Enhancing COVID-19 classification accuracy with a Hybrid SVM-LR Model

Nurul Hila binti Zainuddin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	Q Science (General)
ISSN :	2306-5354
Main Author :	Nurul Hila binti Zainuddin
Title :	Enhancing COVID-19 classification accuracy with a Hybrid SVM-LR Model

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2023
Notes :	Bioengineering
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Support ector achine (SVM) is a newer machine learning algorithm for classification, while logistic regression (LR) is an older statistical classification method. Despite the numerous studies contrasting SVM and LR, new improvements such as bagging and ensemble have been applied to them since these comparisons were made. This study proposes a new hybrid model based on SVM and LR for predicting small events per variable (EPV). The performance of the hybrid, SVM, and LR models with different EPV values was evaluated using COVID-19 data from December 2019 to May 2020 provided by the WHO. The study found that the hybrid model had better classification performance than SVM and LR in terms of accuracy, mean squared error (MSE), and root mean squared error (RMSE) for different EPV values. This hybrid model is particularly important for medical authorities and practitioners working in the face of future pandemics. 2023 by the authors.

References

Sethi, J.K.; Mittal, M. Efficient weighted naive bayes classifiers to predict air quality index. Earth Sci. Inform. 2022, 15, 541–552.

Foo, L.K.; Chua, S.L.; Ibrahim, N. AttributeWeighted Naive Bayes Classifier. CMC-Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 71, 1945–1957.

Jahangiri, M.; Khodadi, E.; Rahim, F.; Saki, N.; Malehi, A.S. Decision-tree-based methods for differential diagnosis of thalassemia trait from iron deficiency anemia. Expert Syst. 2017, 34, e12201.

Asteris, P.G.; Rizal, F.I.M.; Koopialipoor, M.; Roussis, P.C.; Ferentinou, M.; Armaghani, D.J.; Gordan, B. Slope Stability Classification under Seismic Conditions Using Several Tree-Based Intelligent Techniques. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1753.

Gao, F.; Zhang, A.; Bi, W.H.; Ma, J.W. A greedy belief rule base generation and learning method for classification problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 98, 106856.

Ouyang, T.H.; Zhang, X.H. DBSCAN-based granular descriptors for rule-based modeling. Soft Comput. 2022, 26, 13249–13262.

Guenther, N.; Schonlau, M. Support vector machines. Stata J. 2016, 16, 917–937.

Pernes, D.; Fernande, K.; Cardoso, J.S. Directional Support Vector Machines. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 725.

Milosevic, N.; Rackovic, M. Classification Based on Missing Features in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Neural Netw. World 2019, 29, 221–234.

Melin, P.; Monica, J.C.; Sanchez, D.; Castillo, O. Multiple Ensemble Neural Network Models with Fuzzy Response Aggregation for Predicting COVID-19 Time Series: The Case of Mexico. Healthcare 2020, 8, 181.

Murua, A.;Wicker, N. Fast Approximate Complete-data k-nearest-neighbor Estimation. Austrian J. Stat. 2020, 49, 18–30.

Cao, M.W.; Jia, W.; Lv, Z.H.; Xie, W.J.; Zheng, L.P.; Liu, X.P. Two-Pass K Nearest Neighbor Search for Feature Tracking. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 72939–72951.

Zhang, X.; Pan, R.;Wang, H.S. Logistic Regression with Network Structure. Stat. Sin. 2020, 30, 673–693.

Shin, B.; Lee, S. Robust logistic regression with shift parameter estimation. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 2023, 93, 2625–2641 .

Charan, G.V.S.; Kumar, N.S. Analysis and Comparison for Innovative Prediction Technique of COVID-19 using Logistic Regression algorithm over Support Vector Machine Algorithm with Improved Accuracy. J. Pharm. Negat. Results 2022, 13, 461–469.

Pavithraa, G.; Sivaprasad. Analysis and Comparison of Prediction of Heart Disease Using Novel Support Vector Machine and Logistic Regression Algorithm. Cardiometry 2022, 25, 783–787.

Cortes, C.; Vapnik, V. Support vector networks. Mach. Learn. 1995, 20, 273–297.

Nurul Hila, Z.; Muhamad Safiih, L. The Performance of BB-MCEWMA Model: Case Study on Sukuk Rantau Abang Capital Berhad, Malaysia. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 2016, 14, 63–77.

Nurul Hila, Z.; Muhamad Safiih, L.; Maman Abdurachman, D.; Fadhilah, Y.; Mohd Noor Afiq, R.; Aziz, D.; Yahaya, I.; Mohd Tajuddin, A. Improvement of time forecasting model using a novel hybridization of double bootstrap artificial neural network. Appl. Soft Comput. 2019, 84, 105676.

Abdullah, M.T.; Lola, M.S.; Hisham, A.E.; Sabreena, S.; Nor Fazila, C.M.; Idham, K.; Dennis, C.Y. Framework of Measures for Covid-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: Threats, Initiatives and Opportunities. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2022, 17, 6–16.

Wan Mohamad Nawi, W.I.; Abdul Hamid, A.A.; Lola, M.S.; Zakaria, S.; Aruchunan, E.; Gobithaasan, R.U.; Zainuddin, N.H.; Mustafa,W.A.; Abdullah, M.L.; Mokhtar, N.A.; et al. Developing forecasting model for future pandemic applications based on COVID-19 data 2020–2022. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0285407.

Abdul Hamid, A.A.; Wan Mohamad Nawi, W.I.; Lola, M.S.; Mustafa, W.A.; Abdul Malik, S.M.; Zakaria, S.; Aruchunan, E.; Zainuddin, N.H.; Gobithaasan, R.U.; Abdullah, M.T. Improvement of time forecasting models using machine learning for future pandemic applications based on COVID-19 data 2020–2022. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1121.

Naeem, M.; Yu, J.; Aamir, M.; Khan, S.A.; Adeleye, O.; Khan, Z. Comparative analysis of machine learning approaches to analyse and predict the COVID-19 outbreak. Peer J. Comput. Sci. 2021, 17, e746.

Ahmadini, A.A.H.; Naeem, M.; Aamir, M.; Dewan, R.; Alshqaq, S.S.A.; Mashwani, W.K. Analysis and Forecast of the Number of Deaths, Recovered Cases, and Confirmed Cases from COVID-19 for the Top Four Affected Countries Using Kalman Filter. Front. Phys. 2021, 9, 629320.

Lee, J.W.; Lee, J.B.; Park, M.; Song, S.H. An extensive comparison of recent classification tools applied to microarray data. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48, 869–885.

Verplancke, T.; Van, L.S.; Benoit, D.; Vansteelandt, S.; Depuydt, P.; De, T.F.; Decruyenaere, J. Support vector machine versus logistic regression modeling for prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients with haematological malignancies. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak 2008, 8, 56.

Shou, T.; Hsiao, Y.; Huang, Y. Comparative analysis of logistic regression, support vector machine and artificial neural network for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid breast tumors by the use of three-dimensional power doppler. Korean J. Radiol. 2009, 10, 464–471.

Westreich, D.; Lessler, J.; Jonsson, M. Propensity score estimation: Neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2010, 63, 826–833.

Austin, P.C.; Steyerberg, E.W. Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2014, 26, 796–808.

Han, K.; Song, K.; Choi, B.W. How to Develop, Validate, and Compare Clinical Prediction Models Involving Radiological Parameters: Study Design and Statistical Methods. Korean J. Radiol. 2016, 17, 339–350.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page