UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education (General)
Main Author :Alysuliana Alias
Additional Authors :Lilia Ellany Mohtar
Shahrul Kadri Ayop
Fanny Rahmatina Rahim
Title :A systematic review on instruments to assess critical thinking & problem-solving skills
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2022
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving (CTPS) are soft skills essential to be equipped among students according to 21st-century learning. Several instruments have been developed to measure CTPS skills among students in various subjects. This review aimed to identify the type of instrument and the context they are used. The research methodology was based on the systematic literature search in online databases, mainly in Scopus and ERIC, complemented by Google Scholar and MyCite. The keywords used during the searching process included “instrument”, “test”, “assessment”, “critical thinking”, and “problem-solving”. The screening process took into consideration the type of publication in which only the articles written in Malay or English language within the year 2017 to 2021 were considered. The result of this review revealed that the test, rubric, observation sheet, and questionnaire were the most used types of instruments. Meanwhile, the contexts of measurement were by group discussion, experimental report, quiz, and answer sheet. This review can help educators and researchers make informed decisions about choosing the appropriate CTPS instrument and context for their assessments.  


[1] World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report.

[2] Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(9), 1–15.

[3] Chan, C. K. Y., & Luk, L. Y. Y. (2020). Development and validation of an instrument measuring undergraduate students ’ perceived holistic competencies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 467–482.

[4] Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12(June 2014), 43–52.

[5] Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2006). Modul pembangunan kemahiran insaniah (soft skills) untuk IPT Malaysia. Universiti Putra Malaysia.

[6] Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., Mestre, J. P., & Ross, B. H. (2015). Conceptual problem solving in high school physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–13.

[7] Rear, D. (2019). One size fits all? The limitations of standardised assessment in critical thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 664–675.

[8] Wren, D., & Cashwell, A. (2018). Mission Possible: Measuring Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. Educational Leadership, 75(5), 70–75.

[9] Mueller, J. F., Taylor, H. K., Brakke, K., Drysdale, M., Kelly, K., Levine, G. M., & Ronquillo-Adachi, J. (2020). Assessment of Scientific Inquiry and Critical Thinking: Measuring APA Goal 2 Student Learning Outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 274–284.

[10] Mabruroh, F., & Suhandi, A. (2017). Construction of Critical Thinking Skills Test Instrument Related The Concept On Sound Wave. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(012056).

[11] Alsaleh, N. J. (2020). Teaching Critical Thinking Skills: Literature Review. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 21–39.

[12] Larsson, K. (2021). Using Essay Responses as a Basis for Teaching Critical Thinking-a Variation Theory Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(1), 21–35.

[13] Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Lede, Y. A., Rahayu, F., & Nadapdap, A. (2019). Developing IRT-based physics critical thinking skill test: A CAT to answer 21st century challenge. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 267–280.

[14] Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Guidelines and guidance preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

[15] Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses ? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar , PubMed , and 26 other resources. Research Syntheses Methods, 11(2), 181–217.

[16] Kurniawan, W., Pathoni, H., Muliawati, L., Kurniawan, D. A., Romadona, D. D., Ningsi, A. P., &

Dari, R. W. (2020). Relationship of science process skills and critical thinking of students in physics Subject. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5581–5588.

[17] Priyaadharshini, M., & Sundaram, B. V. (2018). Evaluation of higher-order thinking skills using learning style in an undergraduate engineering in flipped classroom. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(6), 2237–2254.

[18] Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2018). Developing and assessing critical thinking skills in marketing students : The power of making explicit problem-solving processes. Journal of Education for Business, 94(3), 195–203.

[19] Dolapcioglu, S., & Doganay, A. (2020). Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: An action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology.

[20] Re, M. R., Amenduni, F., Medio, C. De, & Valente, M. (2019). How to use assessment data collected through writing activities to identify participants’ critical thinking levels. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 117–132.

[21] Kuang, C. Y., Kuen, Y. L., & Shu, F. C. (2017). The development and validation of a mechanical critical thinking scale for high school students. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1361–1376.

[22] Uvathi Mariappan, Arsaythamby Veloo, & Kanageswari Suppiah Shanmugam. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen kemahiran insaniah bagi subjek perakaunan di matrikulasi. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(4), 29–39.

[23] Aris Hanafi Abu Jalil, Gunathevan Elumalai, & Mohd Izwan Shahri. (2019). Pembinaan rubrik kemahiran insaniah bagi matapelajaran Kokurikulum pelajar program matrikulasi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 17, 126–145.

[24] Zainab Ab Rahman, Hoon, T. S., & Sidhu, G. K. (2019). Using the peer socratic questioning (PSQ) technique to develop critical thinking skills in group discussion. Jurnal Penyelidikan Tempawan, XXXVI, 91–103.

[25] Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. De, Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics : Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682.

[26] Lertyosbordin, C., Maneewan, S., Yampinij, S., & Thamwipat, K. (2019). Scoring rubric of problem-solving on computing science learning. International Education Studies, 12(8), 26–32.

[27] Bernstein, A. G., & Isaac, C. (2018). Critical thinking criteria for evaluating online discussion. The International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–8.

[28] Sadhu, S., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and validation of an integrated assessment for measuring critical thinking and chemical literacy in chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 557–572.

[29] Bandyopadhyay, S., & Szostek, J. (2019). Thinking critically about critical thinking: Assessing critical thinking of business students using multiple measures. Journal of Education for Business, 94(4), 259–270.

[30] Azizi Alias, & Kamisah Osman. (2018). Pentaksiran alternatif: Pembinaan dan pelaksanaan rubrik dalam pendidikan Sains. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

[31] Huang, B., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Developing a generic rubric for evaluating students’ work in STEM education. 2020 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), 210–213.

[32] Boughey, S. (2019). Developing rubric to assess 3rd - 5th grade students understanding of science concepts via screencast models. Indiana University, Bloomington.

[33] Tadele, K., & Sitotaw, B. (2018). Perception and trends in assessment of students’ learning in Physics courses. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 12(1), 1307–1315.

[34] Fukuzawa, S., & DeBraga, M. (2019). Graded response method: does question type influence the assessment of critical thinking? Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(1), 1–10.

[35] Poce, A., Medio, C. De, Amenduni, F., & Re, M. R. (2019). Critical thinking assessment : A first approach to the automatic evaluation. 18th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 331–338.

[36] Harahap, D. E., Festiyed, & Djamas, D. (2019). Preliminary study on development of assessment performance instruments on physics learning to improve students’ critical thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1185(012128), 1–7.

[37] Tangkin, W. P. (2019). Pemanfaatan rubrik sebagai instrumen penilaian alternatif. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 29–39.

[38] Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Appropriate criteria : Key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3(22), 1–12.

[39] Afifah Fadhlullah, & Nurbarirah Ahmad. (2017). Thinking outside of the box: Determining students’ level of critical thinking skills in teaching and learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 51–70.

[40] Rathakrishnan, M., Ahmad, R., & Choo, L. S. (2017). Online discussion : Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1891(1), 020120.

[41] Beatty, P. C., Collins, D., Kaye, L., Padilla, J. L., Willis, G. B., & Wilmot, A. (2019). Advances in questionnaire design, development, evaluation and testing. John Wiley & Sons.

[42] Batsell Jr, W. R., Perry, J. L., Hanley, E., & Hostetter, A. B. (2016). Ecological validity of the testing effect : The use of daily quizzes in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 1(6), 18–23.

[43] Ahmad, A., & Awang, M. I. (2016). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

[44] Tenam-Zemach, M., & Flynn, J. E. (2015). Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impact of rubrics in education. Information Age Publishing Inc


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)