UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
The urban village is an area occupied by the urban community that lives and resides in the urban environment as a group or in certain group which was formed or naturally due to urbanization. The formation of the urban village concept is based on two circumstances, which is due to the effects of urbanization and the result of the urban village formation concept brought about by the planning and strategy of re-developing the urban area. Hence, the urban village formation concept must take into consideration the basic characteristics of the urban village environment, which consist of its geography, background of the village, type of village, the position or status of the village, traditional practices and culture, local organizations, certified status of the land title and the land, distance from the city centre and the community’s intrarelationship. Consideration to define squatter areas and settlement on government land or government reserve land were not included in the definition of the urban village concept because this type of settlement does not have certified characteristics of a land title. The operational definition is important as it determines the scope and study sample that can be used in future. |
References |
1. Abdul Hadi, H.S. (2004). Membentuk persekitaran untuk kemampanan budaya setempat. In Jamaludin, M.J. Mohd Jailani, M.N., Kadir,A. & Azahan, A. Alam Sekitar dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Malaysia. Bangi: Pusat Pengurusan Persekitaran, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, pp. 29-34 (In Malay)
2. Azahan, A., Abdul Hadi, H.S. & Kadarudin, A. (2008). Penilaian makna kualiti hidup dan aplikasinya dalam bidang pengurusan persekitaran di Malaysia. Akademika, 72, 45-68. (In Malay)
3. Brindley, T. (2003). The social dimension of the urban village: A comparison of models for sustainable urban development. Urban Design International, 8, 53–65.
4. Haryati, S. (2010). Tempat tinggal dan kualiti hidup masyarakat di bandar. Batu Pahat: Penerbit Universiti Tun Hussien Onn Malaysia. (In Malay)
5. Jeremy, A. (1996). Urban development strategies: the challenge of global to local change for strategic responses an international perspective. Habitat Int, 20(4), 553-566.
6. Katiman, R. (2001). Dasar dan strategi petempatan dalam pembangunan negara. Bangi. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (In Malay)
7. Katiman. R., Asmah, A., Sulung, M., Mohd. Mat Jali & Mohd Azlan, A. (2006). Transfomasi desa-bandar: Koridor Kemaman Dungun. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (In Malay)
8. Lee Kok Chai & Wan Rozali, W. H. (2007). Kualiti hidup sosial dan isu-isu perumahan: Kajian kes di Pulau Pinang. Kertas Kerja Untuk Prosiding Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. (In Malay)
9. Li Ling Hin & Li Xin. (2011). Redevelopment of urban villages in Shenzhen, China-An analysis of power relations and urban coalitions. Journal of Habitat International, 35, 426-434.
10. Malaysia. (2010). 10th Malaysia Plan. (2011-2015).
11. Mansor, I., Shireen, J., Mesut, I., Nurul Syala, A. L. & Nor Zalifa, Z. A. (2010). Architecture as a reflection of social structure: A reminiscence of the suleymaniye complex of Istanbul. Gombak: International Islamic University Malaysia.
12. Mohd Yusof, H., Mohamad Shaharudin, S., Suraiya,I. Abd. Hair, A. (2011). Hubungan kejiranan dalam membentuk kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat ‘Kampung Bandar’: Kes Kampung Berjaya dan Kampung Mempelam, Alor Setar, Malaysia. Geografia Online Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 7(3), 36-44. (In Malay)
13. Murray, C. (2004). Rethinking neighbourhoods: From urban villages to cultural Hubs. In D. Bell, & M. Jayne (Eds.), City of Quarters: Urban Villages in the Contemporary City. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
14. Pu, H., Richard, S. & Stan, G. (2011). The development and redevelopment of “Urban Villages” in Shenzhen. Journal of Habitat International, 35, 214-224.
15. Siti Aminah, M, Kadaruddin, A. & Azahan, A. (2016). Rural transformation and changes in societal life: A case study of Kelantan and Negeri Sembilan. Geografi, 4(2), 83 – 91. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file=f9eef386-b921-448d-a2f8-eb70fee703db.pdf
16. Syivero, P. & Ubong, I. (2016). Small town development in Sabah: Issues and challenges. Geografi, 4(2), 65-82. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file=d01ab716-0ad1-4a09-bf55-fb85e990eb3f.pdf.
17. Tait, M. (2003). Urban village as self-sufficent, integrated communities: A case study in London’s Docklands. Journal of Urban Design International, 8(2003), 37-52.
18. Tammy, S. (1999). Benchmarking Melboune: Indicators of liveability and competitiveness. In Lim Lan Yuan, Belinda Yuen & Christine Low (eds), Urban quality of live: Critical issues and options. School of Building and Real Estate National University of Singapore.
19. Wim, N., Stephanie,R. & Waldo, K. (2009). The non-monetary quality of city life in South Africa. Journal of Habitat International, 33, 319–326.
20. Xie, Z. K. (2005). The transition from village to urban community: A study of institution, policy and the urban village problem during the urbanization in China. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
21. Yan, S & Yves, Z. (2011). Urban villages and housing values in China. Journal of Regional Science and Urban Economic, 1-11.
22. Yazid, S., Hanifah, M., Mohmadisa, H. & Nasir, N. (2015). Small towns sustainability in Bernam Valley from human welfare perspectives. Geografi, 3(2), 28-36. Diperoleh daripada https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file=daa89061-a35e-40ee-be1c-0b26815144eb.pdf
23. Yuting, L., Shenjing, H., Fulong,W. & Chris, W. (2010). Urban village under China’ rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhood. Journal of Habitat International, 34, 135-144. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |