1. Bawaneh, A.K., Abd Ghani, K., Salmiza, S., & Khoo Y.Y. (2011). Jordanian students thinking styles on Hermann Whole Brain Model. International journal of humanities and social science, 1, 89-97. 2. Bawaneh, A. K., Ahmad Nurulazam, M. Z., Salmiza, S., & Abd Ghani, K. (2012). Using Herrmann Whole Brain Teaching Method To Enhance Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning. Journal of Turkish science education, 9(3), 3-22. 3. Bøe, M. V. (2012). Science choices in Norwegian upper secondary school: What matters? Science Education, 96(1), 1–20. 4. Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970. 5. Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M., & Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049–1106. 6. Caine, R.N. & Caine, G. (2005). 12 Brain / mind learning principles in action. The fieldbook for making connections, teaching and the human brain. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. 7. Caine, R.N. & Caine, G. (1994). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Menlo Park, California: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. 8. Caulfield, J., Kidd, S., & Kocher, T. (2000). Brain-based instruction in action. Educational leadership, 58(3), 62-65. 9. Duman, B. (2010). The Effects of Brain-Based Learning on the Academic Achievement of Students with Different Learning Styles. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2077-2103. 10. Eda, G., & Ayhan, D. (2014). The effect of brain based learning on academic achievement: A meta-analytical study. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 14(2), 642-648. 11. Erlauer, L. (2003). The Brain Compatible Classroom. Using what we know about learning to improve teaching. Diambil dari http://www.hwdsb.on.ca/ ancasterhigh/files/2010/10/The-Brain-Compatible-Classroom.-Using-What- We-Know-About-Learning-to-Improve-Teaching.pdf. 12. Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N., & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1159–1176. 13. Goh, C. Y. (1997). Keberkesanan sistem 4MAT dalam pengajaran konsep Matematik. (Tesis Sarjana). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. 14. Hashim, O., Norfadila, C. A. & Yusmiha, Y. (2014). Motivasi Dalaman Dan Pembelajaran Yang Memikat. Dalam Abdul Rashid, M., Hazri, J., Low, H. M. & Aziah, I. (Editor) Pedagogi Dan Kepimpinan. Pendekatan Dan Panduan Untuk Pendidik (muka surat 193-205). Malaysia: Mc-Graw Hill. 15. Jensen, E. (1996). Brain-based learning. Del Mar, California: Turning Point Publishing. 16. Kamisah, O., Zanaton, I., & Lilia, H. (2007). Sikap terhadap sains dan sikap saintifik di kalangan pelajar sains. Jurnal pendidikan, 32, 39-60. 17. Klinek, S.R. (2009). Brain-based learning: Knowledge, beliefs, and practices of College of Education Faculty in the Pennsylvania state system of higher education. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah). Dimuat turun daripada https://dspace.iup. edu/handle/2069/150. 18. Koballa, T. R. J., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 19. Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 585–610. 20. Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. 21. Md. Nor, B., & Syed Muammar, B. (2008). Masalah pembelajaran pelajar sekolah menengah dalam mata pelajaran sains tingkatan 2 tajuk: Fotosintesis. (Laporan Projek Sarjana Muda). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia. 22. Noratiqah, S. (2010). Faktor yang mempengaruhi strategi pengajaran dalam kalangan guru di dalam bidang teknik dan vokasional. (Laporan Projek Sarjana Muda). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia. 23. Salmiza, S. (2011). The effectiveness of the brain based teaching approach in dealing with problems of form four students’ conceptual understanding of Newtonian Physics. Asia pacific journal of educators and education, 26, 9-106. 24. Salmiza, S. (2010). The effectiveness of brain based teaching approach in dealing with the problems of students’ conceptual understanding and learning motivation towards Physics. Proceedings 2nd Paris International Conference on Education, Economy and Society – Paris 21-24 July 2010, 3, 174-185. 25. Salmiza, S. (2008). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pendekatan pengajaran berasaskan otak konteks pengajaran fizik tingkatan empat. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia. 26. Shamsun Nisa M. Y. (2005). Kesan hipermedia terhadap pemecutan pembelajaran konsep mitosis. (Tesis Doktor Falsafah tidak diterbitkan). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia. 27. Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. 28. Sousa, D. (2006). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. 29. Tuan, H.L, Chin C.C, Shieh, S.H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International journal of science education, 27, 639-654. 30. Vedder-Weiss, D. & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: a follow-up study. Journal of research in science teaching, 49, 1057- 1095.