Abdullah, N. A., Yusoff, N. M., & Hamzah, R. (2019). The Effectiveness of Professional Development Programmes for Science Teachers in Implementing Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 299-314.
Abu Bakar Nordin. (1995). Penilaian afektif. Masa Enterprise.
Ahmad, N., & Lajium, D. (2020). Persekitaran pembelajaran dan minat dalam kerjaya STEM. Journal of Modern Education, 2(6), 28-49.
Ahmad ZamzuriMohamad Ali. (2021). Multimedia dan perisian pendidikan: Panduan praktikal reka bentuk dan penyelidikan. Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Ahmadi, M., & Zarei, A. A. (2021). On the effects of linguistic, verbal, and visual mnemonics on idioms learning. Language Related Research, 12(5), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.5.10
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
Ajredini, F., Izairi, N., Rasimi, K., & Zajkov, O. (2019). Phet simulations vs real experiments for better understanding electrical resistance. Science & Research, 3(1), 35–41.
Akpan, J., E. Notar, C.,& Beard,L. (2021). Theimpact of mnemonics as instructional tool. Journal of Education and Human Development, 10(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v10n3a3
Alfiyanti, I. F., Jatmiko, B., & Wasis. (2020). The effectiveness of Predict Observe Explain(POE) model with PhET toimprove criticalthinking skills of senior high school students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i2.34
Amaliah, N. U., Hasanati, A., Latifa, B. R.A., &Kusairi, S. (2021). Senior high school students’ responses to graphical and mathematical representation items: The case of kinematics. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 10(2), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v10i2.9181
Amin, B. D., Sahib, E. P., Harianto, Y. I., Patandean, A. J., Herman, & Sujiono, E. H. (2020). Theinterpreting ability on sciencekinematicsgraphsof senior high school students in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23349
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207.
Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students' engagement and learning about genetics. Computers &Education, 53(1), 74-85.
Antwi, V., Savelsbergh, E., & Eijkelhof, H. (2018). Understanding kinematics graphs using MBL tools, simulations and graph samples in an interactive engagement context in a Ghanaian university. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1076(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012002
Arhin, D. (2020). Effects of mastery learning strategy on pupils’ mathematics achievement in Asante Akim North District. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 5(5), 1034–1040.
Arici, F., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of laboratory experiment and interactive simulation use on academic achievement in teaching secondary school force and movement unit. Elementary Education Online, 19(2), 465–476. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689668
Arslan, M., & Emre, I. (2020). The effect of Predict-Observe-Explain strategy on students’ academic achievement, scientific process skills and attitude towards acience. Nonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 7(14), 1– 11. https://doi.org/10.29129/inujgse.786351
Arsy, H. I., Priyono, A., Prasetyo, B., & Subali, B. (2019). Predict-Observe-Explain strategy with group investigation effect on students’ critical thinking skills and learning achievement. Journal of Primary Education, 8(4), 75–83.
Aziz, A. R., &Razak, A. (2019). Theeffectivenessof blended learning on theacademic performance of students: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 191-202.
Baity Bujeng.(2019). Pembangunan dan kesan modul Multimedia Interaktif Membuat Pakaian (MIMP) terhadap pencapaian, ketekalan ingatan dan motivasi.Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Bala, P. (2019). Effect of mastery learning approach (MLA) on the achievement in mathematics of students with mathematical difficulties. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS, 24(5), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2405042935
Balyer, A., Yalaki, Y., & Gorgulu, E. (2021). Investigating the effects of learning modules on student collaboration and interaction in science education. Journal of Education and Practice, 12(7), 53-60.
Baran, M., & Yasar, S. (2020). The effect of activities based Oon Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) method assisted with games on 10th grade students’ physics achievement. Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, April. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.651074
Baron, N. S., Calixte, R. M., & Havewala, M. (2017). The persistence of print among university students:An exploratory study. Telematics and Informatics,34(5), 590– 604.
Bartholomé, T., & Bromme, R. (2009). Coherence formation when learning from text and pictures:Whatkindof supportfor whom? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 282., 101(2), 282.
Batuyong, C. T., & Antonio, V. V. (2018). Exploring the effect of PhET interactive simulation-based activities on students ’ performance and learning experiences in Electromagnetism. 6(2), 121–131.
Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schneider, S., & Rey, G. D. (2021). The effect of signaling in dependence on the extraneous cognitive load in learning environments. Cognitive Processing, 22(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-020-01002-5
Beege, M., Wirzberger, M., Nebel, S., Schneider, S., Schmidt, N., &Rey, G. D. (2019). Spatialcontinuity effectvs. spatialcontiguity failure. Revising theeffectsof spatial proximity between related and unrelated representations. Frontiers in Education, 4(August), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00086
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449
Bellezza, F. S. (1996). Mnemonic methods to enhance storage and retrieval. Memory, December 1996, 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012102570-0/50012-4
Boncoddo, R. A., Phillips, B. C., Williams, R. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2019). Chunking as a cognitive strategyfor science problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101195.
Boon, R. T., Urton, K., Grünke, M., & Rux, T. A. (2019). Mnemonic Strategies in Mathematics Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Narrative Review. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(2), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2019-v24-i2-9901
Briggs, D. C., & Peacock, T. D. (1999). The effects of POE on student achievement, attitudeand conceptretention. Journalof Research in ScienceTeaching, 36(1),7186.
Bunprom, S., Tupsai, J., & Yuenyong, C. (2019, October). Learning activities to promote the concept of engineering design process for grade 10 students’ ideas about force and motion through Predict-Observe-Explain (POE). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1340, No. 1, p. 012081). IOP Publishing.
Cagande, J. L. L., & Jugar, R. R. (2018). The flipped classroom and college physics students' motivation and understanding of kinematics graphs. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 288-307.
Campos-Navaa, M., Ramírez-Díazb, M. H., Flores-Castroc, E., Torres-Rodríguezd, A. A., & Morales-Maure, L. M. (2021). Mathematical knowledge to teach physics and teacher training :Thecaseofkinematicsgraphs. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(14), 5925–5939.
Ceuppens, S., Bollen, L., Deprez, J., Dehaene, W., & De Cock, M. (2019). 9th grade students’ understanding and strategies when solving x (t) problems in 1D kinematicsand y (x) problemsin mathematics. Physical Review Physics Education Research,15(1), 10101.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010101
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect asa factor in the designof instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233–246.
Chang, L.-Y., Tang, Y.-Y., Lee, C.-Y., & Chen, H.-C. (2022). The effect of visual mnemonics and the presentation of character pairs on learning visually similar characters for chinese-as-second-language learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(May). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783898
Che Nidzam Che Ahmad, Asmayati Yahaya, & Siti Shamsiah Sani. (2020). Pembangunan modulvideo amali(V-Lab) bagimempertingkatkan pengajaran dan pemudahcaraan biologi tingkatan empat. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 10(2), 1–7.
Chen, S., He, Y., &Wang, J. (2020). TheEffectivenessof thePredict-Observe-Explain (POE) Strategy in Improving High SchoolStudents'ConceptualUnderstanding of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(10), 3592-3602.
Cheng, Y.-M., Chen, Y.-H., & Lin, C.-H. (2015). The effects of chunking and prior knowledge on learning physics concepts. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 95–105.
Cheng, Y. S.,&Goodson,P. (2019). Effectsof teacher feedback on studentlearningin primary and secondary education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 777-812.
Choo SzeYee. (2021).Development and the effect of mobile enthalpy game application on matriculation students’ achievement in thermochemical equation. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Chu, W. W., Ong, E. T., Ayop, S. K., Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abdullah, A. S., Abd Karim,
N. S., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The innovative use of smartphone for sound STEM practicalkit:Apilotimplementation for secondary classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 00(00), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1978963
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education both the science and practiceofeducationdependon afirmunder-standing of manypsychological phenomena, including such cognitive topics. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
Clark, R. C., &Lyons, C. (2011). Graphic for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing, and evaluating visuals in training materials. Wiley andSons.
Cohen, L., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2010). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to test and measurement (2nd ed.). Croom Helm.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (fifth). Sage publications.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018a). Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25(January), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Develaki, M., & Sotiriou, S. (2019). The effects of computer-based interactive visualizations on students' performance and cognitive load in kinematics. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(6), 793-810.
Dhia Octariani, A. C. P. (2020). The effect of student worksheet based on Predict-Observe-Explain strategy against th learning outcomes. ASIMEEEETRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 1(2), 43–49.
Duijzer, C., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., Boom, J., Doorman, L. M., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2020). Moving towards understanding: Students interpret and constructmotion graphs. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(May), 25–51.
Duijzer, C., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., & Doorman, M. (2019). Supporting primary school students’ reasoning about motion graphs through physical experiences. ZDM -Mathematics Education, 51(6), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01072-6
Dunleavy, S., Kestin, G., Callaghan, K., McCarty, L., & Deslauriers, L. (2022). Increased learning in acollegephysicscoursewith timely useof shortmultimedia summaries. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 10110. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010110
Echevarría, R., Cárdenas, H., Flores, P., Cueva, C., Juscamaita, P., & Isabel, J. (2020). Assessment of the influence and impact of video analysis on students’ understanding of graphs in kinematics : A low-cost and easy-to-implement alternative.
Fiorini, S., Lindström, P., & Bernhard, J. (2017). Using scaffolding to teach problem-solving in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010111.
Freeman-Green, S. M., O’Brien, C., Wood, C. L., & Hitt, S. B. (2015). Effects of the SOLVEstrategy on themathematicalproblemsolving skillsof secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30(2), 72– 90.
Furqani, D., Feranie, S., & Winarno, N. (2018). The effect of Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) strategy on students’ conceptual mastery and critical thinking in learning vibration and wave. Journal of Science Learning, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i1.12879
Gazit, E., & Yair, Y. (2018). Implementing computer simulations in high school physics: A case study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 37(2), 137-157.
Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2021). Methodology penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian (third). Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Gkiolmas, A., Stoumpa, A., Lazos, P., Skordoulis, C., Chalkidis, A., Michalopoulos, V., & Balwit, J. (2021, May). An instructional method, based on POE (Predict-Observe-Explain), for teaching two basic wave properties and the wave nature of light. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1929, No.1, p.012086). IOP Publishing.
Gobet, F. (2005). Chunking models of expertise: Implications for education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1110
Guo, Y., Bellotti, F., Lazzaro, N., et al. (2021). Game-based learning interventions in K-12 education: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1805-1824.
Guskey, T. (2005). Formative classroom assessment and Benjamin S. Bloom: Theory, research, and implications. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, 1–11.
Gyedu, A. A., Owusu-Darko, I., &Ofosu, E. K. (2020). Effectof Geometer’sSketchpad on senior high school students’ performance in quadratic graphing. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2020.1.1.4
Hair, J. F., Babin, B., Money, A. H., & Samouel, P. (2003). Essential of business research method. John Wiley and Sons.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (Seventh). Prentice Hall.
Halim, L., Rahman, N. A., Ramli, N. A. M., & Mohtar, L. E. (2018). Influence of students’ STEM self-efficacy on STEM and physics career choice. In AIP Conference Proceedings. 1923(1), 020001.
Hamidah, M. (2019). Pembinaan dan kesan modul KPS dengan soalan kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi berasaskan didik hibur tahun 5 (p. 298).
Hammonds, C. (2018). Mnemonics in science education: An overview of research. Journal of ChemicalEducation, 95(2), 161-169.
Hasyim, F., Prastowo, T., & Jatmiko, B. (2020). The use of android-based PhET simulation as an effort to improve students’ critical thinking skills during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(19), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i19.15701
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2019). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations of complex spatial information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 815–833.
Hernández, C. A., Núñez, R. P., & Gamboa, A. A. (2021). Gains in active learning of physics: A measurement applying the testof understanding graphs of kinematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2073(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/2073/1/012003
Hoch, E., Scheiter, K., &Schuler,A. (2020). Implementationintentions for improving self-regulation in multimedia learning: Why don’t they work? The Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 536–558.
Hoch, E., Scheiter, K., Stalbovs, K., &Gerjets, P. (2021). Theintention wasgood:How promoting strategy use does not improve multimedia learning for secondary students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 1291–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12417
Huang, L., & Awh, E. (2018). Chunking in working memory via content-free labels. Scientific Report, 8(1), 1–10.
Humphries, B., &Clark,D. (2021). An examination of studentpreferencefor traditional didactic or chunking teaching strategies in an online learning environment. Research in Learning Technology, 29(1063519), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2405
Inayah, N., & Masruroh, M. (2021). PhET simulation effectiveness as laboratory practices learning media to improve students’ concept understanding. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 9(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v9i2.2923
Ismail, A. T. & Ayop, S. K. (2016). Tahap Kefahaman Dan Salah Konsep Terhadap Konsep Daya Dan Gerakan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia, 37(1), 01090–01101.
Ismail Sulaiman. (2018). Pembinaan dan pengujian kebolehgunaan modul pengajaran berasaskan peta pemikiran bagi topik nisbah, kadar dan kadaran. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Jekri, A., & Han, C. G. K. (2020). Cabaran dalam melaksanakan pengajaran dan pembelajaran STEM di sekolah menengah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling (IJEPC), 5(34), 80-90.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621.
Kalender, B., & Güleç, A. (2021). Using mnemonic illustrations in first reading and writing:Thecaseof turkish alphabet. Advances in Global Education and Research, 4, 1–10. https://doi.org/https://www.doi.org/10.5038/9781955833042
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 126-136.
Kareem, A. A. (2018). The use of multimedia in teaching biology and its impact on students’ learning outcomes. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 9(1), 157–165. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/531778
Kellems, R. O., Frandsen, K., Cardon, T. A., Knight, K., & Andersen, M. (2018). Effectiveness of static pictures vs. video prompting for teaching functional life skills to students with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure, 62(2), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1393790
Khairulazuad Husain. (2021). Pembangunan modul pembelajaran kendiri prngamiran (InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Khairunnissa Zahidi. (2021). Pembangunan dan keberkesanan modul amali keelektromagnetan berteraskan Audacity terhadap pencapaian pelajar tingkatan empat. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Khamis, N., &Phang,F. A. (2021). TheInfluenceof StreamSelectionwith the Interest, Attitude and Perception of Form Three Students on Physics Subjects/Pengaruh Pemilihan Aliran dengan Minat, Sikap Dan Persepsi Pelajar Tingkatan Tiga Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Fizik. Sains Humanika, 13(3).
Kim, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Kim, H. J. (2019). The effects of visualizations on online learning: A review of research. Computers & Education, 128, 385–401.
Klein, P., Küchemann, S., Brückner, S., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., &Kuhn, J. (2019). Student understanding of graph slope and area under a curve: A replication study comparing first-year physics and economics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020116
KPM. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -2025. Education, 27(1), 1–268. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X10001435
Krejcie, V. R., & Morgan, W. D. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30.
Kusairi, S., Noviandari, L., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Analysis of Students' Understanding of Motion in Straight Line Concepts: Modeling Instruction with FormativeE-Assessment. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 353-364.
Kuo, Y. C., Lee, C. Y., & Lin, C. H. (2015). Effect of teaching method on students' mnemonic instruction preferences, and recall ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 335-354.
Kühl, T. (2021). Prerequisiteknowledgeand timeoftesting in learning with animations and static pictures: Evidence for the expertise reversal effect. Learning and Instruction, 73(101457). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101457
Leopold, C., & Mayer, R. E. (2015). An imagination effect in learning from scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037142
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Barenthien, J., & Köller, O. (2021). An integrative study on learning and testing with multimedia: Effects on students’ performance and metacognition. Learning and Instruction, 71(January 2018), 101100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.002
Lubin, J., & Polloway, E. A. (2016). Mnemonic Instruction in Science and Social Studies for Students with Learning Problems: A Review. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 14(2), 207–224.
Malik, A., Khasanah, U., Agustina, R. D., &Zakwandi, R. (2019). Which oneisbetter? Hands on or Phet simulation on harmonic oscillation. Edusains, 11(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10571
Mayer, R. E., &Pilegard, C.(2014). Mayer, R. E.,&Pilegard,C. (2005).Principlesfor managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pretraining, and modality principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (Second, pp. 316–344). Cambridge University Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=principle+for+ma naging+essential+processing+in+multimediapilegard+2014&btnG= Mayer, R.E. (2020). Designing multimediainstruction in anatomy:An evidence-based approach. Clinical Anatomy, 33(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23265
Mayer, R.E., &Fiorella, L. (2014). 12 principlesfor reducing extraneousprocessingin multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, Second Edition (Issue January). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.015
Mayer, Richard E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6
Mayer, R. E., Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., & Campbell, J. (2005). When static media promote active learning: Annotated illustrations versus narrated animations in multimediainstruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,11(4), 256– 265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.11.4.256
Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107-119.
Mazibe, E. N., Coetzee, C., & Gaigher, E. (2020). A comparison between reported and enacted pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about graphs of motion. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-97187
Murshed, M. B., Phang, F. A., Bunyamin, M. A. H. B., & Binti, I. J. (2020). The Reliability Analysis for Force Concept Inventory. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(05), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i5/pr201677
Merill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., & Pratt, J. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5–7.
Miller, G. A. (1956). Themagicalnumber seven, plusor minustwo:Somelimitson our capacity for processing information. Psycological Review, 63(2), 81.
Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009
Mohamad Sattar, Rasul; Faszly, Rahim; Lilia, Halim; Zanaton, Iksan & Kamisah, O. (2021).Modul Bitara STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) (O. Mohamad Sattar, Rasul; Faszly, Rahim; Lilia, Halim; Zanaton, Iksan & Kamisah (ed.)). UKM Press.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principlehold for differentmedia? A test of the method-attributematch hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 8799.
Mostafa, E. A., & El Midany, A. A. H. (2017). Review of mnemonic devices and their applicationsin cardiothoracic surgery. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 25(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jescts.2017.03.005
Mufit, F., Asrizal, A., &Puspitasari, R. (2020). Meta-analysisof theeffectof cognitive conflict on physics learning. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.06213
Mufit, F., & Fauzan, A. (2019, October). The application of real experiments video analysis in the CCBL model to remediate the misconceptions about motion’s concept. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317, No. 1, p. 012156). IOP Publishing.
Najib, M. N. M., Md-Ali, R., & Yaacob, A. (2022). Effects of PhET interactive simulation activities on secondary school students’ Physics achievement. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 73-78.
NajwaMohd Najid. (2020). Kesan modul pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (MICROC PRO) terhadap pencapaian kemahiran penyelesaian masalah, efikasi kendiri dan motivasi intrinsik pelajar di kolej vokasional. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Nasri, N. M., Nasri, N., & Abd Talib, A. A. (2020). Physics teachers’ perceptions on sustainable physics education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 569.
Nia, R., &Ekaningsih, N. (2020).Theeffectivenessof chunkingstrategy in developing student’s ability in story retelling. Prominent, 3(2), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.24176/pro.v3i2.4821
Norazilawati Abdullah. (2021). Trend dan isu pendidikan abad ke-21 (1st ed.). Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Norbaizura Nordin. (2019). The study of student’s difficulties in learning Physics 1. International Journal of Modern Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.11001
Norbaizura Nordin, Nalliah, H., Wan Nur Aishah Maulat Wan Subhe, & Nur Aima Husna Ismail. (2019). Development of Physics 1 online module using Maasive Open Online Course (MOOC). Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.26500/jarssh-04-2019-0305
Norbaizura Nordin, & Rozidawati Awang. (2021). Pencapaian akademik kursus fizik I pelajar diploma di UTHM. Multidisciplinary Applied Research and Innovation, 3(2), 295–307.
Norezan Ibrahim, Zakiang, M. A. A., & Siti Maftuhah Damio. (2019). Attitude in learning physics among form four students. 16(2), 21–42.
Norma Che Lah, Saat, R. M., & Hassan, R. (2014). Cognitive strategy in learning chemistry: How chunking and learning get together. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 2(1), 9–15.
Norris, D., & Kalm, K. (2021). Chunking and redintegration in verbal short-term memory. Cognition, 208(5), 872–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104534
Nur 'Izzati Ah Kabri. (2021). Pembinaan dan keberkesanan modul pembelajaran berasaskan masalah (PBM BIO GENETIC) terhadap pencapaian akademik dan pemikiran kritis pelajar. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Núñez, R. P., Suárez, A. A. G., & Castro, W. R. A. (2022). Interpreting the slope of a straight line in kinematics graphs with school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2163(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2163/1/012011
NurulHudaKasim. (2019).Pembangunan modul Pro-STEM bagi topik biodiversiti dan ekosistem serta kesannya terhadap KBAT dan kemahiran abad ke-21. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Othman Talib. (2013). Asas penulisan tesis. Universita Putra Malaysia.
Ott, N., Brunken, R., Vogel, M., & Malone, S. (2018). Multiple symbolic representations:Thecombination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. Learning and Instruction, 58, 88– 105.
Özcan, H., Çetin, G., & Kostur, I. H. (2020). The effect of phet simulation-based instruction on 6th grade students’ achievement regarding the concept of greenhouse gas. 31(4), 348–355.
Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2014). Improving arithmetic performance with number sensetraining:An investigation of underlying mechanism. Cognition, 133(1), 188200.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., &Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitiveloadtheoryand instructionaldesign: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Pass, J., Wylie, G., & Cirino, P. T. (2013). Working memory and cognitive control: Current directions in theory and research. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2(4), 253-256.
Pálsdóttir, Á. (2019). Advantages and disadvantages of printed and electronic study material: perspectives of university students. Information Research, 24(2). http://informationr.net/ir/24-2/paper828.html
Pelkola, T., Rasila, A., & Sangwin, C. (2018). Investigating bloom’s learning for mastery in mathematics with online assessment. Informatics in Education, 17(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2018.19
Phage, I. (2018). Investigating firstyear university physicsstudents’ ability to integrate algebraic and kinematics graphs. International Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 10(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijpce/81590
Punia Turiman, Kamisah Osman, & Tengku Siti Meriam Tengku Wook. (2019). Development of ChemDataLog module and determination of its content validity and reliability. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 2265–2277. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i12/5437
Radovic, T., & Manzey, D. (2019). The impact of a mnemonic acronym on learning and performing aproceduraltask andItsresiliencetoward interruptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(November), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02522
Radzali, U. S., Mohd-Yusof, K., & Phang, F. A. (2018). Changing the conception of teaching from teacher-centred to student-centred learning among engineering lecturers. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 20(2), 120–126.
Ramadan, E. M., Jumadi, & Astuti, D. P. (2020). Application of e-handout based on PhET simulation to improve critical thinking skills and learning independence of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012025
Ramadhani, R.,& Fitri, Y. (2020).A project-basedlearningintoflipped classroom for ePUB3 electronic mathematics learning module (eMLM)-based on course design and implementation. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 3119– 3135. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080740
Ramadhani, R., & Fitri, Y. (2021). EPUB3 based mathematical e-modules using the Sigil application as a solution in teaching and learning process through Covid-19 pandemic. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 11(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v11i1.6826
Ramlee Ismail, Jamal @ Nordin Yunus, & Marinah Awang. (2016). Analisis data dan pelaporan dengan menggunakan SPSS. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Rasdi, S. S., Masnan, A. H., Hamzah, M., & Ghazali, M. (2021). Development and usability of a teaching module based on board game in the learning of numeric operation among preschoolers National Child Development Research Centre. Jurnal Pendidikan Awal Kanak-Kanak Kebangsaan, 10(2), 71–84.
Riani, V. R., Sa’Diyah, L. H., Purwanto,M. G., Ramalis, T. R., &Samsudin, A. (2021). Assessing graph interpretation of high school students: An examination by students’ gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012011
Richter, J., Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2018). Signaling text–picture relations in multimedia learning: The influence of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 544–560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000220
Rozita Mohamed Radzuan. (2019). Pembangunan dan kebolehgunaan modul Manipulatif Jubin Algebra bagi murid tingkatan empat. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Rumack, A. M. (2021). Chunking thereading:Solving"wordy problems". Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching, 114(4), 312–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2020.0186
Rusell, J. D. (1974). Modular instruction : A guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular material. Burgee Publishing Company.
RuslizaAhmad, Nur AzilaYahya, IniImaninaAbdullah, NadzriMohammad, &Daud,
K. M. (2019). Eztrigo mnemonic diagram : A comparison study of students ’ performance in pre and post result for basic differentiation and integration of trigonometric function test. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 807–813.
Rustana, C. E., Andriana, W., Serevina, V., & Junia, D. (2020). Analysis of student’s learning achievement using PhET interactive simulation and laboratory kit of gas kinetic theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022011
Samsudin, M. A., Awang, H., & Kassim, K. S. (2019). The Effect of SKPMG 2 Standard 4 on Science Teaching and Learning: A Study in Malaysia. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research, 7(4), 383-391.
Saprudin, S., Liliasari, S., Prihatmanto, A. S., & Setiawan, A. (2019). Profile of preservice physics teachers’ creative thinking skills on wave and optics course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(3), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032030
Sarkity, D., Azhar, A., & Sundari, P. (2021). Students’ ability to identify the types of motion of objectsthrough kinematics graphs. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Education, ICOME, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.311-2021.2314799
Satar, S., Gonen, S., & Ayas, A. (2020). The effects of gamified computersimulations on high schoolstudents'understanding ofkinematicgraphs. Journalof Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 126-136.
Schneider, S., Dyrna, J., Meier, L., Beege, M., & Rey, G. D. (2018). How affective chargeand text–pictureconnectedness moderate theimpact of decorative pictures on multimedia learning. ,. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 233.
Setyadi, I.M. A., Sudiarta, I.G. P., &Mertasari, N. M. S. (2019).Theeffectof predict-observe-explain ( POE ) learning model using open-ended problem ( OEP ) towards students ’ mathematical problem solving skill. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 133–144.
Sharifah Alawiah Alsagoff. (1981). Pengenalan pengajaran individu dengan tumpuan khas kepada modul pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidik Dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 54–62.
Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: Bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2020). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-28.
Siti Nuraini Mukhtar. (2021). Pembangunan permainan BIO4 bagi topik komposisi kimia dalam sel biologi tingkatan empat. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Skrabankova, J., Popelka, S., & Beitlova, M. (2020). Ability to work with graphs in physics studies related to three typical student group. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 298–316.
Smaldino,S. E.,Lowther, D. L., &Mims, C. (2019) Instructional technology and media for learning. New York: Pearson.
Starbek, P., Starcic Erjavec, M., & Peklaj, C. (2010). Teaching genetics with multimedia results in better acquisition of knowledge and improvement in comprehension. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 214–224.
Stieff, M., Werner, S., DeSutter, D., Franconeri, S., & Hegarty, M. (2020). Visual chunking as a strategy for spatial thinking in STEM. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00217-6
Strømme, T. A., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Students’ conceptual sense-making of animationsand staticvisualizationsof protein synthesis:asocioculturalhypothesis explaining why animations may be beneficial for student learning. Research in Science Education,51(4), 1013–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-099202
Suppawittaya, P., &Yasri, P. (2021). Thecomparison of chunking methodsto enhance the cognitive capacity of short-term memory to retain textual information among high schoolstudents. International Journal on Research in STEM Education,3(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijrse.v3i1.502
Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kazotti, E., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2018). Student understanding of graph slopeand areaunder agraph:Acomparison of physicsand nonphysics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020109
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., &Kalyuga, S. (2011). Intrinsicand extraneouscognitiveload. In In Cognitive load theory (pp. 57–69). Springer.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)900237
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/09594752(94)90003-5
Sweller, J, & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1
Sweller, J, Merriënboer, J. J. G. van, & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructionaldesign:20 yearslater. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., &Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitivearchitecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
Thalmann, M., Souza, A. S.,&Oberauer, K. (2019). Howdoeschuncking help working memory? Learning, Memory and Cognition, 45(1), 37.
Toheed, L., & Ali, A. (2019). Effects of mastery learning model on academic achievementof secondary schoolstudentsin mathematics. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(IV), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-iv).30
Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science programme for community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 489–495.
Vaara, R. L., &Sasaki, D. G. G. (2019). Teaching kinematicgraphsin an undergraduate course using an active methodology mediated by video analysis. Lumat, 7(1), 1– 26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.1.374
Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35-43.
Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Linder, C. (2020). Developing representational competence: linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750670
Wahyuningtyas, N., & Idris. (2020). Increasing geographic literacy through the development of computer supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(7), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I07.13255
Wiemann, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhancelearning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.
Xu, Y., Xu, L., &Ye,L. (2021).Theeffectsof formativeassessmenton studentlearning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 128-146.
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000459
Yang, C., Jen, C. H.,Chang, C. Y.,&Yeh, T. K. (2018). Comparison of animation and static-picture based instruction: Effects on performance and cognitive load for learning genetics. Educational Technology and Society, 21(4), 1–11.
Yashchenko, A. S., & Rudenko, A. A. (2021). Training pre-service mathematics teacher to use mnemonic techniques training pre-service mathematics teacher to use mnemonic. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012006
Yatim, S. S. K. M., Saleh, S., Zulnaidi, H., Yew, W. T., & Yatim, S. A. M. (2022). Effects of brain-based teaching approach integrated with geogebra (B-Geo module) on students conceptual understanding. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15119a
Yemi, T. M. (2018). Mastery learning approach (MLA): Its effect on the students mathematics academic achievement. European Journal of Alternative Education Studies, 1227280, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1227280
Yu, S., Liu, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). The effects of educational games on college students’ learning motivation and learning outcomes: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 779-793.
Yunzal, J., A. N., & Casinillo, L. F. (2020). Effect of physics education technology (PhET) simulations: Evidence from STEM students’ performance. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 221. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i3.27450
Yusuf, N. M., Abd Rahman, N., & Ghazali, N. (2021). The Effect of a Technology-EnhancedLearning (TEL)Module on the Achievement ofForm Four Students in the Topic of Waves and Sound. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11, 81-93.
Zajkov, O., & Gegovska-Zajkova, S. (2020). First year university students’ graph understanding. Inovacije U Modernom Obrazovanju, 1–4.
Zebregs, E., Langeveld, B., Aarts, R., &Mulder, I. (2017). Web animation:Captivating user's attention. Interacting with Computers, 29(5), 601-612.
Zhang, D., Indyk, A., & Greenstein, S. (2021). Effects of schematic chunking on enhancing geometry performancein studentswith math difficultiesand studentsat risk of math failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720902400
Zhang, Y., Li, H., & Clark, J. D. (2020). Experimental simulation of mathematical learning processbased on “chunk-objective.”Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 5(2), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2020.2.00061
Zhao, L., He, W., Liu, X., Tai, K. H., & Hong, J. C. (2021). Exploring the effects on fifth graders’ concept achievement and scientific epistemological beliefs: Applying the prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(4), 664–676. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.664
Ziad, W. K., Nor’Azam, M. F. A. M., Kaco, H., Idris, F. M., Zulkefly, N. R., Mohd, S. M., & Jan, N. H. M. (2021). An Evaluation Of Student's Perception Towards Learning Physics At Lower Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(Special Issue), 94–106.
Zulaikha, D. F., Pujianto, P., &Wiyatmo, Y. (2021). Learning activitiesin physicsusing students worksheet based on Predict-Observe-Explain (POE). JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(3), 208. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i3.2103