|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun |
| Kajian ini dilakukan untuk mengenal pasti kesan penggunaan perisian Pemprosesan Kata terhadap pencapaian murid dalam penulisan karangan. Penulisan karangan penting sebagai wadah untuk murid menyusun dan mempersembahkan buah fikiran, termasuk membuka ruang untuk mencerna idea. Subjek bagi kajian ini terdiri daripada murid-murid tingkatan empat, Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Petaling, Kuala Lumpur yang dipilih secara rawak bertujuan. Mereka terdiri daripada 30 orang murid Tingkatan Empat Sastera Satu. Reka bentuk kuantitatif berasaskan kaedah eksperimen satu kumpulan telah digunakan dalam kajian ini. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dalam hasil penulisan murid dengan berpandukan skor min ujian pra dan pasca. Diharapkan supaya hasil daripada penyelidikan ini dapat membantu perancang dan penggubal dasar dalam kalangan pentadbir di institusi-institusi pendidikan ke arah menentukan penggunaan alat bantu pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang lebih sistematik, selain membestarikan bidang pendidikan negara.
Kata kunci: kesan, perisian Pemprosesan Kata, penulisan, pencapaian, membestarikan |
| References |
Awang Mohamad Amin. (1997). Beberapa aspek kelemahan penguasaan bahasa Malaysia dalam kalangan pelajar Melayu sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 25(7), 13-19.
Barron, A. E., & Orwig, G. W. (1998). New technologies for education: Beginner’s guide (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Brooks, D. W. (1997). Innovations in writing. New York: Plenum Press.
Brophy, K. A. (1999). Is computer-assisted instruction effective in the English writing classroom? ProQuest Dissertation Abstracts (AAT: 1393861).
Brotherton, P. N. (1996). Language skills: Their nature. Research in English and Technological Education, 13(1), 6-12.
Bruce L. (1998). What changes in cognitive growth. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
Butler, B. S. (1996). Using the world wide to support class-based education: Opportunities and challenges for IS educators. http://www.Gsia.cmu. edu/bb 26/papers/education/aiswww/ (accessed 7 Nov. 1999).
Charlesworth, R. (1999). Language writing for secondary student (3rd. ed.). Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.
Chiapetta, E. L. (1998). Writing instruction in the secondary schools (4th. ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clementa, D. (1998). Writing and Technology. Paper presented at the Forum Languages & Technology Education, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document No. ED 416993).
Collins, J. L. (1999). Computerized text analysis and the teaching of writing. London: Sage Publications.
Crowl, T. K. (1997). Educational technology: Windows on teaching. Wisconsin: Brown & Benchmark.
Daiute, C. (1998). The computer as stylus and audience. College Composition and Communication Journal, 34, 134-145.
Day, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 7(1), 131-141.
Dodge, B. (1997). Active learning on the web. http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people bdodge/active/ActiveLearningk-12 html (accessed 8 August 1999).
Doyle, M. (2002). Learning through information technology. Educational Technology, 27(5), 33-37.
Fulwiler, B. (2002). Phases of writing. Research in Languages and Technological Education, 20(1), 7-21.
Hofmeister, A. (1999). Microcomputers applications in the classroom. New York: CBS College Publishing Co.
Inhelder, B. & J. Piaget (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York Basic Books.
Ismail Zin. (2002). Aplikasi multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors.
Jafari, A. (1999). The rise of a new paradigm shift in teaching and learning. The Educational Technology, 27(3), 58-64.
Jamali Ismail. (1997). Sikap, motivasi dan pencapaian dalam bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa kedua dalam kalangan pelajar Melayu. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, 36, 1071–1085.
Khan, B. H. (Ed). (1997). Web-based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Koschmann, T. (1996). Computer for Learning: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lane, W. (1999). Integrated writing using Word Processing method. Journal of Research in Language Teaching, 2, 215-239.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2009). Peraturan Pemarkahan Kertas 1 Bahasa Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Mason, J. (2001). Learning from experience in mathematics using experience for learning. Buckhingham: SHRE Open University Press.
Neu, J., & Scarcella, R. (1999). Word processing in the ESL writing classroom: A survey of students’ attitudes. New York: Newbury House.
Nimiec, R. P. (1998). Computer and achievement in the elementary school. Jurnal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 33-49.
Oliver, R. (1998). The impact of word processing on preparation and submission of written essays in a tertiary course of study. Higher Education, 26(1), 217-226.
Pennington, M. (1999). Beyond off-the-shelf computer remedies for student writers’ alternatives to canned feedback. Educational Computer System, 20(4), 423-437.
Richards, J. C. (1997). The context of language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rutter, M. (1996). Intensive writing. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.
Smith, F. (1997). Writing and the writer. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Tierney, N. K. (1999). The writing research. (3rd. ed.) Eagle Wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Wolfe, E. (1996). A study of word processing experience and its effects on student’s essay writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27(7), 97-107. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |