Adams, W.K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S., Perkins, K., Dubson, M. & Wieman, C.E. (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 551-577.

Akella, D. (2010). Learning together: Kolb’s experiential theory and its application.  Journal of Management & Organization, 16(1), 100 112. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.16.1.100 

Alcántara-Pilar, J. M., Blanco-Encomienda, F. J., Rodríguez-López, M. E., & Del Barrio-García, S. (2018). Enhancing consumer attitudes toward a website as a contributing factor in business success. Tourism &Amp; Management Studies, 14(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2018.14109 

Almeida, G. D. O., & Bastos, C. A. R. (2018). Application of the Cognitive Walkthrough Method to Evaluate the Usability of PhET Simulations Package to Teach Physics. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 14(4), 34-48. 

https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2018100103 

Babic, A., Vukmirovic, S., & Capko, Z. (2016). Using web applications in education.2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro.2016.7522296 

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164 - 180.

Batuyong, C. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2018). Exploring the Effect of PhET Interactive Simulation-Based Activities on Students’ Performance and Learning Experiences in Electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121–131.

Belsky, V. (2021, September 10). Web application vs. website: finally answered. ScienceSoft. https://www.scnsoft.com/blog/webapplication-vs-website-finallyanswered#:%7E:text=A%20website%20provides%20visua %20and,the%20data%20on%20this%20page. 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach (2010th ed.). Springer.

Branch, R.M., & Kopcha, T.J. (2014). Instructional Design Models.

Brown, I. T. J. (2002). Individual and Technological Factors Affecting Perceived Ease of Use of Web-based Learning Technologies in a Developing Country. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681 4835.2002.tb00055.x 

Chaikivskyi, T., Bauzha, O., Sus, B. B., Tmienova, N., & Zagorodnyuk, S. (2019). 3D  Simulation of Virtual Laboratory on Electron Microscopy. DCSMart, 282–291.

Chamberlain, J. M., Lancaster, K., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2014). How guidance affects student engagement with an interactive simulation. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 15(4), 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00009a  Chmiel, M. (2016, March 10). What is So Hard About Gravity? Smithsonian Science  Education Center. Retrieved from https://ssec.si.edu/stemvisions-blog/what-so-hard about-gravity 

Chong, C., Lee, C., & Tan, L. (2012). Perception and Expectations Towards the PhET Photoelectric Effect Simulation in Learning and Teaching: Similarities and Differences Between Female and Male Students. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on e-Learning, Academic Conferences International Limited, Reading, UK. 

Congelosi, J. (2003) Classroom Management Strategies. (4th ed.). New York: Wiley and Sons Inc. 

Coskunçay, D.F., Alkis, N., & Özkan, S. (2018). A Structural Model for Students' Adoption of Learning Management Systems: An Empirical Investigation in the Higher Education Context. J. Educ. Technol. Soc., 21, 13-27. 

Das, S. (2021, May 12). Levels Of Interactivity In eLearning.eLearning Industry.  https://elearningindustry.com/levels-of-interactivity elearning-modules 

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dede, C., Salzman, M.C., Loftin, R.B., & Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts. 

Desai, J. (2022, April 15). Web Application Vs. Desktop Application: Pros and Cons.  POSITIWISE. https://positiwise.com/blog/web application-vs-desktop-application-pros-and-cons/ 

Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Suyanta. (2021). Diagnosing elementary teacher’s misconceptions of gravity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1720(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1720/1/012001

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1977). The Feynman Lectures on  Physics, Vol. 1: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat (1st ed.). Addison Wesley. 

Furner, J. M., & Daigle, D. (2004). The educational software/website effectiveness urvey. International Journal of Instructional Media, 3 (1), 61+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A139212150/AONEu=anon~478f79fd&s id=googleScholar&xid=209304c7

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2009). Educational Research (9th ed.). New  Gupta, S. (2022, May 20). Mobile App Vs. Web App: What's The Difference? Springboard Blog. https://www.springboard.com/blog/design/mobile-vs-websiteapp/# %7E:text=A%20web%20app%20is%20an,works%20on%20a%20mobile%20device. 

Guven, G., & Sulun, Y. (2012). The Effect of Computer Supported Instruction on Academic Achievement and Students’ Attitudes Towards the Lesson in Eighth Grade Science and Technology Lessons, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(1), 68-79. 

Habibbulloh, M. (2019). EFFECTIVENESS OF THE GUIDED DISCOVERY MODEL BASED VIRTUAL LAB PhET TOWARD MASTERY STUDENTS’ CONCEPT ON TOPIC PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT. Science Education and Application Journal, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30736/seaj.v1i1.100

Hamerski, P.C., McPadden, D., Caballero, M.D., & Irving, P.W. (2022). Students' perspectives on computational challenges in physics class.

Hamzah, N., Ariffin, A., & Hamid, H. (2017). Web-Based Learning Environment Based on Students’ Needs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226, 012196. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/226/1/012196

Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00295-8 

Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the Influence of Perceived Usability and Technology Self-Efficacy on Teachers’ Technology Acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576

Humida, T., Al Mamun, M. H., & Keikhosrokiani, P. (2021). Predicting behavioral intention to use e-learning system: A case-study in Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 2241–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10707-9 

Ibrahim, N., Wan Ahmad, W. F., & Shafie, A. (2015). Multimedia Mobile Learning Application for Children’s Education: The Development of MFolktales. Asian Social Science, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n24p203 Jersey: Merrill.  

Jin, E., & Oh, J. (2019). The Effects of Interactivity on the Attitudes and Intentions about Second-hand Smoke: Comparison of Two Mechanisms. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(4), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1636509 

Johari, A. H., & Muslim. (2018). Application of experiential learning model using simple physical kit to increase attitude toward physics student senior high school in fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012032

Joyce Kimberly Ballard. (2010). Web site usability: A case study of student  perceptions of educational web sites. ProQuest LLC EBooks, 1–407.

Khandagale, V., & Chavan, R. (2017). Identification of Misconceptions for Gravity, Motion, and Inertia among Secondary School Students, Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (AIIRJ), 4(11), 197–205.

Khoiriyah, I., Rosidin, U., & Suana, W. (2015). Perbandingan hasil belajar  menggunakan phet simulation dan kit optika melalui inkuiri terbimbing. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 3 (5), 97-107.

Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology,39(1),6–36. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.770404 

Koh, C., Tan, H.S., Tan, K., Fang, L., Fong, F., Kan, D., Lye, S.L., & Wee, M.L.2010). Investigating the Effect of 3D Simulation Based Learning on the Motivation and Performance of Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 99.

Kolb, D. A. (1983). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. 

Koops, M. C., Verheul, I., Tiesma, R., de Boer, C. W., & Koeweiden, R. T. (2016).Learning Differences Between 3D vs. 2D Entertainment and Educational Games. Simulation & Gaming, 47(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116632871 

Kratochwill, T. R., Cook, J. L., Travers, J. F., & Elliott, S. N. (1999). Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill College. 

Kriek, J., & Stols, G. (2010). Teachers’ beliefs and their intention to use interactive  simulations in their classrooms. South African Journal of Education, 30(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n3a284

Kustijono, R. (2018). THE EFFECT OF SCIENTIFIC ATTITUDES TOWARD SCIENCE PROCESS SKILLS IN BASIC PHYSICS PRACTICUM BY USING PEER MODEL. International Journal of GEOMATE, 15(50). https://doi.org/10.21660/2018.50.ijcst50 

Lampard, R., Sapsford, R., & Jupp, V. (1997). Data Collection and Analysis. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(3), 538. https://doi.org/10.2307/591159

Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9236(00)00076-2 

Lee, J. Y., Kim, J. Y., You, S. J., Kim, Y. S., Koo, H. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, S., Park, J.H., Han, J. S., Kil, S., Kim, H., Yang, Y. S., & Lee, K. M. (2019). Development and Usability of a Life-Logging Behavior Monitoring Application for Obese Patients. Journal of Obesity & Metabolic Syndrome, 28(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.7570/jomes.2019.28.3.194 

Lee, M. C. Y., Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Tan, C. W. K., & Button, C.(2014). Nonlinear Pedagogy: An Effective Approach to Cater for Individual Differences in Learning a Sports Skill. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104744 

Pedagogical Agent (IMMPA) in the Learning of Electrochemistry: Needs Assessment. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(18), 3725–3732.https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.727 

Lin, Y., & Jou, M. (2013). Integrating Popular Web Applications in Classroom Learning Environments and Its Effects on Teaching, Student Learning Motivation and Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 157-165. 

Maki, P. (2010). Assessing for Learning: Building a Sustainable Commitment Across the Institution (2nd ed.). Stylus Publishing.

Mallari, R. L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Integrating PhET Interactive Simulation- based Activities in Improving the Student’s Academic Performance in Science. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(9), 1150–1153. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.31708 

Manolas, E.,  & Kehagias,  T.  (2005).  Kolb’s  experiential  learning model:  Enlivening physics courses in primary education. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference, Hands-on Science:  Science  in  a Changing  Education,  286–289.  Retrieved  from http://potoulis.edc.uoc.gr/2nd/pdf/09.pdf 

Mengistu, A., & Kahsay, G. (2015). The effect of computer simulation used as a teaching aid in students’ understanding in learning the concepts of electric fields and electric forces. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 9(2), 2402/1-242/8. 

Ministry of Education (MOE).  (2019).  Jumlah Pelajar Mengambil Sains, Teknologi,Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) Semakin Merosot. Sektor Pusat Dokumentasi Bahagian Perancangan Dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan, 02, 1–2.

Mohd Hamid, S. N., Lee, T. T., Taha, H., Rahim, N. A., & Sharif, A. M. (2021). E-content module for Chemistry Massive Open Online Course (MOOC): Development and students’ perceptions. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1074 

Moon, J. A. (2004). A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416150 

Mutisya, D. N., & Makokha, G. L. (2016). Challenges affecting adoption of e-learning in public universities in Kenya. E-Learning and Digital Media, 13(3–4), 140-157. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753016672902

Mwaniki, Elizabeth. W., Njihia, S. M., Chege, F. N., & Ireri, A. M. (2016).Development of Interactive Online Learning Modules: Lessons from Kenyatta University, Kenya. In the Proceedings of the 8th Pan Commonwealth Forum Open Learning (pp 1-8).

http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/2526

Nagy, J. T. (2018). Evaluation of Online Video Usage and Learning Satisfaction: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2886 

Najib, M. N. M., Md-Ali, R., & Yaacob, A. (2022). Effects of Phet Interactive Simulation Activities on Secondary School Students’ Physics Achievement. South Asian Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 3(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2022.3204

Null, J. W. (2004). Is Constructivism Traditional? Historical and Practical Perspectives on a Popular Advocacy. The Educational Forum, 68(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984625  

Obsniuk, M. J. (2020). Identifying and defining the computational practices of introductory physics (Order No. 27740001). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2382773678). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/identifying-defining-computational-practices/docview/2382773678/se-2?accountid=13155

Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy,and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294 

Park, S.Y. (2009). An Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding University Students' Behavioral Intention to Use e-Learning. J. Educ. Technol.Soc., 12, 150-162.

Petra, S. F., Jaidin, J. H., Perera, J. Q., & Linn, M. (2016). Supporting students to become autonomous learners: the role of web based learning. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 33(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-05-2016-0017 PhET Interactive Simulations activity database, (2014). Retrieved from http:// phet.colorado.edu/en/for-teachers/browse-activities, accessed April 21, 2014.

Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_4 

Prestridge, S. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028 

Prima, E. C., Putri, A. R., & Rustaman, N. (2018). Learning solar system using PhET simulation to improve students’ understanding and motivation. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 60-70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i2.10239 

Putri, R. Z., Jumadi, & Ariswan. (2020). Moodle as e-learning media in physics class. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3), 032075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032075 

Qudah, A.H. (2016). The Effect of Using an Educational Website in Achievement of Bachelor Students in the Course of Basic Concepts in Mathematics at Al al-Bayt University. Journal of Education and Practice, 7, 139-144.

Rahayu, C. D., & Sartika, S. B. (2020). Students Learning Motivation and Concepts Understanding of Science through the Use of PhET Interactive Simulations. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 4(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i1.750 

Reinbold, S. (2013). Using the ADDIE Model in Designing Library Instruction. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 32(3), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.806859 

Reviews. (2004). Physics Education, 40(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/40/1/m04

Richey, R.C. (1994). Developmental Research: The Definition and Scope. 

Rockinson- Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D.(2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022 

Rogti, M. (2021). Behaviorism as External Stimuli: Improving Student Extrinsic Motivation through Behavioral Responses in Algerian College Education Behaviorism as External Stimuli: Improving Student Extrinsic Motivation through Behavioral Responses in Algerian College Education. Global Journal of Human-Social Science, 21(1), 29–41. 

Rosli, H., Woo, P. Y., Shahril, A. M., Azmi, E., & Akhir, I. M.(2019). Desktop Application Learning System: Multimedia Interactive Learning Online (MiLO) for Teaching and Learning Tool for Hotel Front Office Management. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 5(3), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.20469/ijhss.5.20002-3 

Sasongko, W., Widiastuti, I., & Harjanto, B. (2017). Development of Mobile Learning Module Based on Student’s Learning Style for a Mechanical Engineering Education Course. Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.24 

Saudelli, M. G., Kleiv, R., Davies, J., & Jungmark, M., Mueller, R. (2021). PhET Simulations in Undergraduate Physics: Constructivist Learning Theory in Practice. A journal of educational research and practice, 31(1), 52–68. 

Schreibeis, J.G., Merideth, O.M., & Buxton, G.A. (2022). Using Glowscript to Teach  Numerical Modeling in Undergraduate Biology Education. 

Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization (Revised&Updated ed.). Doubleday.

Shen, C. W., & Kuo, C. J. (2015). Learning in massive open online courses: Evidence  from social media mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.066 

Siraj, S., Alias, N., DeWitt, D., & Hussin, Z. (2013). Design and developmental research: Emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.  

Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha  and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_18

Sumak, B., & Sorgo A. (2016). The acceptance and use of interactive whiteboards among teachers: Differences in UTAUT determinants between pre- and post-adopters. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 602–620. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.037 

Syatriana, E. (2019). A Model of Creating Instructional Materials Based on the  School Curriculum for Indonesian Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/z8gf9  

Taibu, R., Mataka, L., & Shekoyan, V. (2021). Using PhET simulations to improve scientific skills and attitudes of community college students. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 9(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1214

Tayebinik, M., & Puteh, M.M. (2013). Blended Learning or E-Learning? Rhetoric Educator: Communication.

Triviño-Tarradas, P., Mohedo-Gatón, A., Fernández, R. E. H., Mesas Carrascosa, F. J., & Carranza-Cañadas, P. (2021). Preliminary results of the impact of 3D-visualization resources in the area of graphic expression on the motivation of university students. Virtual Reality. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00606-2 

Ummi, A.M., & Tho, S.W. (2021). USABILITY OF GEOMETRICAL OPTICS LEARNING MODULE (GOLeM) AMONG PHYSICS MATRICULATION STUDENTS. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 19(1), 23-50. Retrieved from https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jd/article/view/14346 

University of Florida E-Learning. (2013). Learning Modules overview. University of  Florida e-Learning. Retrieved from https://lss.at.ufl.edu/help/Learning_Modules

Uredi, L. (2013, May). The relationship between the classroom teachers’ level of establishing a constructivist learning environment and their attitudes towards the constructivist approach. International Journal of Academic Research, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-4/b.6

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control,ntrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 

Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M.(2006). Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.2190/flhv-k4wa-wpvq-h0ym 

Wakefield, J., Frawley, J. K., Tyler, J., & Dyson, L. E. (2018). The impact of an iPad-supported annotation and sharing technology on university students’ learning. Computers & Education, 122, 243–259. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.013 

Wang, P., & Li, H. (2019). Understanding the antecedents and consequences of the perceived usefulness of travel review websites. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1086–1103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-06-2017-0380 

Wang, S.-K., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), 597–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0638-2 

Wu, T., Wang, Q., & Wang, S. (2021). Research on the Application of VPython 3D  Dynamic Visualization in the Teaching of College Physics. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(9), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v5i9.2533 

Yahaya, A., Hashim, S., Ramli, J., Boon, Y., & Hamdan, A.R. (2007). Menguasai penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Teori, analisis dan interpretasi data. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd 

Yunzal, A. N., & Casinillo, L. F. (2020). Effect of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Simulations: Evidence from STEM Students’ Performance. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 221. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.27450 

Yusof, H., Yunus, J., & Musa, K. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan pengurusan pendidikan.  Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Zhou, Z. (2018). Websites for physics demonstrations and computer simulations: A non-educational quality evaluation (Order No. 10831407). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2103854458). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/websites-physics-demonstrations-computer/docview/2103854458/se-2?accountid=13155