UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education (General)
ISSN :2232-0393
Main Author :Che Ahmad Che Nidzam, Shaharim Saidatul Ainoor, Yahaya Asmayati,
Title :Kesesuaian persekitaran pembelajaran, interaksi guru-pelajar, komitmen belajar dan keselesaan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar Biologi
Place of Production :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :2016

Abstract :
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti, kesesuaian persekitaran pembelajaran, tahap interaksi guru-pelajar, komitmen belajar dan keselesaan pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar Biologi. Di samping itu, hubungan antara pemboleh ubah, perbezaan pemboleh ubah berdasarkan lokasi dan jantina serta sumbangan terhadap keselesaan pembelajaran turut dikaji. Kajian ini merupakan kajian kuantitatif yang menggunakan kaedah tinjauan di mana empat soal-selidik digunakan iaitu 1) Inventori Interaksi Guru-Pelajar, 2) Inventori Persekitaran Pembelajaran Bilik Darjah, 3) Inventori Komitmen Belajar dan 4) Inventori Keselesaan Pembelajaran. Seramai 325 orang pelajar tingkatan empat di Daerah Larut Matang dan Selama, Perak dipilih dengan menggunakan persampelan rawak berstrata. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif dan inferensi. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan kesesuaian persekitaran pembelajaran, tahap interaksi guru-pelajar, komitmen belajar dan keselesaan pembelajaran adalah tinggi. Selain daripada itu, dapatan juga menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan bagi interaksi guru-pelajar, persekitaran pembelajaran, komitmen belajar dan keselesaan pembelajaran berdasarkan lokasi, manakala terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan berdasarkan jantina. Dapatan kajian memberi implikasi bahawa interaksi guru-pelajar, persekitaran pembelajaran, komitmen belajar dan keselesaan pembelajaran perlu diberi perhatian bagi meningkatkan keberkesanan pembelajaran dan pengajaran Biologi.

References

1. Aziz Nordin & Lin, Hui Ling .(2011) Hubungan sikap terhadap mata pelajaran Sains dengan penguasaan konsep asas sains pelajar tingkatan dua. Journal Of Science & Mathematics Education, 4, 2231-7368. 2. Barnitt, H. 2003. Lighting for the future. Building Services Journal: The magazine for the CIBSE 25 (1): 38-39. 3. Bartlett, B.A. (2003). Blogging to Learn. Knowledge Tree E-Journal. Retrieved from: http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edtion04/pdf/Blogging_olearn.pdf. 4. Campbell, P. B., & Clewell, B. C. (1999). Science, math, and girls. Education Week, 19(2), 50. 5. Cavanagh, R (2012). Associations between the Classroom Learning Environment and Student Engagement in Learning 1: A Rasch Model Approach, in Knight, J. (ed), The Joint Australian Association for Research in Education and Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association Conference (AARE-APERA), Dec 2-6 2012. Sydney, Australia: Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE). 6. Che Nidzam, C. A. (2011). Physical and psychosocial aspects in sciemce laboratory learning environment. Doctoral Thesis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 7. Che Nidzam, C.A, Kamisah, O & Lilia, H. (2010). Predictive Relationship between Science Laboratory Learning Environment and Level of Students Satisfaction. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2) 19-30. 8. Coleman, L. F. (1997). Meeting facilities that foster learning. Training & Development. 36-41. 9. Covell, K., McNeil, J.K. & Howe,R.B. (2009). Reducing teacher burnout by increasing student engagement: A children’s rights approach. Journal of School Psychology International, 30, 282–290. 10. Cruickshank D.R., Jenkins D.B., & Metcalf K.K. (2009). The Act of Teaching (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw Hill. 11. Dallimore, E. J. and Platt, M and Hertenstein, J. H. (2008). Class Participation in Accounting Courses. 12. Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., & Scott, R. (2005). The importance of teacher interpersonal behaviour for student attitudes in Brunei primary Science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 765–779. doi:10.1080/09500690500038488. 13. Douglas, J. A., Douglas, A., McClelland, R. J., & Davies, J (2015) Understanding student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: an interpretive study in the UK higher education context. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 329-349, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842217. 14. Effandi Zakaria & Zanaton Iksan. (2007). Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education : A Malaysian Perspective. Eurasia J. Math., Sci. & Tech. Ed., 3(1), 35-39. 15. Ferguson, P.D. & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Student gender, school size and changing perceptions of science learning environments during the transition from primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 387-397. 16. Fraser & Walberg, 1981 Fraser. B. J. & Walberg, H.J. (1981). Psychological learning environment in science classrooms: A review of research. Studies in Science Education 8: 67-92. 17. Fraser, B. J, Gidding, G. J. & McRobbie C.J. (1995). Evolution and validation of a personel form of an instrument for assessing Science laboratory classroom environment. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching. 32, 399-422. 18. Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Soerjaningsih, W. (2010). Instructor-student interpersonal interaction and student outcomes at the university level in Indonesia. 21–33. 19. Goh, S., Young, D. & Fraser, B. J. (1995). Psychosocial climate and student outcomes in elementary Mathematics classrooms: A multilevel analysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 43, 90-93. 20. Hair, J.F. Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 21. Hair, J.F. Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. & Tatham, R.L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 22. Hill, Mary, and Kathryn, Epps. 2010. “The Impact Of Physical Classroom Environment On Student Satisfaction And Student Evaluation Of Teaching In The University Environment.” Academy Of Educational Leadership Journal 14(4) 65-79. 23. Honigsfeld, A. & Dunn, R. ( 2003). High school male and female learning style similarities and differences in diverse nation. Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 195-206. http://teacherneedhelp.com/students/. 24. Jabatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia. (2008). Garis panduan dan peraturan bagi perancangan bangunan oleh jawatankuasa standard dan kos. Unit Perancangan Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia. 25. Jackson, R. (2008). Students can Learn on Their Own. Diperoleh dari. 26. Jan Bennett. (2001). The relationship between classroom climate and student achievement. Thesis PHD. 27. Jarina, P. (2010). Gender differences in learning environment and students attitudes in primary science classroom in Singapore. Asia Pacific Conference. 28. Kamarulzaman Kamaruddin. (2007). Kemahiran interpersonal guru sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pedagogi, 1(2), 47-62. 29. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Maklumat Asas Pendidikan (MAP): Portal Sistem Maklumat Pengurusan Pendidikan. Retrieved from http://www.apps.moe. gov.my/emis/emis2/emisportal2/ . 30. Kennedy, M. (2012). Learning in comfort ergonomic consideration are an important factor in classroom furniture. American School & University.ASUMAG.COM. 31. Khadijah Kamaruzzaman & Azimin Samsul Mohd Tazilan. (2013). Thermal comfort assessment of a classroom in tropical climate conditions. Recent Advances in Energy, Environment & Development, 30(1), 87-91. 32.Retrievedfromhttp://www.wseas.us/eibrary/conferences/2013/CambridgeUSA/ ENVMECH/ENVMECH-12.pdf. 33. Kim, Heui-Baik; Fisher, D.L. & Fraser, B.J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behavior in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research Education, 14(1),3-22. 34. Krejie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sampel size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. 35. Lee, T. T & Kamisah Osman. (2013). Impact of interactive multimedia module with pedagogical agents on students`s understanding and motivation in the learning of Electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12 (2), 395-421. 36. Maria Chong Abdullah, Habibah Elias, Rahil Mahyuddin & Jegak Uli. (2009). Penyesuaian dalam kalangan pelajar baharu di universiti, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.fp.utm.my/medc/journals/vol3/10.Penyesuaian 09.pdf. 37. Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Hairy Ibrahim, Noraini Mohamed Noh & Che Nidzam Che Ahmad. (2014). An analysis of comfortable teaching and learning environment: Community response to climate change in school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 285 – 290. 38. Mohd Nihra Haruzuan Mohd Said & Chandrathevy Kuppusamy. (2012). Hubungan sikap (komitmen, emosi, berwawasan) dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar PKPG (SPT, SPN, SPH) tahun akhir di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Skudai. Journal of Educational, 6, 74–91. 39. Moos, R.H. (1979). Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings and Policy Implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 40. Myint, S. K. & Lourdusamy Atputhasamy. (2005). Self-perceived and students’ perceptions of teacher interaction in the classrooms. A paper presented at the Conference on Redesigning Pedagogy; Research, Policy, Practice, Singapore, 30 May - 1 June. 41. Owen, L & Barnes, J. (1982). Relationship between cooperative, competitive and individualized learning preferences and students perceptions of classroom learning atmosphere. American Research Journal, 19, 182-200. 42. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. (3rd ed.). Allen & Unwin. 43. Parveen Khan. (2012). Role of physical facilities in teaching learning process. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(3). 44. Progremme for International Student Assessment. (2009). Assessment Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. OECD 2009. 45. PPPM. (2012). Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 46. Quek C. L., Wong, A. F. L. & Fraser, B. J. (2002). Gender differences in the perceptions of Chemistry laboratory classroom environments. Queensland Journal of Educational Research, 18(2), 164-182. Retrieved from http://education.curtin.edu.au/iier/qjer/qjer18/quek.html. 47. Rahmad Sukor Ab. Samad & Shahrir Jamaluddin. (2005). Peranan kepimpinan guru dalam mempengaruhi iklim bilik darjah. Masalah pendidikan 2005. Universiti Malaya. 48. Rawlins, P. & Kehrwald, B. (2014). Integrating educational technologies into teacher education: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(2), 207-217. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.770266. 49. Rohani Arbaa, Hazri Jamil & Nordin Abd Razak, (2010), Hubungan guru-pelajar dan kaitannya dengan komitmen belajar pelajar: Adakah guru berkualiti menghasilkan perbezaan pembelajaran antara jantina pelajar?. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(2), 61-69. 50. Sahin, I.T., Tantekin-Erden, F.,& Akar,H. (2011). The influence of the physical environment on early childhood education classroom management. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 44,185-202. 51. Sahlberg P. (2008). The more you talk, the more you learn: Missing Conditions for cooperative Learning in secondary Schools. European Journal of Education. 43(2):151-172. 52. Stevens, J. (1986). Applied Multivariate Statistic for the Social Science (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum. 53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistic (4th ed.). USA: Allyn And Bacon. 54. Vale´ria Azzi Collet da Grac, Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski & Joao Roberto Diego Petreche. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of The State Sao Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42 (2007), 984–999. 55. Walberg, H.J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational leadership (Alexandria, VA), 41(8), 19 –27. 56. Weilin, C., Guoguang, C., Jung, H.P., Qin, O., Yingxin, Z., (2013). Influence of indoor air temperature on human thermal comfort, motivation and performance. Building and Environment, 68(2013), 114-122. 57. Wonglorsaichon, B., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). The influence of students’ school engagement on learning achievement: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 1748- 1755. 58. Wubbels, T. & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 1-18. 59. Wubbels,T. & Levy,J. (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education. London : Falmer. Retrieved from https://www. sensepublishers.com/media/1407-interpersional-relationships-in-education2.pdf. 60. Wubbles, T. & Brekelmans, M. (1998). The Teacher Factor in The Social Climate of The Classroom. International Handbook of Science Education Part Two: Great Britain. Kluwer Academic Published. 61. Zalika Adam, Faridah Kassim & Mohamad Johari Salleh. (2009). Memperkasakan pendidikan luar bandar, 3–5. Prosiding “Persidangan Kebangsaan Pendidikan Luar Bandar 2009”, 3 – 5 Februari 2009, Hotel Baverly, Kota Kinabalu. Sabah. Anjuran: Sekolah Pembangunan Dan Pendidikan Sosial, University Malaysia Sabah. Diperoleh dari http://irep.iium.edu.my/11670/1/Procedng_ Memperkasakan_Pend_Luar_Bandar.pd


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.