Alwi, S., Sadikin, A., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2015). Inculcating sustainability among first-year engineering students using cooperative problem-based learning. Sustainability in Higher Education, 67-95. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100367-1.00004-4
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd ed.). Michigan: Wiley.
Mosher, B. (2007, November 2). Is your learning about mastery or competency? diambil daripada https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2007/11/02/is-your-learning-about-mast ery-or-competency/
Muela, F. J., & Abril, A. M. (2014). Genetics and cinema: Personal misconceptions that constitute obstacles to learning. International Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 260-280. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.817026
Muhammad Ridho, F. (2020). Efektivitas layanan bimbingan belajar melalui teknik motivational interviewing untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar peserta didik kelas XI di SMAN 9 Bandar Lampung tahun pembelajaran 2019/2020 (Master's thesis, UIN Raden Intan, Lampung, Indonesia). diambil daripada http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/id/eprint/12191
Muhammad Sabri, S., Nor Aziah, A., Zawawi, I., & Nurulhuda, O. (2012). Employing design and development research (DDR) approaches in design and development of online arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2), 108-119. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ989018
Muhammad Wahyu, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran biologi berbasis pendekatan saintifik untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 3(2), 102-112. doi:10.26858/est.v3i2.3468
Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi : Konsep, karakteristik, implementasi, dan inovasi. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murray, G. T. (1985). The international encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press Ltd.
Murtafiah, M., & Amin, N. (2018). Pengaruh gaya kognitif dan gender terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 11(1), 75-82. doi:10.30870/jppm.v11i1.2986
Musa, A. K., Dauda, B., & Umar, M. A. (2016). Gender differences in achievement goals and performances in English Language and Mathematics of senior secondary schools students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 165-175. diambil daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115862.pdf
Muslimin, M. S., Mohd Nordin, N., Mansor, A. Z., & Md Yunus, M. (2017). The design and development of MobiEko: A mobile educational app for microeconomics module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (Special Issue), 221-255. doi:10.32890/mjli.2017.7804
Newman, D. L., Catavero, C. M., & Wright, L. K. (2012). Students fail to transfer knowledge of chromosome structure to topics pertaining to cell division. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 425-436. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-01-0003
Noperi, H., Sarwanto, S., & Aminah, N. S. (2021). Pengembangan modul ilustratif berbasis inkuiri terbimbing bermuatan pendidikan karakter. Science and Physics Education Journal, 4(2), 70-81. doi:10.31539/spej.v4i2.2392
Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2012). Developing a social constructivist teaching and learning module on DNA for high school students in Thailand. In Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development (pp. 233-240). Brill.
Noraini, N., Sarina, M. N., Rushami, Z. Y., & Abdul Aziz, O. (2016). Isu kesahan dalaman terhadap kaedah penyelidikan kuasi eksperimen di dalam pendidikan keusahawanan. Asean Entrepreneuship Journal, 2(2), 90-97.
Norhashim, A. S., Mazenah, Y., & Rose Alinda, A. (1998). Pengajaran bantuan komputer. Skudai : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Nowak, G. T. (1986). Western Michigan University career guidance inventory manual. Michigan: Western Michigan University Testing and Evaluation Services.
Nur Fazirah, R., & Eng Tek, O. (2008). Keberkesanan penggunaan modul nota mitosis dan meiosis dan sikap pelajar terhadap penggunaannya bagi Biologi Tingkatan 4 (Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nur Salimah, A., Huzili, H., Junainor, H., Nor Syamimi, M. A., Mohamad Hashim, 0. O., & Kamarudin, H. (2018, February). Perception of teacher on cooperative learning. Paper presented at Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017), Universiti Malaysia Perlis.
Nur Syarima, S., Mariny, A. G., & Yahaya, M. (2020). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen ketara sedar sekolah (KSS) dan pendidikan abad ke-21 (PAK21) berdasarkan analisis PLS-SEM. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(4), 106-119.
Nurhazwani, M. S., Najwa Husna, S., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Exploring pre-university students’ manipulative skills and understanding on mitosis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 1-8. diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol10.1.1.2020
Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi, R. (2018). Preliminary studies of analyzing misconception and scientific argumentation using diagnostic question clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetics concept. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 43-53. doi:10.15575/bioeduin.v8i2.3190
Nurlaila, L., Sriyati, S., & Riandi. (2017). Analizing student biology education misconception and scientific argumentation ability using diagnostic question clusters (Dqcs) of molecular genetic concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1-7. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012112
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183-200. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414279
Nwagbo, C., & Obiekwe, C. (2010). Effects of constructivist instructional approach on students’ achievement in basic ecological concepts in biology. Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 45(1), 26-35.
Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. doi:10.9790/7388-05616670
Ong, E. T., & Tan, S. C. (2012). Keberkesanan kaedah “Numbered Heads Together” terhadap pencapaian Biologi dalam kalangan pelajar di Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Jurnal Teknologi, 53(1), 35-46. doi:10.11113/jt.v53.112
Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: Skewness to test normality for mean comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 236-246. doi:10.21449/ijate.656077
Othman, M. (2000). Prinsip psikoterapi dan pengurusan dalam kaunseling. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Ozcan, T., Yildirim, O., & Ozgur, S. (2012). Determining of the university freshmen students’ misconceptions and alternative conceptions about mitosis and meiosis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 3677-3680. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.126
Oztap, H., Ozay, E., & Oztap, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: An investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15. doi:10.1080/00219266.2003.9655890
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). China: Everbest Printing Co. Ltd.
Pasion, R. (2019). The efficacy of strategic intervention materials (SIMS) in teaching social studies among third year high school students. SMCC Higher Education Research Journal, 6(1), 175-187. doi:10.18868/sherj6j.06.010119.11
Patrick, A. O. (2012). Unequal achievement of science undergraduates: Does sex influence the differences? US-China Education Review, 6, 578-594. diambil daripada https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535484.pdf
Perez-Felkner, L. (2015). Attitude differences and gender. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 93-94). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_351
Poh, B. T., & Ng, H. K. (2008). Kesan faktor jantina, etnik dan gaya kognitif ke atas pencapaian Pengajian Am. Journal of Educators & Education, 23, 123-140.
Popi, S., Deby Putri, P., & Yesni, O. (2021, June 30). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika "Analisis model pengembangan bahan ajar (4D, ADDIE, ASSURE, Hannafin dan Peck)". Retrieved from https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/7bydx/
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Prakash, M., Raj, B., Khanal, B., Krishna, R., & Belbase, S. (2021). Eighth grade students’ misconceptions and errors in mathematics learning in Nepal. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1101-1121. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1101
Prastyo, D. D., Amin, M., & Susanto, H. (2021). Effectiveness of genetic module to reduce misconception levels and improve cognitive learning outcomes of grade XII students of SMA Negeri 5 Malang. Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI), Vol. 2 (2), 2021, 2(2), 89-97.
Price, C. G., Knee, E. M., Miller, J. A., Shin, D., Mann, J., Crist, D. K., … Grotewold, E. (2018). Following phenotypes: An exploration of mendelian genetics using arabidopsis plants. The American Biology Teacher, 80(4), 291-300. doi:10.1525/abt.2018.80.4.291
Quillin, K., & Thomas, S. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es2. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
Radanoviš, I., Lukša, Ţ., Garašiš, D., Bastiš, M, Markoviš, N., Furlan, Z., Dolenec, T., Begiš,V., Kapov, S., Štigliš, N. & Petraţ, T., I., Lukša, T., Garašiš, D., Bastiš, M., Markoviš, N., Furlan, Z., & Dolenec, T. (2011). External evaluation exams in Biology in the eighth grade in the school year 2010/2011 - Main examination. (pp. 1-114). diambil daripada National Center for External Evaluation of Education, Zagreb website: http://dokumenti.ncvvo.hr/OS/Izvjesca/izvjesce_bio_2010_2011.pdf
Rafiee, J., & Hafsah, T. (2020). Analisis keperluan kebolehgunaan aplikasi mudah alih terhadap sikap, minat dan pengetahuan asas matematik tahun 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(1), 9-15.
Rahdiyanta, D. (2012). Teknik penyusunan modul [PDF]. diambil daripada http://staffnew.uny.ac.id/staff/131569341
Ramli, I., Jamal, N., & Marinah, A. (2020). Analisis data dan pelaporan dalam penyelidikan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Ria Rosita. (2018). Improving the high school students' appeal and effectiveness in the history learning through inquiry based digital module design. Social Science Learning Education Journal, 03(12), 01-09. doi:10.15520/sslej.v3i12.2377
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rodríguez Gil, S. G., Fradkin, M., & Castañeda-Sortibrán, A. N. (2019). Conceptions of meiosis: Misunderstandings among university students and errors. Journal of Biological Education, 53(2), 191-204. doi:10.1080/00219266.2018.1469531
Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan teori Piaget dan Vygotsky ruang lingkup bilangan dan aljabar pada siswa mts plus Karangwangi. Prisma, 9(1), 65. doi:10.35194/jp.v9i1.886
Roini, C., & Sundari. (2018). Using certainty of responses index (CRI) for assessment to identify graduate students’ misconceptions in genetics. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning. doi:10.5220/0008899502110217
Roseman, J. E., Caldwell, A., Gogos, A., & Kurth, L. (2006). Mapping a coherent learning progression for the molecular basis of heredity. diambil daripada American Association for the Advancement of Science website: http://www.project2061.org/publications/articles/papers/narst2006.pdf
Rosenberg, M. (2012, May 21). Beyond competence: It’s the journey to mastery that counts. Learning Solutions Magazine. diambil daripada www.learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/930/beyondcompetence-its-the-journ ey-to-masterythat-counts
Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2007). Using a computer animation to teach high school molecular biology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 49-58. doi:10.1007/s10956-007-9080-4
Rotbain, Y., Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2005). Understanding molecular genetics through a drawing-based activity. Journal of Biological Education, 39(4), 174-178. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9655992
Rulina, S. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran koperatif tipe student facilitator and explaning untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar ips terpadu. Wahana Inovasi, 3(2), 384-399. diambil daripada http://penelitian.uisu.ac.id/
Russel, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction: A guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular materials. New York: Publishing Company.
Sadiah, B. (2008). Kesan paduan kitar pembelajaran dan pemetaan konsep terhadap konsepsi pelajar tentang pembahagian sel (Disertasi kedoktoran, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Pulau Pinang). diambil daripada http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/9964
Safrida, S., Dewi, C. R., & Abdullah, A. (2017). Penggunaan modul dan media animasi dalam mengurangi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi sistem peredaran darah di SMAN 5 Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pencerahan, 11(1), 39-45.
Saper, M. N., Mohd Daud, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan Modul I-Sc (Islamic spiritual counseling) ke atas pelajar bermasalah tingkah laku. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9(1), 32-43. doi:10.24035/ijit.09.2016.004
Sharifah Alwiah, A. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas kepada modul pengajaran dan modul pembelajaran. Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 46-57. diambil daripada http://apjee.usm.my/vol03_1981.html
Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2014). A tri-part model for genetics literacy: Exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485-507. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y
Sidek, M. N. (1997). Modul penilaian dalam kaunseling. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Sidek, M. N., & Jamaludin, A. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Serdang, Malaysia: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Siritunga, D., Montero-Rojas, M., Carrero, K., Toro, G., Vélez, A., & Carrero-Martínez, F. A. (2011). Culturally relevant inquiry-based laboratory module implementations in upper-division genetics and cell biology teaching laboratories. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 287-297. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-04-0035
Siti Ramdiah, & Corebima, A. D. (2014). Learning strategy equalizing students’ achievement, metacognitive and critical thinking skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 577-584. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-3
Siti Seri Kartini, M. Y., Salmiza, S., Hutkemri, & Yew, W. T. (2021). Development and usability of B-Geo module in differentiation topic using ASSURE model of instructional design. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies, 3(1), 94-117.
Siti Shahida, M. A., & Che Nidzam, C. A. (2014). Penggunaan modul pembelajaran dan pengajaran berasaskan analogi terhadap pencapaian pelajar bagi topik Enzim dalam biologi tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 4(2), 91-103.
Slavin, R. E. (2015). Cooperative learning in elementary schools. Education, 43(1), 5-14. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.963370
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 315-342. doi:10.3102/00346543050002315
Slavin, R. E. (2008). Cooperative learning, success for all, and evidence-based reform in education. Éducation et didactique, 2(2), 149-157. doi:10.4000/educationdidactique.334
Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to document persistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses. Genetics, 191(1), 21-32. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.137810
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51. doi:10.3102/00346543069001021
Sri Wardani, Sri Nurhayati, & Aulia Safitri. (2016). The effectiveness of the guided inquiry learning module towards students. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(6), 1589-1594. doi:10.21275/v5i6.nov164512
Stefanski, K. M., Gardner, G. E., & Seipelt-Thiemann, R. L. (2016). Development of aLacOperon concept inventory (LOCI). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(2), 1-11. doi:10.1187/cbe.15-07-0162
Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193-225. doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns in students across developed countries. Intelligence, 81, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453
Strand, S., & Boes, K. E. (2019). Drawing a link between genetic inheritance and meiosis: A set of exercises for the undergraduate biology classroom. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(2), 1-8. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1733
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (p. 147–176). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Suherman, D. P., Purwianingsih, W., & Diana, S. (2018). Analisis hubungan self-efficacy dan metakognitif terhadap hasil belajar siswa sma berdasarkan gender pada konsep genetika. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 1(1), 14-20. doi:10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11450
Sulfemi, W. B. (2018). Hubungan motivasi belajar dengan hasil belajar IPS di SMP Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutecno, 18(1), 1-12. doi:10.31227/osf.io/u8nvd
Suratsih, Henuhili, V., Rahayu, T., & Hidayat, M. L. (2009). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran genetika berbasis fenomena lokal. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 28(2), 165-176.
Surendran, S., & Norazlinda, S. (2019). Pembelajaran mod teradun berasaskan modul interactive lecture dalam kalangan pelajar. Jurnal Pembangunan Sosial, 22, 1-9. doi:10.32890/jps.22.2019.12672
Susanti, D., Fitriani, V., & Sari, L. Y. (2020). Validity of module based on project based learning in media biology subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 042012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042012
Suwono, Hadi; Prasetyo, Triastono Imam; Lestari, Umie; Lukiati, Betty; Fachrunnisa, Rifka; Kusairi, Sentot; Saefi, Muhammad; Fauzi, Ahmad; Atho'Illah, Mochammad Fitri, H., Prasetyo, T. I., Lestari, U., Lukiati, B., Fachrunnisa, R.,
Saefi, S., & Atho'Illah, M. F. (2021). Cell biology diagnostic test (CBD-Test) portrays pre-service teacher misconceptions about biology cell. Journal of Biological Education, 55(1), 82-105.
Syaharom, A. (1990). Practical guide to educational research (Edisi terjemahan). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Tan, K. C. (2000). Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate secondary students’ conceptions of qualitative analysis (Disertasi kedoktoran). Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia .
Tekkaya, C. (2002). Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal of Faculty of Education, 23, 259-266. diambil daripada https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6677/b6a7211f31f5ff9da14bede0b0c00a5004 15.pdf
Thörne, K., & Gericke, N. (2013). Teaching genetics in secondary classrooms: A linguistic analysis of teachers’ talk about proteins. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 81-108. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9375-9
Todd, A., & Kenyon, L. (2015). Empirical refinements of a molecular genetics learning progression: The molecular constructs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(9), 1385-1418. doi:10.1002/tea.21262
Todd, A., & Romine, W. (2018). The learning loss effect in genetics: What ideas do students retain or lose after instruction? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(4), ar55. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-10-0310
Topcu, M. S., & Sahin-pekmez, E. (2009). Turkish middle school students’ difficulties in learning genetics concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2), 55-62. diambil daripada https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2995/148cad2ebac1b7a8a09c39bbfa3bc789c7 9e.pdf
Tran, U. S., Hofer, A. A., & Voracek, M. (2014). Sex differences in general knowledge: Meta-analysis and new data on the contribution of school-related moderators among high-school students. Plos One, 9(10), e110391. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110391
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. doi:10.1080/0950069880100204
Trianto. (2009). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif progresif. Surabaya, Indonesia: Kencana.
Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary students' conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 205-235. doi:10.1002/tea.20116
Tsui, C., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two‐tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073-1098. doi:10.1080/09500690902951429
Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 489-495. doi:10.1002/tea.3660180603
Utomo, F. W., & Sugihartati, R. (2018). Diversitas persepsi masyarakat terhadap pendidikan. SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 15(2), 197-203. doi:10.21831/socia.v15i2.22678
Valette, R. M. (1977). Modern language testing: A hand book (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Vlckova, J., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2016). Czech high school students' misconceptions about basic genetic concepts : Preliminary results. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(6), 738-745. diambil daripada https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312164010
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). London, England: Harvard University Press.
Wan Norafifah, W. M. (2018). Pelaksanaan Flipped Classroom dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (pdpc) ke arah meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar matrikulasi (Unpublished master's thesis). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar., A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Macmillan Library Reference USA: Prentice Hall International.
Weldon, L. C. (2014). Measuring difference in knowledge achievement and satisfaction between viewing interactive and linear online learning modules (Tesis sarjana). diambil daripada https://doi.org/10.31274/etd-180810-1416
Williams, M., Montgomery, B. L., & Manokore, V. (2012). From phenotype to genotype: Exploring middle school students' understanding of genetic inheritance in a web-based environment. The American Biology Teacher, 74(1), 35-40. doi:10.1525/abt.2012.74.1.8
Wolyniak, M. J. (2013). Improved student linkage of Mendelian and molecular genetic concepts through a yeast-based laboratory module. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 41(3), 163-172. doi:10.1002/bmb.20679
Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases students' understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(5), 344-351. doi:10.1002/bmb.20523
Yang, X., Hartman, M. R., Harrington, K. T., Etson, C. M., Fierman, M. B., Slonim, D. K., & Walt, D. R. (2017). Using next-generation sequencing to explore genetics and race in the high school classroom. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar22. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-09-0281
Yip, D. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461-477. doi:10.1080/0950069980200406
Zalizan M. Jelas, M. J., Amla Salleh, S., Izwan Mahmud, M., Norzaini Azman, A., Hanizah Hamzah, H., Zaleha Abd. Hamid, A. H., & Rohana Jani, J. (2014). Gender disparity in school participation and achievement: The case in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 62 – 68, 140, 62-68. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.387
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |