Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or
diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27, 669-681.
Bardelle, C.(2010). Visual Proofs: An Experiment. Proceedings of CERME 6, January 28th-
February 1st 2009, Lyon France. INRP 2010
Blackwell, A., & Engelhardt, Y. (2002). A meta-taxonomy for diagram research. In M.
Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and reasoning,
47–64. London: Springer-Verlag.
Carney, R. and Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from
text. Educational Psychology Review, 14,1, 5- 26.
Cook, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of visual representations in the science classroom. Science
Education International, 22, 3,175-184.
Cox, R., & Grawemeyer, B. (2003). The mental organisation of external representations.
Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference (EuroCogSci-joint
Cognitive Science Society and German Cognitive Science Society conference),
Osnabrück, September,2003. Available from: http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~bg230/Cox&
GrawemeyerEuroCogsci03.pdf
Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education Malaysia (2003). Integrated
Curriculum for Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum Specifications. Kuala Lumpur.
Dhakulkar & Nagarjuna, (2011) An Analysis of Graphs in School Textbooks. Proceedings of
epiSTEME 4 International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology and
Mathematics Education, 127-131. India: Macmillan.
Diezmann, C. M. (1999) Assessing diagram quality: Making a difference to representation. In
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of
Australasia, 185-191, Adelaide.
Diezmann, C.M.& English, L. D..(2001) Promoting the use of diagrams as tools for thinking. In
Cuoco, A.A. (ed.) 2001 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook: The Role
of Representation in School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,
pp. 77-89.
Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning
the problem of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation inthe
teaching and learning of mathematics, 110-120. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Francisco, J.M., & Maher, C.A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving:
Insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 361-372.
Henningsen, M. & Stein, M.K.(1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroombased
factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 524-549.
Hembree, R. (1992). Experiments and relational studies in problem-solving: A meta-analysis.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 242–273.
Ichikawa, S. (2000). Benkyou-hou ga kawaru hon [A book about changing the approach to
learning] Tokyo: Iwanami Press. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is
(sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
Kidman,G. (2002). The Accuracy of mathematical diagrams in curriculum materials. In
Cockburn, A. & Nardi, E. (Eds) Proceeding of the PME 26, 3, 201-208. UK: University of
East Anglia.
Larkin, J. and Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words.
Cognitive Science, 11:65-69.
Lowrie , T. & Diezmann, C. M. (2007). Middle School students’ interpreting graphical tasks:
Difficulties within a graphical language. Proceeding 4th East Asia Regional Conference on
Mathematics Education, Penang, Malaysia.
Ministry of Education (2001). Malaysian Education Development Plan 2001-2010. Kuala
Lumpur
Ministry of Education (2013). Malaysian Education Development Plan 2013-2025. Kuala
Lumpur
Mayer, R.E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instruction design
methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125-139.
Novick, L. R. (2006). Understanding spatial diagram structure: An analysis of hierarchies,
matrices, and networks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1826-
1856.
Novick, L. R., & Hurley, S. M. (2001). To matrix, network, or hierarchy: That is the question.
Cognitive Psychology, 42, 158–216.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development. (2004).Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003.
Paris,VA: Author.
Pantziara, M., Gagatsis, A. &Pitta-Pantazi, D.(2004). The use of diagrams in solving nonroutine
problems.Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 489–496
Paoletti, G. (2004). Writing-to-learn and graph drawing as aids for the integration of text and
graphs. In Rijlaarsdam, G., Van den Bergh, H. & Couzijn, M. (Eds.) Studies in writing.
Volume 14, Effective learning and teaching of writing. Second Edition. Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publishers, 587-598.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of
Psychology, 45, 255–87.
Postigo, Y. & Pozo, J. (2004). On the road to graphicacy: The learning of graphical representation
systems. Educational Psychology, 24(5), 623-644.
OECD (2005). PISA 2003 Technical Report, OECD, Paris.
Shaughnessy, J.M. (2003). Research on Students’ Understanding of probability. In A Research
Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Kilpatrick, J., Martin,
W.J., Schifter, D. (2003). (Eds.) Reston VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics,
216-226.
Uesaka, Y., & Manalo, E. (2011). The effects of peer communication with diagrams on
students’ math word problem solving processes and outcomes. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher,
& T. Shipley (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Society,312–317. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., & Ichikawa, S. (2007). What kinds of perceptions and daily learning
behaviours promote students’ use of diagrams in mathematics problem solving? Learning
and Instruction,17, 322–335.
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., & Ichikawa, S. (2010). The effects of perception of efficacy and
diagram construction skills on students’ spontaneous use of diagrams when solving math
word problems. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik,& N. H. Narayanan (eds.), Diagrams 2010,
LNAI 6170 (pp. 197–211).Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Winn, B. (1987). Charts, graphs, and diagrams in educational materials. In D. M.Willows & H.
A. Houghton (Eds.). The psychology of illustration, 1. New York:Springer-Verlag.