Ab Rahman, N. (2005). Menilai keberkesanan pendekatan konstruktivisme dapat

meningkatkan pencapaian pelajar [Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

 

Abd Halim, N. D., & Kamarudin, N. A. (2015). ChemMol4: Learning concept of mole

via Needham’s five phase to overcome students’ alternative concepts.

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/62211/1/NoorDayanaHalim2015_Chemmol4Le

arningConceptofMoleViaNeedhams.pdf

 

Abd Halim, N. D., Ali, M. B., & Junaidi, J. (2012). Pengaplikasian teori

konstruktivisme dan model motivasi ARCS dalam pembelajaran asid dan bes

berasaskan laman web. https://people.utm.my/noordayana/files/2012/10/9-

bab9.pdf

 

Abd Rahman, A. N. (2009). Keberkesanan kaedah pembelajaran konstruktivisme

model needham terhadap pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam [Tesis Sarjana,

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia]. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/28299/

 

Abdul Basit, N. F., Lubis, M. A., Baharudin, H., & Yahya, N. A. (2015). Pembelajaran

interaktif e-learning mencorakkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. In Proceeding

The 7th International Workshop And Conference Of Asean Studies On Islamic

And Arabic Education And Civilization (POLTAN-UKM-POLIMED).

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Abdul Kadir, S. (2002). Perbandingan pembelajaran koperatif dan tradisional

terhadap prestasi, atribusi pencapaian, konsep kendiri akademik dan hubungan

sosial dalam pendidikan perakaunan [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Putra

Malaysia]. UPMIR.

http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9291/1/FPP_2002_16_A.pdf

 

Abdul Rahim, N., Agus, S. & Asikin, N. A. (2021). Minat dan sikap pelajar terhadap

penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan

(PdPc) dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Malaysian Online Journal of Education,

5(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v5i2.16

 

Abdul Razak, R. (2013). Pembelajaran berasaskan penghasilan penghasilan penceritaan

digital multimedia bagi menganalisis novel Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan

Malaysia, 38, 53-64. http://www.ukm.my/jurfpend/index.html

 

Abdul Said, A., Mohamad, B., Salleh, M. J., & Nelly, F. (2011). Keberkesanan

penggunaan model bentuk muka bumi sungai bagi meningkatkan prestasipelajar dalam mata pelajaran Geografi Tingkatan Satu. National Seminar on

History and Geography Education, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.

 

Abdul Wahab, J. L & Abdul Hadi, M. (2021). Pengaruh elemen pembelajaran koperatif

terhadap perubahan sikap murid di sekolah. Internasional Conference on

Business Studies and Education.

 

Abdullah, M. Z., Daud, I., Idris, M. R., & Abdul Rahman, M. N. (2020). Kesan

pembelajaran flipped classroom terhadap sikap bagi penyelesaian masalah bagi

algebra. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 7(4), 1–10.

https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JUKU/article/view/19983/10447

 

Abu Bakar, N., Mamat, I., & Ibrahim, M. (2017). Influence of parental education on

academic performance of secondary school students in Kuala Terengganu.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business Social Sciences, 7(8),

2222-6990.

https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/3230/Influence_of_Parental_Education_

on_Academic_Performance_of_Secondary_School_Students_in_Kuala_Teren

gganu.pdf

 

Abu, B., & Said, S. N. M. (2010). Tahap pengetahuan membina item aneka pilihan

dalam kalangan guru pelatih Teknik Dan Kejuruteraan (PTK), Fakulti

Pendidikan, UTM, Skudai. http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11153/

 

Abu, M. F., Mohd Radzi, N., Ghavifekr, S., & Kenayatullah, H. B. (2014). Pengurusan

disiplin murid di sekolah kawasan bandar dan luar bandar: Perspektif pemimpin

sekolah. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 1(1), 7-40.

 

Adnan, M., & Abd. Kadir, N. (2014). The practice of school-based assessment (SBA)

among secondary school mathematics teachers (59-69). Jurnal Pendidikan

Sains dan Matematik Malaysia, 4(1), 59-69.

 

Agustini, N. W. W., Artini, L. P., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2019). English teacher’s

perceptions and classroom practices on constructivism values in primary

schools in badung regency. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggeris Indonesia, 7(2).

http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v7i2.2722

 

Ahamad, M. A., Bakar, E. W., & Juhary, J. (2022). Kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi

melalui pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam pengajaran seni bahasa. Malaysian

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(7), e001597.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i7.1597

 

Ahmad, A. G. (2018). Pendidikan kita bertaraf dunia. Rencana Majalah Pendidikan,

120.

 

Ahmad, A., Khan, I., Ali, A., Islam, T., & Saeed., N. (2021). Implementation of

constructivist approach in teaching English grammar in primary schools.

Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 2803-2813.

http://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.305

 

Ahmadi, R. (2018). The use of techonology in english language learning: A Literature

review. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 3(2),

115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115

 

Al Zboun, M. S., Al Ghammaz, S. A. D. A., & Al Zboun, M. S. (2018). The impact of

the use of youtube and facebook on students’ academic achievement in

Geography course at the university of Jordan for the bachelor’s degree. Modern

Applied Science, 12(3), 64. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n3p164

 

Aldaghir, M. I. (2018). Do morning class improve students learning of microeconomics

principles? International Advances in Economics Research, 24, 163-177.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-018-9680-1

 

Al-Ghazo, A., & Al-Zoubi, S. M. (2018). How to develop writing skill through

constructivist design model. International Journal of Business and Social

Science, 9(5), 91-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v9n5a11

 

Al-Haq, F. A.-A., & Al-Sobh, M. A. (2012). Online linguistic messages of the

Jordanian secondary students and their opinions towards a web-based writing

instruction EFL Program. International Journal of Humanities and Social

Science, 2(6), 228-299.

 

Ali, A., & Mahmood, Z. (2016). Pembangunan dan kebolehpercayaan modul

berasaskan bermain bagi pembelajaran kemahiran bahasa Melayu kanak-kanak

prasekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 6(1), 16-29.

http://spaj.ukm.my/jpbm/index.php/jpbm/issue/view/22

 

Ali, M. & Uzir. N. (2010). Tahap kefahaman pelajar tingkatan dua bagi topik nombor

negatif. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Aliyyah, R. R., Saraswati, S., Ulfah, S. W., & Ikhwan, S. (2021). Upaya meningkatkan

hasil belajar IPA pada materi sifat-sifat cahaya menggunakan media video

pembelajaran. AKSARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 7(2), 317-326.

https://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/Aksara/article/view/442/466

 

Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for students critical

thinking, creativity, and problem solving to affect academic performance in

higher education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929

 

Alnusra, D. S., & Suaema, A. (2019). Penerapan metode pembelajaran konstruktivisme

untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar Geografi pada materi bentuk-bentuk

permukaan bumi untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP Gotong-royong Tobela, Edukasi,

17(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.33387/j.edu.v17i2.1511

 

Al-Quran, M. (2002). The class function confusion in the complex sentence structure:

A Study EFL student composition errors, DIRASAT. Human and Social

Science, 20(3), 821-835.

 

Alzahrani, I., & Woollard, J. (2013). The roles of the constructivist learning theory and

collaborative learning environment on Wiki classroom and the relationship

between them [Paper presentation]. International Conference for e-Learning &

Distance Education, 3rd, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539416.pdf

 

Amatan, M. A., Han, K. C. G., & Pang, V. (2021). Pembinaan dan pengesahan soal

selidik penerimaan pelaksanaan elemen pendidikan STEM dalam pengajaran

dan pembelajaran guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities

(MJSSH), 6(5), 64 - 77. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i5.793

 

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social

constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1, 9-16.

 

Andam, E. A., Okpoti, C. A., Obeng-Denteh, W., & Atteh, E. (2015). The constructivist

approach of solving word problems involving algebraic linear equations: The

case study of Mansoman Senior High School, Amansie West District of Ghana.

Advances in Research, 5(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2015/13932

 

Arif, Z. Y., & Amin, N. M. (2021). The implementation of 21st century skills in the

teaching and learning process of vocational college teacher. Asian Journal of

Research in Education and Social Sciences, 3(1), 144-151.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ajress/article/view/12900

 

Ariffin, A, Hasnan, N., Zakaria, N., Rubani, S. N. K & Hamzah, N. (2020).

Pembangunan bahan e-pembelajaran berasaskan model needham lima fasa bagi

topik konkrit. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 5(2), 63–70.

https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/oj-tp/article/view/6177

 

Asari, F. F. A. H., & Saad, A. M. (2019). Penggunaan kaedah “pass the marker” dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran (P & P) subjek Ekonomi. International

Conference on Design Industries & Creative Culture, 51-58.

https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/34123/1/34123.pdf

 

Asbulah, L. H., Lubis, M. A., Aladdin, A., & Sahrim, M. (2018). Kesahan dan

kebolehpercayaan instrumen strategi pembelajaran kolokasi Bahasa Arab:

Analisis menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 1(1), 131-

140. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEN-2018-43.03-14

 

Ashcraft, D., Treadwell, T., & Kumar, V. K. (2008). Collaborative online learning: A

constructivist example. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching, 4(1), 109-116.

 

Asikhia, O. A. (2010). Students and teachers’ perception of the causes of academic

performance in Ogun state secondary school [Nigeria]: Implications for

counselling for national development. European Journal of Social Sciences,

13(2), 229-242.

 

Atmoko, D., Rosmalia., & Subekti, A. T. (2020). Pelatihan pembuatan teks pidato

dan berpidato pada siswa Kelas XII Smk Semesta Bumiayu. Jurnal Abdimas

Bhakti Indonesia, 1(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.36308/abp.v1i1.179

 

Atteh, E. (2022). Exploring the effect of constructivist learning approach on pre service

teachers problem solving skills in Mathematics at Wiawso College of education.

Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 18(4), 174-185.

http://dx.doi.org/10.9734/ARJASS/2022/v18i4414

 

Awang, Z. (2012). Strategi pengajaran mata pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani yang

berkesan [Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti

Malaya].

 

Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on

student learning experience. Computers and Education, 128, 269-283.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013

 

Ayob, A., & Bakar, N. A. (2018). Interpretasi hubungan pembelajaran terarah kendiri

dengan kebolehpercayaan kognitif berasaskan fahaman konstruktivis.

International Journal of Education, 3(10), 75-87.

http://www.ijepc.com/PDF/IJEPC-2018-10-03-10.pdf

 

Azisah, N. R., & Syukur, M. (2020). Strategi guru dalam penerapan pembelajaran

kontekstul abad ke-21 di maddi takkalasi. Jurnal Sosialisasi, 7(3), 58-65.

https://doi.org/10.26858/sosialisasi.v0i2.14769

 

Aziz, A., & Andin, C. (2018). Penggunaan strategi pembelajaran koperatif untuk

meningkatkan tahap kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan

Malaysia, 43(1), 1-9. http://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/issue/view/1089

 

Aziz, S. N. A., Zulkifli, N., Norwant, N. M., & Yusof, R. (2008). Faktor kelemahan

pelajar dalam mata pelajaran ekonomi asas di peringkat SPM: Tinjauan di

Sekolah-sekolah terpilih negeri Johor.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=263eb562e1bdc7d05e589450568af98e

646f717e2cbb6

 

Azizan, N. H. (2021). Hubungan antara kecerdasan emosi dan tekanan belajar dengan

pencapaian akademik dalam kalangan murid sekolah menengah [Tesis Sarjana,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=94a1a2ae9d6eab578358cda9499838d0

647065d26259c

 

Azwani, S. (n.d). Teori pengajaran konstruktif.

https://www.academia.edu/16595731/Teori_pengajaran_konstruktif

 

Baba, A. (1997). Statistik penyelidikan dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial. Universiti

Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Bachtiar, F. A., Sulistyo, G. H., Cooper, E. W., & Katsuari, K. (2017). Affect,

personality and learning styles in online reading comprehension. Proceedings

of the 5th International Conference on Information and Education Technology,

78-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3029387.3029422

 

Bael, B.T., Nachiappan, S., & Pungut, M. (2021). Analisis kesediaan guru dalam

pelaksanaan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi dalam pembelajaran, pengajaran dan

pemudahcaraan abad ke-21. Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities,

5(1), 100-119, https://doi.org/https//doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/115/

 

Baharin, Y. & Yusop, F. D. (2011). Pembelajaran kolaboratif menggunakan blog dalam

pelaksanaan pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi Asas. Jurnal Pendidikan,

31(1). http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/9215

 

Bahrudin, I. A., Muhammad, M., Nawawi, M. I. A., Saharudin, I. N., Din, H. M., Ali,

M. A., & Abdullah, M. E. (2011). Development of interactive courseware for

learning basic computer system components. American Journal of Economics

and Business Administration, 3(1), 132-138.

https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2011.132.138.pdf

 

Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Mathematical instructional: A conceptual of

redesign of active learning with metacognitive regulation strategy. International

Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 633-648.

https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13343a

 

Baker T. L. (1994). Doing social research. (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

 

Basari, J., & Siew, N. M. (2022). Kerangka pemupukan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi

dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Matematik Tambahan. Malaysian Journal

of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 7(3), e001348.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i3.1348

 

Basri, S. (2022). Modul “basic concepts in genetics”: Intervensi tahap penguasaan dan

kerangka alternatif konsep asas genetik pelajar Biologi Tingkatan Empat [Tesis

Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=7672e008d5ca34dc2daffca5c94b81f76

46f624c1f035

 

Benade, L. (2015). Teachers’ critical reflective practice in the context of twenty-first

century learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 42-54.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.998159

 

Berawi, F. M. (2017). Metodologi penyelidikan. Panduan menulis tesis. UUM Press.

 

Berliana, N. P. (2022). Kajian Model Pembelajaran Koperatif Tipe Team Assisted

Individualization (TAI) terhadap hasil belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah

Dasar. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan, 7(1), 9-15.

https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jkpd/article/download/5663/4321

 

Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic

course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers & Education, 115,

69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014

 

Boghossian, P. (2006). Behaviorism, constructivism and Socratic Pedagogy.

Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(6), 713-722.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00226.x

 

Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist

and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C.

J. Bonk, & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered

technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25–50). Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

 

Borg, & Gall. (1993). Dalam Bahagian Pendidikan Guru, Kajian Keberkesanan

Kurikulum Kursus Perguruan Lepas Ijazah (KPLI) Institut/ Maktab Perguruan

Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Borich, G. D. & Tombori, M. L. (1995). Education psycology: A comtemporary

approach. (2nd ed.). Merill Publisher.

 

Brownstein, B. (2001). Collaboration: The foundation of learning in the future.

Education, 122(2), 240-247.

https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A84143800/AONE?u=anon~64973aaf&sid=go

ogleScholar&xid=0797c1da

 

Burton, C. B. (1987). Problems in children’s peer relationship: A broadening

perspective. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood

Education.

 

Butler, J. I., & Griffin, L. L. (2010). More teaching games for understanding: Moving

globally. Human Kinetics.

 

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs

for research. Rand McNally & Company.

 

Candy, P. C. (1989). Constructivism and the study of self- direction in adult learning.

Studies in the Education of Adults, 21(2), 95-116.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.1989.11730524

 

Caprio, M. W. (1994). Easing into constructivism connecting meaningful learning with

student experience. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(4), 210-212.

 

Caropreso, E., & Haggerty, M. (2000). Teaching economics: A cooperative model.

College Teaching, 48(2), 69-74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27558992

 

Che Hassan, N. (2016). Kecenderungan pelajar dalam memilih ekonomi asas sebagai

mata pelajaran elektif di Kelantan [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan

Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=be441d7c51b0292dae84426ea1bc5e09

646f28388118b

 

Chear, S. L. S., & Nor, M. Y. M. (2020). Intervensi pembelajaran di portal epembelajaran

melalui aplikasi whatsapp dan telegram berdasarkan model lima

fasa needham. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences, 1, 11-27.

https://doi.org/10.37134/esss.vol1.1.2.2020

 

Chew, F. P., & Sulung, M.M. (2019). Kesan strategi Gallery Walk terhadap pencapaian

murid-murid dalam pembelajaran penulisan Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal

Penyelidikan Sains Sosial, 2(5), 43-62.

 

Chong, O. S., & Mahmod, Z. (2014). Gaya pembelajaran pelajar Bahasa Melayu

berdasarkan gaya pembelajaran Grasha. Journal of Applied Research in

Education, 18, 52-66. https://drzamri.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/2014-ongsc-

zamri-jare-ubd.pdf

 

Christensen, L. B. (2007). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative and mixed

approaches. Sage.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan: Kaedah penyelidikan. (Buku 1).

McGraw Hill Education.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2009). Advanced research statistics: regression test, factor analysis and

SEM analysis. Mcgraw-Hill Education.

 

Chua, Y. P. (2014). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan-ujian univariat dan multivariat.

Edisi Ketiga. Mc Graw Hill Education.

 

Chusnul Rochmadhoni. (2019). Penerapan metode pembelajaran Two Stay Two Stray

dalam pembelajaran menyimak pemahaman dialog berbahasa Mandarin siswa

kelas X IPA SMA HANG TUAH 2 Sidoarjo. Mandarin UNESA, 1(1).

 

Çolak, E. (2017). Teachers' Experiences in a Professional Learning Community on The

Constructivist Lesson Planning: A Case Study Among Primary School

Teachers. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190). doi:10.15390/EB.2017.6911

 

Coldwell, J., Craig, A., Paterson, T., & Mustard, J. (2008). Online students relationships

between participation, demographic and academic performance. The Electronic

Journal of e-Learning, 6, 19-30. http://www.ejel.org/

 

Connelly, L. M. (2008) Pilot Studies. MEDSURG Nursing, 17, 411-412.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Pearson.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods

approaches.(4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

 

D’Amato, D. S. (2017). Is Economics a hard science? https://spectator.org/iseconomics-

a-hard-science/

 

Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A paradigm for teaching and learning.

Arts Social Sciences Journal, 7(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2151-

6200.1000200

 

Damanhuri, N. H. A., Jamlus, S., & Ahmad, S. S. (2020). Faktor-faktor yang

mempengaruhi pencapaian subjek matematik pengurusan bagi pelajar sijil

pengoperasian perniagaan di kolej komuniti Hulu Langat. International Journal

of education and Pedagogy, 2(4), 275-287.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap/article/view/11622

 

Danes, S. M., Huddleston-Casas, C. & Boyce, L. (1999). Financial planning curriculum

for teens: Impact evaluation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning,

10(1), 26-39. https://www.afcpe.org/assets/pdf/vol1013.pdf

 

Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2021). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan.

Universiti Malaya.

 

Dazid, N. D. M. (2021). Analisis keberkesanan dan kecekapan pengaplikasian

pemikiran komputasional dalam pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dalam

kalangan murid tahun tiga [Disertasi Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan

Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=70d7eab9174030d4cff236f27c96f7d46

47a1841ccf12

 

Dewi, C., Astuti, B. & Nugroho, S. E. (2018). Kemampuan berpikir kritis melalui

pembelajaran discovery learning berbantuan bahan ajar fisika berbasis

pendekatan saintifik. UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal, 7(2), 22-28.

https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v7i2.27464

 

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, A. & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education:

A system mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.

 

Dimyati, M. (2011). The implementation of ‘Kagan Structure: One Stay Two Stray’ in

managing class- discussion in speaking class of grade VII of Junior High

School. Semarang State University.

 

Ding, M., & Li, H. (2011). On the application of multimedia in Economics teaching.

International Education Studies, 4(3), 88-90.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1066536.pdf

 

Doman, N. (2017). Implikasi Google Apps dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran murid

pesisir UTHM [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia].

http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/id/eprint/7845

 

Drie, J. Van, & Boxtel, C. Van (2003). Developing conceptual understanding through

talk and mapping. The Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 124-140.

 

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scotts, P. (1994). Constructing

scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1176933

 

Ducan, R. G., Rogat, A., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening

students’ understanding of modern generations across the 5th-10th Grades.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655-674.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312

 

Duffy, T., & Cunningham, D. (1996). Constructivism: Implication for the design and

delivery of Instruction. MacMillan.

 

Dwi Lasati. (2010). Penerapan pendekatan konstruktivisme pada pembelajaran

Teorema Phytagoras di Kelas 8 SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif, 3(1), 47-50.

 

Ealangov, S. (2023). Strategi dan Cabaran Pengajaran Kemahiran Berfikir Secara

Kreatif [Strategies and Challenges in Teaching Creative Thinking Skills.]

[Paper presentation]. n 2222 National Conference Malaysia TVET on Research

via Exposition 2022 (MATRIX'22). Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369740978

 

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms.

(6th ed). Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

 

Ekici, D.I. (2017). The use of Edmodo in creating an online learning community of

practice for learning to teach Science. Malaysia Online Journal of Educational

Sciences, 5, 91-106

 

Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Littlefield Cook, J. & Travers, J. (2000). Educational

psychology: effective teaching effective learning. (3rd ed.). Mcgraw-Hill

College.

 

Embros, N. M. (2021). Kesan teknik permainan terhadap prestasi, minat dan sikap

murid sekolah kebangsaan dalam mengenal perkataan Bahasa Cina [Tesis

Sarjana,.Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=5e533fb6e4ec37ae2dbe6498f9cf18d76

4706758a001a

 

Eng. J. A. J., & Ngen L. N. (2020). Guru sebagai pakar. Strategi-strategi

pengajaran dan pembelajaran abad ke-21. PTS Media Group.

 

Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Falmer Press.

 

Evans, C., & Waring, M. (2013). Exploring students’ perceptions of feedback in

relation to cognitive styles and culture. In C. Evans, & M. Kozhevnikov (Eds.),

Styles of practice in Higher Education: Exploring approaches to teaching and

learning (pp. 39-58). Routledge.

 

Fadzilah, A. H. (2017). Pelaksanaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran koperatif

berasaskan abad ke-21: Satu tinjauan di sekolah menngah kebangsaan Pekan

Nanas [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Tun Hussien Onn].

 

Fahim, M., & Hashroodi, P. (2012). The effect of critical thinking on developing

argumentative essays by Inranian EFL university students. Journal of Language

Teaching and Research, 3(4), 632-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.632-

638

 

Farellel, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice.

Continuum Press.

 

Farozi, M. (2016). Rancang bangun website gamifikasi sebagai strategi pembelajaran

dan evaluasi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Semnasteknomedia Online, 4(1), 4-2.

https://ojs.amikom.ac.id/index.php/semnasteknomedia/article/viewFile/1298/1

225

 

Fatmawati, I. & Wanita, D. (2019). The use of Two Stay Two Stray strategy to improve

students writing ability in report text. Tell; Teaching of English Language and

Literature, 7(1), 25-32.

 

Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach

to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.

 

Firdatama, N. (2018). Hasil belajar, sikap, persepsi siswa dalam pembelajaran modul

kesetimbangan Kimia berbasis konstuktivisme lima dase Needham di SMA

negeri 15 Palembang [Skripsi, Universitas Sriwijaya].

https://repository.unsri.ac.id/13876/1/RAMA_84204_06101181419003_00050

86502_01_font_ref.%20pdf.pdf

 

Firdaus, Kailani, I., & Bakar, M. N., & Bakry (2015). Developing critical thinking skills

of students in Mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3),

226. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1830

 

Firdaus, S. (2020). Perbandingan antara kaedah permainan dengan kaedah

konvensional terhadap pencapaian pelajar dalam mata pelajaran ekonomi

[Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. MALRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=8609

 

Fisher, R. (2013). Teaching thinking: philosophical enquiry in the classroom. (4th ed.).

Bloomsbury.

 

Fosnot, C. T. (2005). Constructivism: theory, perspectives and practice. (2nd ed.).

Teachers College Press.

 

Fox-Turnbull, W., & Snape, P. (2011). Technology teacher education through a

constructivist approach. Design and Technology Education: An International

Journal, 16(2). https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/1625

 

Fraenkel, J. R & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in

education. 7th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill.

 

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1996). How to design and evaluate research in

education. (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

 

Frankel, M. L. (1965). Education for the Economic Challenges of Today and

Tomorrow. The Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School

Principals, 49(304), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263656504930406

 

Frety, S. M. H. (2017). Pembelajaran berbasis proyek metode gallery walk untuk

meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi sistem ekskresi manusia. Jurnal

Skripsi Pendidikan Biologi, 1-13. http://lib.uinsg.ac.id/

 

Gallardo-Alba, C., Gruning, B., & Solano, B.S. (2021). A constructivist -based

proposal for bioformatics teaching practices during lockdown. PloS

Computational Bilogy, 17(5), e1008922.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008922

 

Gay, L. R. (1987). Educational research competencies for analysis and application.

(3rd ed.). Merrill Publication Company.

 

Gijbels, D., Watering, G. Van de, Dochy, F., & Bossche, P. Van den (2006). New

learning environments and constructivism: The students perspective.

Instructional Science, 34, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z

 

Gilakjani, A. P., Lai, M. L., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teacher’s use of technology and

constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer

Science, 5(4), 49-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.04.07

 

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enchancing student engagement

using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour,

47(1), 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

 

Gindis, B. (1999). Vygotsky Vision: Reshaping the practice of special education for the

21st century. Remedial and Special Education, 20(6), 333-340.

https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259902000606

 

Ginting, F. Y. (2018). An analysis of students’s ability in using punctuation marks

indescriptive paragraph writing. Journal Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3),

338-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.33258/birci.v1i3.57

 

Goffe, W. L., & Kauper, D. (2014). A Survey of Principles Instructors: Why Lecture

Prevails. The Journal of Economic Education, 45(4), 360–375.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/43608816

 

Graber, J. A. (2009). Internalizing problems during adolescence. In R. M. Learner, &

L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Individual bases of

adolescent development (pp. 642- 683). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

Gupta, M. L. (2004). Enhancing students performance through cooperative learning in

physical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 63-73.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000158162

 

Hadijah (2019). Keberkesanan pendekatan konstuktivisme dalam meningkatkan

kemahiran komunikasi Matematik pelajar sekolah menengah pertama [Tesis

Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. MyTO.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=5090

 

Hambali. K., & Lubis, M. A. (2022). Kepentingan gamifikasi dalam pengajaran dan

pemudahcaraan (PdPc) Pendidikan Islam. Research Journal on Islam and

Civilization, 5(1), 58-64. https://spaj.ukm.my/acerj/index.php/acerj/

article/view/96/90

 

Hamdan, H. (2017). Ke arah memartabatkan Sains dan Teknologi Negara

[Pembentangan PowerPoint]. Dokumen. http://www.stem-malaysia.com/

uploads/1/0/5/7/105798971/stem_statistics_datuk_halimahton.pdf.

 

Hanapi, M. H. M., Zakaria, N., & Abdullah, N. (2019). Nilai pendidikan dalam bahan

pengajaran multimedia kartun animasi upin dan ipin untuk murid sekolah

rendah. International Journal of Heritage, Art and Multimedia, 2(4), 12-23.

 

Hang, N. V. T., Meijer, M. R., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2015). The implementation

of a constructivist approach in primary science education in confucian heritage

culture: the case of Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 665-

693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9634-8

 

Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., Land, S. M., & Lee, E. (2014). Student-centered, open

learning environments: research, theory, and practice. In J. Spector, M. Merrill,

J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational

communications and technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-

3185-5_51

 

Hardy, M. D., & Taylor, P. C. S. (1997). Von Galserfeld’s radical constructivism: a

critical review. Science and Education, 6(1-2), 135-150.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008664626705

 

Hartle, R. T., Baviskar, S., & Smith, R. (2009). A field guide to constructivism in the

college science classroom: Four essential criteria and a guide to their usage.

Bioscience. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1002158.pdf

 

Harun, Z., Pisol, M. I. M., Rosli, H. F., Rashed, Z. N., & Halim, M. N. A. (2023). Teori

Vygotsky dalam pembelajaran murid dan kaitan dengan ciri murid keperluan

khas penglihatan. Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 6(1), 57-63.

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v6i1.34

 

Hashim, M. H. M., & Kasbolah, M. (2012). Application of Needham’s Five Phase

Constructivism Model in Civil, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering subject

at Technical Secondary School. Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 117-128.

https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n1p117

 

Hashim, S., Yaakub, R., & Ahmad, M. Z. (2007). P

 

Hashim, Y., & Man, R. (2006). Teknologi instruksional: teori dan aplikasi. (Ed. 2).

Randys.

 

Hasmi, L. (2019). Pengaruh penggunaan metode Two Stay Two Stray terhadap

keterampilan menulis karangan teks deskripsi siswa kelas X SMKN 1 Kota

Bukit Tinggi. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 2(1), 26-42.

 

Hassan, J., & Ab. Aziz, N. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat terhadap

Matematik di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah. Journal of Science &

Mathrmatics Education, 1-7.

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11972/1/Faktor.pdf

 

Hassan, S. (2020). Tahap pengetahuan dan sikap guru Bahasa Melayu Daerah Sibu

dalam mengaplikasikan kemahiran abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa

Melayu, 10(2), 74-81. http://spaj.ukm.my/jpbm/index.php/jpbm/issue/view/57

 

Hertzog, M. (2008) Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies.

Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 180-191.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

 

Hidayat, I., Desi, Lesmini, B., Sukaryawan, M., & Mujamil, J. (2020). Implementation

and the impact of constructivism – based module on students’ academic

achievement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research,

513, 64-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201230.084

 

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research

Review, 1(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

 

Holzer, S. (1994). From constructivism to active learning. The innovator, 2.

 

Hoover, W. A. (1996). The practice implications of constructivism. SED Letter, 9(3).

Hyun, C. C., Tukiran, M., Wijayanti, L. M., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., & Santoso, P.

B. (2020). Piaget versus Vygotsky: Implikasi pendidikan antara persamaan dan

perbedaaan. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 1(2),

286-293. https://doi.org/10.7777/jiemar.v1i3.92

 

Ibrahim, A. R., Suhaman, A., & Sari, D. K. (2022). Development of E-module food

chemistry constructivism-based 5-phase Needham. Jurnal Penelitian

Pendidikan IPA, 8(3), 1532-1537. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i3.1221

 

Ibrahim, M. A., & Redwan, A. S. (2010). Pembangunan perisian pengajaran

berasaskan model konstruktif needham 5 fasa bagi tajuk keelektifan dalam

matapelajaran sains sekolah rendah.

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/11305/1/Pembangunan_Perisian_Pengajaran_B

erasaskan_Model_Konstruktif_Needham_5_Fasa_Bagi_Tajuk_Keelektrikan_

Dalam_Matapelajaran_Sains_Sekolah_Rendah.pdf

 

Ibrahim, R., Nasri, N. M., & Ibrahim, R. (2021). Kesediaan murid sekolah terhadap

penggunaan flipped classroom dalam mata pelajaran ekonomi. Jurnal Dunia

Pendidikan, 3(1), 148-160.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/12564

 

Institut Tadbir Awam Negara. (2003). Ilmu dan latihan dan teras cemerlangan

perkhidmatan awam.

https://docs.jpa.gov.my/docs/pelbagai/ubulanan/2003/INTAN.pdf

 

International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE). (2015). ISTE Standard for

Students. ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standard-for-students

 

Ishak, H., Mat Nor, Z., & Ahmad, A. (2017). Pembelajaran interaktif berasaskan

aplikasi kahoot dalam pengajaran abad ke-21. Kementerian Pendidikan

Malaysia.

 

Ismail, H. (2016, December 19). KSSM bermula 2017. Utusan Malaysia.

 

Ismail, R., & Krishnan, S. K. (2013). Amalan pengajaran guru, sikap pelajar dan

hubungannya dengan pencapaian Ekonomi Asas sekolah menengah. KORPUS,

122-131.

 

Ismail, Z. (2006). Kaedah mengajar Sains. PTS Professional.

 

Ismajli, H., & Krasniqi, B. (2022). Constructivist instruction practices in Kosovo

primary education: The field of languages and communication curriculum.

Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(1), 259-281.

https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/4012/559

 

Isniarni. (2018). Peningkatan keterampilan menulis pantun dan syair dengan model

contextual teaching and learning siswa kelas V MI Ma’arif Candran Godean.

Jurnal Al-Bidayah, 10(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.14421/albidayah.

v10i1.132

 

Jaffar, M., & Hussin. M. (2020). Keberkesanan pembelajaran berasaskan masalah

terhadap pencapaian murid bagi mata pelajaran ekonomi peringkat sijil

peperiksaan Malaysia. Proceeding Book International Conference on Global

Education VIII.

 

Jamili, S., & Mahamod, Z. (2022). Perbezaan penerapan aktiviti didik hibur secara

bersemuka dan dalam talian berdasarkan jantina dan pengalaman mengajar guru

bahasa melayu sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 12.

https://spaj.ukm.my/jpbm

 

Jatisunda, M. G. (2017). Pengaruh pendekatan konstruktivisme terhadap pemecahan

masalah Matematik peserta didik. Jurnal Theorems (The Original of

Mathematics), 2(1), 57-66.

https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/301739-pengaruh-pendekatankonstruktivisme-

terh-509d109b.pdf

 

Jephcote, M. (2004). Economics in the school curriculum: It’s origin, and reflections

on the workings of a subject community. Teaching Business and Economics,

8(1), 23-20.

 

Jerry, F., & Jamaludin, K. (2021). Pelaksanaan pembelajaran berasaskan Inkuiri kritis

dalam mata pelajaran Matematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(2), 386-400.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/13780

 

Johari, S., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., & Yaacob, F. S. (2014). The beauty of

Bonding” website development based on Needham 5 phase constructivism

model. International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and

Engineering, 5(2), 283-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.61

 

Junsay, F. B., & Madrigal, D. V. (2021). Challenges and benefits of facilitating online

learning in time of Covid-19 pandemic: Insights and experiences of Social

Science teachers. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 20(6), 233-243.

http://dx.doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v20i1.3548

 

Kadir, M. N. B. A., Karim, M. M. A., & Abd. Rahman, N. (2016). Sikap terhadap

pembelajaran Fizik dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian dalam kalangan

pelajar Sains. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(1), 23-38.

http://www.ukm.my/personalia/publication-category/jilid-1/

 

Kamarul, A. J., Ibrahim, N., & Ilias, M.F. (2017). Gaya pengajaran guru dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam. Seminar Antarabangsa

Perguruan dan Pendidikan Islam. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Kamti, K. (2022). Upaya Meningkatkan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman melalui

Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Menggunakan Bahan Ajar Khusus [Efforts to

Improve Reading Comprehension Skills through the Constructivism Approach

Using Special Teaching Materials]. Journal of Psychology, Behavioral, and

Social Sciences, 1(4), 115. https://doi.org/10.55909/jpbs.v1i4.115

 

Kandasamy, O. K., Mydin, A.-A., Kanesan, A. G., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2021).

Keberkesanan kaedah pengajaran Needham, STAD dan konvensional

berpandukan modul Pendidikan Seni terhadap hasil kerja seni dan minat murid

sekolah rendah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(8),

162-172. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i8.942

 

Kannan, B., & Visuvarasam, A. (2019). Hubungan komitmen dan emosi dengan

pencapaian akademik pelajar ambilan khas Januari 2012 di IPG Kampus Ipoh.

Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 13, 96-116.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jd/article/view/12186

 

Kasim, T. S. A. T., Abdurajak, F. S., Md Yusof, Y., & Baharuddin, M. (2017).

Pendekatan konstruktivisme di Malaysia dan Brunei Darussalam: Satu tinjauan

awal terhadap pengalaman guru pendidikan Islam. Journal Of Islamic

Educational Research, 2(1), 23-35.

https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/JIER/article/view/9750

 

Kaufman, R. (2004). A university parthnership to change public policy: pre- condition

and processes. Journal of Community Practice. 12(3), 163-180.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J125v12n03_10

 

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). International Conference on

Teaching and Learning with Technology (ICTLT 2014).

https://dp2m.umm.ac.id/files/file/ICTLT-2014_2.pdf

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2015). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah:

Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Tingkatan 4. Bahagian

Pembangunan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Sukatan pelajaran ekonomi asas. Pusat

Perkembangan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Sukatan Pelajaran Ekonomi Asas. Pusat

Perkembangan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kurikulum standard sekolah menengah:

Dokumen standard kurikulum dan pentaksiran Tingkatan 4. Bahagian

Pembangunan Kurikulum.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Laporan Tahunan 2018 Bahagian

Pengurusan Sekolah Harian. https://www.moe.gov.my/muat-turun/laporandan-

statistik/2615-laporan-tahunan-2018-bpsh/file.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2021). Laporan Analisis Keputusan Sijil Pelajaran

Malaysia 2019, 2020 & 2021. Lembaga Peperiksaan.

 

Kerlinger. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research. (3rd ed). Holt, Rinehart and

Winston.

 

Khalid, K., Hilman, H., & Kumar, D. (2012). Get along with quantitative research

process. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(2), 15-29.

 

Khan, A. B., Ramanair, J., & Rethinasamy, S. (2023). Perceptions of Pakistani

undergraduates and teachers of collaborative learning approaches in learning

English. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-18.

https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.6

 

Khoiriyah, T. E., Hakiman, H., & Aminuddin, A. (2021). Pembelajaran pendidikan

agama Islam kontekstual di sekolah dasar alam. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru

Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v4i2.147

 

Kiamsin, L. L., & Talin, R. (2018). Kaedah pengajaran Sejarah yang diminati pelajar

dan justifikasinya. Malaysian Journal of Science and Humanities (MJSSH),

3(2), 137-145. doi: 10.47405/mjssh.v312.92.

 

Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic

achievement, self-concept and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education

Review, 6(1), 7-19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ728823.pdf

 

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during

instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery,

problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational

Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

 

Konting, M. M. (2000)Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. (7th ed.). Dewan Bahasa dan

Pustaka.

 

Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges,

cencerns and clarity for teachers. Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and

Ideas, 89(3), 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311

 

Krapp, A., (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical

considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12,

383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1

 

Kumar, M. K. (2016). Challenges of implementing student-centered strategies in

classrooms. International Reseach Journal of Engineering and Technologies

(IRJET), l3(12), 1224-1227. https://www.irjet.net/archives/V3/i12/IRJETV3I12276.

pdf

 

Kuppusamy, Y. & Norman, H. (2021). Kemahiran teknologi dan kesediaan

melaksanakan pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan dalam talian semasa era

pandemik dalam kalangan guru di sekolah rendah Tamil. Jurnal Dunia

Pendidikan, 3(1), 428-441.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/12937

 

Lay, A. M., Saunders, R., Lifshen, M., Breslin, C., LaMontagne, A., Tompa, E., &

Smith, P. (2016). Individual, occupational, and workplace correlates of

occupational health and safety vulnerability in a sample of Canadian workers.

American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 59, 119-128.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22535

 

Laz, H. A., & Shafei, K. E. (2014). The effectiveness of construvtivist learning model

in the teaching of mathematics. Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences,

2(3), 106-109.

 

Lee Abdullah, M. F. N., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen

penilaian kendiri pembelajaran geometri tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of

Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211-265.

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.1.9

 

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design Framework for enchancing engagement in

students-centred learning: Own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology

Research and Development, 64, 707-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-

9422-5

 

Lim, C. H. (2007). Penyelidikan pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif.

McGraw-Hill.

 

Liu, H., Ferris, D. R., Sinha, A. & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for

individual L2 witers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307-329.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009

 

Lo, Y. M. (2019). Inovatif pelaksanaan kurikulum: Satu tinjauan persekitaran

pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme dalam kalangan guru Sains dan Teknologi

sekolah menengah kebangsaan kawasan Lembah Klang. Jurnal Penyelidikan

Teknokrat II, XXI, 2020.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jpt/article/view/8405

 

Madjapuni, M. N., & Harun, J. (2019). Kemahiran berfikir kritis melalui permainan

digital dalam persekitaran pembelajaran konstruktivisme sosial. International

Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(28),73-83.

http://www.ijepc.com/

 

Mahalingam N., & Jamaludin, K. (2022). Impak dan cabaran pelaksanaan pengajaran.

Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4, 104-115.

 

Mahamod, Z. (2014). Kemahiran Bahasa Melayu untuk pelajar warganegara asing di

IPTA dan IPTS Malaysia. Prosiding Seminar Pascasiswazah Pendidikan

Bahasa Melayu Kali Ke-3, 1-6.

 

Maheshwari, G., & Thomas, S. (2017). An analysis of the effectiveness of the

constructivist approach in teaching business statistics. Informing Science: The

International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 20, 83-97.

http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3748

 

Mahmud, H. (2011). Pengaplikasian pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam pengajaran

dan pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan

Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=cdb9fba77e91253e8f68c8212cb6d80e

646f915009484

 

Mahzir, K. (2016). Teks ucapan Menteri Pendidikan Malaysia Majlis Pelancaran Hari

Guru Peringkat Kebangsaan kali ke-45, Dewan Canselor Universiti Malaysia

Sabah.

 

Mailis, M. I. (2021). Pandangan dan cabaran guru terhadap pelaksanaan pengajaran dan

pembelajaran di rumah (PdPR) dalam tempoh pandemik covid-19. Jurnal Iimi,

11(1), 14-25.

 

Makmun, M. (2019). Kesan penggunaan kaedah mobil gallery walk terhadap minat

dan prestasi pelajar ekonomi [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=54037cde9c5a8c729270dcbb4a8d8e94

646f397e30b02

 

Marashi, H., & Khatami, H. (2017). Using cooperative learning to boost creativity and

motivation in language learning. Journal of Language and Translation, 7(1), 43-

58.

 

Marimuthu, T. (2004). An insight into constructivism and discovery inquiry in the

teaching of science by secondary school trainee teachers during practicum.

Seminar Penyelidikan MPBL: Penyelidikan Pendidikan Teras Peningkatan

Profesionalism Guru.

 

Marx, R. G., Menezes, A,, Horovitz, L., Jones, E. C., & Warren, R. F. (2003). A

comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status

instruments. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(8), 730-5.

https://doi.org./10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2. PMID: 12954464.

 

Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (2004). Constructivist theories. In B. Hopkins, R. G.

Barre, G. F. Michel, & P. Rochat (Eds.). Cambridge encyclopedia of child

development. Cambridge University Press.

 

Masgumelar, N. K., & Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori belajar konstruktivisme dan

implikasinya dalam pendidikan dan pembelajaran. GHAITSA: Islamic

Education Journal, 2, 49-57. https://siducat.org/index.php/ghaitsa

 

Masyuniza, Y. (2015). Hubungan sikap dan persepsi murid terhadap pembelajaran

Bahasa Melayu dengan kemahiran abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa

Melayu, 5(2), 22-30.

 

Mat Jasin, Z., & Shaari, A. S. (2012). Keberkesanan Model Konstruktisme Lima Fasa

Needham dalam pengajaran Komsas Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan

Bahasa Melayu, 2(1), 79-92. http://www.ukm.my/jpbm/Current.aspx

 

Mat Lui, M. Z., Awang, M., Ahmad, A. R., & Muhthar, M. (2019). Constructivism

approach to increase the knowledge and appreciation in history among

secondary student. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on

Sustainable Development & Multi-Ethnic Society, 2, 90-94.

https://doi.org/10.32698/GCS.0177

 

Mat, S. F., & Matore, M. E. M. (2020). Faktor yang mempengaruhi keterlibatan pelajar

dalam pembelajaran matematik: Sorotan literatur bersistematik. Jurnal DuniaPendidikan, 2(3), 173-187.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/10967

 

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

McBrien, J. L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to education

terms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth,

 

M. T., Gharkholonarehe, N., & Mumper, R. J. (2013). Pharmacy student

engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 196.

https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe779196

 

McMillian, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based

inquiry. (7th ed). Pearson.

 

Md Daud, M. J., Latif, A. A., & Talib, R. (2020). Inventori penilaian penjajaran

konstruktif (IPPK) di Institut Pendidikan Guru: satu analisis literatur. Sains

Humanika, 12(2–2), 67–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.11113/sh.v12n2-2.1787

 

Md Nasir, M. A. (2016). Kesan penggunaan kartun melalui persekitaran pembelajaran

maya terhadap prestasi, motivasi dan interaksi sosial dalam kalangan pelajar

ekonomi asas. [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=18c653c9afcf8dfc05f612ee28be8ca96

46f26b3e0f3d

 

Md Yaacob, J. A. (2017). Kesan pembelajaran 5E secara kontekstual terhadap

pemahaman konsep pembahagian sel, penaakulan saintifik dan motivasi [Tesis

Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Sains Malaysia].

http://eprints.usm.my/38858/1/Kesan_pembelajaran_5E_secara_kontekstual_t

erhadap_pemahaman_konsep_pembahagian_sel_penaakulan_saintifik_dan_m

otivasi_by_Jaswardi_Anwar_Md_Yaacob..pdf

 

Mergendoller, J. R., Maxwell, N. L., & Bellissimo, Y. (2006). The effectiveness of

problem-based instruction: A comparative study of instructional methods and

students characteristics. International Journal of Problem-Based Learning,

1(2), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1026

 

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. (2013). Measurement and assessment in

teaching. Pearson.

 

Mohamad Zani, N. (2015). Faktor penentu niat terhadap perkongsian maklumat

mangsa banjir Rantau Panjang, Kelantan dari persperktif Teori Kognitif Sosial

[Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Utara Malaysia].

https://etd.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/5764

 

Mohamad, S. N. A. (2011). The instructional material blended with Needham 5 phases

strategy in teaching visual art education. In Y. Wang (Ed.), Education and

educational technology. Advances in intelligent and soft computing (vo. 108).

Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24775-0_2

 

Moharam, M. M. A., Mokhtar, S., & Thia, K. (2021, August 3-5). Pendekatan kaedah

interaktif dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam abad ke-21 si

Sekolan Menengah Kebangsaan Kota Kinabalu. 5th International Conference

on Teacher Learning and Development (ICTLD) 2021.

 

Mohd Majid, K. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

 

Mohd Taher, F. I., & Jamaluddin, Z. S. (2021). Penggunaan kaedah Gallery Walk

dalam pengajaran kursus DUA6022 Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam: Satu

tinjauan di Politeknik. Internasional Conference On Syariah & Law 2021.

 

Mok, S. S. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan dan pedagogi murid dan alam belajar.

Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.

 

Mok, S. S. (2011). Pedagogi untuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Penerbitan

Multimedia Sdn.Bhd.

 

Moon, J., Wiliford, A., & Mendenhall, A. (2017). Educators’ perceptions of youth

mental health: Implications for training and promotion of mental health services

in schools. Children and Youth Services Review, 73, 384-391.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.01.006

 

Morkbak, M. R., & Olsen, S. B. (2014). A within-sample investigation of test–retest

reliability in choice experiment surveys with real economic incentives.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 59(3), 375-392.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12067

 

Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A. M. (2015). The flipped classroom stimulates greater

learning and is a modern 21St century approach to teaching today’s

undergraduates. Journal of Animal Science, 93(7), 3722-3731.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9087

 

Moskaliuk, J., Bokhorst, F., & Cress, U. (2016). Learning from others experiences:

How patterns foster interpersonal transfer of knowledge-in-use. Computers in

Human Behaviour, 55(Part A), 69-75.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.051

 

Muhibbin, M., & Hidayatullah, M. A. (2020). Implementasi teori belajar

konstruktivisme Vygotsky pada mata pelajaran PAI di SMA Sains Qur’an

Yogyakata. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 1-11.

http://journal.staincurup.ac.id/indek.php/belajea

 

Murshed, M. (2013). Pemindahan pembelajaran antara konsep dan aplikasi

keseimbangan daya serta trigonometri dalam kalangan pelajar Tingkatan

Empat [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48255/1/MazlenaMurshedMFP2013.pdf

 

Musa, N. (2005). Hubungan persekitaran pengajaran dan pembelajaran

konstruktivisme dengan pencapaian pendidikan seni visual di kalangan pelajar

tingkatan empat di Daerah Larut Matang dan Selama (IR) [Tesis Sarjana,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/detailsg.php?det=2887

 

Musalamani, W., Yasin, M. R., & Osman, K. (2022). The effectiveness of the school

based-cooperative problem based learning model in improving students

achievement in Science. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 47(1), 75-87.

https://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/issue/view/1462

 

Muslikh, Fatimah, S., Rosidin, D. N., & Hidayat, A. (2022). Student-based learning in

the perspective of constructivism theory and maieutics method. International

Journal of social science and Human Research, 5(5), 1632-1637.

https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i5-10

 

Muthiah, M. (2010). Membandingkan kesan kaedah Lima Fasa Needham, kaedah

STAD dan kaedah konvensional terhadap pencapaian, kemahiran sosial dan

minat murid dalam pengajaran Sejarah Tingkatan Empat [Tesis Doktor

Falsafah, Universiti Sains Malaysia].

http://eprints.usm.my/41991/1/MALAR_MUTHIAH.pdf

 

Mutia, Z., Rahimah, E., & Che Omar, M. (2018). Pengaruh kefahaman guru terhadap

model pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning di Aceh Barat. BITARA

International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 1(1), 63-

68. https://bitarajournal.com/index.php/bitarajournal/article/view/8/7

 

Nair, S., & Muthiah, M. (2005). Penggunaan model konstruktivisme lima fasa needham

dalam pembelajaran sejarah. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 20, 21-41.

http://web.usm.my/apjee/webtest/APJEE_20_2005/JPP02Subadrah%20(21-

42)B.pdf

 

Najib, H. M., Bakar, N. R. A., & Othman, N. (2020). E-pembelajaran dalam kalangan

pelajar di sebuah institusi pengajian tinggi Selangor. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian

Online Journal of Education, 1(1), 74–82.

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v1i1.121

 

Needham, R. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. The

Centre for Studies in Sciences and Mathematics Education.

 

Ng, C.W., & Amran, M. S. (2021). Pembelajaran menggunakan kaedah ‘Stay and

Stray’ terhadap kreativiti dan motivasi penulisan Bahasa: Learning using

cooperative methods stay and stray towards creativity and motivation of

language writing. Sains Insani, 6(2), 28-

38. https://doi.org/10.33102/sainsinsani.vol6no2.278

 

Ngah, N.S., Abdul Aziz, N.A., Mohamad, N., Vadeveloo, T. (2017). Implementation

of instructional material in enchancing learning processing project management

course. Journal of Humanities, Languages, Culture and Business, 1(6), 47-53.

 

Ngasiman, N. H. (2014). Kesan kaedah pembelajaran koperatif terhadap pencapaian

pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Matematik [Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

 

Nguyen, L. Q., & Le, H. V. (2022). Improving L2 learners’ IELTS task writing: The

role of model essays and noticing hypothesis. Lang Test Asia, 12, 58.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00206-0

 

Nguyen, P.-M. (2008). Culture and cooperation: Cooperative learning in Asian

heritage cultures – The case of Vietnam [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Utrecht

University].

https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/27818/nguyen.pdf;sequence

=2

 

Nik Pa, N. A. (1999). Pendekatan konstruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan

Matematik. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Nowak, G. T. (1986). Western Michigan University career guidance inventory manual.

Western Michigan University Testing and Evaluation Services

 

Nur, M. (2022). Pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam proses pembelajaran IPS. Journal

of Education, 2(4), 636-649.

https://adisampublisher.org/index.php/adiba/article/download/297/310

 

Nurpatri, Y., Mullani, D., & Indrawati, E. S. (2020). Implementation of constructivism

approach in physics learning on student’s critical thinking ability of junior high

school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1876, 012068.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1876/1/012068

 

Nyutu, E. N., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A-S. (2021). Correlational study of

student perceptions of their undergraduate laboratory environment with respect

to gender and major. Internasional Journal of Education in Mathematics,

Science and Technology (IJEMST), 9(1), 83-102.

 

O’Connor, K. (2020). Constructivism, curriculum and the knowledge question:

tensions and challenges for higher education. Studies in Higher Education,

47(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585

 

Omar, A. (2007). Amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran Sains menggunakan

pendekatan konstruktivisme 5-fasa Needham dalam kalangan guru KPLI (IR)

[Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=3b98e538192543aad157d6f79a7ab6c8

647a0863ba063

 

Omar, Z. (2014). Pendekatan konstruktif dalam inovasi pengajaran dan pembelajaran

Bahasa Melayu di kolej vokasional [Laporan projek Sarjana, Universiti Tun

Hussein Onn Malaysia]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42955455.pdf

 

Omodan. B. I. (2022). The potency of social constructivism on classroom productivity

in universities. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3(1), 36-45.

https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v3i1.97

 

Orbanic, N. D., Dimec, D. S., & Cencic, M. (2016). The effectiveness of a constructivist

teaching model on students understanding of photosynthesis. Journal of Baltic

Science Education, 15(5), 575-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.575

 

Orcan, F. (2020). Parametric or non-parametric: skewness to test normality for mean

comparison. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(2), 255–

265. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.656077

 

Osadebe, P. U. (2014). Standardization of test for assessment and comparing of

students’ measurement. International Education Studies, 7(5).

http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n5p94

 

Othman, A. J., & Omar, B. (2005). Aplikasi pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme

dalam pengajaran karangan berpandu. Makalah Pendidikan, 4, 6-8.

 

Othman, N., & Shah, M. I. A. (2013). Problem-based learning in the English language

classroom. English Language Teaching, 6(3), 125-134.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076845.pdf

 

PADU. (2015). Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21. Buletin Anjakan 5: 1-5.

http://www.padu.edu.my/files/Anjakan_Bil_4_(2015)_Final.pdf

 

Paily, M. U. (2013). Creating constructivist learning environment: Role of “Web 2.0”

technology. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 9(1), 39-50.

http://etec512constructivismonline.weebly.com/uploads/2/3/7/5/23750641/role

_of_2.0_conference.pdf

 

Palaniappan, A. K. (2009). Creative teaching and its assessment.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277058107_Creative_teaching_and_

its_assessment

 

Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using

the SPSS program. (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin, Berkshire.

 

Pelech, J. (2021). Students-centered research: Blending constructivism with action

research. Information Age Publishing Incorporated.

 

Peng-Armao, J. (2014). Economics professor’s passion for tough subject creates

champs and changes career paths. http://www.sanjac.edu/article/economicsprofessor%

E2%80%99s-passion-tough-subject-create-champs-and-changescareer-

paths.

 

Pitsoe, V. J., & Maila, W. M. (2012). Towards constructivist teacher professional

development. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(3), 318-324.

https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2012.318.324

 

Pornamasari, E. I. (2017). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran berbantu flipbook

maker dengan model pembelajaran Numbered Heads Together (Nht) berbasis

teori Vygotsky materi pokok relasi dan fungsi. Aksioma: Jurnal Matematika

dan Pendidikan Matematika UPGRIS Semarang, 7, 74-83.

 

Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York.

Dell.

 

Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing

tools for effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241.

Link.gale.com/apps/doc/A216181184/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmar

k-AONE&xid=3f64b9a8

 

Prawiradilaga, D. S. (2009). Prinsip desain pembelajaran. Kencana.

 

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of

Engineering Education, 93, 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-

9830.2004.tb00809.x

 

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2001). Spesifikasi Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah

Menengah. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

 

Putrayasa, L. B. (2013). Buku ajar landasan pembelajaran [Textbook of learning

foundation]. Undhiksa Press.

 

Radzi, M. S. M (2010). Aplikasi kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi melalui pembelajaran

berasaskan masalah [Disertasi yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Teknologi

Malaysia].

 

Rahim, N. A., Fadzir, N. A. M., Zaimal, N. A. H., Yahaya, F. F. A., Zainol, Z. I., &

Husin, M. R. (2021). Implikasi gaya pembelajaran koperatif subjek Sains bagi

murid tahap dua di sekolah kebangsaan Bandar Baru Rawang. Journal of

Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 57-66.

https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0302.238

 

Rajendran, N. S. (2008). Teaching and acquiring higher order thinking: theory and

practice. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Ramlogan, S., Raman, V., & Sweet, J. (2014). A comparison of two forms of teaching

instruction: Video vs Live lecture for education in clinical periodontology.

European Journal of Dental Education. 18(1), 31-38.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12053

 

Rashid, N. A., & Buang, N. A. (2015). Aplikasi edmodo dalam pengajaran dan

pembelajaran mata pelajaran Ekonomi STPM.

https://docplayer.info/209387337-Aplikasi-edmodo-dalam-pengajaran-danpembelajaran-

mata-pelajaran-ekonomi-stpm.html

 

Ratnam, K., Hamdan, A. R., & Ariffin, A. (2022). The effect of “Fiminqu” on students’

achievement in malay language speaking skills among Chinese secondary

students. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 20(1), 202-219.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jd/article/view/18582

 

Razali, N. A., & Zaid, N. M. (2022). The effectiveness of the constructivism video

approach in self-learning Malay sentence building skills for special

rehabilitation students. Humanizing Education: Trends and Challenges, 14(3-

2), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v14n3-2.2018

 

Redzuan, N. H., Osman, Z., & Yusof. (2018). Keberkesanan pelaksanaan pengajaran

dan pembelajaran abad ke-21 (ICLEHI). 9th Internasional Conference on

Language, Education, Humanities and Innovation 10-11 May 2018.

 

Rhodes, L. K & Bellamy, G. T. (1999). Choices and consequences in the renewel of

teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(1), 17-18.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719905000103

 

Rila, A., Arifmiboy, A., & Zakir, S. (2021). Pembelajaran pai menggunakan

pendekatan konstruktivisme di SMP N 2 Tilatang Kamang. Jurnal Kajian dan

Pengembangan Umat, 4(2), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v4i2.2721

 

Riyanto, B., & Siroj, R. A. (2011). Meningkatkan kemapuan penalaran dan prestasi

matematika dengan pendekatan konstruktivisme pada siswa sekolah menengah

atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 5(2), 111-127.

https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.5.2.581

 

Rodenbaugh, D. W. (2015). Maximize a team-based learning gallery walk experience:

Herding cats is easier than you think. Advances in Physiology Education, 39(4),

411-413. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00012.2015

 

Rohayu, S. H., Puspitasari, I., & Mohtar, L. E. (2021). Ciri kefahaman pelajar sekolah

menengah atas negeri menggunakan teknik kartun konsep dalam topik haba.

Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 9(2), 33-42.

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol9.2.4.2021

 

Rohmah, F., Rusilowati, A., Supriyadi, S., & Widowati, T. (2023). Validitas dan

reliabilitas instrumen penilaian berbasis android untuk menilai kemampuan

siswa SMK dalam mendesain busana secara digital. Jurnal Penelitian

Pendidikan Indonesia, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.29210/020232131

 

Rop, R. C. M. (2005). Keberkesanan pengajaran menggunakan pendekatan

konstruktivisme dalam sub topik jadual berkala dalam kalangan pelajar

tingkatan empat di sekolah [Tesis Sarjana Muda yang tidak diterbitkan,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

 

Ropisa & Rahimah, E. (2018). Penerapan model numbered head together di sekolah

rendah wilayah Aceh Barat. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational

Studies and Human Sciences, 1(1), 33-38.

https://bitarajournal.com/index.php/bitarajournal/article/view/5/4

 

Ruel, E., Wagner, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2016). The practice of survey research:

theory and applications. SAGE Publications, Inc.

 

Rusdin, N. M., & Ali, S. R. (2019). Amalan dan cabaran pelaksanaan pembelajaran

abad ke-21. Proceedings of the International Conference on Islamic Civilization

and Technology Management, 87-105.

https://www.tatiuc.edu.my/assets/files/ICTM19-Papers/ICTM-09.pdf

 

Rusman. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan.

Kencana

 

Sabtari, N., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Keberkesanan penggunaan multimedia terhadap

minat dan pencapaian murid tahun empat dalam mata pelajaran sejarah. Jurnal

Dunia Pendidikan, 5(1), 417-428.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/22009

 

Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex

appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 35, 535-550.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015

 

Saidin, K., Dali, M. H., & Ambotang, A. S. (2016). Peranan guru cemerlang Malaysia

di sekolah. MANU, 24, 161-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.51200/manu.v24i0.521

 

Saimi, R. (2021). Kesan penggunaan kaedah bulat dan potong terhadap pemahaman,

minat dan pencapaian numerasi murid tahun 1 [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=fe288786fb26fb4a383571b55754431a

647a2d7e9a13f

 

Salahuddin, N. M., & Rosli, R. (2023). Aspek tingkah laku dan pencapaian pelajar

semasa pembelajaran aktif dalam mata pelajaran Matematik: Kajian literatur

bersistematik. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and

Society, 5(1), 91-102.

https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijares/article/view/21428

 

Salam, F., Mailok, R., & Ubaidullah, N. (2015). Perubahan pencapaian mata pelajaran

teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi pembelajaran berasaskan projek dengan

scaffolding. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 40(1), 29-41.

http://www.ukm.my/jurfpend/articles_for_vol_40(1)_2015.html

 

Saleh, M. K. (2016). Kesan pembelajaran koperatif terhadap pencapaian pelajar

dalam tajuk menterjemah litar skematik, mata pelajaran Kemahiran Hidup

Bersepadu (IR) [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UPRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=2c769af9dd6d455694d150ebc682ac2b

647a168fc21d4

 

Salemi, M. K. (2002). An illustrated case for active learning. Journal Southern

Economic, 68, 721-731. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061730

 

Salleh, M. J., Kamin, M., Loven, C. L., Henry, J. F., & Rubin, M. (2012). Kajian

terhadap faktor-faktor mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar dalam penilaian

menengah rendah di Sabah. Labuan International Conference on Educational

Research.- LICER 2012, Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan.

 

Santi, J. (2012). Penerapan pendekatan konstruktivisme untuk meningkatkan hasil

belajar siswa pada pokok bahasan tumbuhan hijau di Kelas V SDN Tolitoli.

Jurnal Kreatif, 4(3), 57-71.

 

Sanuddin, N. D., & Hashim, A. (2017). Kesahan kandungan instrumen penilaian minat

terhadap aktiviti fizikal [Contents validity of interest assessment instrument to

physical activities]. Jurnal Sains Sukan & Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(2), 45-54.

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsspj.vol6.2.5.2017

 

Saputro, M. N. A., & Pakpahan, P. L. (2021). Mengukur keefektifan teori

konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Journal of Education and Instruction, 4,

24-39. https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2151

 

Sashi Kala, K. (2018). Keberkesanan pembelajaran teradun terhadap kesediaan

pembelajaran terarah kendiri dan pencapaian murid dalam subjek Ekonomi

[Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Sains Malaysia].

http://eprints.usm.my/id/eprint/47947

 

Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.R. Wentzel and A.

Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. Routledge.

 

Sekaran, U. (1992). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach. John

Wiley & Sons, Inc.

 

Selley, N. (2013). Art of constructivist teaching in the primary school: A guide for

students and teachers. Routledge

 

Selvaraju, J. (2018). Pengaruh faktor dalaman dan luaran terhadap prestasi pelajar

dalam mata pelajaran ekonomi asas di daerah Port Dickson [Tesis Sarjana,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=11ec018dbdb5a7cf7dd8d180b10cd6bb

646f7055a7130

 

Seow, Y. P. (2011). Persepsi terhadap keberkesanan pembelajaran aktif dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran ekonomi asas Tingkatan Empat [Disertasi

Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=50644c7858ada7a16b67cdc844b6975b

646f3f7befb7b

 

Shaari, A. S., & Aplanaidu, K. (2012). Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran masteri

terhadap pencapaian kemahiran membaca bahasa Melayu murid pemulihan

sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 2(2), 94-105.

http://www.ukm.my/jpbm/Current.aspx

 

Shanmugam, R. (2021). Pembangunan modul strategi struktur dekonstruktivisme kata

kerja tatabahasa Bahasa Tamil [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Malaya].

UM Students’s Repository. http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/id/eprint/14282

 

Shaughnessy, R. O., Kim, C., Kalogera, V., & Belczynski, K. (2008). Constraining

population synthesis model via empirical binary compact object merger and

supernova rates. The Astrophysical Journal, 672, 479-488.

https://doi.org/10.1086/523620

 

Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject. Prentice-

Hall.

 

Sipayung, H. D., Rahmatsyah, Sani, R. A., Bunawan, W., & Lubis, R. H. (2019).

Pengaruh model pembelajaran kolaboratif inkuri terhadap keterampilan 4C

siswa di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 29-38.

http://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf

 

Siti Nurul Azwanee, K. S. (2019). Faktor pemilihan rumah pertama di kalangan

mahasiswa yang baru bekerja di Lembah Klang: Kenaikan harga rumah. Dlm

Menelusuri Pengajian Melayu: Siri Seminar Pengajian Melayu Pelajar Ijazah

Tinggi. Institut Terjemahan Dan Buku Malaysia Berhad.

 

Slavin, R.E. (2005). Educational Psychology: Theory into practice. Prentice Hall

Limited.

 

Slezak, P. (2000). The mind-brain problem. In Gordon, E. (Ed.), Integrative

neuroscience. Hardwood Academic Publishers.

 

Somasundram, B., & Mahamod, Z. (2017). Keberkesanan pembelajaran koperatif

terhadap pencapaian dan motivasi murid sekolah menengah dalam

pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 7(1), 11-23.

 

Steffe, L. P. (2012). Establishing Mathematics Education as an academic field: a

constructive odyssey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2),

353-371.

 

Suanto, E., Zakaria, E., & Maat, S. M. (2017). Penerapan pembelajaran pengalaman

dalam pendidikan Matematika: Sebuah kajian awal. Prosiding Seminar

Serantau ke-VII Bidang Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

 

Subramaniam, G., & Mahmud, M. S. (2022). Pelaksanaan pendekatan sosial

konstruktivisme menggunakan google jamboard dalam PdP Matematik

terhadap pelajar tahun empat. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and

Humanities, 7(12), e001923. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v7i12.1923

 

Sugiyono. (2013). Educational research methods quantitative approach, qualitative

and R&D. Alfabeta.

 

Sugrah, N. U. (2019). Implementasi teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran

Sains. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 19(2), 121-138.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/hum.v19i2.29274

 

Sukumarian, M. (2017). Penggunaan konstruktivisme lima fasa needham dalam

pengajaran kemahiran penulisan cerpen Bahasa Tamil [Tesis Sarjana,

Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris]. UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=d975f28e97e8bfbc9014c751472702d8

646f23651ac75

 

Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan disposisi matematik: Apa.mengapa dan bagaimana

dikembangkan pada peserta didik.

http://math.sps.upi.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2010/02/BERFIKIR-DANDISPOSISMATEMATIK-

SPS-2010.pdf

 

Sumihariantini, S. (2018). Penerapan pembelajaran problem based instruction melalui

model konstruktivisme pada materi program linear siswa kelas x SMK. Jurnal

Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, 2, 162-165.

https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jtam/article/view/723/633

 

Suparlan. (2019). Teori konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran. Islamika, 1(2), 79-88.

 

Sushkin, N. (1999). (Tajuk artikel tidak dinyatakan).

http://carboncudenver.edu/mryder/ite-data/constructivism.html.

 

Swan, K., & Hofer, M. (2011). In search of technological pedagogical content

knowledge: Teacher’s initial foray into podcasting in economics. Journal of

Research on Technology in Education, 44(1), 75-98.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ951446.pdf

 

Syukri, M. (2016). Model pengajaran konstruktivisme lima fasa needham dalam

pengintegrasian pendidikan STEM. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan

Fisika, FKIP, Universiti Syiah Kuala.

 

Taip, R., & Md Sabri, M. S. (2013). Penggunaan aplikasi Google Earth dalam

meningkatkan prestasi pelajar mata pelajaran Geografi di sekolah menengah.

Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

 

Talib, N. S. A., Ghani, K. A., Yusuff, N. A. (2016). Tahap pengetahuan dan sikap

graduan IPT serta hubungannya dengan minat terhadap sejarah: usaha awal

memupuk semangat cinta negara. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 7, 57-72.

 

Tangkui, R., & Tan, C. K. (2020). Kesan pembelajaran berasaskan permainan digital

Minecraft terhadap pencapaian murid tahun lima dalam pecahan. Malaysian

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(9), 98-113.

https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i9.476

 

Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving

implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology

Review, 29(3), 443-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2000.12086029

 

Tha-Do, T. P., Bac-Ly, D. T., & Yuenyong, C. (2013). Learning environment in

Vietnamese Physics teacher education programme through the lens of

constructivism: A case study of a state university in Mekong Delta Region,

Vietnam. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1),

55-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9585-2

 

Thao, L. P. (2023). A study on the implementation of the constructivist teaching

approach to teach first-year university students academic essays at a university

in Hanoi. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(1), 116-126.

http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap

 

Thorbun, D. (2000). Technology integration and educational change. Is it possible?

USASK. https://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/index.htm

 

Tobias, S., & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: success or failure?

Routledge.

 

Tomljenovic, Z., & Vorkapic, S. T. (2020). Constructivism in visual arts classes. Center

for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 13-32.

https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.913

 

Triantafyllou, S. A. (2022, April 8-10). Constructivist learning environments. 5th

International Conference on Advanced Research in Teaching and Education,

Paris, France. http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/5th.icate.2022.04.10

 

Umam. K., Cahyono, R., & Ridha. A. A. (2019). Effectiveness of training on

constructivism learning methods to improve teaching skills self-help material

for early childhood education teachers. International Journal of Indian

Psychology, 7(3), 667-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.25215/0703.072

 

Vaughan, W. (2002). Effects of cooperative learning on achievement and attitude

among students of color. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 359-364.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596610

 

Veloo, A. (2010). Hubungan di antara orientasi pembelajaran Matematik (Opm) dengan

pencapaian Matematik. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education,

25(1), 1-19.

http://apjee.usm.my/APJEE_25_2010/APJEE_25_03_Arsaythamby%20(35-

51).pdf

 

Vighnarajah, Wong, S. L., & Bakar, K. A. (2008). The shift in the role of teachers in

the learning process. European Journal of Social Science, 7(2), 33-41.

 

Vijayakumaran, R. K., Ismail, R., & Abdul Jalil, N. (2022). Kaedah Flipped Learning

terhadap minat, penglibatan, dan kefahaman pelajar Ekonomi [Flipped Learning

Methods towards Interest, Involvement, and Understanding of Economics

Student]. Journal Of ICT In Education (JICTIE), 9(1).

 

Viro, E., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2018). The development of project work in lower secondary

school’s mathematics education. FMSERA Journal, 1(1), 121-131.

 

Voon, S. H., & Amran, M. S. (2021). Pengaplikasian teori pembelajaran

konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran matematik. Jurnal Sains Insani, 6, 73-82.

 

Wahyuningsih, S. (2021). Pembelajaran berbasis konstruktivisme untuk meningkatkan

aktivitas dan prestasi belajar siswa pada materi pokok himpunan. Jurnal

Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia (JPPI), 1(1), 10-21.

https://dx.doi.org/10.53299/jppi.v1i1.19

 

Walstad, W. B., & Watts, M. (2015). Perspectives on economics in the school

curriculum: coursework, content and research. The Journal of Economic

Education, 46(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2015.1040185

 

Wang, Y. (2022). Research on the implications of constructivism to education.

Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference in Humanities and Social

Science Research (ICHSSR 2022), 664(Ichssr), 2793-2797.

 

Wang, Y. (2022). Research on the implications of constructivism to education.

Proceedings of the 2022 8th International Conference in Humanities and Social

Science Research (ICHSSR 2022), 664(Ichssr), 2793-2797.

 

Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The perceptions of teachers and students on a 21st

century Mathematics instructional model. International Electronic Journal of

Mathematics Education, 12(2), 193-214.

https://www.iejme.com/download/the-perceptions-of-teachers-and-studentson-

a-21st-century-mathematics-instructional-model.pdf

 

Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The perceptions of teachers and students on a 21st

century Mathematics instructional model. International Electronic Journal of

Mathematics Education, 12(2), 193-214.

https://www.iejme.com/download/the-perceptions-of-teachers-and-studentson-

a-21st-century-mathematics-instructional-model.pdf

 

Waruwu, S. (2022). Pendekatan konstruktivisme dengan Teknik M3 (mengamati,

menirukan, memodifikasi) untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis teks

pidato. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 326-333.

https://doi.org/10.56248/educativo.v1i1.57

 

Waseso, H. P. (2018). Kurikulum 2013 dalam perspektif, teori pembelajaran dan

konstruktivisme. Journal Studi Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 59-72.

https://doi.org/10.52166/talim.v1i1.632

 

Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical

approaches. (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

 

White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi experimental design and methods.

https://www.unicef-irc.org/KM/IE/img/downloads/Quasi-

Experimental_Design_and_Methods_ENG.pdf

 

Wild, A. (2015). Relationships between high school chemistry students’ perceptions

of a constructivist learning environment and their STEM Career. International

Journal of Science Education, 9(11), 3–22.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1076951

 

Williams K. & Williams, C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student

motivation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 104-122.

http://aabri.com/manuscripts/11834.pdf

 

Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of

dilemmas: An Analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political

challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research Summer, 72(2),

131-175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131

 

Wong S. F. & Nasri, N. M. (2020). Keberkesanan Model Konstruktivisme Lima Fasa

Needham terhadap kemahiran penulisan hujah murid sekolah menengah atas.

Jurnal Personalia Pelar, 23(2), 69-80.

http://www.ukm.my/personalia/publication-category/volume-23-number-2-

december-2020/

 

Wong, L. L., Osman, K. & Maat, S. M. (2018). Analisis faktor pengesahan bagi

instrumen pengetahuan guru matematik sekolah rendah dalam pentaksiran

berasaskan sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 43(1), 11-20.

http://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/issue/view/1141

 

Wong, S. F., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2022). Keberkesanan Model Konstruktivisme

Lima Fasa Needham Terhadap Kemahiran Penulisan Hujah Murid Sekolah

Menengah Atas [The Effectiveness of Needham's Five-Phase Constructivism

Model in Developing Argumentative Writing Skills among Upper Secondary

Students]. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 23(2), 69-80.

 

Woo, Y. L. (2007). Kepuasan kerja guru-guru aliran pendidikan teknikal dan

vokasional di sekolah-sekolah menengah teknik di negeri Johor Darul Takzim

[Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia].

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/6473/1/WooYokeLingMFP2007.pdf

 

Yaakub, M. Y., Hamzah, M. I. M., & Nor, M. Y. M. (2020). Pengesahan instrumen soal

selidik kepimpinan distributive menggunakan kaedah fuzzy delphi. Jurnal

Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(2), 58-70.

https://jupidi.um.edu.my/index.php/JUPIDI/article/view/23860/11608

 

Yahaya, A., Peter Voo, Maakip, I., & Malek. M. D. (2021). Kaedah penyelidikan dalam

pendidikan. UPSI.

 

Yahaya, M., Hanafiah, R., Zakara, N.S, Osman, R. & Bahrin, K. A. (2019). Amalan

pembelajaran abad ke-21 (PAK21) dalam pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan

(PdPc) guru-guru sekolah rendah. Jurnal IPDA, 26(1).

 

Yahya, A., Hashim, S., Ramli, J., Boon, Y., & Hamdan, A. R. (2007). Menguasai

penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

 

Yang, L., & Wilson, K. (2006). Second language classroom reading: a social

constructivist approach. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 364-372.

https://www.readingmatrix.com/articles/yang_wilson/article.pdf

 

Yasin, M. H. M., Toran, H., Tahar, M. M., & Bari, S. (2014). Teacher’s perspective on

infrastructure of special educations classroom in Malaysia. Procedia - Social

and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 291-294.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.152

 

Yasmin, M. & Naseem, F. (2019). Teacher-directed learning to self-directed learning

transition barriers in Pakistan. Studies in Education Evaluation, 61, 34-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.02.003

 

Yatim, S. S. K., Saleh, S., & Hutkemri, Z. (2021). ICT-based teaching aid material in

rural high school additional mathematics learning: Need analysis. Malaysian

Journal of Education, 46, 1-10. https://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/issue/view/1431

 

Yazar, A. (2019). Investigation of Teacher Candidates’ Technology Competencies and

Perceptions in Terms of Various Variables. Journal of Education and Learning

Archives, 8(6), 129. doi:10.5539/jel.v8n6p129

 

Yildirim & Kasapoglu. (2015). Teacher’s perceptions of contructivist curriculum

change as a preditor of their perceptions of the implementation of constructivist

teaching-learning activities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 565-577.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9394-5

 

Yin, K. Y. (2008). Keberkesanan kaedah penyelesaian masalah secara kolaboratif

dalam kalangan pelajar Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam [Tesis yang tidak

diterbitkan, Universiti Sains Malaysia].

 

Yong, S. L. (2013). Gabungan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan behaviorlisme bagi

meningkatkan prestasi mata pelajaran Sejarah tingkatan tiga. Seminar

Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi 2013, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

 

Yuninda, A.A. (2011). Peningkatan motivasi belajar siswa melalui model pembelajaran

koperatif teknik Three Stay One Stray (TSOS) di kelas X IPA , Madrasah

Aliyah Negeri I Pekanbaru. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Islam Negeri

Sultam Syarif Kasim Riau.

 

Yusof, H., Yunus, J., & Musa, K. (2015). Kaedah penyelidikan: Pengurusan

pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Yusoff, F. A., Shahimin, M. M., Salehuddin, K., & Saat, N. Z. M. (2019). Kesahan dan

kebolehpercayaan soal selidik ‘pengalaman pembelajaran berbantukan rakan’

Versi Bahasa Melayu untuk pembelajaran Teknik Lampu Celah Biomikroskopi.

Jurnal Personalia Pelajar 21(2), 13-22. https://www.ukm.my/personalia/wpcontent/

uploads/2019/01/Artikel-13_MIZHANIM_Final1.pdf

 

Yusoff, N. (2022). Pembangunan aplikasi pembelajaran berasaskan permainan dalam

talian bagi topik Kebarangkalian Mudah dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian

murid Tingkatan Dua [Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

UDRep.

https://ir.upsi.edu.my/doc.php?t=p&id=2991fff25a6c81e5d3e31f7289db30a46

46f54bc733b9

 

Yustina. (2010). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan modul pembelajaran alam sekitar

melalui pendekatan konstruktivisme [Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti

Kebangsaan Malaysia].

 

Yusuf, M., & Arfiansyah, W. (2021). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” dalam pandangan

filsafat konstruktivisme. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan

Keislaman, 7(2), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.53627/jam.v7i2.3996

 

Zagoto, M. M., Yarni, N., & Dakhi, O. (2019). Perbedaan individu dari gaya belajarnya

serta implikasinya dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Penabdian Masyarakat, 2(2),

259-265. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v2i2.481

 

Zahari, Z. A., & Abdul Razak, K. (2020). Pendekatan kaedah konstruktivisme dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan islam di sekolah rendah [The Constructivism Approach in Teaching and Learning Islamic Education in

Primary Schools]. In Persidangan Antarabangsa Sains Sosial dan Kemanusiaan

ke-5 (PASAK5 2020) – Dalam Talian, 24 & 25 November 2020. e-ISBN: 978

967 2122 906

 

Zainol, M. (2019). Kaedah “MEC” dalam pembelajaran dan pengajaran ekonomi

tingkatan lims satu kaedah bagi meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir murid.

Seminar Antarabangsa Isu-Isu Pendidikan, 203-215.

http://conference.kuis.edu.my/ispen/wpcontent/

uploads/2019/05/ISPEN19_22.pdf

 

Zainuddin, Z. A., & Suardi, A. (2010). Keberkesanan kaedah konstruktivisme dalam

pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik.

http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10448/1/Keberkesanan_Kaedah_Konstruktivis

me_Dalam_Pengajaran_Dan_Pembelajaran_Matematik.pdf

 

Zakaria, E. (1998). Pembelajaran koperatif. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Zakaria, S. N. (2015). Kesan pendekatan konstruktivisme dan pendekatan tradisional

dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran komponen sastera Bahasa Melayu. Jurnal

Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 5, 12-21. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/9857/1/93-

184-1-SM.pdf

 

Zhong, L. (2022). Creative thinking in teh teaching of Chinese language and literature

in colleges from the perspective of educational psychology. Frontiers in

Psychology, 13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1018289

 

Zubiri-Esnaola, H., Vidu, A., Rios-Gonzalez, O., & Morla-Folch, T. (2020).

Inclusivity, participation and colaboration: learning in interative groups.

Educational Research, 62(2), 162-180.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1755605