Abd Mujib, N. H. B., Mustafa, R. B., & Anual, M. A. B. M. (2019). Meningkatkan Penguasaan Pelajar Terhadap Topik Taburan Kebarangkalian menggunakan ‘Video Project Based Learning’. Jurnal Penyelidikan Teknokrat II, (Jilid XXI). 

Abdul J. O. & Bahtiar O. (2005). Aplikasi pembelajaran secara konstruktivisme dalam pengajaran karangan berpandu. Makalah Pendidikan, 4: 6-8. 

Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2013). The effects of Van Hiele's phases of learning geometry on students’ degree of acquisition of Van Hiele levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.740 

Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Wei, L. T. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian kendiri pembelajaran geometri tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 211-265. 

Abdullah, Z., & Kassim, J. M. (2010). The Digital Library Usability Testing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 9(1). 

Ahamad, S. N. S. H., Li, H. C., Shahrill, M., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017, December). Implementation of problem-based learning in geometry lessons. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 943, No. 1, p. 012008). IOP Publishing. 

Ahmad, A. M. (2013). Faktor yang mempengaruhi perbezaan pencapaian akademik pelajar lepasan diploma politeknik dan matrikulasi terhadap subjek kejuruteraan. (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Parit Raja : Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. 

Akayuure, P., Asiedu-Addo, S. K., & Alebna, V. (2016). Investigating the effect of origami instruction on Preservice teachers’ spatial ability and geometric knowledge for teaching. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 198. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.78424 

Alhassan, M. N., & Agyei, D. D. (2020). Examining colleges of education mathematics tutors’ conceptions in teaching completing the square in Ghana. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(3), https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.03.2020.p9927 

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Edition). American Psychological Association.   

Amir, A. (2016). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pendidikan dan Sains, 4(02), 1-17. 

Amir, N. F., & Zakaria, M. Y. (2019). Mistake analysis of class x students in Handayani Sungguminasa High School in completing the problems of equation and equality equation square. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.31327/jomedu.v4i1.877 

Andini, M., & Yunianta, T. N. H. (2018). The Development of Borad game “The Adventure Of Algebra” in The Senior High School Mathematics Learning. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 95-109 

Arbain, N., & Shukor, N. A. (2015). The effects of GeoGebra on students achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 208-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.356 

Arici, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2013). The effect of origami-based instruction on spatial visualization, geometry achievement, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9487-8 

Ariffin, A., Hasnan, N., Zakaria, N., Rubani, S. N. K., & Hamzah, N. (2020). Pembangunan Bahan e-Pembelajaran Berasaskan Model Needham Lima Fasa bagi Topik Konkrit. Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 5(2), 63-70. 

Azlina, K. M., & Lok, Y. (2010). Keberkesanan perisian Geometer’s Sketchpad untuk tajuk pembinaan geometri dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran matematik.Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik, 1-11. 

Azzahyiruddin, A. (2012). Pembinaan ujian diagnostik objektif dan kupasan jawapan bagi mengesan kesalahan pelajar dalam" graf gerakan linear". (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Bakar, Z. A., & Ismail, N. H. A. (2011). Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Serta Mata Pelajaran Matematik. Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 4. 

Bakhri, S. (2019). Animasi Interaktif Pembelajaran Huruf dan Angka Menggunakan Model ADDIE. INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 130-144. 

Björklund, C. (2014). Less is more–mathematical manipulatives in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(3), 469-485. 

Boggan, M., Harper, S., & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using Manipulatives to Teach Elementary Mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3. 

Boytchev, P. (2010). Bridging the gap between abstract math and reality. In Proceedings of 7th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation “Information and Communication Technologies in Education” (HCICTE 2010). 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media. 

Briner, M. 1999. Learning Theories. Denver: University of Colorado. 

Buchori, A. (2011). Potensi Program Cabri 3D untuk Mendukung Pembelajaran Geometri Analit di Perguruan Tinggi. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1). 

Burhan, R. (2009). Penggunaan Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Fizik. Dimuat turun daripada http://burhan-cikgubob.blogspot.com/2009/02/penggunaan-teori-konstruktivisme-dalam.html 

Burns, B.A., & Hamm, E.H. (2011). A comparison of concrete and virtual manipulative use in third-and fourth-grade mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 111(6),256-261 

Che Jaafar, F. N. H., & Nordin, A. (2007). Tahap Kefahaman Kemahiran Menggraf Di Kalangan Pelajar-pelajar Tingkatan Empat Sekolah Menengah (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Che Yom, Z. (2014). Keupayaan penyelesaian masalah persamaan Surd dalam kalangan pelajar Kolej Matrikulasi Kedah: Kes pemahaman dan kesalahan lazim Matematik. (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Sintok : Universiti Utara Malaysia. 

Chear, S. L. S., & Nor, M. Y. M. (2020). Intervensi pembelajaran di portal e-pembelajaran melalui aplikasi WhatsApp dan Telegram berdasarkan model lima fasa Needham. Evaluation Studies in Social Sciences, 9(1), 11-27. 

Chen, W. H. (2013). Applying problem-based learning model and creative design to conic-sections teaching. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 3(7), 73-80. 

Cheng, L. H. (2019). Penggunaan modul Smart-Flip ke arah meningkatkan kemahiran pelajar menyelesaikan masalah algebra dan statistik.. Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, 17, 18-36. 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Collecting qualitative data. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Fourth ed. Boston: Pearson, 204, 35 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2001). Research Method in Education 6th. Routledge. 

Dagar, V., & Yadav, A. (2016). Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Arts Social Sciences Journal, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000200 

Darusalam, G., & Hussin, S. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur : Penerbit Universiti Malaya. 

Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5, 194-197. 

De Loach, M. (2013). The impact of graphing calculators on high school students' performance on a standardized mathematics test. (Unpublished Thesis). University of Phoenix. 

Diaz, C., Hincapié, M. & Moreno, G. (2015). How the type of content in educative augmented reality application affects the learning experience. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 205-212. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.239. 

Dick, W & Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Fourth Edition. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York USA. 

Didis, M.,G. (2018).Secondary School Students’ Conception of Quadratic Equations with One Unknown. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. 19(1): 112-128. 

Didis, M., G., & Erbas A., K. (2015). Performance and difficulties of students in formulating and solving quadratic equations with one unknown. EducationalSciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4):1137-1150. 

Fabiyi, T. R. (2017). Geometry concepts in mathematics perceived difficult to learn by senior secondary school students in Ekiti State Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOS-JRME), 7, 83. 

Faezah, A.G., & Mazlan, A. (2012). Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Modul Kemahiran Mengawal Stress Kehidupan Guru. Jurnal Teknologi, 58(2012), 45-50. 

Fauzi H., Jamal A. & Mohd S.Z.N. (2014). Kaedah Penyelidikan & Analisis Data SPSS. Sintok : Universiti Utara Malaysia. 

Fauziyyah, F. A., & Kriswandani, K. (2017). Description profile of understanding layer concept of conic section of mathematics education students 2016 of FKIP UKSW. Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICoMSE 2017). Atlantis Press. 

Fosnot, C. T. (1993). Learning to teach, teaching to learn: The center for constructivist teaching/teacher preparation project. Teaching Education, 5(2), 69-78.  

Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (2012). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (Vol. 36). Springer Science & Business Media. 

Ganesan, N., & Eu, L. K. (2020). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software Geometer's Sketchpad on Students' Achievement in Topic Circle among Form Two Students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(2), 58-68. 

Gardner, H. (2000). Using multiple intelligences to improve negotiation theory and practice. Negotiation Journal, 16(4), 321-324. 

Geršak, V., Vitulic, H. S., Prosen, S., Starc, G., Humar, I., & Geršak, G. (2020). Use of wearable devices to study activity of children in classroom; Case study—Learning geometry using movement. Computer communications, 150, 581-588. 

Ghazali, D., & Sufean , H. (2016). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Universiti Malaya.  

Gilakjani, A. P., Lai, M. L., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers’ Use of Technology and Constructivism. IJMECS, 5(4), 49-63. 

Greenes, C., Chang, K. Y., & Ben-Chaim, D. (2007). International survey of high school students’ understanding of key concepts of linearity. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 273-280). PME. 

Gur, H., & Kobak-Demir, M. (2017). Geometry Teaching via Origami: The Views of Secondary Mathematics Teacher Trainees. Journal of education and Practice, 8(15), 65-71. 

Heddens, J.W. (2005).Improving mathematics teaching by using manipulatives. In Durmus & E. Karakirik (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A International Journal for Infonomics (IJI), Volume 6, Issues 3/4,  

Hodiyanto, H., & Santoso, D. (2020). How Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) Develops Geometry Concept Understanding. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 3(1), 31-35. 

Howse, T. D., & Howse, M. E. (2014). Linking the Van Hiele theory to instruction. Teaching children mathematics, 21(5), 304-313. 

Hussin, F., Ali, J., & Noor, M. S. Z. (2014). Kaedah penyelidikan & analisis data SPSS. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press. 

Ismail, A. D., & Azmi, R. D. (2017). Pemanfaatan Geometer’s Sketchpad dalam Melukis Fungsi Trigonometri. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 3(2), 560-566. 

Ismail, J. N. & Hassan N.A. (2019). Analogi ”LAM ALIF”bagi Menyamakan Penyebut Pecahan Berbentuk Algebra dalam kalangan Pelajar Sistem Empat Semester Program Matrikulasi Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Kebangsaan IPGKSAH (SAHConfEd). 

Ismail, S. (2018). Pembinaan dan Pengujian Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran Berasaskan Peta Pemikiran Bagi Topik Nisbah, Kadar dan Kadaran. (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan).  Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Jais, R., Azman, N., & Ibrahim, M. S. (2011). Tahap Kualiti Pelajar Sekolah Dan Pensyarah Matrikulasi Dalam Menghadapi Meritokrasi Di Kolej Matrikulasi Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi, 15â-35. 

Jamhari, & Wongkia, W. (2018). CircleBoard-Pro: concrete manipulative-based learning cycle unit for learning geometry. AIP Conference Proceedings 1923(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019512 

Jati, Y. N., & Hidayat, D. (2017). The effect of using origami paper to teach the perimeter of plane figures on cognitive achievement of students grade IX. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 13(1), 35-42.  

Jeng, J. (2005). Usability assessment of academic digital libraries: effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and learnability. Libri, 55(2-3), 96-121. 

Juan A.Y., Omar F. A., Khairuddin U. & King T.S. (2019). Penggunaan permainan papan MOOV Mission sebagai pemudahcara dalam pentaksiran serta pembelajaran konsep matematik. Konvensyen Penyelidikan Pendidikan Program Matrikulasi Peringkat Kebangsaan. Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

Juklová, L. (2019). Constructional tasks of conics with GeoGebra. Journal of Mathematics and Statistical Science, Vol.5, 167-174  

Kamal, Megat, Sohaida & Zaimah (2014). Tahap kemahiran pembelajaran kendiri pelajar Kolej Matrikulasi Selangor. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Program Matrikulasi Peringkat Kebangsaan Kali Ke 8. Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

Kamaruddin, M. I., & Romli, N. H. M. (2010). Kemahiran Menggraf Pelajar Tahun Akhir Aliran Sains Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Kandaiah, K. T. (2017). Effect of PBL method on critical thinking in mathematics problem solving among matriculation college students. (Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Karmina Abdul Rahman (2018). Keberkesanan Strategi Pengajaran Menggunakan Projektor Ortogon (PO) Terhadap Pencapaian Dalam Topik Pelan dan Dongakan. (Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

KPM, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran Secara Konstruktivisme. Kuala Lumpur. Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. KPM: Putrajaya. 

KPM, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Laporan Tahunan Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. KPM: Putrajaya. 

KPM, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019). Panduan Program Matrikulasi KPM Sistem Empat Semester Sesi 2019/2020. Bahagian Matrikulasi: Putrajaya. 

Khairiree, K. (2015). Creative Thinking in Mathematics with Tangrams and The Geometer’s Sketchpad. In Proceedings of the 20th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics. Leshan, China. 

Kim, K. M., & Md Ali, R. (2017). Penggunaan geogebra dalam pembelajaran matematik melalui pembelajaran modular. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(1), 147-154. 

Kurtulus, A., & Ada, T. (2012). WebQuest on conic sections as a learning tool for prospective teachers. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: International Journal of the IMA, 31(4), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrs003 

Kusuma, A. B., & Utami, A. (2017). Penggunaan Program Geogebra dan Casyopee dalam Pembelajaran Geometri Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Mercumatika, 1(2). 

Latha, K. V. (2020). Impact of Geometer’s Sketch Pad on High School Students’ Performance in Mathematics. International Journal of Research and Review, 7(3).  

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A Design Framework for Enhancing Engagement in Student Centered Learning: Own It, Learn It, and Share It. Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 707-734. 

Leung, K. I., Ding, L., Leung, A. Y., & Wong, N. Y. (2014). Prospective teachers' competency in teaching how to compare geometric figures: The concept of congruent triangles as an example. Research in Mathematical Education, 18(3), 171-185.  

Liggett, R. S. (2017). The Impact of Use of Manipulatives on the Math Scores of Grade 2 Students. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 26(2), 87-101. 

López, J., Robles, I., & Martínez-Planell, R. (2016). Students' understanding of quadratic equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(4), 552-572. 

Luengwattanachod, P., Wongkia, W., & Laosinchai, P. (2020). High School Students’ Understanding and Retention of the Connection between Two Ways of Constructing an Ellipse. RSU International Research Conference 2020. 

Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the use questionnaire12. Usability interface, 8(2), 3-6. 

Majerek, D. (2014). Application of geogebra for teaching mathematics. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 8, 51-54.  

Makgakga, S. (2014). Errors and Misconceptions in Solving Quadratic Equations By Completing A Square. Mathematics Education. 

McGee Jr, D., Moore-Russo, D., Ebersole, D., Lomen, D. O., & Quintero, M. M. (2012). Visualizing three-dimensional calculus concepts: The study of a manipulative's effectiveness. Primus, 22(4), 265-283. 

Mendoza, J. K. R. (2018). The experimental teaching of the conics using the reflection of the light: The conceptual study of the Cassegrain telescope. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 699-707. 

Mhd Yatim, N., & Idris, A. R. (2009). Pembangunan Laman Web Tingkatan Empat Bagi Tajuk Garis Dan Satah Dalam Tiga Matra Berasaskan Teori Konstruktivisme Lima Fasa Needham (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan).  Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar (2003).Reka bentuk tinjauan soal selidik pendidikan. Skudai:Penerbit UTM. 

Mohd, C. K. N. C. K., Shahbodin, F., Sedek, M., & Samsudin, M. (2020). Game based learning for autism in learning mathematics. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 4684-4691. 

Namirah Fatmanissa. (2018). Word problems of conic sections: analysis of linguistic difficulties. Proceedings of INTCESS2018- 5th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences, 5-7, Istanbul, Turkey. 

Nasir, A. N. M., Ahmad, A., Udin, A., Abd Wahid, N. H., & Suhairom, N. (2018). Vocational College’s Students Preferences on Practical Teaching Methods for Electronic Subject. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 12(3), 180-188. 

Nasohah, U. N., Gani, M. I. B. A., & Shaid, N. B. M. S. (2015). Model ADDIE dalam proses reka bentuk modul pengajaran: Bahasa Arab tujuan khas di Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia sebagai contoh. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Language Teaching (pp. 4-5). 

Nik Azis Nik Pa. (2008). Isu-isu kritikal dalam pendidikan matematik. Penerbit Universiti Malaya. 

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability inspection methods. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 413-414). 

Noor, N. M., Ahmad, N. L. & Idris, A.R. (2014). User's perception on instructional video based on Needham's Five Phase Theory for Learning Advanced Differential Equations (Picard's Method). In 2014 IEEE 6th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED) (pp. 84-89).  

Noor Aziah, A. G. (2014). Pemahaman Pelajar Matrikulasi Tentang Logaritma (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Sintok : Universiti Utara Malaysia. 

Noraini, I. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (2nd ed.). Shah Alam, Selangor: McGraw-Hill Education 

Novita, R., Prahmana, R. C., Fajri, N., & Putra, M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18-29.  

Nurul Amalina, J. (2018). Pembinaan dan Keberkesanan Pembaris Garis Nombor Terhadap Pencapaian Operasi Asas Matematik dalam Kalangan Murid Prasekolah (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Nunnally. J.C. & Bernstein. I.H. 1994. Pychhometric Theory (3rded.). New York: McGraw-Hill. 

Omar, M. S., Saad, N. S., & Dollah, M. U. (2017). Penggunaan bahan bantu mengajar guru matematik sekolah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik. 

Omar, N., & Abdullah, Z. (2007). Cadangan Penggunaan Realiti Maya (desktop) Sebagai bahan Bantu Mengajar Dalam Matapelajaran Kalkulus II Graf Fungsi/hubungan Dalam Tiga Matra (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan) Skudai : Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 

Panaoura, G., & Gagatsis, A. (2010). The geometrical reasoning of primary and secondary school students. In Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics (pp. 746-755). 

Piaget, J.(1977).Foreword.In H.E. Gruber & J.J. Voneche (Eds.) Theessential Piaget. New York : Basic Books. 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497. 

Postman, N. & Weingartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York : Delacorte Press. 

Puspita, D. M., & Surya, E. (2017). Development of Snake-Ladder game as a medium of mathematics learning for the fourth-grade students of primary school. International Journal of Science: Basic and Applied Research, 33(3), 291-300. 

Reena Nancy Stephen Benjamin (2018). Effectiveness of Using Circle Geometry Board Strategy in Learning Circle Geometry Towards Form Four Students’ Perfomance. (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah, NJ. 

Richey, R. C., & Seels, B. (1994). Defining a Field: A Case Study of the Development of the 1994 Definition of Instructional Technology. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 20, 2-17. 

Rohani, A. W., Noor Azean, A., Mohd Salleh, A., Mahani, M., & Abdul Halim, A. (2015). Pembangunan Strategi Pembelajaran Geometri Tiga Dimensi: Pelan Dan Dongakan Melalui Sketchup Maker. In 2nd International Education Postgraduate Seminar 2015 (IEPS 2015). 

Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. 

Rozali, N. A., & Abd Halim, N. D. (2019). Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Inkuiri Dengan Integrasi Video Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Pembelajaran Matematik (Effect of Inquiry Based Learning with Video Integration towards Students’ Achievement in Learning Mathematics). Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 3(2), 42-60. 

Rumasoreng, M. I., & Sugiman, S. (2014). Analisis kesulitan matematika siswa SMA/MA dalam menyelesaikan soal setara UN di Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-34. 

Salinas, P., & Pulido, R. (2016). Understanding the conics through augmented reality. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 341-354. 

Salleh, F., & Salleh, S. M. (2019). Pembangunan Aplikasi Pembelajaran 3D Maths Untuk Topik Bentuk Geometri 3 Dimensi Berasaskan Android (Development of 3D Maths Learning Application for Android-Based 3-Dimensional Geometry Topics). Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 3(2), 80-91. 

Sari, P. P. (2016). Analisis Kasus Rendahnya Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa pada Materi Irisan Kerucut dan Solusi Pemecahannya di Kelas XI IA 2 SMA IT Nur Hidayah. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya 2016. 

Selamat, M., Ibrahim, N. H., Surif, J., Zainal, R., & Mohamed, R. (2008). Locus in Cartesian Plane : Menggunakan Pendekatan Hands On Dalam Meningkatkan Kefahaman Murid Dalam Konsep Lokus Dalam Dua Dimensi. Konvensyen Antarabangsa Jiwa Pendidik 2014. 

Shafii, S. F., & Jaafar, H. (2018). Kesan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Masalah Terhadap Pemikiran Kritis Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Dalam Mata Pelajaran Prinsip Perakaunan. Management Research Journal, 7, 175-187. 

Sidek M. N. & Jamaludin A. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan & Modul Akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. 

Siti Nabila, K. (2019). Pembangunan dan Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran STEM Bagi Bidang Pembelajaran Statistik dan Kebarangkalian dalam KSSM Matematik Tingkatan Dua.  (Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Soewardini, H. M. D. (2017). Deskripsi Asimilasi Dan Akomodasi Mahasiswa Berkemampuan Sedang Dalam Belajar Ellips, Hiperbola, Dan Parabola. Gammath: Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 32–37. 

Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction. Journal for research in mathematics education, 20(5), 498-505. 

Suanto, E., Zakaria, E., & Maat, S. M. (2019). Impak Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pengalaman terhadap Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi Topik Bongkah Geometri Tiga Dimensi Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 44(1SI), 121-135. 

Sudihartinih, E. (2018). Students’ Errors on the Circle Concept in Basic Mathematics Lectures. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 5(2). 

Sudihartinih, E., & Purniati, T. (2020). Students’ Mistakes and Misconceptions on the Subject of Conics. International Journal of Education, 12(2), 92-129. 

Sumiati (2016). Pengujian Kebolehgunaan Kit Pembelajaran Visualisasi Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Asas Komunikasi Tanpa Wayar Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Novis. (Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan). Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Sundawan, M. D. (2016). Perbedaan model pembelajaran konstruktivisme dan model pembelajaran langsung. LOGIKA Jurnal Ilmiah Lemlit Unswagati Cirebon, 16(1). 

Suparlan, S. (2019). Teori Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran. ISLAMIKA, 1(2), 79-88. 

Surif, J., Tamilselvam, S., Ibrahim, N. H., Abdullah, A. H., & Ali, M. (2018, April). Addressing chemical reaction misconceptions using five phase Needham Model. In 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 825-834). 

Sushkin, N. (1999). (Tajuk artikel tidak dinyatakan). Dicapai daripada http:/carbon.cudenver.edu/mryder/ite-data/constructivism.html. 

Suydam, M. N., & Higgins, J. L. (1977). Activity Based Learning in Elementary School Mathematics. Science Mathematics and Environmental Education Information Centre. 

Swenty, M. K., Hartman, G. N., Johnstone, D. W., Joseph, D. S., Siemers, T. J., & Squire, J. C. (2012). An Interactive Tool for Visually Presenting Conic Sections to STEM Students. 2012 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, American Society for Engineering Education. 

Syazwani, A., Siti Fadzilah, M.N., Hazura, M. (2018). Kebolehgunaan Aplikasi M-Pembelajaran TVET. SkillsMalaysia Journal, Vol.4, No.1,34 -46. 

Syukri, A., Marzal, J., & Muhaimin, M. (2020). Constructivism-Based Mathematics Learning Multimedia to Improve Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 117-132. 

Tatlah, I. A., Amin, M., & Anwar, M. (2017). An Investigation of Students' Learning Difficulties in Mathematics at Secondary Level. Journal of Research & Reflections in Education (JRRE), 11(2). 

Thangamani, U., & Eu, L. K. (2018). Students’ achievement in symmetry of two dimensional shapes using Geometer's Sketchpad. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences (MOJES), 7(1), 14-22. 

Turner, C. W., Nielsen, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2002). Current issues in the determination of usability test sample size: How many users is enough. In Usability Professionals’ Association 2002 Conference Proceedings. 

Uribe-Flórez, L. J., & Wilkins, J. L. (2017). Manipulative use and elementary school students’ mathematics learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1541-1557. 

Usry, R., Rosli, R., & Maat, S.M. (2016). An Error Analysis of Matriculation Students’ Permutations and Combinations. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 4. 

Vaishali & Misra, P. K. (2020). Implications of Constructivist Approaches in the Classrooms: The Role of the Teachers. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 17-25. 

Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 

Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard (through 2013), 16(40), 33. 

Veloo, A., Krishnasamy, H. N., & Wan Abdullah, W. S. (2015). Types of student errors in mathematical symbols, graphs and problem-solving. Asian Social Science, 11(15), 324-334. 

Vighnarajah, Luan, W. S., & Bakar, K. A. (2008). The shift in the role of teachers in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 33-41. 

Vintere, A. (2018). A constructivist approach to the teaching of mathematics to boost competences needed for sustainable development. Rural Sustainability Research, 39(334), 1-7.Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, 3-17. 

Wahid, K. A., & Samah, N. A. (2019). Pembelajaran Teradun Berbantukan Streaming Video bagi Meningkatkan Pencapaian, Minat dan Persepsi Pelajar dalam Pembelajaran Topik Ruang. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 3(2), 61-79. 

Weiss, D. M. F. (2006). Keeping it real: The rationale for using manipulatives in the middle grades. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 11(5), 238-242. 

Wijaya, T. T., Ying, Z., & Purnama, A. (2020). The empirical research of hawgent dynamic mathematics technology integrated into teaching fraction in primary school. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 144-150. 

Witzel, B. S., Mercer, C. D., & Miller, M. D. (2003). Teaching algebra to students with learning difficulties: An investigation of an explicit instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 121-131. 

Yan, N. G. (2019). Penggunaan Teknik Tai-E-Chi Untuk Meningkatkan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Tajuk Ellipses. Jurnal Dedikasi, 17, 107-125. 

Yoke, C.M. (2010). Jenis-jenis kesilapan dan punca-puncanya yang biasa dihadapi oleh pelajar tingkatan 4 dalam kecerunan garis lurus. (Tesis Sarjana Tidak Diterbitkan).  Tanjong Malim : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 

Zahiah, I (2014). Meningkatkan Tahap Pencapaian Pelajar dalam Topik Pembezaan Melalui Kaedah Pembelajaran Koperatif. Prosiding Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Program Matrikulasi Peringkat Kebangsaan Kali Ke 8. Bahagian Matrikulasi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

Zainuddin, Z. A., & Suardi, A. (2008). Keberkesanan Kaedah Konstruktivisme Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Matematik. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 1-7. 

Zhang, D. (2017). Effects of Visual Working Memory Training and Direct Instruction on Geometry Problem Solving in Students with Geometry Difficulties. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 117-138.