Abdul Aziz @Ahmad, A., Ismail, F., Ibrahim, N. M., & Samat, N. A. (2017). Investigating the Implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skills in Malaysian Classrooms: Insights from L2 Teaching Practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 65– 73. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1361 

Abdullah, S. I. S. S., Halim, L., & Shahali, E. H. M. (2011). Integration of environmental knowledge across Biology, Physics and Chemistry subject at secondary school level in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1024–1028. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.233 

Adnan khan, M. F., & Masood, M. (2013). The Design and Development of Multimedia-Assisted Mastery Learning Courseware in Learning of cellular Respiration. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing and Informatics, ICOCI, (016), 235–240. 

Aksoy, G. (2012). The Effects of Animation Technique on the 7th Grade Science and Technology Course. Creative Education, 03(03), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33048. 

Almarabeh, H., Amer, E. F., & Sulieman, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of Multimedia Learning Tools in Education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(12), 761–764. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290429349_The_Effectiveness_of_Mu ltimedia_Learning_Tools_in_Education. 

Almomen, R. K., Kaufman, D., Alotaibi, H., & Al-rowais, N. A. (2016). Applying the ADDIE — Analysis , Design , Development , Implementation and Evaluation — Instructional Design Model to Continuing Professional Development for Primary Care Physicians in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, (August), 538–546. http://doi.org/. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2016.78059 

Alon, I., & Herath, R. K. (2014). Teaching International Business via Social Media Projects. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 25(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2013.847814 

Anthony, Edward M. (1963). Approach, Method, and Technique”. English Learning 17: 63-67. An Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 

Arip, M. A. S. M., Bakar, R. B. A., Ahmad, A. B., & Jais, S. M. (2013). The Development of a Group Guidance Module for Student Self-development based on Gestalt Theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1310–1316. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.748 

Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active Learning and Student-centered Pedagogy Imporve Student Attitdues and Performance in Introductory Biology. Life Sciences Education, 8, 203–213.http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.09 

Arshad, W. S. S. L. & M. Y. (2015). Inquiry practices in Malaysian secondary classroom and model of inquiry teaching based on verbal interaction. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 151–175. 

Artun, H., & Costu, B. (2013). Effect of the 5E Model on Prospective Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis: A Mixed Method Approach. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9371-2 

Azizi Yahaya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaludin Ramli, Yusof Boon, dan Abdul Rahim Hamdan (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Teori, Analisis dan Interpretasi data.(1st ed.). Wangsa Melawati, Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd. 

Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, K. P. M. (2014). Elemen KBAT dalam pentaksiran, 1–24. 

Beal, C. R., & Cohen, P. R. (2012). Teach Ourselves: Technology to Support Problem Posing in the STEM Classroom. Creative Education, 03(04), 513–519. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.34078 

Cankoy, O. (2014). Interlocked problem posing and children’s problem posing performance in free structured situations. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(1), 219–238. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9433-9 

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, Critical Thinking, Problem Solving: A Suggested Course for All High School Students in the 21st Century. Interchange, 44(1–2), 63–81. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8 

Carrió, M., Larramona, P., Baños, J. E., & Pérez, J. (2011). The effectiveness of the hybrid problem-based learning approach in the teaching of biology: a comparison with lecture-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 45(4), 229–235. http://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.546011 

Chaia, A., Child, F., Dorn, E., & Frank, M. (2017). Drivers of Student Performance: Insights from Asia. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Social Sector/Our Insights/What drives student performance in latin america/Drivers-of-Student- Performance.ashx 

Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of Mitosis and Meiosis in Higher Secondary Students of Northeast India and the Implications for Genetics Education. Education, 2(3), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.edu.20120203.04 

Chua, Y.P.(2006). Kaedah penyelidikan. Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Malaysia. 

Chiu, T. K. F., & Mok, I. A. C. (2017). Learner expertise and mathematics different order thinking skills in multimedia learning. Co 

Cho, Y., & Brown, C. (2013). Project-based learning in education: integrating business needs and student learning. European Journal of Training & Development, 37(8), 744–765. http://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2013-0006 

Choi, E., Lindquist, R., & Song, Y. (2014). Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning.Nurse Education Today, 34(1), 52–56. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.012 

Çimer, A. (2012). What Makes Biology Learning Difficult and Effective: Students’ Views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.205 

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology (Second Edi, Vol. 18). http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.969 

Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. (R. Taff, Ed.), Learning. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Philosophical, Paradigm, and Interpretive Frameworks. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2008.02.005 

Da Ponte, J. P., & Henriques, A. (2013). Problem posing based on investigation activities by university students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 145– 156. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9443-5 

Davis, A. L. (2013). Using instructional design principles to develop effective information literacy instruction: ADDIE overview. College & Research Libraries News, 74(4), 205–207. 

Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(2), 235–247. 

Dwitri Pilendia, and S. A. (2020). The development of powerpoint optimization training module as learning media: A validation study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000544 

Elliot, D., Wilson, D., & Boyle, S. (2014). Science learning via multimedia portal resources: The Scottish case. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 571–580. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12085 

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2010). A Guide for Novice Researchers: Design and Development Research Methods. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE), (10), 107–118. http://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2009.5211872 

Fauzi, A., & Mitalistiani, M. (2018). High School Biology Topics That Perceived Difficult By Undergraduate Students. DIDAKTIKA BIOLOGI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1242 

Fensham, P. J., & Bellocchi, A. (2013). Higher order thinking in chemistry curriculum and its assessment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 250–264. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.003 

Furió, D., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Vivó, R. (2015). Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: A comparative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 189–201. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071 

Ganapathy, M. G., Singh, M. K. M., Kaur, S., & Kit, L. W. (2017). Promoting higher order thinking skills via teaching practices. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 23(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-06 

Girard, T., & Pinar, M. (2011). A usability study of interactive web-based modules. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 27–32. 

Gough, A. (2014). STEM policy and science education: scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9590-3 

Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1983). Designing for usability-key principles and what designers think. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 28(3), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/800045.801579 

Hafizan, E., Shahali, M., Ismail, I., & Halim, L. (2017). Science and Technology Trends Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education STEM Education in Malaysia: Policy, Trajectories and Initiatives. Asian Research Policy, 8(2), 122–133. 

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis.pdf. 

Hamid, S. N. M., Lee, T. T., Taha, H., Rahim, N. A., & Sharif, A. M. (2021). E-Content Module For Chemistry Massive Open Online Course (Mooc): Development And Students’ Perceptions. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 67– 92. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1074 

Harrison, N. (2013). Using the interactive whiteboard to scaffold a metalanguage: Teaching higher order thinking skills in preservice teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 54–65. http://doi.org/10.1234/ajet.v29i1.48 

Hasni, A., Roy, P., & Dumais, N. (2016). The teaching and learning of mitosis and meiosis: What can we learn from analysis of classroom practices? A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1507–1531. http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1242a 

Hiong, L. C., & Osman, K. (2013). A Conceptual Framework for the Integration of 21st Century Skills in Biology Education. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(16), 2976–2983. http://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.3681 

Hong, J. C., Lin, M. P., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Kuo, Y. C. (2015). Comparing animated and static modes in educational gameplay on user interest, performance and gameplay anxiety. Computers and Education, 88, 109–118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.018 

Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. a. (2001). Using a Technology-Enriched Environment to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Research on Technology in EducationJournal of Research on Technology in Education (International Society for Technology in Education)., 34(2), 109–120. http://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2001.10782338 

Hutchinson, S. (2004). Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. Foundations for Research. 

Jackson, S. L. (2009). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach (Third edit).Belmont: Wadsworth,cengage Learning. 

Jarjoura, C., Tayeh, P. A., & Zgheib, N. K. (2015). Using Team-Based Learning to Teach Grade 7 Biology: Student satisfaction and improved performance. Journal of Biological Education, 49(4), 401–419. http://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.967277 

Kapur, M. (2015). The preparatory effects of problem solving versus problem posing on learning from instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 23–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.004 

Karimi-Aghdam, S. (2017). Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) as an Emergent System: A Dynamic Systems Theory Perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 76–93. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9359-1 

Khairuddin, N. (2020). A Meta-Analysis on Developing Effective Hots Questioning Skills for Stem Teachers in Malaysia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5), 5346–5358. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr2020241 

Kim, Y., & Wei, Q. (2011). The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment. Computers and Education, 56(2), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.016 

Kojima, K., Miwa, K., & Matsui, T. (2013). Supporting mathematical problem posing with a system for learning generation processes through examples. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 22(4), 161–190. http://doi.org/10.3233/JAI-130035 

Koneru, I. (2010). ADDIE: Designing Web-enabled Information Literacy Instructional Modules. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(3), 23–33. http://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.30.388 

Kontorovich, I., Koichu, B., Leikin, R., & Berman, A. (2012). An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 149–161. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.002 

Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1 

Leung, S. kwan S. (2013). Teachers implementing mathematical problem posing in the classroom: Challenges and strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 103–116. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9436-4 

Lodico, M., Spaulding, D., & Voegtle, K. (2006). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. Jossey-Bass (Vol. 1). http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666- 2656-0.ch019 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantificatiom of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. 

Lynn M.R., Laman E.L. & Englebardt S.P. (1998) Nursing administration research priorities: a national Delphi study. Journal of Nursing Administration 28(5), 7±11. 

McKillip, J. (1987). Need Analysis: tools for the human services and education. 

Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 

Madhuri, G. V, Kantamreddi, V. S. S. N., & Prakash Goteti, L. N. S. (2012). Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(2), 117–123. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.661701 

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, (December), 0–1. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007 

Marshall, J. C., Smart, J., & Alston, D. M. (2016). Development and validation of Teacher Intentionality of Practice Scale (TIPS): A measure to evaluate and scaffold teacher effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 159–168. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.007 

Martin, F., Carolina, N., Hoskins, O. J., Brooks, R., & Bennett, T. (2013). Development of an Interactive Multimedia Instructional Module. The Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 3(3), 5–18. Retrieved from http://www.jaidpub.org/wp- content/uploads/2013/12/MartinEtAl-JAID-Dec2013.pdf 

Matawali, A., Bakri, S. N. S., Jumat, N. R., Ismail, I. H., Arshad, S. E., & Din, W. A. (2019). The preliminary study on inverted problem-based learning in biology among science foundation students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(4), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20294 

Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19 

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 611–623. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0883- 0355(99)00027-0 

Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical Education, 44(6), 543–549. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x 

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R (2000). A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117 

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 4752(01)00018-4 

Ministry of Education Malaysia (2012). Preliminary Report—Malaysia Education Blue-print Executive 2013-2025 Executive Summary, E-16. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: MOE. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. 2016 Annual Report | Malaysia. 

Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2 

Mishra, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). Problem posing exercises (PPE): An instructional strategy for learning of complex material in introductory programming courses. Proceedings - 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Technology for Education, T4E 2013, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.45 

Mishra, S., & Iyer, S. (2015). An exploration of problem posing-based activities as an assessment tool and as an instructional strategy. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1), 5. http://doi.org/10.1007/s41039-015- 0006-0 

Muijs, D. (2004). Doing quantitative research in education with SPSS. D. Avison & J. Pries-heje .London:Sage Publications. 

Murtonen, M., Nokkala, C., & Södervik, I. (2020). Challenges in understanding meiosis: fostering metaconceptual awareness among university biology students. Journal of Biological Education, 54(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1538016 

Mustafa, N., Mohd Nordin, N., Embi, M. A., & Norman, M. H. (2018). Testing the Usability of a Mobile Learning Module. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, (January 2019), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.21.21626 

Nardone, C. F., & Lee, R. G. (2010). Critical Inquiry Across the Disciplines: Strategies for Student-Generated Problem Posing. College Teaching, 59(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2010.489077 

Nawawi, S. (2017). Developing of module challenge based learning in environmental material to empower the critical thinking ability. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 212–223. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.15988 

Nerida F, E. (2015). Problem posing as an integral component of the mathematics curriculum: A study with prospective and practicing middle-school teachers. In Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 513– 543). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_25 

Nidzam, C., Ahmad, C., Yahaya, A., & Sani, S. S. (2020). Pembangunan modul Video Amali (V-Lab) bagi mempertingkatkan pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan biologi tingkatan empat. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(2), 1–7. 

Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In Usability Inspection Methods. J. Nielsen & R.L. Mack, Eds. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 25–62 

Noah, M.N. & Ahmad, J. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik (First Edit). Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. 

Noordin, S., Fatimah Wan Ahmad, W., & Kwang Hooi, Y. (2011). Study of Effectiveness and Usability of Multimedia Courseware Integrated with 3- Dimensional Model as a Teaching Aid. International Journal of Computer Applications, 16(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.5120/2001-2697 

Nunes, E. P. S., Luz, A. R., Lemos, E. M., & Nunes, C. (2016). Approaches of participatory design the design process of a serious game to assist in the learning of hospitalized children. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9733, pp. 406–416). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 39513-5_38 

Odom, A. L., & Kelly, P. V. (2001). Integrating concept mapping and the learning cycle to teach diffussion and osmosis concepts to high school biology students. Science Education, 85(6), 615–635. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1029 

Osman, K., & Kaur, S. J. (2014). Evaluating biology achievement scores in an ICT integrated PBL environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(3), 185–194. http://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1076a 

Osman, K., & Lee, T. T. (2014). Impact of Interactive Multimedia Module With Pedagogical Agents on Students’ Understanding and Motivation in the Learning of Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9407-y 

Oztas, F. (2014). How do high school students know diffusion and osmosis ? High school students ’ difficulties in understanding diffusion and osmosis . Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3679–3682. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.822 

Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. and Owen, S.V. (2007) Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 459-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199 

Pratiwi, H. E., Suwono, H., & Handayani, N. (2014). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Hybrid Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI. Jurnalonline. Um. Ac.  Id,  1–12.  Retrieved  from http://jurnalonline.um.ac.id/data/artikel/artikel5C078664CE7FDAFB63596CA5 E40E83D1.pdf 

Rahman, N. A., Halim, L., Ahmad, A. R., & Soh, T. M. T. (2018). Challenges of Environmental Education: Inculcating Behavioural Changes among Indigenous Students. Creative Education, 09(01), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.91004 

Ramon, G. O. ., , Bello, M. R. ., & ., & Bauchi, U. S. . (2019). Achievement Of Pre- Service Biology Teachers In Kwara State, 15(3), 157–168. 

Richland, L. E., & Simms, N. (2015). Analogy, higher order thinking, and education. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(2), 177–192. http://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1336 

Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2014). STEM and technology education: international state- of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429–451. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z 

Robinson, B. K., & Dearmon, V. (2013). Evidence-based nursing education: Effective use of instructional design and simulated learning environments to enhance knowledge transfer in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(4), 203–209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.022 

Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2014). The effects of problem posing on student mathematical learning: A meta-analysis. International Education Studies, 7(13), 227–241. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p227 

Russell, J. D. (1974). Modular Instruction; A uide to the Design, Selection, Utilization and Evaluation of Modular Materials. New York: Publishing Company 

Saido, G. M., Siraj, S., Nordin, A. B. Bin, & Amedy, O. S. A. (2015). Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Secondary School Students in Science Learning. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3), 13–20. 

Sangoseni, O., Hellman, M., & Hill, C. (2013). Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess the Effect of Online Learning on Behaviors, Attitudes, and Clinical Practices of Physical Therapists in the United States Regarding Evidenced-based Clinical Practice. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, (September). https://doi.org/10.46743/1540-580x/2013.1439 

Seman, S. C., Yusoff, W. M. W., & Embong, R. (2017). Teachers Challenges in Teaching and Learning for Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Primary School. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(7), 534–545. http://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2017.77.534.545 

Setambah, M. A. B., Tajudin, N. M., Adnan, M., & Saad, M. I. M. (2017). Adventure Based Learning Module: Content Validity and Reliability Process. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 615. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2669 

Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. 

Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2013). A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 9–26. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9422-x 

Sousa, C. (2016). Problem-based learning on cell biology and ecophysiology using integrated laboratory and computational activities. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences, 3(1), 118. http://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2016.3763 

Subahan Mohd. Meerah T., (1997). Strategi-strategi pengajaran untuk meningkatkan prestasi dalamsains., Prosiding Seminar KebangsaanPendidikan; Sains & Matematik, m.s. 1-12., FakultiPendidikan, UKM 

Sung, H.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, Y.-C. (2013). Development of a Mobile Learning System Based on a Collaborative Problem-Posing Strategy. Interactive Learning Environments, (April 2013), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.867889 

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. http://doi.org/10.1016/0364-023(88)90023-7 

Teoh, B., & Neo, T.-K. (2007). Interactive Multimedia Learning: Students’ Attitudes and Learning Impact in an Animation Course. Online Submission, 6(4). 

Thomas, B., & Watters, J. J. (2015). Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 42–53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002 

Tuan Soh, T. M., Arsada, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073 

Türker, F. M. (2016). Design process for online websites created for teaching Turkish as a foreign language in web based environments. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(8), 642–655. http://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2511 

Veselinovska, S. S., Zivanovik, J., Petrovska, S., & Gokik, M. (2010). Interactive learning in programmed teaching of the subject “Based of nature science” at pedagogical faculties in the Republic of Macedonia (ICT tools in Biology education). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2253–2259. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.318 

Vidergor, H. E. (2017). Effectiveness of the multidimensional curriculum model in developing higher-order thinking skills in elementary and secondary students. The Curriculum Journal, 5176(May), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.131877 

Walker, P. D., Cammy, N. E., Ellis, B. J., & Seibert, K. D. (2018). O Perations S Kills F or the 21 St C Entury, (10), 1–16. 

Watson, C., & Brathwaite, V. (2013). An Open and Interactive Multimedia e-Learning Module for Graphing Kinematics. Proquest, (Clement 1985), 409-- XVII.Retrieved from http://searh.proquest.com/docview/1380702773?accountid=14887 

World Economic Forum. (2016). The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf 

Yaakob, M. N. (2015). Reka Bentuk Model Kurikulum M-Pembelajaran PengajianProfesional Di Institut Pendidikan Guru. 

Yarden, H., & Yarden, A. (2010). Learning using dynamic and static visualizations: Students’ comprehension, prior knowledge and Conceptual Status of a biotechnological method. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 375–402. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9126-0 

Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015). Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sciences, 4(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15171/jcs.2015.017 

Zeidan, A. (2010). the Relationship Between Grade 11 Palestinian Attitudes Toward Biology and Their Perceptions of the Biology Learning Environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(5), 783–800. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9185-8