|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Kajian ini bertujuan untuk membangunkan dan menguji kesan penggunaan koswer Nutri-Score dengan ejen pedagogi beranimasi bagi topik Nutrisi dalam Biologi Tingkatan Empat. Reka bentuk eksperimen kuasi digunakan. Persampelan kelompok tiga tahap dilaksanakan untuk memilih 181 responden dari masing-masing dua sekolah menengah di Kedah dan Pulau Pinang. Kumpulan rawatan mempelajari Nutrisi melalui Nutri-Score. Kumpulan kawalan mempelajari Nutrisi secara lazim. Pembolehubah-pembolehubah bersandar ialah kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, kemahiran mengelaskan, kemahiran membandingbeza dan kemahiran menyelesaikan masalah mengikut Taksonomi Baru Model Marzano. Dapatan dianalisis dengan menggunakan ujian MANCOVA. Skor ujian pra dijadikan kovariat. Didapati penggunaan Nutri-Score telah meningkatkan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi, kemahiran mengelaskan dan kemahiran membandingbeza secara signifikan. Justeru, reka bentuk dan pembangunan Nutri-Score boleh dijadikan panduan berguna untuk mereka bentuk dan membangunkan koswer pembelajaran bagi merangsang kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. |
| References |
1. Barak, M. & Shakhman, L. (2008). Fostering higher-order thinking in science class: Teachers’ reflections. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(3), 191- 208. doi: 10.1080/13540600802006079 2. Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik pengkajian: Kaedah pengkajian (Buku 1). Shah Alam: McGraw-Hill Education (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 3. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2012). Spesifikasi kurikulum Biologi tingkatan empat. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. 4. Kim, C., & Baylor, A. L. (2008). A virtual change agent: Motivating pre-service teachers in their future classrooms. Educational Technology and Society, 11(2), 309-321. Diperolehi daripada https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374597_A_ Virtual_Change_Agent_Motivating_Preservice_Teachers_to_Integrate_ Technology_in_Their_Future_Classrooms 5. King, F.J., Goodson, L., & Rohani, F. (2009). Higher order thinking skills. Center for Advancement of Learning and Assessment. Diperolehi daripada http://www.cala. fsu.edu/files/higher _order_ thinking_skills.pdf 6. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2010). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2010 Biologi 2 4551/2. Putrajaya. 7. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2013). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2013 Biologi 2 4551/2. Putrajaya. 8. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2014). Kupasan mutu jawapan SPM 2014 Biologi 2 4551/2. Putrajaya. 9. Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & McTighe, J. (2005). Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). 10. MDEC (2008). Penilaian koswer-koswer kursus Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Diperolehi daripada http://www.mscmalaysia.my/sites/default/files/pdf/ publications references/ Penilaian _Koswer_-_Koswer_Kursus.pdf. 11. Norsaliza Sabu & Noraini Mohamed Noh (2018). The need for creativity in teaching higher order thinking skills in Biology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 889-898. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/ v8-i1/3957. 12. Rajendran, N. S. (2010). Teaching and acquiring higher-order thinking skills: Theory and practise. Tanjong Malim: Sultan Idris Education University. 13. Satyaprakasha, C. V., & Sunitha, B. (2014). Effectiveness of multimedia teaching on achievement of VIII standard students in Biologi. International Journal of Informative & Futuristic Research, 1(8). Diperolehi daripada http://www.ijifr. com/pdfsave/27-04-201442320-04-2014302Dr%20CVS%20ACH% 20a3a.pdf 14. Siti Zubaidah (2010). Pembelajaran koperatif dan group investigation (sebagai salah satu teknik pembelajaran kolaboratif). Diperolehi daripada: https:// www. researchgate.net/publication/318040393 15. Thomas, A., & Thorne. G. (2009). How to increase higher level thinking. The Centre for Development and Learning. Diperolehi daripada http://www.cdl.org/articles/ how-to-increase-high-order-thinking/ 16. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in Mathematics. Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center. Diperolehi daripada www.mff.org/pubs/ME161.pdf 17. White, H., & Sabarwal, S. (2014). Quasi-experimental design and methods. Florence, Italy: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Diperolehi daripada https:// www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/brief_8_quasi-experimental%20design_eng. pdf |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |