UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)

Perceived usefulness of Instagram as a marketing tool in Higher Education Institutions

AVAILABLE Article 635 Views
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Login required to access this item.
General Information Cached
Title
Perceived usefulness of Instagram as a marketing tool in Higher Education Institutions
Type
Article
Main Author
Rusliana Rusle
Additional Authors
  • Jastini Mohd Jamil
  • Mohamad Fadli Zolkipli
  • Izwan Nizal Mohd Shaharanee
Subject
L Education (General)
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjong Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of publication
2021
Degree Type
Not related
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

Social media marketing, including the use of Instagram, is becoming a prevalent part of the promotional marketing mix by higher education institution. This study investigates the factors that influence the perceived usefulness of Instagram as a marketing tool in Higher Education Institutions specifically in Community College in Malaysia. An online questionnaire was used to collect data from the 278 semester one community college students in Pahang. Based on the results, most of the participants were Malay male at the age of 18 years old which were familiar with Instagram and frequently used the application. The results show that there is no difference between gender towards perceived usefulness of social media. The results also indicate that all the hypotheses suggested have been positive and significant. It is worth noting that there were strong connections between hedonic value and co-creation value towards perceived usefulness of social media as the marketing tools in higher education institutions. Additionally, this article contributes practically by providing some guidelines on Instagram advertising.

References

Abdullah, D. (2019). Diversity and Inclusivity of Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific. Asia Pacific Education Review, March.

Appel, G., Grewal, L., Hadi, R., & Stephen, A. T. (2020). The future of social media in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1

Betz, C. L. (2019). Generations X, Y, and Z. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 44, A7–A8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2018.12.013

Dao, W. V. T., Le, A. N. H., Cheng, J. M. S., & Chen, D. C. (2014). Social media advertising value: The case of transitional economies in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Advertising, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-33-2-271-294

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). Instafamous’ – credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information Communication and Society, 22(10), 1432-1446.

Gaber, H. R., Wright, L. T., & Kooli, K. (2019). Consumer attitudes towards Instagram advertisements in Egypt: The role of the perceived advertising value and personalization. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1618431

Hair, F. J., Black, B., Babin, J. B., Anderson, E. R., & Tatham , R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson University Press.

Howell, C. G. (2018). Social Media Marketing and College Choice : A Phenomenological Study. PhD Dissertation. Northcentral University School of Business.

Kannan, P. K., & Li, H. “Alice.” (2017). Digital marketing: A framework, review and research agenda. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006

Kusumawati, A. (2019). Impact of Digital Marketing on Student Decision-Making Process of Higher Education Institution: A Case of Indonesia. Journal of E-Learning and Higher Education, 2019, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.267057

Lin, X., & Wang, X. (2020). Examining gender differences in people’s information-sharing decisions on social networking sites. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 45-56.

Madar, M., & Willis, O. (2014). Strategic Model Of Implementing E-Learning. Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3(5), 3–6.

Maresova, P., & Hruska, J. (2020). Social Media University Branding. Education Sciences, 10(3), 1 –14.

Musselin, C. (2018). New forms of competition in higher. Socio-Economic Review, 16(3), 657–683.16(3), 657–683. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy033

Paladan, N. N. (2019). Higher Education Institutions Embracing Digital & Social Media Marketing: A Case of Top 25 Universities in Asia & Africa. SSRN Electronic Journal, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347018

Paymaei, H. (2019). An Investigation On The Impact Of Social Media Advertising On The Brand Equity. PhD Dissertation. Faculty of the California School of Management and Leadership Alliant International University San Diego.

Sago, B. (2020). Factors influencing social media adoption and frequency of use: An examination of Facebook, Twitter , Pinterest and Google+. International Journal of Bussiness and Commerc, 3(1), 1-14.

Salloum, S. A., Qasim Mohammad Alhamad, A., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467

Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2015). Collaborating to Create: The Internet as a Platform for Customer Engagement in Product Innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19, no. 4, 4-17.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2003). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Seo, E. J., & Park, J. W. (218). A study on the effects of social media marketing activities on brand equity and customer response in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 66, 36-41.

Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior Instagram : Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059

Sherman. (2019, October 4). Digital Marketing vs Traditional Marketing: Which Produces Better ROI? Retrieved from LYFE Marketing: https://www.lyfemarketing.com/blog/digital-marketing-vs-traditional-marketing/

Statista. (2020). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2020. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com

Tarik, Z., & Adnan, S. (2018). Online Vs Traditional; Marketing Challenge In The Telecom Market In Bosnia And Herzegovina. xvi(1), 45–57.

Thornton, K. K. (2017). Understanding the role of social media on a student’s college choice process and the implications on a university’s enrollment and marketing strategies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 234. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1931958050?accountid=17242

Voorveld, H. A. M., Noort, G. Van, Muntinga, G., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with Social Media and Social Media Advertising : The Differentiating Role of Platform Type. Journal of Advertising. 47(1), 38-54 https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754

Vries, N. J., & Carlson, J. (2014). Examining The Drivers and Brand Performance Implications of Customer Engagement with Brands In The Social Media Environment. Journal of Brand Management, 21(6), 495-515.

Yong, J. (2017). The Gender Gap In Malaysian Public Universities: Examining The ‘Lost Boys’. Journal of International and Comparative Education. 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14425/JICE.2017.6.1.0116


Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.