UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
The purpose of this study is to identify the e-courseware effectiveness and Special Education (SpeEdu.) Teacher perception in using Basic Living Skills (BLS) E-courseware prototypes, namely BLS (Augmented Reality Animation) & BLS (Static graphic). The study employed survey research design and experimental approaches. The survey design approach was conducted in identifying the usability of theprototype of Basic Living Skills e-courseware among Special education (SpeEdu) Teachers and for the experimental design approach was carried out to identify the ASD’s achievements between Basic Living Skills E-courseware (Augmented Reality Animation) & Basic Living Skills (Static graphic) for Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) students master in basic living skills. A total of five (5) practising SpeEdu teachers had participated in this study, and there was 4 total number of children involved in the study. The study used a pre-post experimental research design. The participating in-service teachers and ASD students were selected based on the criteria required. Pre-test and Post-test nstruments were employed to gather ASD students’ achievement scores. Analysis descriptive was carried out to understand and compare the differences between control and treatment group. The result indicated that BLS (Augmented Reality Animation) is more effective to be used rather than BSL (Static graphic) and respondents are more dominant and satisfied with the BLS (Augmented Reality Animation) presentation. The implications of this study are significant contributions to the Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE), teachers, parents and caregivers.
|
References |
1. Wong, K. T., MSG Hamzah, Goh, P.S.C. & Khatijah, A. (2019). Blended Learning pedagogical practices for improving students’ learning autonomy and academic results in learning. Religación. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 4 (17), 228 -237. 2. Wong, K.T., Abdullah N., Goh, P.S.C (2019). Cross-Examination of the Intention to Integrate MOOCs in Teaching and Learning: An Application of Multi-Group Invariance Analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14 (19),106-116 3. Alison, C., Root, J. R., Browder, D. M., & Wood, L. (2017). Technology-Based Shared Story Reading for Students with Autism Who Are English-Language Learners. Journal Of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 91-101. 4. Austin, K. S., & Peña, E. V. (2017). Exceptional Faculty Members Who Responsively Teach Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal Of Postsecondary Education And Disability, 30(1), 17-32. 5. Eliçin, Ö., & Kaya, A. (2017). Determining Studies Conducted upon Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using High-Tech Devices. Educational Sciences: Theory And Practice, 17(1), 27-45. 6. Yikmis, A. (2016). Effectiveness of the Touch Math Technique in Teaching Basic Addition to Children with Autism. Educational Sciences: Theory And Practice, 16(3), 1005-1025. 7. Creer, S., Enderby, P., Judge, S., & John, A. (2016). Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need. International Journal Of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(6), 639-653. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12235. 8. Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., & Lang, R. (2014). Comparing Acquisition of AAC-Based Mands in Three Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using iPad Applications with Different Display and Design Elements. Journal Of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 44(10), 2464-2474. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2115-9 9. McLay, L., Schäfer, M. M., van der Meer, L., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., & ... Sutherland, D. (2017). Acquisition, Preference and Follow-up Comparison Across Three AAC Modalities Taught to Two Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. International Journal Of Disability, Development & Education, 64(2), 117-130. 10. Wong, K.T, Teo, T., & Goh, P.S.C. (2014). Development of the Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance Scale (IWBAS): An Initial Study. Educational Tech-nology & Society, 17(4), 268–277. 11. Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Pauline, S.C.G. (2015). Understanding and intention to use interactive whiteboard: Model development and testing. Interactive Learning Environments. 23(6), 731-747. 12. Chiang, T. C., Yang, S. H., & Hwang, G. (2014). An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students' Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365. 13. Koutromanos, G., Sofos, A., & Avraamidou, L. (2015). The use of augmented reality games in education: a review of the literature. Educational Media International, 52(4), 253-271. doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1125988. 14. Kucharczyk, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carter, E. W., Hedges, S., El Zein, F., Fan, H., & Gustafson, J. R. (2015). Addressing the Needs of Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Considerations and Complexities for High School Interventions. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 329-349. 15. Wang, M. Truijens, L. Hou, Y. Wang, Zhou (2014). Integrating augmented reality with building information modeling: onsite construction process controlling for the liquefied natural gas industry, Autom. Constr. 40, 96–105. 16. Padmadewi, N. N., & Artini, L. P. (2017). Teaching English to a Student with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Regular Classroom in Indonesia. International Journal Of Instruction, 10(3), 159-176. doi:10.12973/iji.2017.10311a.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |