UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)

Transforming classroom dynamics: A comparative analysis of U-style, V-style, and circle innovative teaching techniques

AVAILABLE Article 699 Views
Scan QR Code to share or view item link:

Digital Assets & Download Files
Login required to access this item.
General Information Cached
Title
Transforming classroom dynamics: A comparative analysis of U-style, V-style, and circle innovative teaching techniques
Type
Article
Main Author
Thamburaj, Kingston Pal
Additional Authors
  • Ponniah, Kartheges
Subject
P Philology. Linguistics
ISBN
2313626X
Language Code
eng
Bibliographic Details
Place of Production
Tanjung Malim
Publisher
Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of publication
2024
Notes
International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences
Dissertation Note
Other
Degree Type
Others
Corporate Name
Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract

This research paper examines three distinct teaching methods—U-Style, V-Style, and Circle—and analyzes their impact on student participation, collaboration, and learning outcomes. The study involved 30 students enrolled in a Tamil degree program, with the seating arrangement used in a Tamil classical literature class. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to evaluate the impact of these seating styles. Data was collected through observation, tests, and student feedback. The findings suggest that cluster seating is particularly effective in creating a student-centered classroom. This setup promotes collaborative learning and improves student engagement and learning outcomes. The study emphasizes the importance of well-planned seating arrangements in the classroom. Using cluster seating can help create an active and cooperative learning environment, supporting the goals of modern education. © 2024 The Authors.

References

Afriadi B (2018). Effective management class concept (Case study: Student behavior problematics). JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 4(2): 83-94. https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v4i2.11195.

Anderson LW (1995). International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education. 2nd Edition, Pergamon Press, London, UK.

Barkley E (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, USA.

Cheryan S, Ziegler SA, Plaut VC, and Meltzoff AN (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1): 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548677.

Cooper L and Fry KF (2020). The relationship between classroom environment and student course attrition and perceptions of engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 9(2): 93-102.

Cutillas MA, Lagumbay DG, Ancajas VM, and Besinga AO (2023). Enhancing student learning through classroom design exploring the influence of environment on academic performance. World Journal on Education and Humanities Research, 3(4): 27-37.

Duan S, Bissaker K, and Xu Z (2024). Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36: 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2.

Evertson CM and Emmer E (2017). Classroom management for elementary teachers. Pearson, London, UK.

Fernandes AC, Huang J, and Rinaldo V (2011). Does where a student sits really matter? The impact of seating locations on student classroom learning. International Journal of Applied Educational Studies, 10(1): 66-77.

Metzger KJ and Langley D (2020). The room itself is not enough: Student engagement in active learning classrooms. College Teaching, 68(3): 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2020.1768357.

Montello DR (1988). Classroom seating location and its effect on course achievement, participation, and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8(2): 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80005-7.

Rands ML and Gansemer-Topf AM (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1): 26-33.

Rogers B (2011). Classroom behaviour: A practical guide to effective teaching, behaviour management and colleague support. Paul Chapman, London, UK.

Rogers K (2020). The effects of classroom seating layouts on participation and assessment performance in a fourth grade classroom. Journal of Learning Spaces, 9(1): 31-41.

Sanders MJ (2013). Classroom design and student engagement. In the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, SAGE Publications, 57(1): 496-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571107.

Talbert R and Mor-Avi A (2019). A space for learning: An analysis of research on active learning spaces. Heliyon, 5(12): e02967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02967 PMid:32368631 PMCid:PMC7190693.

Turner JC and Patrick H (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106(9): 1759-1785. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810410600905.

Weinstein CS and Romano ME (2014). Elementary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USA.

Willms JD (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.

Woodcock S and Reupert A (2024). First-year primary teachers’ classroom management strategies: Perceptions of use, confidence, and effectiveness. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(1): 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2023.2219218.


Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.